logo
Arkansas lawmakers advance bill to create military committee

Arkansas lawmakers advance bill to create military committee

Yahoo30-01-2025
House Speaker Brian Evans and Lieutenant Gov. Leslie Rutledge preside over a joint session of the Arkansas House and Senate on Jan. 14, 2025. (Antoinette Grajeda/Arkansas Advocate)
A bill to create the Joint Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs is headed to the Arkansas Senate for a final vote following approval by a legislative committee Thursday.
House Bill 1056 is sponsored by House Speaker Brian Evans, who told his House colleagues earlier this month that now's the time 'to show those who serve us in uniform that we are going to take their work more seriously.'
The Senate does not have a committee focused on military affairs, but the House has the Committee on Aging, Children and Youth, Legislative and Military Affairs. If HB 1056 is approved, Evans said a resolution would be needed to remove 'military affairs' from the committee's name.
The Cabot Republican noted that his district is home to a large veteran population and cited several other military communities across the state, including central Arkansas' Little Rock Air Force Base and Camp Robinson, as well Fort Smith, home to Ebbing Air National Guard Base, which has been selected as as the new site of the Foreign Military Sales Program Pilot Training Center.
'As a body, [we] will do everything that we can possibly do with intent and with passion to make sure that we are providing those benefits that we can as a state and those opportunities and those protections for their families while they are out serving for us,' Evans said.
The new Joint Committee to Military and Veterans Affairs would consist of 12 representatives and eight senators. The Speaker would designate a House co-chair and co-vice chair while the chair and co-chair of the Senate Committee on State Agencies and Governmental Affairs would fill those positions on the Senate side.
The new joint committee could meet at any time at the call of the chairs. Bills or resolutions introduced during a legislative session pertaining to military or veterans affairs 'may be referred' to the joint committee, according to an amendment adopted Thursday.
Bart Hester, Senate President Tempore and HB1056 co-sponsor, explained to the Senate Committee on State Agencies and Governmental Affairs Thursday that changing the word 'shall' to 'may' would allow the parliamentarian to send a bill pertaining to veterans and military affairs to another committee when appropriate.
Addressing concerns about the efficiency of creating a joint committee and challenges of scheduling a meeting during the legislative session, Hester said he'd 'be shocked' if the new group met more than twice during the current session.
HB1056, which will likely be considered by the full Senate next week, contains an emergency clause and would be effective immediately upon the governor's signature.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump reacts to Tulsi Gabbard reveal: ‘Irrefutable proof of Obama coup'
Trump reacts to Tulsi Gabbard reveal: ‘Irrefutable proof of Obama coup'

The Hill

time5 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump reacts to Tulsi Gabbard reveal: ‘Irrefutable proof of Obama coup'

President Donald Trump is furious with former President Barack Obama, whom he is accusing of participating in a 'coup' against him in 2016. Trump is referring of course to recent disclosures from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who has released documents showing it was Obama who encouraged intelligence officials to reach stronger conclusions about Russia's alleged meddling in the 2016 election. According to Gabbard, the intelligence community was well aware that Russia did not hack voting machines, nor did the country have much impact on the outcome, but Trump's enemies in the Democratic Party wanted to paint him as a Russian collaborator, and so they overreached. The media, of course, followed suit, publishing headline after headline suggesting that Trump was a Russian stooge. Here is President Trump reacting to the latest news: 'We found absolute — this isn't like evidence, this is like proof, irrefutable proof, that Obama was seditious. That Obama was trying to lead a coup. And it was with Hillary Clinton and with all these other people, but Obama headed it up. And, you know, I get a kick when I hear everyone talks about people I never even heard of. […] It was Obama, he headed it up. And it says so right in the papers.' These allegations are extremely serious. Now, it's far too premature to throw around the word treason; in fact, I don't like when anybody, Democrat or Republican, starts accusing their opponents of treason. This reads less like treason to me and more like political weaponization of national intelligence for partisan purposes, which has become a recurring theme. Make no mistake: There was an effort to de-legitimize Trump's election to the presidency, and the argument was made by mainstream media mouthpieces leveraging the expertise of deep-state spymasters. Hillary Clinton and Jimmy Carter both said that Trump was an illegitimate president, in response to media reporting on Russia's meddling. This was the original 'stolen election' theory, and it's only been overshadowed because Trump's false contention that the 2016 election was stolen has subsequently received much more media coverage and much more vigorous pushback. Let me be perfectly clear: Trump should have never claimed that the 2020 election was stolen from him. But he's in good company: Look at the Democrats who said the same thing about 2016! And their main theory backing that up was Russian malfeasance — something intelligence officials privately discounted, until they went to the White House and had a chat with outgoing President Barack Obama.

Alina Habba politicized her job as US attorney. Team Trump politicizes her exit.
Alina Habba politicized her job as US attorney. Team Trump politicizes her exit.

USA Today

time5 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Alina Habba politicized her job as US attorney. Team Trump politicizes her exit.

Alina Habba has no business being a federal prosecutor. That didn't stop the Trump administration from trying to make it happen. President Donald Trump and the crew of cynical sycophants surrounding him can seem pretty unpredictable until you start spotting the patterns. On matters of law and order, expect the inversion of what Trump claims to be true. If he says he's ending the "weaponization" of the Department of Justice, you better believe he'll use that legal power like a blunt instrument to pound away at his perceived enemies, no matter what the law allows, no matter how inept his agents are. That's why the kerfuffle about Trump's pick for U.S. attorney for New Jersey, Alina Habba, feels so predictable. Habba was widely seen as inexperienced when she represented Trump in a 2024 New York defamation case, which he lost. But she played the part of a lawyer in a passable way while lavishing Trump with loyalty on Fox News so, of course, he made her the top prosecutor for the entire state of New Jersey. And, of course, she made a mess of it, politicizing the office from the get-go in a set of fits-and-starts prosecutions against Democrats in the state who are critical of Trump's deport-them-all approach to immigration. But Habba faced two roadblocks that Trump and her DOJ cheerleaders, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, couldn't push her past. Alina Habba was clearly not experienced enough for US attorney job Federal prosecutors are nominated by the president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. And Senate protocol gives the two senators from any state significant yay-or-nay say over those picks. Cory Booker and Andy Kim, the two Democratic senators from New Jersey, jointly announced on July 2 that Habba "in her short tenure as interim U.S. Attorney ... has degraded the office and pursued frivolous and politically motivated prosecutions." So, that was a nay from them. Habba had another chance. The federal judges of the District of New Jersey could have voted to keep her on the job, past the 120-day limit of her interim capacity as U.S. attorney. That deadline expired July 22. But the judges also said nay to Habba. Opinion: Gabbard yells 'Russia hoax' to distract MAGA from Epstein for Trump. It won't last. In an order at the deadline, Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb named an experienced prosecutor who had been serving as New Jersey's first deputy U.S. attorney, Desiree Leigh Grace, as Habba's replacement, effective the same day. What came next was as predictable as the rest of it. Trump's MAGA administration wasted no time attacking the courts Bondi and Blanche accused the judges of playing politics because they would not rubber-stamp Habba, who was so clearly playing politics with her role. And Bondi removed Grace from the job she had just been given, whining that "rogue judges" had impeded Trump's presidential power. So an experienced prosecutor got bounced from the job that Habba just got bounced from for being inexperienced and using the job like a political activist. Experience is really a red flag to a crew trying to invert the meaning of justice. Grace's removal injected yet more chaos into the office of a federal prosecutor, which had already been a mess under Habba. Booker and Kim, in a joint statement on July 22, pointed to a pattern of Trump's DOJ attacking judges and the rule of law. "The firing of a career public servant, lawfully appointed by the court, is another blatant attempt to intimidate anyone that doesn't agree with them and undermine judicial independence," Booker and Kim said. Opinion: MAGA is coming for Trump over lost Epstein files. Bondi may pay the price. Here's what comes next: Habba will play the victim, with Bondi and Blanche sobbing along. Then Trump will sneer about "activist judges," a favorite villain in the trite emails he sends out all the time, pleading with his supporters to give him money. And then Trump will find another spot for her, probably at the DOJ, definitely not in a post where the Senate has to weigh her qualifications. That part's not too difficult to predict, because we've already seen it. Habba isn't the only Trump loyalist to secure a position in this administration Trump picked Ed Martin, a devoted supporter with scant legal background and zero experience as a prosecutor, to be the interim U.S. attorney for Washington, DC, on Jan. 20, right after the inauguration. Martin got right to work on Trump's inversion of justice, serving as one of the early inquisitors of how federal agents and prosecutors investigated the rioters who invaded and ransacked the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, as Trump refused to admit that he had lost the 2020 presidential election. Opinion: Donald Trump's Jan. 6 pardons cast a long shadow over justice six months later Martin's nomination stalled in the Senate in May and, facing the same 120-day deadline problem as Habba, Trump had to hand the gig off instead to one of his most fervent Fox News supporters, Jeanine Pirro. Martin wasn't sent packing. He landed another DOJ gig in the new Weaponization Working Group, which Bondi claims was set up to stop the politicization of the agency. But, remember, inversion is always at play here. So Bondi, with Trump's blessing, is really using the group to weaponize justice as a tool for political power. If Habba travels the same route, and that does seem likely, she'll finally be in a post she's qualified for ‒ using the levers of power at DOJ to punish anyone Trump feels is out of line. See her potential job description this way: Think of what an experienced, professional, principled lawyer would do ‒ and then wait for her to invert that expectation. Follow USA TODAY columnist Chris Brennan on X, formerly known as Twitter: @ByChrisBrennan. Sign up for his weekly newsletter, Translating Politics, here.

Huizenga skips Michigan Senate race
Huizenga skips Michigan Senate race

Axios

time5 minutes ago

  • Axios

Huizenga skips Michigan Senate race

Rep. Bill Huizenga won't run in the Michigan Senate race, he said in a statement on Wednesday. Why it matters: Huizenga's decision to pass on the Senate opens up a clearer path for former Rep. Mike Rogers, the National Republican Senatorial Committee's preferred candidate. Huizenga hasn't given a clear indication that he has decided to run for reelection to the House. "I look forward to announcing my future plans later this year," he said in a statement. Huizenga raised $747,000 in the second quarter, leaving him with $1.4 million in cash on hand. Zoom in: The White House has been putting pressure on House Republicans in swing districts to forgo senate or gubernatorial campaigns to help President Trump retain the House majority. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) became the latest House Republican to officially take a pass on a statewide bid when he announced his plans to run House on Wednesday morning. "I've decided the right thing to do for me, my family and my district is to run for re-election," Lawler said said on "Fox & Friends" after telling the New York Times that he wouldn't be running for governor. Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa) decided to run for House reelection and forgo a governor's bid after pressure from the White House.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store