logo
Budapest Pride: Unprecedented crowd defies Hungarian government at 'illegal' march

Budapest Pride: Unprecedented crowd defies Hungarian government at 'illegal' march

Yahooa day ago

Well over a hundred thousand people marched in the Budapest Pride march organised by the NGO Rainbow Mission and city hall, despite the government's ban, standing up for the rights of the LGBTQ+ community as well as for freedom of assembly, and against the Hungarian government's policies.
In the spring, the Hungarian ruling parties attempted to ban the annual regular human rights march of the LGBTQ community through a series of constitutional and legislative amendments on the grounds that it violates the rights of children, which they have put above other fundamental rights by amending the constitution.
The police rejected the application for a permit by the NGOs that usually organise Pride in the past, at which time the Mayor of Budapest, Gergely Karácsony, announced that another event, the Budapest Pride march, would be held as a municipal event, because the municipality is not subject to the law on assembly and therefore, according to their interpretation of the law, does not need to apply for a permit to hold the event.
The police called the event illegal and warned that participants could face fines and organisers up to one year in prison. Despite this, a huge crowd turned out.
"I feel we have to stand up now, if we don't speak out now we may never have the chance to do so again," one participant told Euronews.
"We're not that political, we really just want to be free, and this is how we can be free, by coming out and standing up for ourselves," a young couple told us.
There was concern before the event that police had allowed counter-demonstrations by several far-right groups on the route of the march, but in the event, they were separated from the Pride march and their presence did not cause any disruption. Although the Our Homeland counter-demonstrators blocked the Freedom Bridge on the original route of the march, they were surrounded by police on both sides while Pride participants crossed the Elisabeth Bridge.
"What is happening here is completely illegal, it is endangering the healthy development of children, and I find it very sad that the police are not stopping this process," Tamás Gaudi-Nagy, executive director of the National Legal Defence Service, told Euronews. "While the national radical organisations have been restricted in their demonstrations, as they have been for many years, the protesters of Our Homeland have not been allowed to cross the Liberty Bridge."
The march was joined by more than 70 members of the European Parliament and several mayors from various European capitals.
One of the organisers of the event, Budapest Mayor Gergely Karácsony, who has been threatened with jail by the Hungarian government's justice minister, said in his speech:
"If you can ban a Pride event in a European Union member state, then no mayor in Europe is safe, and today, by so many of you coming, you have made Budapest the capital of Europe for this day."
Karácsony said that the participants "showed a big gesture to the powers that be", while at the same time he also took a swipe at Péter Magyar, the leader of the strongest opposition party, Tisza, who did not participate in the march and only cautiously posted a message of support on social media without mentioning the name of the event.
The mayor said that they would not vote for just anyone in the election against the powers that be. They will support whoever they can rightly expect to make Hungary their common home again.
According to the police, to whom Karácsony nevertheless gave special thanks, they had a lot of trouble with what they thought was an illegal gathering, and blamed the organisers for not co-operating with them. However, by 20:00, a total of only 36 people had been stopped and only two people had been arrested - one for hooliganism and one for possession of drugs - meaning that Budapest Pride ended with literally no major incidents.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ECB Strategy Fixes Help Avoid ‘False Certainty,' Lagarde Says
ECB Strategy Fixes Help Avoid ‘False Certainty,' Lagarde Says

Bloomberg

time22 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

ECB Strategy Fixes Help Avoid ‘False Certainty,' Lagarde Says

Tweaks to the European Central Bank's strategy unveiled Monday will allow policymakers to deliver more nuanced communication in an increasing unpredictable world, President Christine Lagarde said. 'Our updated strategy commits to ensuring that our policy decisions account not only for the most likely path of inflation and the economy, but also for the surrounding risks and uncertainty — including through the appropriate use of scenario and sensitivity analyses,' she said.

Starmer's Welfare Overhaul Hangs in Balance Ahead of Key Vote
Starmer's Welfare Overhaul Hangs in Balance Ahead of Key Vote

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Starmer's Welfare Overhaul Hangs in Balance Ahead of Key Vote

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is girding for what could be the most consequential vote of his premiership, with Labour rebels warning that the government's welfare overhaul still risks defeat despite huge concessions to push it through parliament. Starmer spent Monday trying to persuade skeptics in his left-leaning party to back a revised package of reforms to disability benefits that he says are necessary to slow the pace of Britain's ballooning welfare costs and get people back to work. Some of the party's Members of Parliament said they weren't satisfied by sweeping last-minute changes offered by the prime minister last week at an estimated cost of £3 billion ($4.1 billion) to the Treasury.

Transgender-Rights Rulings Warrant New Look, Supreme Court Says
Transgender-Rights Rulings Warrant New Look, Supreme Court Says

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Transgender-Rights Rulings Warrant New Look, Supreme Court Says

(Bloomberg) -- The US Supreme Court ordered reconsideration of rulings backing transgender rights in clashes over health care and birth certificates, while holding off saying whether the justices will take up a polarizing fight over sports participation in their next term. Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center The actions Monday came in a lengthy list of orders as the court disposed of dozens of appeals in the wind-down to its nine-month term. The reconsideration orders follow a June 18 ruling that let Tennessee and other states ban transgender minors from getting puberty blockers, hormone treatments and surgery. The justices told a federal appeals court to revisit its ruling that state-sponsored health plans in North Carolina and West Virginia are unconstitutional because they refuse coverage for transgender care. The North Carolina case involves the exclusion of a number of treatments in its health plan for state employees, while the West Virginia fight concerns a surgery ban in the Medicaid insurance program for the low-income and disabled. The cases are Folwell v. Kadel, 24-99, and Crouch v. Anderson, 24-90. The Supreme Court also said a different appeals court should take a fresh look at a decision allowing a lawsuit over Idaho's refusal to pay for surgeries under its Medicaid program. The case is Hamso v. M.H., 24-631. In each instance, the Supreme Court said the appellate judges should take into account the 6-3 Tennessee ruling, which said the state's treatment ban comported with the Constitution's equal protection guarantee. The justices also told an appeals court to take a fresh look at a ruling that said Oklahoma could be sued for barring people from getting amended birth certificates consistent with their gender identity. The state allowed amended birth certificates for 14 years before Republican Governor Kevin Stitt changed the policy in 2021. The case is Stitt v. Fowler, 24-801. The high court deferred acting on appeals by three states defending laws that categorically ban transgender girls and women from competing for their schools on female athletic teams. Federal appeals courts barred Idaho, West Virginia and Arizona from enforcing their bans against students who sued. The Supreme Court's silence leaves open the possibility the justices will take up at least one of the state appeals when they issue another list of orders on Thursday. The cases are Little v. Hecox, 24-38; West Virginia v. B.P.J., 24-43; and Petersen v. Doe, 24-449. The court also formally turned away a second line of argument LGBTQ families had pressed against the Tennessee ban. The families contended the law also violated the constitutional right of parents to make decisions concerning the medical care for their children. The case is L.W. v. Skrmetti, 23-466. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate Does a Mamdani Victory and Bezos Blowback Mean Billionaires Beware? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store