Hispanic Heritage Council receives $7M for construction of cultural institute
The council's plans for the multi-use 37,000-square-foot facility on the corner of Niagara and Hudson Streets was first announced in 2019, but it has since faced delays due to COVID-19.
Hochul described the investment as a 'gap-filling' initiative for phase two of the institute, which will serve as a hub for Hispanic history, arts and community. The $30 million facility broke ground in September 2023 at the beginning of Hispanic Heritage Month.
The council plans for the institute to house a museum, 150-seat performing arts theater, event spaces, cafe, media center and learning labs.
'We are deeply grateful to Governor Hochul for her unwavering support of the Hispanic Heritage Cultural Institute. This historic investment is not just a milestone for the Buffalo Hispanic community — it's a gift to all of Western New York,' said Casimiro Rodriguez, the council's president and founder. 'As the first of its kind, this institute will serve as a vibrant hub for arts, culture, education, and heritage, drawing visitors from near and far, including our Canadian neighbors. It will enrich our region's cultural landscape and strengthen our identity as a welcoming and diverse community. The future is bright, and we are filled with hope and gratitude as we take this giant step forward together.'
Hochul said the previous announcement in 2023 of a $5 million grant, along with additional funding, will continue to help with the completion of the project's second phase and grand opening.
'New Yorkers of Puerto Rican heritage have been an integral part of our state's cultural fabric for generations,' Hochul said. 'We are honored to make bold investments that will empower organizations to expand and thrive, ensuring that the vibrant presence of Puerto Rican culture in New York State remains a cherished aspect of our state's identity.'
The council also received $1 million in federal funding in August 2023 for construction.
Katie Skoog joined the News 4 team in April 2024. She is a graduate from the University at Buffalo. You can view more of her work here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Media still undercounting return-to-office phenomenon
The media continues to absurdly undercount, downplay or misunderstand the return-to-office phenomenon, although the surge should be obvious from the current leasing frenzy and from crowds on the street. For example, Crain's last week questioned whether the 345 Park Ave. murders would 'impact the city's already stagnant return-to-office rates.' The story based its 'stagnant' claim partly on the Partnership for New York City's supposed finding that only '57% of Manhattan office workers had returned on the average workday.' 3 The Midtown shooting happened at 345 Park Ave. AFP via Getty Images 3 An NYPD police officer stands at the shattered glass entrance to 345 Park Avenue after the shooting. John Angelillo/UPI/Shutterstock 3 NYC office capacity was never full — even during pre-COVID times. Tierney – That — like many similar off-base readings of data — made it sound as if Manhattan offices that were full before 2020 are now barely more than half full. What the Partnership actually said in March was that 57% of workers in offices at the time 'equates to 76% of respondents' pre-pandemic attendance.' In other words, pre-pandemic offices were not 100% occupied — they never were — but 75% occupied. That's because 57 is 76% of 75. The 19% difference between 76% and 57% is much less than an alleged 43% gap between 100% and 57%. And with so many CEO's calling their staffs back, the 19% gap can only continue to shrink further.
Business Upturn
4 hours ago
- Business Upturn
FLYW LEGAL ALERT: Lose Money on Your Flywire Corporation Investment? Contact BFA Law by September 23 Class Action Deadline (NASDAQ:FLYW)
NEW YORK, Aug. 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a lawsuit has been filed against Flywire Corporation (NASDAQ: FLYW) and certain of the Company's senior executives for potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Flywire, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: Investors have until September 23, 2025, to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors who purchased Flywire securities. The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York and is captioned Hickman v. Flywire Corp., et al. , No. 1:25-cv-04110. Why Was Flywire Sued for Securities Fraud? Flywire operates as a payments-enablement, and software company. Its largest client vertical is education, the volumes and revenue from which rely on international enrollments and student school preferences. In and around late 2023 and early 2024, the Canadian and Australian governments began to tighten student visa and permitting rules. Despite these headwinds, Flywire consistently touted the sustainability of its revenue growth and financial condition, while downplaying the negative impacts of permit- and visa-related headwinds on the Company's business. In truth, it is alleged that Flywire overstated the strength and sustainability of its revenue growth while understating the negative impacts that the permit- and visa-related restrictions had and were likely to have on Flywire's business. The Stock Declines as the Truth Is Revealed On February 25, 2025, Flywire announced that its business in the education sector had significantly deteriorated due to worsening permit- and visa-related headwinds, including 'double digit declines in student visa issuance in our big four geographic markets,' with 'continued visa policy restrictions' anticipated in 2025. On this news, the price of Flywire stock declined roughly 37%, from $17.64 per share on February 25, 2025, to $11.05 per share on February 26, 2025. Click here for more information: What Can You Do? If you invested in Flywire you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis, there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: Or contact:Ross Shikowitz [email protected] 212.789.3619
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mismatched financial expectations? How to cope in a relationship where one partner out-earns the other
For some, the road to marriage can look financially lopsided. Those in their 30s earning their fair share — say, more than $100,000 a year — may be used to covering 100% of their individual household expenses. However, it doesn't typically feel good when a fiancé refuses to contribute, claiming their money is only for 'fun,' not 'responsibilities.' This is particularly troubling given cost of living increases and how those are reflected in the cost of non-negotiable spending. According to Statistics Canada, the average household spent about $76,750 annually on expenses in 2023, including housing, transportation and food, the three largest categories. In a two-person household, those costs can quickly add up. And when only one person is footing the bill, the financial and emotional burden becomes even heavier. Don't Miss Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich — and 'anyone' can do it The Canadian economy is showing signs of softening amid Trump's tariffs — protect your wallet with these 5 essential money moves (most of which you can complete in just minutes) I'm almost 50 and don't have enough retirement savings. What should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 solid ways you can catch up The red flags of an unequal dynamic While differences in income are normal, refusing to contribute entirely can trigger long-term problems. When one partner sacrifices and handles 100% of the financial responsibilities, their personal finances may suffer down the road, while the other partner gains. This creates several challenges: Budget strain: Even with a six-figure salary, carrying the full weight of household costs limits your ability to save, invest or spend on yourself. Lifestyle imbalance and negative emotions: When one person is financially constrained while the other uses their full income for leisure, it can foster resentment. Power imbalance: Financial inequality can also seep into decision-making. The partner who pays for everything may feel overburdened and unheard, while the non-contributing partner may avoid accountability. Future financial insecurity: Without shared financial planning, big goals — from buying a home to starting a family — may be delayed or derailed entirely. It's about more than just paying the bills: Aligning your values, goals and decisions is important in a successful relationship. How to address it before saying 'I do' Before walking down the aisle, a couple in this situation needs to have a candid conversation in a productive, structured way. If you see yourself as the "giving" half of your relationship, here are a few practical steps to take to hopefully see change. 1. Have a values-based conversation Frame the conversation not as a confrontation, but as a shared planning session for your future. You can try something like: 'I want us to feel like we're building something together. Can we talk about how we want to manage money as a team?' Focus on shared goals, like housing, travel, kids and retirement, and how to achieve them together. Read more: 'You're going to live on beans and rice': This senior told Dave Ramsey she has debt and zero savings — 2. Consider financial counseling If emotions are running high, a third party can help. Premarital or financial counselling can uncover deeper money beliefs and create shared understanding. Resources, like the Canadian Association for Financial Empowerment, can help you locate professionals near you. You can also seek help from a financial advisor, who can look at you and your partner's financial health and find ways to be more reasonable with your money, like finding ways to save for the future, while also finding avenues for realistic, personal indulgences. 3. Propose a fair cost-sharing model A practical approach is using a cost-sharing model like a proportional contribution one. Under this, you'd figure out the proportion of total household income you each bring in. This system keeps contributions equitable while acknowledging income disparities. For example, say you earn 70% of your combined income and your partner earns 30%. You'd each contribute these proportions toward shared costs. So, if those costs are $65,000 annually, you'd pay $45,500 per year, while your partner would pay $19,500 per year. You can also look into a budgeting app, which can help bolster more thoughtful money management and create an actionable and trackable plan moving forward. 4. Set boundaries and deadlines If your partner continues to resist contributing, it's worth asking yourself if this is a difference in values or a refusal to partner in life. Marriage is a financial partnership as much as an emotional one. Put yourself first by setting a deadline to revisit the conversation and being honest with yourself about your limits. What To Read Next Here's how to retire in 10 short years no matter where you live in Canada — even if you're starting with $0 savings Here are 5 expenses that Canadians (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Are you rich enough to join the top 1%? Here's the net worth you need to rank among Canada's wealthiest — plus a few strategies to build that first-class portfolio Pet owners, here's how you can get up to 90% cashback on expensive emergency veterinary bills — and you can even get a free quote in 30 seconds 1. Statistics Canada: Survey of Household Spending, 2023 (May 21, 2025) This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
