logo
Toronto couple turns to green roof as city faces climate-driven flooding

Toronto couple turns to green roof as city faces climate-driven flooding

When Julie Wang sees streets turn into rivers after another heavy downpour in Toronto, she thinks of the 600-square-foot patch of greenery on her roof — and feels a little less helpless.
'It's a fantastic feeling to know you're doing your part — for stormwater management and all the other benefits of the green roof,' said Wang, who lives with her husband, Edmund, in the city's east end. 'If everyone does their bit, the collective effect would be huge. That's why I believe every flat roof in the city should be green.'
The Wangs are among a growing number of Toronto homeowners turning to green roofs — layers of vegetation installed on rooftops — as a way to help the city adapt to climate change. Flash floods are becoming more frequent and intense, overwhelming aging infrastructure and causing costly damage.
On Monday, Toronto ranked among the most polluted cities in the world, with wildfire smoke and extreme heat triggering simultaneous air quality and heat warnings in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA).
Last year, flash floods shut down highways, swamped basements and pushed storm sewers beyond their limits in cities across the GTA. Friends from Julie's old neighbourhood in North York told her their basement flooded during storms.
While no single solution can stop these impacts, experts say infrastructure like green roofs plays a valuable role in helping cities adapt.
Julie and Edmund moved into their home on Gough Avenue about six years ago, bringing with them a shared commitment to sustainability — partly inspired by their daughter, who works in environmental conservation. A green roof was one of their top design goals.
As well as absorbing rainwater, green roofs can reduce energy use, improve air quality and cool cities during heat waves. They also offer habitat for pollinators and extend the life of roofing materials.
They weren't sure how effective it would be, but the results quickly exceeded expectations. Their top floor is cooler in summer and warmer in winter, thanks to the insulating effect of the green roof. Sedum plants cover the roof, supported by a system that retains rainwater and reduces runoff. They estimate it absorbs more than 70 per cent of rainfall in a typical storm.
They also received a rebate from the City of Toronto's Eco-Roof Incentive Program, which helped cover nearly half the cost.
One unexpected perk was the sound insulation. During construction, the couple had worried rain would drum loudly on the flat roof. Instead, the green roof muffled the noise so effectively that stormy nights now pass in near silence
'It's like sleeping under silence,' said Edmund. 'We barely hear it anymore. It's been great for our mental health.'
A small fix for a big problem
As well as absorbing rainwater, g reen roofs can reduce energy use, improve air quality and cool cities during heat waves. They also offer habitat for pollinators and extend the life of roofing materials.
Toronto was the first city in North America to require green roofs on certain new buildings. The Green Roof Bylaw, passed in 2009, applies to commercial, institutional and multi-unit buildings over 2,000 square metres. In 2024 alone, the city approved 41 new eco-roof projects, adding more than 63,000 square metres of green roof space.
To support smaller properties, the city offers up to $100 per square metre through its incentive program. Since 2009, the program has funded over 600 projects, helping divert nearly 19 million litres of stormwater each year. It has also cut energy use by more than 2,300 megawatt hours annually and avoided over 430 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions.
But green roofs alone won't prevent flooding, said Darko Joksimovic, professor and chair of civil engineering at Toronto Metropolitan University (TMU). He said green roofs are more effective when they are part of a broader system engineers call a 'treatment train' — a layered strategy for managing water at multiple points, from rooftops to rain gardens to sewer systems.
'They capture rain where it falls, which is always better than rushing it into pipes and hoping for the best,' Joksimovic said.
He added that if every roof in Toronto were green, stormwater runoff could be reduced by up to 30 per cent — significant in a city covered in impermeable surfaces, such as roads and buildings.
Joksimovic also pointed to other benefits. At TMU, a rooftop farm produces several tonnes of food each year for underserved communities, showing how green roofs can contribute to food security and urban biodiversity as well.
Stormwater costs rising, cities seek solutions
Managing stormwater is expensive for Toronto, especially since the city doesn't currently charge property owners for runoff. Nearby cities, such as Mississauga, Vaughan and Markham, have long had stormwater charges to help fund flood prevention and infrastructure.
To help cover rising costs, Toronto also proposed a stormwater charge on commercial and residential properties with large paved surfaces. But the idea — quickly branded a 'rain tax' by critics sparked backlash and was suspended. Public consultations were cancelled.
Now, Toronto has set aside $4.3 billion over 10 years (2023 to 2032) for stormwater management, including $2.11 billion for its basement flooding protection program.
A separate proposal for a commercial parking levy — targeting large paved lots that contribute to runoff — was also paused. City staff say more engagement is needed with the provincial government and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation before it can move ahead.
The city is now shifting to a new green infrastructure program to help property owners reduce paved areas and install green infrastructure to soak up rain water.
Growing interest — under threat
Nearly 90 per cent of surveyed residents support more green roofs in Toronto, despite most being unaware of the city's green roof bylaw. Residents ranked air quality, habitat and cooling as top benefits.
The bylaw is part of the city's green building strategy to reach net-zero emissions by 2040. But that progress is now under threat. The Ford government recently passed Bill 17, which removes municipalities' ability to set their own green building standards. Critics warn the law could undermine local climate action and make flooding worse.
For Julie and Edmund, the motivation is both personal and political.
'We're losing so much green space,' Julie said. 'There has to be a balance. We can't keep building over farmland and wetlands and expect no consequences.'
At their home, nearly 80 per cent of the property is now green space — including the rooftop, front yard and garden beds. The only part left is the garage roof, which they hope to green next.
'We're doing this because we can, because we care,' Julie added. 'But also because the government isn't doing enough. So we're doing our part — one roof at a time.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Aussie rangers caught unlawfully using 'cruel' devices on native animals
Aussie rangers caught unlawfully using 'cruel' devices on native animals

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Aussie rangers caught unlawfully using 'cruel' devices on native animals

Australian authorities have admitted to unlawfully using a controversial device to capture dingoes so they could be killed, despite the possession and practice being 'in breach' of their own animal welfare rules. The ACT Government confirmed the mistake with Yahoo News, revealing it permitted soft-jaw traps to be used for years, even after it passed an amendment in 2019 that prohibited them. When stepped on, the trap's jaws snap tightly around the animal's foot, keeping it in a fixed position until a routine check is made, sometimes causing it pain for hours. Unlike steel-jawed traps, they have padding to lessen damage to the animal's limb, and they are commonly used for dingo control in other states. The practice of trapping dingoes on public land was never hidden. But it's understood that until recently, the territory authorities didn't realise the method was now banned. Most animal welfare groups oppose the traps, with Humane World for Animals (formerly Humane Society International) claims they are 'inherently cruel, cause intense stress, injury, and prolonged suffering'. While Deakin University ecologist Professor Euan Ritchie said governments have 'far better ways' to manage dingoes humanely. Alix Livingstone from wildlife protection organisation Defend the Wild described them as "outdated". Why are dingoes trapped? Dingoes are regarded as a separate species from domestic dogs, and they have notable behavioural differences, including howling like wolves. DNA testing across Australia suggests there is very little hybridisation between dogs and dingoes. Despite being culturally important to Indigenous people and playing an important ecological role as an apex predator, state and territory governments around Australia routinely trap, shoot and poison dingoes on public land that borders farmland, due to concerns they kill sheep. Two notable places they are protected are K'gari in Queensland and a small, critically endangered population in Victoria's northwest. How was the illegal trapping discovered? In July, a confidential source alerted Yahoo about conflicting descriptions of soft-jaw traps in ACT government documents. Their possession and use were explicitly prohibited as prescribed items alongside shock collars and cockfighting spurs under the Animal Weflare Act and the associated Animal Welfare Regulation. Yet another government document, the ACT Pest Animal Management Strategy, described them as an 'effective technique' to control wild dogs, which is a common term used to describe dingoes. On July 23 this year, Yahoo posed six questions to Parks and Conservation Services (PCS), which manages dingo control, about its use of soft-jaw traps. It did not respond directly and instead emailed a short statement from the government. 'The ACT Government is currently reviewing the legislation and the appropriateness of the regulatory settings regarding the management of overabundant wildlife in the ACT,' it said. For over a week, further requests for comment did not receive a response. Government amends laws and resumes dingo trapping Concerns about the use of soft-jaw traps were raised at an uncomfortable time for the ACT government. It is in the process of updating the Nature Conservation Act to change the status of dingoes from a pest species to a controlled native animal, giving it a similar status to eastern grey kangaroos. And this has upset some farmers who fear it could make it harder to control dingoes, and the matter was raised during budget estimates on Friday. After PCS was told it was illegally using traps, it suspended their use for weeks. But it quietly began working on amending legislation. On July 31, a new regulatory change was published by the government, creating an exemption for the use of soft-jaw traps by permit holders and conservation officers. Then on August 1, as the law came into effect, it resumed dialogue with Yahoo, responding to new questions by issuing a lengthy statement. 'The use of soft-jaw traps by [PCS], primarily for controlling pest animals or overabundant native wildlife under the Biosecurity Act 2023, was recently found to be in breach of the Animal Welfare Act 1992 and its associated Regulation,' it said in part. 'Although PCS had used these traps for many years as part of their pest management activities, an amendment in 2019 added soft-jaw traps to the list of prohibited items under the Animal Welfare Regulation 2001, rendering their continued use unlawful.' It then explained its decision to resume their use, claiming they are "essential for effective dingo control". "To resolve the issue, the ACT Government has amended the Animal Welfare Regulation to include exemptions to the possession and use of soft-jaw traps," it said. Government urged to consider 'humane' control methods The government said soft-jaw traps are used in accordance with national animal welfare standards, including the National Code of Practice for the humane control of dingoes and that daily inspections and prompt euthanasia ensure "humane treatment". But the decision to amend legislation rather than adhere to established animal welfare protections has frustrated a number of leading experts and ecologists. Humane World for Animals Dr Renae Charalambous described the change as 'deeply troubling'. 'Rather than bringing their wildlife management practices into line with the law and community expectations, the government has amended the legislation to suit its own operational needs,' she said. "The use of these traps to manage native species like dingoes is particularly disturbing. Dingoes are a native apex predator, not a 'pest', and lethal control methods like trapping and killing fail to provide long-term solutions to conflicts with livestock." In many cases, traps can kill or harm non-target native wildlife, including birds, wombats, and goannas. Due to the risks they pose to animal welfare, Professor Euan Ritchie warned trapping can also harm and, in some cases, said 'strong considerations' needed to be made about where and when they were used. 'Leg-hold traps can cause a range of impacts on dingoes, ranging from relatively minor and short-lived pain and discomfort, through to more severe pain and distress, swelling, dehydration, bruising, lacerations, dislocations, and fractures,' he told Yahoo. Continuing, he said there are 'better ways' to manage dingoes that are more humane than trapping, shooting and poisoning, and that more investment was needed in alternative methods. 'Strategic fencing, but not large barrier fencing, has a role. So too does the appropriate use of guardian dogs and donkeys, which have been demonstrated to be effective in Australia, and around the world,' he said. Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.

10-year-old boy ditched at airport by parents who realized his passport was expired upon arrival at airport
10-year-old boy ditched at airport by parents who realized his passport was expired upon arrival at airport

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

10-year-old boy ditched at airport by parents who realized his passport was expired upon arrival at airport

An unnamed mother and father allegedly abandoned a 10-year-old boy at an airport in Spain and boarded without him after realizing his passport was expired In a scene one airport staffer described as "utterly surreal,' a couple allegedly abandoned their 10‑year‑old son at a Spanish airport after discovering his travel documents were invalid. With the boy's Spanish passport expired and no visa in hand, the parents reportedly opted to board their flight anyway—arranging for a relative to meet and collect him at the terminal while they departed. An airport staffer claims to have witnessed the incident According to Lilian—a staff coordinator who shared the incident in a TikTok video now viewed by hundreds of thousands—the child told authorities his parents were already on board and en route to their home country for vacation. When airport and police personnel located the boy alone, they immediately informed the plane's pilot, who then asked passengers if anyone had left a child behind. No one came forward. Eventually, officers identified the parents, who were traveling with another younger child. They were taken to the airport's police station—along with the boy—after authorities removed their six suitcases from the flight. Lilian questioned how someone could calmly board a plane and leave a 10‑year‑old unattended, even with assurances a relative would arrive within an hour or more. The fate of the parents is still unknown It's not yet known whether the parents have been formally charged or faced any legal consequences. Their nationality hasn't been disclosed, and the claims remain unverified beyond the coordinator's TikTok account. Not the 1st case of children left behind or unattended at airports Back in 2018, a couple in Germany forgot their five-year-old daughter at Berlin's Stuttgart Airport, claiming they'd each thought the other parent had taken charge of her. More recently, an unattended two-year-old was swept away on a luggage conveyor belt and dropped down a chute at New Jersey's Newark Liberty International Airport in late May. Solve the daily Crossword

Lionel Messi's bodyguard banned from Leagues Cup after entering field in postgame confrontation
Lionel Messi's bodyguard banned from Leagues Cup after entering field in postgame confrontation

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lionel Messi's bodyguard banned from Leagues Cup after entering field in postgame confrontation

Lionel Messi's bodyguard Yassine Cheuko apparently took his job a little too seriously at the Leagues Cup. After a postgame confrontation in which Cheuko ran onto the field to push some Atlas players away from the Inter Miami star, the League Cup disciplinary committee announced it was banning him from all technical areas for the rest of the tournament, which runs through Aug. 31, and fining Inter Miami an undisclosed amount of money. The full statement: After the July 30 Inter Miami CF vs. Club Atlas match, a member of Inter Miami's club delegation displayed improper conduct by entering restricted areas without an official event credential. In accordance with the Leagues Cup 2025 Tournament Regulations, the Disciplinary Committee has suspended the individual involved from all technical areas for the remainder of Leagues Cup 2025 and issued an undisclosed fine to Inter Miami CF. ESPN identified the member of Inter Miami's delegation as Cheuko. The incident occurred on Wednesday after Inter Miami's 2-1 win over Atlas. Several players congregated at midfield, with Cheuko entering the fray to physically break up the confrontation. He is the bald man with a short beard and black Miami T-shirt in the video below. Atlas players were not happy about Cheuko's intervention, with defender Matheus Doria calling for the rules to be applied in this case via ESPN: "We already know that our board works very well and will take care of the issue. I understand that Messi's bodyguard is there to protect Messi from a possible entry by a fan, I don't know, but between players, he doesn't have that permission," said Doria. "It's not up to us to say much or give our opinion on the matter, but the board and those in charge of the Leagues Cup have already seen it and will take charge of what can and can't be done because as long as it protects not only Messi but the other players, and the physical integrity of the players who are there, that's fine. But if it's for other issues, no one will agree, but it's not up to me to do anything." Cheuko has been a fixture at Messi's side since his days at Paris Saint-Germain. Contrary to past reports, he is not a former Navy SEAL or professional MMA fighter, but he has entered the field in the past to protect the eight-time Ballon d'Or winner. In April, Inter Miami banned Cheuko from being on the sidelines during MLS matches, though he remains an employee of the team.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store