Stretched services leaving psychiatrists ‘in emotional and ethical distress'
It comes as a survey of RCPsych members found almost three-quarters felt they had made decisions to admit or discharge people based on factors other than what is in the patient's best interests.
According to Dr Smith, 'long-term underinvestment and a failure to follow an evidence-based approach has led to an erosion of standards in the mental health system'.
She will add: 'Despite this, mental health staff across the NHS continue to provide outstanding care in the face of unprecedented demand and workforce pressures.
'Psychiatrists are committed to providing expert and timely treatment that prevents people entering mental health crisis.
'But the reality is that current targets are not based on patient outcomes. Pressures that override clinical judgment, combined with inadequate inpatient and community provision, are damaging the very foundations of compassionate, therapeutic and holistic care.
'Repeated failure to attend to the pressures facing mental health services mean that provisions are now so threadbare that psychiatrists are having to make life and death decisions based on financial rather than clinical concerns.
'At worst, these systemic pressures prevent clinicians from delivering the care they know is needed, risking people becoming more unwell, resulting in greater risk of mental health crisis and increased risk of suicide. This is causing deep distress and moral injury among psychiatrists.'
Of the 860 RCPsych members who completed the survey in England, 73% felt they had made decisions to admit or discharge patients based on factors outside clinical need.
Meanwhile, more than eight in 10 (81%) said they had experienced feelings of guilt, shame, burnout and frustration over these decisions.
Members said a lack of investment in community mental health services lead to more patients going into crisis, while a lack of affordable housing is causing delayed discharges.
Almost half (47%) of those who responded to the survey said they are facing delays in admitting or treating people because of a lack of local capacity.
Dr Smith will add: 'These findings paint a stark picture of longstanding systemic issues in the way mental health services are currently commissioned and delivered.'
She said the upcoming 10 Year Health Plan 'presents the perfect opportunity' for the Government to outline a 'clear ambition for the prevention and treatment of serious mental illness'.
'Alongside this, we need to see an updated long-term workforce plan with a recommitment to double medical school places as well as bolder promises to retain the workforce and increase specialty training places,' Dr Smith will tell delegates.
An NHS spokesperson, said: 'The pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation's mental health with NHS staff treating a million more people now than we did in 2019, which is why we've drastically expanded access and boosted our mental health workforce by over 40,000 staff.
'We know more needs to be done to increase access to inpatient services, which is why we are working with the Government on the upcoming NHS 10 year-plan to create a service that is better for patients and is fit for the future.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Heart attack alert as 5m Brits living undiagnosed with 'silent killer' condition
Failing to diagnose and treat this condition risks creating a 'powder keg' of future ill health, according to the British Heart Foundation. Health experts have warned that around five million Brits living with an undiagnosed 'silent killer' condition are at risk of heart attacks and strokes. It is estimated that millions of people in the UK currently have high blood pressure, but aren't aware. Also known as hypertension, high blood pressure is a condition where the force of your blood against your artery walls is consistently too high. Over time this can cause damage to the blood vessels as well as organs. It is also a key contributing factor to many serious medical issues. However, it typically doesn't appear with any symptoms - earning it the nickname as a "silent killer". In an update provided by the British Heart Foundation (BHF) as many as 125,000 heart attacks and strokes could be prevented in the coming decade by finding and treating the millions of people with undiagnosed high blood pressure in the UK,. The charity warned that failing to do so risks creating a 'powder keg' of future ill health that threatens to 'devastate families' and pile 'unsustainable pressure' on the NHS. Around half of heart attacks and strokes are linked to high blood pressure condition, it said. The BHF said: 'Of the 16 million adults in the UK estimated to have high blood pressure, up to half are not receiving effective treatment, our latest estimates show. As many as five million are estimated to have undiagnosed high blood pressure.' It is now calling on the UK to 'reimagine how it prevents cardiovascular disease' through research and innovation. Professor Bryan Williams, chief scientific and medical officer at the BHF, said: 'Huge gains can be made by reimagining how we detect and treat common risk factors for cardiovascular disease such high blood pressure. "But at the moment, millions of people are still living undiagnosed with these conditions, which raise the risk of serious illness such as heart attack and stroke – this is a powder keg for the nation's future health, so making sure these people are identified and treated is critical. 'Such change is within our grasp – years of medical advances mean we have highly effective, evidence-based treatments to treat high blood pressure. This is one of the many tools we have to stop heart disease before it starts, but we must get more effective at identifying those at risk and treating them. "Moreover, we must change the way we approach disease prevention, making it more convenient to access and by using cutting edge science and technology to more precisely identify and effectively treat people at risk, so that serious illness is avoided in the first place.' What is considered to be high blood pressure? The only way to be sure if your blood pressure is too high is to get it tested. You can do this either with an at-home kit or by asking your GP or pharmacist. Blood pressure readings are given as two numbers, with the first number higher than the second (for example, 130/80). According to the NHS, if you're under 80 years of age, you're usually considered to have high blood pressure if your reading is either: 140/90 or higher when checked by a healthcare professional 135/85 or higher when checked at home If you're aged 80 or over, you're usually considered to have high blood pressure if your reading is either: 150/90 or higher when checked by a healthcare professional 145/85 or higher when checked at home To lower your blood pressure, the NHS recommends you: Have a healthy, balanced diet Exercise regularly – aim to do at least 150 minutes of exercise a week Lose weight if you're overweight Do not eat too much salt – avoid salty food or adding salt to your meals Do not drink too much alcohol – avoid drinking more than 14 alcohol units a week on a regular basis Do not drink too much caffeine – drinks high in caffeine include coffee, tea and cola Do not smoke If you're concerned about your blood pressure, you should speak to your GP.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Britons ‘cheating the system' to get fat jabs for holiday, says Streeting
Britons are ' cheating the system ' to use weight-loss jabs before their holidays, Wes Streeting has claimed. The Health Secretary claimed people are pretending to be overweight so that they could get hold of jabs like Mounjaro and Wegovy, which is also sold as Ozempic to treat diabetes. He said the Government was looking at how to prevent people who do not need the jabs getting hold of them as people continue to exaggerate their size to get hold of the drugs. 'I was reading some stuff today about the number of younger people, so it was 16-to-24-year-olds. Now if they're overweight, no problem. If it's with good clinical diagnosis and supervision, no problem,' he told the the Politics Inside Out podcast. 'But I think we what we are seeing is a lot of people cheating the system online and making out they're bigger than they are because there are a lot of people who maybe want to lose a few pounds before they go on holiday, who are jabbing.' Mr Streeting added that considering issues around body image and eating disorders, exacerbated by platforms like Instagram, 'we have just got to be a bit careful about that side of this'. He continued: 'And so while I am very enthusiastic about this approach and we will scale them up on the NHS, not least because I really hate the idea that those who can afford it are benefiting and those who can't are being left behind – that goes against our Labour values – I've also got to mitigate against some of the risks, and so we're looking at all of that in the round.' The warning comes despite the General Pharmaceutical Council, the pharmacy regulator, introducing stricter checks earlier this year. Online pharmacies were told they could no longer dispense the medications to patients who have just completed online questionnaires or sent photos. They will will instead require in-person or video consultations to verify patient body mass index (BMI), along with information from GP or medical records. It is estimated some 1.5 million Britons are currently on the medications, and the overwhelming majority are accessing them privately through online pharmacies. Weight-loss drugs, which were initially licensed for Type 2 diabetes, are technically known as GLP-1 receptor agonists. The medications work by mimicking a hormone that regulates blood sugar levels, but they also suppress appetite, which makes people feel fuller, sooner. And by eating less, patients can lose weight. However, doctors and health officials have sounded the alarm about the number of people who are not obese taking the drugs, and suffering complications as a result. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) stressed that the drugs are only meant for treating obesity and diabetes. While most side effects are mild, some can be serious, the MHRA warned, with more than one in 10 users experiencing gastrointestinal side effects, such as vomiting or diarrhoea. It said while these were not usually serious, it could cause severe dehydration, and urged those on the drugs to keep well hydrated throughout treatment.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Should higher earners pay to use the NHS?
A report by the International Monetary Fund has called on the British government to consider charging those on high incomes to use the NHS. The report suggested that in the face of 'tough fiscal choices' facing the chancellor, 'access to public service could depend more on an individual's capacity to pay'. We ask two experts whether this idea could work. The country can no longer afford to provide healthcare to everyone free at the point of use. It is time for middle and high-earners to start paying. Nye Bevan's ambition was laudable. However, taxpayer-funded spending on healthcare has reached levels that were unimaginable in the 1940s. It is now the equivalent of the entire GDP of Portugal. These taxes not only place a heavy burden on households and firms, they also act as a disincentive towards productive activities and dampen economic growth. In Policy Exchange's report, The NHS — a Suitable Case for Treatment?, we showed that not only is the NHS incredibly expensive, it is also producing far worse outcomes for patients compared with other advanced economies. It ranks second from bottom for healthy life expectancy and preventable and treatable mortality. We need to make sure that healthcare funding is sustainable while maintaining the principle of universality to ensure that those on modest incomes still get free healthcare. People with middle and high incomes should start paying for certain services. For example, there should be a £20 fee for a GP appointment, as well as a charge for certain elective procedures. Free prescriptions and sight and hearing tests for the over-60s should also be abolished. However, all these services should remain free for people on low incomes. • Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts Of course, we should not adopt the failed US system, which is not only far more expensive but also leaves many people uninsured and with worse outcomes. Instead, the UK should follow the example of most other European countries and shift to a mixed-funding model. In these countries citizens are required to have health insurance, which is supplemented by co-payments and charges, meaning that wealthier patients who can pay do. Their systems are sustainable, produce better patient outcomes, and ensure that those on low incomes and vulnerable people have access to healthcare. Such a shift would be radical, but it is necessary. It has the potential to lower costs, reduce the burden on taxpayers, and improve patient outcomes. It is the only way that we can ensure that the NHS is there for us today and in the future. The British Social Attitudes survey, which has been conducted every year since 1983, makes grim reading for the NHS, but reports of its death are greatly exaggerated. While only 21 per cent of respondents are satisfied with the way the NHS is run, more than 90 per cent support its central tenet: free at the point of need. People are committed to the principle that everybody, no matter how rich or poor, should have access to treatment, even when dissatisfied with the performance of the NHS. We want our healthcare system to mirror us as a nation united: the last remnants of Blitz spirit and post-war consensus. I can think of little that would sow the seeds of discontent across our fractured nation faster than implementing a policy that can only bring about a two-tier healthcare system. Allowing hospitals to charge higher earners is tailor-made for perverse incentives that distort inequalities. Given the present financial crisis, what chief executive would not prioritise the patient who could provide income, even if the clinical need between two patients was equal? And what would it do to trust in the NHS when patients don't know whether their delayed operation is due to clinical need or the size of their wallet? • Hospital funding will be tied to patient ratings in NHS overhaul Hospitals in affluent areas already have recruitment advantages. Revenue generation enables investment in staff, equipment, and facilities, leaving the rest to slip even further behind. This ultimately widens the equality gap for those in disadvantaged communities who are most reliant on free healthcare. Finally, could this be successful? Do we want our cash-strapped NHS to waste resources on hiring marketeers to compete for private demand rather than developing the health prevention messages critical to reducing future costs? I say this as a great supporter of the NHS. No healthcare system is perfect, but few have principles such as 'free at the point of use' held in such high esteem by its users. It is a principle that many other nations look at with envy. So, no, the state should not overreach itself by getting richer to pay to use the NHS. Ill-conceived plans like this would sound the death knell for our greatest public institution.
