logo
Budget 2025 Fails To Shift The Dial On Child Poverty

Budget 2025 Fails To Shift The Dial On Child Poverty

Scoop22-05-2025
Budget 2025 fails to shift the dial on child poverty
'Budget 2025 reduces investment in our youngest New Zealanders and fails to address the urgent needs of children and families in Aotearoa New Zealand', says Chief Executive of the New Zealand Council of Christian Social Services (NZCCSS), Alicia Sudden.
'Following the launch of the Social Investment Fund last week, NZCCSS wanted to see Government continue to deliver their social investment approach by increasing incomes for families, recognising frontline social service providers and investing in prevention and early intervention.'
'We have seen some positive progress in today's Budget including Accommodation Supplement boundary updates, Working for Families abatement threshold increases, investment in transfers from hospital to community care for older people, and continued food bank provider and infrastructure funding. However, this comes at the expense of new parents and fails to make positive progress on child poverty.'
'The recently released UNICEF Innocenti Report Card 19 shows that New Zealand ranks 32 out of 36 wealthy nations for child wellbeing. On top of that food insecurity for children is worsening with 27% of children living in households where food runs out sometimes or often. It is more imperative than ever to ensure the needs of children are at the centre of government investment. Yet according to the Child Poverty Budget report we are way off track. Budget 2025 is anticipated to have very little impact on child poverty rates for the future and there is no major reduction in child poverty forecast in the coming years. This means this Budget will leave thousands of children in poverty.'
Positively, today's Budget included an increase in the abatement threshold for Working for Families which will mean more families have access to these support payments. However, to fund this, the first year of the Best Start payment will now be income tested. The Best Start payment provides a critical payment to new parents to recognise the cost of raising a child and help equip them for the early years. Until now, this had been universal for the first year of a child's life. A Ministry of Social Development rapid review of internal evidence on possible impacts of Best Start noted that one study found that 'unconditional cash transfers significantly increased the percentage of children with good school attendance.'
'Best Start payment is a critical support that recognises the financial pressures of parenthood and invests early in our youngest New Zealanders. Today's reduction will have a major impact on new parents and their newborns. We hear from frontline providers that more working families are needing support, with an increasing amount of traditionally middle-income families coming in for social service support as they have limited bandwidth to manage financial changes due to cost of living pressures.'
'As a result of the reduction to Best Start, there are estimated to be around 62,000 parents of newborns per tax year who will receive less support in their child's first year and, of that, 55,000 parents won't receive any Best Start payment in the first year at all. While we support more people accessing Working for Families, this should not be at the cost of other parents.'
Recent research by NZCCSS on middle childhood (5-12 year olds) noted that improving wellbeing outcomes for children and how they develop healthy relationships requires investment in preventative, not just bottom of the cliff, approaches across all stages of childhood.
'We want to see the Government deliver on its Child and Youth Strategy, the ambitious child poverty 2028 targets and their prevention focused social investment approach. Taking away funding from parents of our youngest New Zealanders goes against this.'
'On top of that, the changes to the employer contribution for Kiwisaver fails to take into account the impact on community social service providers. Our social service providers are delivering support for families facing disadvantages and challenges, for tamariki and rangatahi by providing opportunities and support, and for our older people who need care and assistance. These social service providers are critical to a thriving Aotearoa and supporting families through times of crisis and hardship.'
'This Budget puts extra pressure on our critical social service providers by requiring employers to increase their default Kiwisaver contributions without any further investment for contracted providers to deliver this change. This is even more disappointing in light of the recent pay equity changes which undermine the social sector by failing to recognise and value the work of kaimahi who care for New Zealanders.'
'As we start to see green shoots of economic growth, NZCCSS calls on the Government to ensure it doesn't leave people behind. This Budget will take away much needed support for new parents, leave too many children in poverty and put further financial pressure on community social services. We want to see a Budget that delivers compassion and equity for New Zealanders," says Alicia Sudden.
Ko wai tātou | Who we are
NZCCSS has six foundation members; the Anglican Care Network, Baptist Churches of New Zealand, Catholic Social Services, Presbyterian Support and the Methodist and Salvation Army Churches.
Through this membership, NZCCSS represents over 100 organisations providing a range of social support services across Aotearoa. Our mission is to call forth a just and compassionate society for Aotearoa, through our commitment to our faith and Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How bad is the tariff news for NZ, really?
How bad is the tariff news for NZ, really?

1News

timean hour ago

  • 1News

How bad is the tariff news for NZ, really?

New Zealand has been hit with a higher tariff rate than Australia on exports to the US – but economists say the situation could have been worse. It was revealed today that New Zealand exports would have a 15% tariff applied, up from 10% announced earlier. Australia remains at 10%. Brad Olsen, chief executive at Infometrics, said that was a clear challenge for New Zealand. "There is now a wedge between us and Australia." ADVERTISEMENT There were other parts of the world that previously had a higher tariff rate that were now on the same level as New Zealand, such as Europe. "Wine, for example, under the original tariffs, we might have had a slight advantage. Now we don't." But he said it was not necessarily true that the country would have been better off had it negotiated a deal. He said New Zealand did not have a lot to "give up" in those negotiations, and it could have ended up being costly. "I'm a little bit surprised by comments, including from the opposition's trade spokesperson, that the Government failed to achieve a lower tariff rate. "The comments seem to make the implication that New Zealand could have found a way to come up with a trade agreement that might have given us a lower tariff rate. "That might be true, but we have no idea what we would have had to give up to achieve that… some of what had to be given up by other countries to get a 15% tariffs rate is consequential – Japan and other countries had to give up to half a trillion dollars of further investment into the US." ADVERTISEMENT US President signs an executive order for new tariffs on a wide swath of US trading partners to go into effect in seven days. (Source: 1News) He said the impact on New Zealand's trading partners might not be as bad as had been expected, which should prove positive for the economy. "It will be slightly more challenging to export to the US from a New Zealand point of view, but our trading partner activity might not be hit as bad as was feared in April. That's probably a net benefit for us." Mike Jones, chief economist at BNZ, said the increase was not unexpected given indications of the past few weeks. "It's obviously unhelpful for NZ exports into the US, particularly how we line up with those coming from Australia and the UK, given the lower 10% baseline tariff rate for those countries. "Beef and wine exports could be affected. It's interesting in this context that we've seen the NZD/AUD exchange rate fall a little today in the wake of the announcements." 'Quite myopic' ADVERTISEMENT Cranes and shipping containers are seen at a port in Busan, South Korea, Thursday, July 31, 2025. (Source: Associated Press) Kelly Eckhold, chief economist at Westpac, said he thought New Zealand was in roughly the same position as in April. "On one hand, the tariff is higher, so there is a bigger direct cost, but it's a bit lower for a lot of our trading partners, so it's better for the economy than would otherwise be the case." He said how the lingering elements of uncertainty played out over the coming weeks would be important. "The legal basis of these tariffs, whether they're going to be able to continue or need to be replaced with a different type of tariff, is an issue. And the sectoral tariffs have not yet really been negotiated. "While I don't think these things affect the sort of goods New Zealand trades with the US, there may be some impact on our trading partners." He said it seemed strange that the US was calculating tariffs based on which countries exported more than they imported. ADVERTISEMENT "The concept that US authorities have had of countries ripping them off by selling more stuff to America than they're been buying is quite myopic. "We're only talking about goods trade here, we buy a lot of services from the US. "In large part, the trade imbalance is a cyclical rather than a structural story. "In the last few years, the economy has been relatively weak compared to the US. We're not sucking in as many imports, and the exchange rate has been lower than would normally be the case, which has encouraged export revenues. "I would have thought trade policy metrics like tariffs would be determined on the basis of structural, not cyclical factors. "All those things could easily be the other way around in a few years' time."

The Weekend: Oh no, it's starting to feel like 2021…
The Weekend: Oh no, it's starting to feel like 2021…

The Spinoff

time2 hours ago

  • The Spinoff

The Weekend: Oh no, it's starting to feel like 2021…

Madeleine Chapman reflects on the week that was. Usually I try my best not to think about being in lockdown for four months in 2021. It feels like a fever dream now but for a period there a whole million Aucklanders were collectively losing their minds and it felt like no one else, including the government, noticed or cared. And underneath the desperate chaos there was a genuine anger. It was anger at being condescended to, asked to 'do more' without any assurance that help was on the way. But that 2021 lockdown began four whole years ago (in August, even) and most of us are happy to leave it there. So I was surprised to find myself feeling nostalgic while reading Anna Rawhiti-Connell's satirical diatribe as the government's anger translator. A short, aggressive call to New Zealanders to toughen up and get to work. Evidently others felt something too as it's the most-read article of the week but why did it hit such a nerve? I think it's because there's a nihilistic humour in thinking you can simply talk people into doing anything, especially when it's virtually impossible for that thing to be achieved. I guess that's just politics 101 but Anna yelling at all of us to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps while also pointing out that most people can't afford boots really did echo the 2021 calls to just-stay-home-for-maybe-a-long-time-we're-not-sure-just-keep-doing-it-thanks. A tsunami emergency alert and a pandemic lockdown are very different circumstances but New Zealanders feeling deeply frustrated at being told to 'just deal with it' – whether it's Covid restrictions, an unaffordable cost of living or a hostile job market – is always the same. Being called dropkicks by the deputy prime minister is kind of funny when people are feeling secure in their jobs and homes. It's a lot less funny when many feel like they're the ones being constantly kicked. At any rate, it has never served a government well to try to shift blame or responsibility for the country's ills onto the people. Labour has still not recovered its support in Auckland after 2021. How many 'just suck it up and sort it out' calls will be one too many for New Zealanders? The stories Spinoff readers spent the most time with this week 'Fake news. No one's flush enough to waste a whole block of butter on lubing up a goat ' 'A couple of years ago, we had a Tūī in our neighbourhood singing Super Mario music. It was both hilarious and horrifying…'

Luxon to tell National faithful country is 'turning the corner'
Luxon to tell National faithful country is 'turning the corner'

RNZ News

time3 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Luxon to tell National faithful country is 'turning the corner'

Luxon to tell National faithful "we're turning the corner" National leader Christopher Luxon. Photo: RNZ / Nick Monro National Party members are gathering in Christchurch to cap off a week in which MPs attempted to steer public minds back towards the government's cost of living policies. Members will also farewell a party stalwart, with former president Peter Goodfellow retiring from National's board of directors. While leader Christopher Luxon will be speaking to the converted, he will be acutely aware the cost of living has become front of mind . Earlier this week, he was asked what his message to the party faithful would be. "Look, they know it's been a tough time, they know that we're turning the corner," Luxon said. "But really ... this country's got great potential and a great future ahead of it, and we've just got to keep working at it." National's deputy leader, Nicola Willis, said the conference would be focused on the steps the government was taking to make the country "an easier, better place to do business, to hire people, to create well paying jobs". "It is our job as a government not to moan about the things we can't control, but to focus on how we can make things better here in New Zealand, and we're very proud of the efforts we're making," she said. It is a stark contrast to this time last year, where Luxon's message ahead of the first conference since National returned to government was its focus on action and delivery . It shows just how much the cost of living crisis is lingering, and National has spent the week attempting to convince the public it has got it under control. With no announcement to make at this week's post-Cabinet press conference (bar the card surcharge ban, which had already been announced), Luxon and Willis gave a more than 10-minute address about the economy and cost of living, and actions the government had taken. "The most important thing we can do to make you better off is to double-down on our long-term economic plan," Luxon said. Willis used her speech to remind people of National's tax changes, FamilyBoost policy and a falling Official Cash Rate. It prompted Labour to accuse the government of "more spin than a front-load washing machine" . The latest Ipsos Issues Monitor has Labour in front of National as the party New Zealanders consider most able to handle the cost of living, despite releasing no substantive policy since the election. In 2023, National won 38.06 percent of the party vote, but since then has failed to poll above that. Recent polls have had National in the low thirties, with some showing the left bloc would have enough numbers to form a government. Other polls give the coalition the numbers to form a government, but only just. National party ministers will hold panels on health, education, law and order, agriculture, and the economy and cost of living. Members will also elect board positions. Long-serving board member and former party president Peter Goodfellow will be retiring from the board. Goodfellow was president from 2009 to 2022 before stepping down but remaining on the board. ANZCO Foods founder Sir Graeme Harrison, who joined the National board in 2021, has also decided to retire. Current board member Rachel Bird is up for re-election. Under National's constitution and rules, board members serve three years and then retire. They can then be eligible for re-election. Craig Carr, Andrew von Dadelszen and Edgar Wilson have also put their names forward for the vacancies. Party president Sylvia Wood and board members Jannita Pilisi, Stefan Sunde and David Ryan are not up for re-election, and so will remain on the board. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store