Marc Andreessen reportedly told group chat that universities will ‘pay the price' for DEI
Venture capitalist Marc Andreessen sharply criticized universities including Stanford and MIT, along with the National Science Foundation, in a group chat with AI scientists and Trump administration officials, according to screenshots viewed by the Washington Post.
According to the Post, Andreessen described MIT and Stanford (which I attended two decades ago) as 'mainly political operations fighting American innovation.' He also reportedly complained that Stanford 'forced my wife out [as chair of its Center on Philanthropy and Civil society] without a second thought, a decision that will cost them something like $5 billion in future donations.'
In a separate message that did not mention a specific school, Andreessen reportedly said that universities 'declared war on 70% of the country and now they're going to pay the price.' He took aim at 'DEI and immigration,' which he reportedly described as 'two forms of discrimination' that are 'politically lethal.'
Last year, Andreessen and his Andreessen Horowitz co-founder Ben Horowitz both said that they were supporting Donald Trump's campaign to return to the White House. Andreessen's allies have subsequently taken roles in the Trump administration.
TechCrunch has reached out to a16z for comment. Meanwhile, Sequoia Capital has remained silent following partner Shaun Maguire's criticism of Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for New York City mayor, as an 'Islamist' who 'comes from a culture that lies about everything.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
23 minutes ago
- New York Times
Monday Briefing: America's Brain Drain and the World
'A once-in-a-century brain gain opportunity' Universities are an easy target for right-wing populists. Polls show that a lot of Americans consider them too liberal, too expensive and too elitist, and not entirely without reason. But the fight between the Trump administration and Harvard is something more: It has become a test of the president's ability to impose his political agenda on all 2,600 universities in the U.S. Students, professors and scientists are all feeling the pressure, and that could undermine the dominant position that American science has enjoyed for decades. What does that mean for the world? European countries are wooing U.S.-based scientists, offering them 'scientific refuge' or, as one French minister put it, 'a light in the darkness.' Canada has attracted several prominent American academics, including three tenured Yale professors who study authoritarianism and fascism. The Australian Strategic Institute described this moment as 'a once-in-a-century brain gain opportunity.' Who has the secret sauce? In the mid-20th century, America was seen by many as a benign power, committed to scientific freedom and democracy. It attracted the best brains fleeing fascism and authoritarianism in Europe. Today, the biggest beneficiary could be China and Chinese universities, which have been trying to recruit world-class scientific talent for years. Now, Trump is doing their work for them. One indication of the success of China's campaign to attract the best and brightest is Africa, the world's youngest continent. Africans are learning Mandarin in growing numbers. Nearly twice as many study in China as in America. Could America gamble away its scientific supremacy in the service of ideology? It has happened before. Under the Nazis, Germany lost its scientific edge to America in the space of a few years. As a German, my brain may wander too readily to the lessons of the 1930s, but in this case the analogy feels instructive. Several of my colleagues covering the fallout from the crackdown on international students and researchers pointed to Hitler's silencing of scientists and intellectuals. No one region can currently replicate the secret sauce of resources, freedom, a culture of risk-taking and welcoming immigrants that made America the engine of scientific innovation. But if it tumbles as a scientific superpower, and potential breakthroughs are disrupted, it would be a setback for the whole world. Read these accounts from my colleagues of the ripple effects across the globe. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
Tom Homan pushes back on CNN host when pressed on 'reasonable suspicion' claim regarding ICE
Border Czar Tom Homan pushed back on CNN host Dana Bash on Sunday when he was asked about previous comments he made about reasonable suspicions regarding ICE agents detaining illegal immigrants. "You said in an interview this week that reasonable suspicion can be based on, 'the location, their occupation, their physical appearance, their actions.' What about an individual's physical appearance would give immigration agents 'reasonable suspicion' that they might be in the U.S. illegally?" CNN host Dana Bash asked. Bash and Homan also discussed a judge's ruling that barred ICE from conducting detentive stops in the Central District of California unless agents have "reasonable suspicion" that a person is in the country unlawfully. "I want to be clear about that again, because my words were taken out of context. Physical description cannot be the sole reason to detain and question somebody. That can't be the sole reason to raise reasonable suspicion. It's a myriad of factors, and I could sit here for the next half hour and give you all the factors," Homan responded. "But I can tell you this, every ICE officer goes through Fourth Amendment training every six months and reminded what their authorities are for arrest, detention and questioning. So the officers are very well-trained," Homan continued. Bash pointed to the ruling and what the judge said did not qualify as reasonable suspicion, including accents or the language they speak, location and their race or ethnicity. "I'm not going to disagree with everything the judge has said because a location alone shouldn't have reasonable suspicion. It's a combination of articulable facts that an officer determines before he detains somebody for a short period of time and questions them. So again, every case is different. Different articulable facts for different people and different places. So, again, I look forward to litigation. I think we will win this on appeal," Homan said. Bash then asked Homan if the Trump administration would follow the order until it goes through the appeal process. Homan said they would, as Bash went on to ask him a question about people who live in this country legally being afraid of being detained by ICE. "If they're in the country legally, they got no reason to be afraid. ICE is looking for those in the country illegally, and we're still prioritizing public safety threats to national security threats. That's the priority. But like I said, we do have collateral arrests in many areas because we're out looking for those public safety threats, but we're going to enforce immigration law, too," Homan said. "It's not okay to be in this country illegally. It's not okay to enter this country illegally. It's a crime. But legal aliens and U.S. citizens should not be afraid that they're going to be swept up in a raid. We know who we're looking for. And that's where the agents are out there seeking," he added. Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., also spoke about Homan's remarks during a conversation with Bash on Sunday. "Homan has said it very clearly in other interviews. They're not even asking for significant findings to detain people. They're going based on appearance. His words, not mine. Based on occupation. His words, not mine. Based on accents, physical appearance," Padilla said.
Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
DOJ brass vowed full transparency on Epstein before turning up empty-handed
Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino all called for Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking secrets to be made public long before the DOJ's stunning about-face last week. "This systemic review revealed no incriminating 'client list,'" read a joint memo leaked to Axios a week ago. "There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties." The revelation shocked many MAGA Republicans and Trump supporters, who had for years believed that Epstein was at the heart of a child sex trafficking ring that involved blackmailing prominent movers and shakers worldwide. Many also doubt the government's finding that Epstein died by his own hand in New York's Metropolitan Correctional Center in 2019. Trump has since brushed off the Epstein investigation as old news, slamming a reporter who asked about Epstein during a Cabinet meeting last week, and posting a Truth Social message on Saturday defending Bondi for her leadership over the case and claiming that Epstein is "somebody that nobody cares about." "LET PAM BONDI DO HER JOB — SHE'S GREAT! The 2020 Election was Rigged and Stolen, and they tried to do the same thing in 2024 — That's what she is looking into as AG, and much more," Trump wrote in a lengthy Truth Social post defending Bondi. "One year ago our Country was DEAD, now it's the 'HOTTEST' Country anywhere in the World. Let's keep it that way, and not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about." As MAGA supporters continue calling for details on Epstein's crimes and alleged ties to the world's elite, Fox News Digital took a look back at what Bondi, Patel and Bongino had to say about Epstein before the anticlimactic memo dropped. Just a couple of weeks after Bondi was sworn in as the nation's 87th attorney general on Feb. 5, she joined Fox News Channel and touted her mission of transparency, most notably on Epstein, and the assassinations of former President John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. "The DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients. Will that really happen?" Fox News' John Roberts asked Bondi in an interview on Feb. 21. "It is sitting on my desk right now to review. That's been a directive by President Trump. I'm reviewing that. I'm reviewing the JFK files, the MLK files. That is all in the process of being reviewed because that was done at the directive of the president from all these agencies," Bondi responded. "Have you seen anything that you said, 'Oh, my gosh?'" Roberts asked. "Not yet," Bondi responded. Bondi released an initial batch of files on Epstein to a handful of social media personalities in late February, but the packets did not contain new evidence. However, Bondi once again vowed to come through on Trump's message of transparency on Epstein's "disgusting actions." "This Department of Justice is following through on President Trump's commitment to transparency and lifting the veil on the disgusting actions of Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators," Bondi said in press release. "The first phase of files released today sheds light on Epstein's extensive network and begins to provide the public with long overdue accountability." The next month, in March, Bondi joined Fox News' Sean Hannity and said she ordered the FBI to deliver evidence related to Epstein under a firm deadline, claiming a local field office in New York initially withheld evidence on Epstein. "I gave [the FBI] a deadline of Friday at 8 a.m. to get us everything," Bondi said. "And a source had told me where the documents were being kept, Southern District of New York, shock. So we got them all by Friday at 8 a.m." "Thousands of pages of documents. I have the FBI going through them... and Director Patel is going to get us a detailed report as to why the FBI withheld all of those documents," she continued at the time. Bondi again in May fanned the flames of a potential Epstein bombshell when she stated there were no files missing from her investigation and that the DOJ had uncovered tens of thousands of videos showing Epstein with "children and child porn." "No, the FBI, they're reviewing tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn," Bondi told the media in May when asked about the Epstein files. "There are hundreds of victims," she added. "… The FBI is diligently going through that." Bondi was confronted about her February comments on the Epstein files during a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday, where she defended her remarks to Fox News regarding claims that the Epstein files were on her desk and ready for review. "I was asked a question about the client list, and my response was, 'it's sitting on my desk to be reviewed,' meaning the file along with the JFK, MLK files as well," Bondi responded. "That's what I meant by that. Also, to the tens of thousands of video, they turned out to be child porn downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein," she continued, saying no such videos would be released or "see the light of day." Long before Patel was floated and named as Trump's FBI chief, the longtime opponent of the "Deep State" claimed the FBI was in control of Epstein's reported client list and said it could be released on Trump's first day in office via a subpoena. "That's under direct control of the director of the FBI," Patel said in 2023 during an interview with BlazeTV's Glenn Beck. "That's a thing I think President Trump should run on. On day one, roll out the black book." Patel added in an interview with conservative social media personality Benny Johnson that same year that the FBI was keeping the list private due to the high-profile names in Epstein's orbit. "Put on your big boy pants and let us know who the pedophiles are," Patel said, aiming his remarks at Republican lawmakers. He continued that "one subpoena to the FBI" would have forced the release of the alleged list during the same interview with Johnson. Patel, who was seen as one of Trump's more controversial Cabinet picks, earned the praise of key senators for his public calls to uncover details on Epstein ahead of his confirmation hearings. Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., for example, promoted Patel's nomination as FBI director as he would reveal details on Epstein. "I look forward to working with Kash Patel as FBI Director to release Epstein's flight logs and black book," Blackburn posted to X following Patel's nomination in November. "Under the Trump administration, the American people are going to get answers." Fast-forward to his confirmation hearing in January, Patel vowed he would work to uncover Epstein's alleged vast web of crimes and connections to high-profile individuals. "I want to talk to you about the Epstein case," Blackburn told Epstein in January during his confirmation hearing. "I have worked on this for years, trying to get those records of who flew on Epstein's plane and who helped him build this international human trafficking, sex trafficking ring. Now earlier I urged then Chairman Durbin to subpoena those records and I ended up being blocked by Senator Durbin and Christopher Wray. They stonewalled on this and I know that breaking up these trafficking rings is important to President Trump. So will you work with me on this issue so we know who worked with Jeffrey Epstein in building the sex trafficking rings?" "Absolutely, Senator," Patel responded. "Child sex trafficking has no place in the United States of America. And I will do everything, if confirmed as FBI director, to make sure the American public knows the full weight of what happened in the past and how we are going to counterman missing children and exploited children going forward." Patel again vowed in February that he would let no stone go unturned as Bondi demanded more documents from the FBI related to Epstein. "The FBI is entering a new era – one that will be defined by integrity, accountability, and the unwavering pursuit of justice. There will be no cover-ups, no missing documents, and no stone left unturned – and anyone from the prior or current Bureau who undermines this will be swiftly pursued. If there are gaps, we will find them. If records have been hidden, we will uncover them. And we will bring everything we find to the DOJ to be fully assessed and transparently disseminated to the American people as it should be. The oath we take is to the Constitution, and under my leadership, that promise will be upheld without compromise," he posted to X a the time. Patel and Bongino joined Fox News' Maria Bartiromo in May and defended that evidence showed Epstein killed himself in his New York City jail cell in 2019 – a death many speculated was not suicide, but a cover-up to allegedly protect elites wrapped up in Epstein's crime – which sparked outrage among conservatives for their handling of the case. "As someone who has worked as a public defender, as a prosecutor who's been in that prison system, who's been in the Metropolitan Detention Center, who's been in segregated housing, you know a suicide when you see one, and that's what that was," Patel said when questioned about Epstein's death during the interview. As Trump supporters spoke out against the FBI and DOJ memo determining there was no Epstein bombshell, reports circulated that a rift at DOJ could lead to Patel resigning. The FBI chief denied such claims on X while also adding that "the conspiracy theories just aren't true." "The conspiracy theories just aren't true, never have been. It's an honor to serve the President of the United States @realDonaldTrump – and I'll continue to do so for as long as he calls on me," he posted to X. Back when Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino hosted a popular national podcast, he urged Americans to keep their eyes peeled on details related to Epstein because it's a "big deal." "That Jeffrey Epstein story is a big deal. Please do not let that story go. Keep your eye on it," he told his audience in May 2023. In January 2024, Bongino again claimed to his audience that details surrounding Epstein were shocking and that he heard from trusted sources that there were multiple videos showing Epstein with associates abusing children. "Ladies and gentlemen, it has been speculated by many people who are extremely credible," Bongino said on a podcast in 2024, "including multiple sources to others and to me – one I spoke to directly – that there are a multitude of tapes." "This is where I get really upset at the media," he said later in the podcast, adding that journalists had "done almost like no – maybe because I was an investigator before, it's like, I'm amazed at how few people are putting two and two together." Following Patel and Bongino reporting to the public that evidence showed Epstein committed suicide, Bongino posted to X that he was not asking Americans to "believe me, or not," but was telling them the facts surrounding "what exists, and what doesn't." "I was asked about some of the details surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case. I have reviewed the case. Jeffrey Epstein killed himself. There's no evidence in the case file indicating otherwise," Bongino posted on the social platform X after the interview. "I'm not asking you to believe me, or not. I'm telling you what exists, and what doesn't. If new evidence surfaces I'm happy to reevaluate." Reports spread over the weekend that Bongino clashed with Bondi over the Epstein files, including allegedly raising his voice at White House chief of staff Susie Wiles before abruptly leaving a meeting. Bongino was said to be irate over Bondi's "lack of transparency from the start" over the handling of the files. Bongino is considering resigning over the matter, but no decision has been made publicly known. Trump, meanwhile, threw his support behind Bondi in the Saturday Truth Social post while underscoring members of his administration are all on the same team. "What's going on with my 'boys' and, in some cases, 'gals?' They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB," Trump wrote in a lengthy post on Truth Social on Saturday. "We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening." "For years, it's Epstein, over and over again," Trump continued while pinning blaming for the files on Democrats. "Why are we giving publicity to Files written by Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey, Brennan, and the Losers and Criminals of the Biden administration." "They created the Epstein Files, just like they created the FAKE Hillary Clinton/Christopher Steele Dossier that they used on me, and now my so-called 'friends' are playing right into their hands," Trump wrote. "Why didn't these Radical Left Lunatics release the Epstein Files? If there was ANYTHING in there that could have hurt the MAGA Movement, why didn't they use it?" Trump, who said from the campaign trail he was open to releasing such Epstein files if re-elected, slammed a reporter on Tuesday for inquiring about the files, calling Epstein a "creep" who was old news in comparison to national tragedies such as the floods that gripped Texas this month. "This guy's been talked about for years. You're asking.… We have Texas, we have this, we have all of the things. And are people are still talking about this guy, this creep?" Trump asked. "That is unbelievable." "I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Jeffrey Epstein," Trump added. "At a time like this, where we're having some of the greatest success and also tragedy with what happened in Texas. It just seems like a desecration. But you go ahead." The DOJ and White House did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's requests for comment on the previous remarks from DOJ leadership ahead of the memo determining Epstein did not have a client list.
