logo
The government's unexpected record borrowing will hit us all – but where?

The government's unexpected record borrowing will hit us all – but where?

Independent22-07-2025
For Rachel Reeves, the hits keep on coming. The latest? Higher than expected government borrowing last month.
The figures are enough to make anyone wince. The government spent £20.7bn more than it received in tax receipts in June, which is the second highest figure since monthly records began in 1993 – and £6.6bn more than in the same month in 2024.
To put it in context: that number would cover the government's share of building the £38bn Sizewell C nuclear power plant, with enough change left over to throw in a new hospital or two. In just a month.
You can probably guess when it was worse: June 2020, slap bang in the middle of the pandemic when the state was subsidising the wages of the furloughed British workforce. The extra debt incurred as a result of that is a major cause of the problems the chancellor is currently grappling with.
The consensus forecast in the City was for borrowing of £17.5bn, but it should be said at this point that these figures are highly volatile, and tough to predict. The overshoot was principally caused by higher interest payments on the vast existing debt pile, particularly IOUs linked to the Retail Prices Index (RPI), an outdated and statistically dubious measure of inflation that is still making its presence felt in a very bad way.
I said the hits keep on coming for the chancellor. But they're coming for us, too. Unless things improve, Reeves is going to have to sit down with her team to come up with some new and exciting ways to shaft us in the autumn Budget.
The electorate won't easily forgive having its bills raised again. Trouble is, the way the public finances are going, the chancellor mightn't have much choice. The markets, which Britain relies on to fund its debt, are getting twitchy about the state of its public finances. Only a fool would take them on. Consider what happened to the fool who tried (that would be Liz Truss).
'Ten-year gilt yields briefly nudged up to 4.645 per cent, which is the market's way of saying it isn't impressed with the state of public finances,' said Russ Mould, from broker AJ Bell. 'Soaring debt interest payments haven't helped and the situation will further stir speculation that the government will have to put up taxes in the autumn Budget.'
Speculation or certainty? The cry of ' tax the rich, they can afford it' will inevitably be heard. But there aren't enough of them to make a meaningful dent in the numbers, plus they'll be off if they get hit too hard. Reeves tried taxing businesses last time around, by hiking employer's national insurance contributions. Rising unemployment was the entirely predictable result.
So now it's on you and me.
I suspect that the thresholds at which people move into higher tax bands will remain frozen, which might well mean that next year's pay rise is worth a lot less than you hoped. What else? A raid on savings is possible. There has also lately been speculation about wealth taxes, with little to suggest how they might work.
Reeves probably should raise fuel duty, which has been frozen forever and would raise a decent slug of cash, but I doubt that she will, She keeps promising not to hit 'working people', which that would do
So I think stealth taxes will be the order of the day. Except, that people are getting wise to those. They see their impact in the diminishing amount left over at the end of the month after accounting for essentials, the price of which is rising uncomfortably fast. Kantar, the researcher, says the average family spends more than £5,000 annually on food with its measure of food price inflation jumping to 4.7 per cent.
It does rather look like Number 11 is caught in Catch 22 situation in which almost every possible decision is bad, both economically and politically.
But, wait – is there a way out?
Well, as I said, these figures tend to be highly volatile. Inflation is also expected to fall in the tail end of the year, which means the cost of interest on those index linked bonds will fall. The Bank of England is expected to cut base rates, which will further help with the chancellor's debt interest bills.
One final point to consider: while these figures were higher than the City expected, the government's borrowing in the current financial year (which starts in April) is still in line with the forecasts of the Office for Budget Responsibility, the 'independent' agency set up to mark the homework of Britain's finance ministers. That matters.
So cross you fingers. This could yet turn around. Anything's possible, and if our economic fairy godmother is feeling kind, for a change we mightn't get hit quite so hard. But don't bank on it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senior judge says he would apologise to IPP prisoners he jailed
Senior judge says he would apologise to IPP prisoners he jailed

The Independent

time15 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Senior judge says he would apologise to IPP prisoners he jailed

Senior judges who imposed indefinite jail terms, known as IPP sentences, have expressed regret over their role in the 'injustice' that has left thousands of inmates trapped in prison for minor offences. Former High Court judge Sir John Saunders stated he would apologise to IPP prisoners he jailed, while former recorder Simon Tonking says he feels driven to rectify the system that he was part of. Over 2,500 prisoners remain incarcerated under IPP sentences, which were abolished in 2012 but not retrospectively, with cases including people serving nearly two decades for mobile phone theft. The judges are backing proposals from the Howard League for Penal Reform, advocating for IPP prisoners to be given a release date within a two-year window at their next parole hearing, alongside mental health support. Prisons Minister Lord Timpson said the IPP sentence was rightly abolished and support has improved, but said further reductions in prisoner numbers will only occur in a way that protects the public.

Firms call for interest rate cuts as taxes bite
Firms call for interest rate cuts as taxes bite

Daily Mail​

time16 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Firms call for interest rate cuts as taxes bite

Business leaders last night urged the Bank of England to press ahead with interest rate cuts this week. The heads of the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) and Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) told the Daily Mail that now was the time to lower borrowing costs to ease pressure on companies and households struggling despite four rate cuts since last August. They also warned firms have been clobbered by Rachel Reeves' £25billion National Insurance tax raid on employers. Fears are mounting of more tax hikes this autumn to plug a gaping hole in the Chancellor's Budget plans. A report by the Institute of Directors last week showed business confidence has collapsed to a record low under Labour, with morale lower than during Covid lockdowns. Interest rates are expected to be cut from 4.25 per cent to 4 per cent on Thursday – though with inflation well above the 2 per cent target and the highest in the G7 at 3.6 per cent, the CBI warned the Bank is 'walking a tightrope'. Alpesh Paleja, deputy chief economist at the CBI, said: 'We expect a rate cut and then two more after that, so that rates settle at 3.5 per cent early next year. 'However, interest rates rank fairly low in the spectrum of costs. Firms continue to grapple with the rise in employer NICs, high energy costs and more general uncertainty. 'The cumulative burden is something the Government needs to be mindful of, as we head closer to the next Budget.' David Bharier, head of research at the BCC, said small firms in particular 'are increasingly impatient for more cuts'. He added: 'Interest rate cuts are only part of the solution right now. For many SMEs, the cost of doing business is too high with new tax and administrative burdens. To restore business confidence and stimulate investment, a comprehensive growth plan is essential.' Martin McTague, chairman of the FSB, said: 'Small firms will be hoping for a cut to ease some of the financial pressure they are under and enable more of those who need finance to grow to access it. 'If no cut is forthcoming, the Bank should set out a clear path for the rest of the year, building in a gradual easing of the base rate to encourage investment and unlock growth.'

Labour must come up with a deterrent that makes migrants worry their money won't get them what or where they want
Labour must come up with a deterrent that makes migrants worry their money won't get them what or where they want

The Sun

time16 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Labour must come up with a deterrent that makes migrants worry their money won't get them what or where they want

Boats sailed WHEN will the Government finally get the message on illegal immigration? Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's announcement of 300 extra National Crime Agency officers to tackle people-smuggling gangs is welcome, of course. 1 Anything that disrupts this evil trade is a good thing, in the same way that a crackdown is needed on profiteers who employ the migrants on the cheap — no questions asked — when they get here. But if this £100million investment is the Government's grand plan to 'break the business model' of the crooks then it is doomed to failure. When the risk-versus-reward equation is so much in their favour, the smugglers and the illegal migrants will always find a way. The incentives are too great: millions of pounds for the smugglers, for little effort; hand-outs, accommodation and black market jobs for the migrants, with virtually no chance of being deported. The only way to break the business model is to come up with a deterrent which makes the migrants worry that their money — and the dangers they will face — won't get them what they want. Or where they want. A deterrent like the Rwanda scheme, which was already beginning to work but which Labour couldn't wait to ditch. The soaring number of Channel small boats is the inevitable consequence. Jobs shame THE number of young people facing unemployment is one of the most heart-breaking results of the Chancellor's job-wrecking tax hikes. A million Neets — youngsters Not in Education, Employment or Training — is a disaster for the economy as well as a tragedy for them. Migrant boats are carrying 'bad people' REJECTED by other NATIONS says Trump At a time in their lives when they are desperately trying to find their place in the world, a job — or the skills to get one — gives them purpose and a sense of who they are, just as surely as being dumped on benefits crushes that. The Skills Tax Relief proposed by more than 100 business chiefs would be a vital boost to apprenticeships and vocational training, offering young Brits a route into the workplace. If Rachel Reeves isn't swayed by the thought of saving so many from the scrapheap, then she should be swayed by the £10billion of welfare savings it could bring over the next five years. It's not the water temperature that puts them off but the sewage dumped in it. What a blow for our coastal communities and seaside resorts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store