Aussies warned over major national park hazard to tackle 'big threat' from this week
Across the country, foxes kill hundreds of millions of native animals per year, and in New South Wales, the pest is widespread. It's estimated they cost governments millions annually in eradication efforts, livestock losses, and environmental damage, meaning regular control efforts are critical to ensure their management remains possible.
The NSW Evrionment Department carries out fox control several times a year. But despite this, they're still found across up to 90 per cent of the state. From August 1 until January next year, another round of baiting will be conducted across NSW national parks and reserves, by the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS).
The announcement prompted a callout from a number of local vets, warning that toxic bait is also harmful to domestic pets. They urged owners to be aware of the signs of ingestion, and to avoid areas where the poison will be laid.
In NSW, it's actually illegal to walk pets in most national parks, but despite this, evidence suggests it regularly occurs — either among people flouting the law or doing so unwittingly.
Speaking to Yahoo News, a NPWS spokesperson detailed the true scale of the threat foxes pose to both the state, and the nation. They explained that a "range of strictly controlled methods" are used to manage feral animals in national parks, with "decisions about control methods" for a particular species and circumstance made in consideration of humaneness and effectiveness.
"Invasive species are one of the biggest threats to native plants and animals and cause extensive damage to the environment, along with billions of dollars' worth of damage to Australian agricultural production each year," they said.
"Sodium fluoroacetate (1080) is the most effective landscape fox control method. 1080 is a naturally occurring compound found in some native plant species that rapidly breaks down in the environment."
They said extensive research has shown that native animals — including lace monitors, quolls and birds — have a high tolerance to 1080 at the concentrations used to control foxes.
Typically, 1080 fox baits resemble small chunks of meat or meat-like material, often dyed a distinct colour (usually green or red) to help identify them as toxic and discourage accidental handling.
In the state, without large-scale control efforts, foxes can quickly recolonise areas where populations were reduced, due to their mobility and territorial behaviour.
Is 1080 poison humane?
While 1080 poison remains a key tool in controlling invasive pests like foxes and wild dogs across Australia, it continues to stir debate over animal welfare. Critics, including some animal welfare organisations, environmentalists, and vets, argue the poison causes prolonged and distressing deaths, citing symptoms like vomiting, convulsions and frenzied behaviour. They label it inhumane and push for tighter restrictions or alternatives.
On the other hand, many scientific experts, particularly in conservation biology, defend the use of 1080 as a necessary evil in protecting native species. Australia's native wildlife has no natural defence against introduced predators like foxes and cats, which kill millions of animals annually. Without effective control, many endangered species face extinction.
☠️ Plea to Aussies over controversial substance found in bush
🦊 Aussie council under pressure as iconic species ravaged by invasive predator
🐜 Aussie mum's brutal injuries as property owners warned of painful threat
Supporters argue that while 1080 isn't perfect, it's currently the most effective broadscale option, especially in remote or rugged areas where trapping or fencing isn't feasible.
Research from institutions like the Invasive Species Council and CSIRO states that native animals are more tolerant to 1080 due to the presence of the chemical in some native plants. While concerns about cruelty remain, proponents say the ecological damage from unchecked predator populations would be far worse — and that alternatives either aren't viable at scale or pose greater risks to the environment.
And across NSW, population decline is strongly dependent on sustained, coordinated control efforts, highlighting the need for urgent and consistent action.
Why are foxes such a big problem in Australia?
Foxes were introduced to Australia in the 1860s by Europeans for recreational hunting. But since then, their numbers have exploded exponentially across the country, largely due to a lack of natural predators.
They feed on native species, particularly small mammals, reptiles, and ground-nesting birds, many of which are already vulnerable or endangered. Their introduction has significantly contributed to the decline of several native species, particularly small mammals like the bilby, numbat and bettong.
Foxes' hunting behaviour is opportunistic and highly efficient, often killing more than they need. Beyond their environmental impact, they pose risks to agriculture by preying on lambs and spreading diseases such as hydatid tapeworm.
Wildlife that benefit from fox control programs include brush-tailed rock-wallabies, malleefowl, bandicoots, little terns and plains wanderers, the NPWS said.
It conducts feral animal management in partnership with the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Local Land Services, and other landholders and managers. From August, bait will be laid in numerous locations, including the Garigal, Lane Cove, Ku-ring-gai Chase and Sydney Harbour National Parks.
Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Horror find on uni student's phone: cops
A university student has allegedly been caught with more than 25,000 files of child abuse material on their phone. Police allege the man had marked 42 of the files as 'favourites'. Ali Alghamdi, 35, was arrested at a Randwick university campus at about 3pm on Monday. Officers allegedly found more than 25,000 videos and images of child abuse material on his phone. He was charged with use carriage etc to access child abuse material. Mr Alghamdi was refused bail and is expected to front Waverley Local Court on Tuesday. His arrest followed an investigation into the online distribution, supply and access of child abuse material by the State Crime Command's Sex Crimes Squad Child Internet Exploitation Unit. Officers had identified Mr Alghamdi as an alleged suspect. More to come...
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Toughest' bail laws in land to target repeat offenders
Bailed crooks who commit serious crimes will find it "almost impossible" to keep their freedom under new laws. The Victorian government will introduce its second package of bail reforms to parliament on Tuesday, amid rising crime rates. These changes include a new bail test for people accused of repeat, serious offending and a "second strike" rule for those charged with further offending. "We are making it very clear to bail decision-makers across the system that in Victoria community safety comes first," Premier Jacinta Allan told reporters. "Victorians remain not just concerned but disgusted with what we are seeing with repeat offending." Attorney-General Sonya Kilkenny described the bail test, for people accused of one of six offences while on bail, as the "toughest" in the nation. The offences covered are aggravated home invasion, aggravated carjacking, armed robbery, aggravated burglary, home invasion and carjacking. Bail must be refused unless the decision maker is satisfied there is a "high degree of probability" the person won't reoffend. Police Minister Anthony Carbines said the test went further than NSW laws as it was not time limited and didn't just apply to young people. "Your chances of getting bail are almost impossible," he said. The "second strike" rule will also make it harder people to get bail if accused of repeat indictable offending such as burglary, theft, assault, robbery, sex offences and serious drug offences. Ms Kilkenny said low-level drug possession, petty theft and crimes driven by poverty and homelessness would be carved out to mitigate disproportionate impact on vulnerable people. But she made it clear those offenders would still face a bail hearing. The legislation's default start date is March 30, 2026 but the attorney expects the laws to come into effect "as soon as system capacity permits and it's safe to do so". Victoria tightened bail laws in 2018 after James Gargasoulas drove into Melbourne's busy Bourke Street Mall in 2017 while on bail, killing six people and injuring dozens more. A coronial inquest into the death of Indigenous woman Veronica Nelson in 2020 found the changes were a "complete and unmitigated disaster", sparking a relaxation of laws in 2024. Ms Allan conceded the government "got it wrong" and vowed a crackdown on repeat serious offenders. Its first law changes removed the principle of remand as a last resort for children, made community safety an overarching principle for bail decisions and reintroduced bail offences. Victoria's latest crime statistics, which showed youth offending at a record high, were collected before the harsher bail laws were rolled out. But figures released by the justice department in mid June showed the number of youths being held on remand had doubled since the changes took effect in late March.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Aussie fisherman's illegal act 'costs him $12,000 and his boat'
An east coast fisherman has been hit with a whopping fine and had his boat destroyed after he was caught in a highly illegal act in the country's northeast last week. Officers from the Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol (QBFP) launched an investigation after reports of interference with fishing gear in Cairns. When they visited the man's property, they allegedly uncovered more than just stolen catches — a sawfish rostrum was found along with commercial gill nets. The sawfish's long, tooth-lined snout is its most distinctive feature. It's also protected by law, making its removal illegal. The man was slapped with a $12,000 fine and has lost his boat permanently. Authorities say it will be destroyed. "This man's poor decision to interfere with other people's crab pots has cost him $12,000 and his boat," QBFP Manager Greg Bowness said. Why is interfering with fishing gear illegal? Under Queensland law, touching or lifting another person's crab pot is illegal, even if the intention isn't to steal crabs. The Fisheries Act 1994 strictly prohibits interference with fishing gear that you don't own, to protect both the sustainability of marine life and the integrity of recreational and commercial fishing. While it may seem harmless, this kind of interference undermines the efforts of legitimate fishers and can damage livelihoods. Recreational and commercial fishers alike rely on the fairness of the system, being able to trust that their equipment, and whatever it catches, will be left undisturbed. Alarming haul pulled from major Aussie river MP says it's 'time to release the virus' as invasive species takes over Trailer full of fish exposes disturbing reality in Aussie waterways Sawfish are a protected species in Queensland waters due to their declining population. The discovery of a rostrum in the man's possession raised further questions about his fishing practices. Removing or possessing parts of these endangered animals is a serious offence and can attract additional penalties. Gill nets are also tightly controlled in Queensland due to their potential to harm non-target species, including turtles, dugongs and dolphins. This case serves as a reminder that fisheries officers have wide powers to investigate and prosecute breaches of fishing laws, and that the consequences for doing the wrong thing can be significant. Earlier this month, a Victorian copped a $2,000 fine after authorities discovered he was allegedly using live carp as fishing bait, a serious breach of the law. The Victorian Fisheries Authority (VFA) said he was also allegedly deploying illegal setlines, another significant offence. VFA said "given the risk of the man's fishing activity spreading carp to other Victorian waters", officers proceeded to inspect his property, where they located "a large seine net, and several setlines like those observed in Broken Creek". As a result, the fisher received fines of more than $2,000 for possessing live noxious aquatic species, using carp as live bait, and possessing commercial fishing equipment without authorisation. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.