Another important green space could be lost under plan for 300 new homes in Littleover
Ainscough Strategic Land has launched a public consultation on its plans to build approximately 335 'much-needed' houses next to Moorway Lane in Littleover. The company has launched a website detailing its plans before a formal planning application is submitted to Derby City Council.
The Nottingham-based firm says the site currently consists mainly of grassland fields with no public access. Its surrounding land includes residential development to the west and the Millennium Wood nature haven to the north.
READ MORE: City centre takeaway temporarily closed after prayer mat stored on food prep surface
READ MORE: Trentbarton wants to demolish its Derby bus depot
Join us on WhatsApp to get the latest news straight to your phone
It says the application site lies within the southern part of the Littleover/Sunnyhill Green Wedge. Green wedges are spaces which separate suburbs in Derby and form an important part of the city council's planning policy – as was evidenced in the recent planning inquiry for new homes in Spondon for which the council lost.
The company state the new development will involve the creation of new access points from Moorway Lane for pedestrians and cyclists, providing links to the existing footpath and cycle network. Additionally new roads from Moorway Lane are proposed to accommodate the "increased anticipated traffic movements ensuring safe and efficient access to the site'.
Ainscough Strategic Land says on its website: 'The design of the proposals has carefully considered the potential impact on the Green Wedge, with built development focused on the western part of the site to preserve its overall width. A landscaped buffer is included along the southern and eastern edges of the site to further protect its character.
'This development will assist in addressing the shortfall in housing that has been identified by Derby City Council. National policy requires the council demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, however the latest published position is just 3.85 years, and as a result the policies most important for the determination of planning applications are out of date. This shortfall will need to be addressed through the provision of new residential sites across the city, such as the land east of Moorway Lane.'
Residents have until Monday, July 14, to submit their views online or by post. But the pre-application plans have already caused concern.
Read more - City takeaway temporarily closed after prayer mat stored on food prep surface
An online petition titled 'Stop development threatening Millennium Woods Area, Littleover' has raised 355 signatures at the time of writing. The petition has been launched by community organisation Greener Littleover.
There is concern building new homes will threaten the biodiversity of the "beloved" Millenium Woods area next to where the homes could be built. It says: "This tranquil area not only offers a refuge for a wide variety of wildlife, but it also serves as a green escape for community members seeking tranquillity away from urban chaos. The development will completely surround this nature haven.
It adds: 'Millennium Woods is home to an array of biodiversity, playing a crucial role in maintaining ecological balance. This year newts have been spotted in Millennium Pond. Such nearby developments pose a significant threat by potentially displacing numerous species that over the years have found safety within its lush expanse.'
The petition can be seen here – https://www.change.org/p/stop-development-threatening-millennium-woods-area-littleover?
The Local Democracy Reporting Service has approached the petition author for further comment. To take part in the public consultation or for further information visit - https://www.moorwaylane-derby.co.uk/

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Amid AI boom, veteran analyst reboots AMD, Supermicro stock price targets
Nvidia (NVDA) stock typically hogs all the AI spotlight, but if you look at the bigger picture, two other names deserve a deeper look. AMD (AMD) and Super Micro Computer (SMCI) stock have been silently positioning themselves at the heart of AI's next big upgrade cycle. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The former is pushing for new GPUs to hyperscalers, desperate for an alternative, while the latter is building the racks that make all that horsepower usable at scale. With that said, a bold and fresh analyst take this week shows why these tech giants are poised to chip away at Nvidia's massive lead. Image source: Cheng/Getty Images One thing is clear from recent weeks: Nvidia's AI crown isn't as untouchable as it looks on paper. AMD, in particular, has been showing that it isn't content playing second fiddle. CEO Lisa Su recently dropped a bombshell at the company's big "Advancing AI" event, unveiling the new Instinct MI350 series. These powerful new GPUs are built to supercharge AI, delivering up to four times more compute performance and a 35× boost in inference. More importantly, the top AI juggernauts in Meta, Microsoft, and OpenAI are already kicking the tires on these chips. That shows the bellwethers in the hyperscaler space are itching for a serious Nvidia alternative. Related: Cathie Wood makes surprising chip bet as AI battle heats up While AMD fires up the accelerator race, Supermicro is locking down the racks to run them. Though it was primarily a key player in motherboards and chassis, Supermicro now considers itself a leading hyperscale AI systems powerhouse. Last month, Saudi-based DataVolt signed a jaw-dropping $20 billion multi-year deal to deploy Supermicro's liquid-cooled GPU racks across AI campuses in Saudi Arabia and the U.S. Such an enormous order indicates that Supermicro's modular, dense, and energy-efficient designs are critical in powering AI mega-centers. Nvidia still calls the shots in the AI space, but AMD's MI350X ramp and Supermicro's hyperscale push highlight room for major competition. More Tech Stock News: Analyst reboots IonQ stock price target for surprising reasonApple could make big change to Siri, delight fansVeteran analyst issues big Broadcom call, shakes up AI stock race And with the MI400 series and Helios AI Rack on deck for next year, it's clear AMD and Supermicro are gunning to rewrite the script on AI. Mizuho's latest bullish note shows how AMD and Supermicro offer strong upside for chipmakers looking to feed AI's insatiable compute appetite. Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh stuck with his Outperform call on AMD stock but raised his 12-month price target to $152 from $135. That implies a 10.2% bump from Thursday's close at $137.91 and a 12.6% increase from the previous price target. Rakesh called out a "slightly better MI355X ramp" in the second half of this year. That's huge, considering the new Instinct series is arguably AMD's most promising play at challenging Nvidia's AI accelerator dominance. Hyperscalers want alternatives, and AMD's open-standard hardware is firmly on their radars. Related: Analyst reboots AMD stock price target on chip update Still, Mizuho didn't sugarcoat everything. It left its near-term numbers mostly unchanged, keeping the June-quarterly sales forecast at $7.40 billion and EPS at 47 cents, both just shy of consensus. For the full year, Rakesh has trimmed its EPS slightly to $3.90. Nevertheless, the real story is what happens next, with AMD's robust margin mix and high-end AI chips offsetting any short-term softness. Over at Supermicro, Rakesh sees plenty to like, too. He nudged his price target to $47 from $40, a healthy 17.5% bump, while keeping a Neutral rating. The veteran analyst believes the demand for AI servers is running hot. Sizeable shipments for Tier-2 Microsoft Azure partners, plus a steady drumbeat of orders for Supermicro's liquid-cooled GPU, point to an excellent runway ahead. Also, Rakesh models the Saudi Arabia DataVolt deal, adding $2.5 billion in annual sales starting next year, highlighting a massive ramp-up in top-line expansion. Related: Google's quiet AI win spells trouble for Amazon The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump can't give up the fight against foreign meddling in US tech
President Donald Trump last month got Canada to kill a blatantly unfair tax on US-based companies, but the fight against foreign meddling in America's tech industry has a long way to go. Canada's Digital Services Tax was set to slap companies like Google, Meta, Amazon, Uber and Airbnb with a 3% levy on revenue from Canadian users — until Trump canceled trade talks over what he rightly slammed as an 'egregious' move. Prime Minister Mark Carney promptly nixed the fee hours before it would've kicked in. Good: The tax was a shameless cash grab at the expense of American companies — and it was retroactive, demanding US-based tech firms fork over a whopping $2 billion. Note that the Biden administration also opposed the tax, and even whined that it might violate the USMCA trade agreement — but did nothing to actually stop it. Making Carney back down is fresh proof that Trump's big-stick trade tactics can work — and work to protect cutting-edge knowledge-based industries, not just brick-and-mortar manufacturing. It also shows that, despite all the ink spilled over Elon Musk's tiff with Trump, the tech industry still has plenty of reason to stay friendly with the administration. Especially since, as the prez pointed out on TruthSocial, Canada was just seeking to copy the European Union, which shamelessly uses its Digital Markets and Digital Services Acts to fill its coffers and bend US tech to its will. Six of seven tech companies the European Commission has highlighted as 'gatekeepers' to be reined in are American: Google, Apple, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft and The EU has already hit Apple and Meta this year with massive fines for allegedly breaking the Digital Markets Act's antitrust rules. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Far worse: The Digital Services Act chills free expression by threatening steep financial repercussions against companies that allow speech that the EU considers 'disinformation,' 'hate speech' or threats to 'civil discourse' — concepts so nebulous that it's hard to see how companies can comply without stomping on the First Amendment. It's beyond unacceptable for Brussels to determine what Americans can say on American–owned sites. The EU's legal harassment of US-based tech firms is so egregious that Trump aide Peter Navarro slammed it as 'lawfare' in April. These 'fines' are basically tariffs by another name — milking successful American companies by creating strict regulations that target them especially. Canada clearly meant to get its own slice of that pie, only for Trump to slap down Ottowa's grasping hand. Making the Europeans back off should be high on the president's agenda as he starts his next tariff offensive. Don't let America's trade partners reap the benefits of our thriving, innovative tech industry while spitting on the free-speech and free-market ideals that make it possible.


The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Democrats might be ‘overthinking' strategy to recapture voters
Democrats are rethinking ways to recapture voters they've lost to President Trump in recent election cycles, and they may have been offered an important lesson in the New York mayoral primary. In various post-mortems and focus groups done on the heels of their devastating 2024 election loss, Democrats have thoroughly examined exit polls and voter demographics in search of the gaps in their party's appeal. But Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha, who served as a senior adviser on Sen. Bernie Sanders's (I-Vt.) presidential campaign in 2020, said Democrats are 'overthinking' the solution by analyzing the voters who flipped sides or skipped voting during the last election. 'It's more simple than that,' Rocha said. 'Just concentrate on people who are frustrated as hell and get both of them.' Rocha pointed to the New York mayoral race as proof. He says progressive upstart-turned-party nominee Zohran Mamdani (D) was able to capture voters — including those who did not vote a few months ago in the presidential election — by talking about affordability and other tangible economic issues that appealed to them. Rocha said voters 'want anything that's different' from the status quo when it comes to the cost of living. 'It shows how desperate people are,' he said. While many Democrats disagree with Mamdani's politics, they say the campaign he ran shows the unwavering preeminence of economic issues. And Trump taught the same lesson in 2024, political observers say, by telling voters what they wanted to hear on the economy and his message on 'draining the swamp.' 'Donald Trump and Zohran Mamdani just showed, in very different elections, that economic issues are still king — and that you can appeal to a wide, bipartisan swath of voters by saying you'll bring down the cost of living,' said Democratic strategist Christy Setzer. 'Working-class voters have been drifting away from the Democratic Party on so-called 'cultural' issues for a long time, but they're still very gettable through a clear message and from a compelling messenger.' According to exit polls, Democrats in 2024 lost significant ground with middle-class voters, a cornerstone of their traditional base, down 10 percentage points from 2020. At the same time, there is a decreasing sense of strong party leadership and little optimism about the party's future, respective CNN/SSRS and AP/NORC polling out in May revealed. But Mamdani, a self-proclaimed democratic socialist, took aim at the Democratic establishment, calling for draining the swamp to make room for change. It was an echo of Trump's messaging in his 2024 campaign. 'Donald Trump was successful because … he wasn't afraid to be against and call out people in his own party and other parties,' said Susan Del Percio, a longtime New York-based Republican strategist who does not support Trump. 'Mamdani was the exact same. He was calling out everybody, and then that's when you get to act with no fear.' Mamandi strayed from the Democratic establishment with a clear message of affordability and came out on top in a crowded and competitive primary. Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Mamdani's only serious competition, ran on a message of protecting New York City from Trump. But the New York City electorate is drastically different from the rest of the country, political observers say, noting someone like Mamdani may not appeal to moderates and centrists. 'Being a self-proclaimed democratic socialist … doesn't play in swing districts. It plays in New York City primaries,' Del Percio said. 'The Democratic candidates have to look more like Elissa Slotkin talking about the cost of living than they do Mamdani talking about the cost of living.' Realizing they need to do more to appeal to the middle class, Democrats across the country have begun to put forward plans and back legislation to regain lost ground. Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) recently came out with her 'Economic War Plan,' the goals of which, she has said, are to reconnect the Democratic Party with the middle class. At the same time, Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) signed a bill this week overhauling California's environmental protection laws to accelerate much-needed housing construction in the state. In the name of bringing down the cost of living, Newsom's move goes against a history of California Democrats unconditionally defending the state's environmental protection laws. But the New York race gave some Democrats an injection of hope that their party was starting to turn things around after the crushing loss last year. 'We have proof now, and the proof is the NYC mayor's race,' Rocha said. Mamdani won 'the same precincts in New York City where Donald Trump overperformed in the general election,' he explained. Democratic strategist Jamal Simmons said while not every voter is gettable, 'a lot of them are,' and he said some of the people who supported Trump are Democrats who simply found Trump's message more compelling than the Democratic ticket in the 2024 race. 'Voters are not captive to any political party,' Simmons added. 'They have agency. They get to make their own choices, and if politicians aren't speaking to them, they'll look elsewhere.'