logo
Bombay high court sets July hearing to reconsider challenges to Maratha reservation law

Bombay high court sets July hearing to reconsider challenges to Maratha reservation law

Time of India11-06-2025
MUMBAI: A special three-judge bench of the Bombay High Court on Wednesday set July 18 as the date it would start hearing afresh the challenges to the state's latest iteration of the Maratha reservations.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
After the Supreme Court directive, the HC in May constituted a new three-judge bench to hear petitions, including those filed as public interest litigation (PIL), challenging the constitutional validity of the 2024 law providing Maratha reservation.
The state opposed the request for consideration of any interim relief.
The HC is faced with a clutch of petitions that assailed the Socially and Educationally Backward Classes Act, 2024 (SEBC), which gives 10 percent reservation to the Marathas in public employment.
The new full bench of Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge, Justice N. J. Jamadar, and Justice Sandeep Marne recorded submissions of Advocate General Birendra Saraf.
There were detailed arguments heard in 2024 on interim relief, after which there was an interim arrangement that all further admissions to educational institutions and employment would be subject to the orders of the court. He submitted that this has operated for over a year and that the request for fresh consideration of interim relief was unwarranted.
Pradeep Sancheti, senior counsel for a petitioner challenging the constitutional validity of GR, sought an earlier date. Other lawyers also argued, saying students who took admission last year were also affected and hence were seeking interim orders.
The top court last month asked the HC to expeditiously hear the pleas, including applications by students appearing for the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) undergraduate and postgraduate exams of 2025.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The students filed pleas seeking interim relief, claiming that a delay in the disposal of pleas was impacting their right to equal consideration in the admission process.
The petitions in the matter were not fully heard when the former Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court was transferred in January this year as the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court. The High Court must consider the issue of interim relief without delay due to the wide-reaching impact of the case on students who are currently undergoing the admission process, the Supreme Court said.
Last July, the High Court observed that the Maharashtra state backward class commission, headed by the former High Court Judge, Justice S. B. Shukre, was a necessary party to be heard in one of the PILs filed before it against the validity of the Maratha reservations.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NCERT Class 8 book calls Babur 'ruthless', Akbar's rule 'brutal, tolerant'
NCERT Class 8 book calls Babur 'ruthless', Akbar's rule 'brutal, tolerant'

Business Standard

time21 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

NCERT Class 8 book calls Babur 'ruthless', Akbar's rule 'brutal, tolerant'

In the latest edition of NCERT's Class 8 Social Science textbook, Babur is described as a 'ruthless conqueror', Akbar's rule is said to combine 'brutality and tolerance', and Aurangzeb is labelled a 'military ruler' who re-imposed taxes on non-Muslims. The revised text aims to encourage students to think critically about the complexities of India's medieval history, including its grandeurs and violence, news agency PTI reported. Titled 'Exploring Society: India and Beyond', the book is part of NCERT's updated curriculum aligned with the National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCFSE) 2023. It shifts the entire timeline of topics like the Delhi Sultanate, the Mughals, the Marathas, and the colonial period to Class 8. These subjects were previously taught in Class 7, PTI reported. At the start of the book is a section titled 'Note on Some Darker Periods in History', which explains the inclusion of sensitive historical content. It urges students to view violent past events — such as wars and invasions — with context and objectivity, stating, 'No one should be held responsible today for events of the past.' The chapter 'Reshaping India's Political Map' covers Indian history from the 13th to the 17th century, including the Delhi Sultanate, the Vijayanagara Empire, the Mughal Empire, and various forms of resistance. Babur is described as 'brutal and ruthless, slaughtering entire populations', while Aurangzeb is noted for temple and gurdwara destruction and for reviving the jiziya tax. Akbar's reign, though praised for religious tolerance, is also marked by harsh events like the killing of 30,000 civilians during the Chittorgarh siege. The book also reinterprets jiziya tax as a source of social humiliation and financial pressure, encouraging conversion to Islam. In earlier editions, the tax was explained more neutrally, PTI reported. While the Mughal and Sultanate sections portray a grim period in history, the textbook also celebrates resistance movements and resilient leaders. It includes stories of the Marathas, Ahoms, Rajputs, and Sikhs. Leaders like Shivaji, Tarabai, and Ahilyabai Holkar are described as visionary figures. Shivaji is hailed as a strategic leader who upheld Hindu values while respecting other faiths. Michel Danino, head of NCERT's Social Science curriculum group, denied any intent to vilify Mughals. Union Minister of State BL Verma supported the content, saying, 'The next generation should learn about what all happened. We should accept the truth.' Mughals, Sultanate dropped from NCERT textbooks The new Class 7 NCERT Social Science textbook has completely removed references to the Mughals and the Delhi Sultanate. Instead, it now features chapters on ancient Indian dynasties such as the Magadha, Mauryas, Shungas, and Satavahanas, along with themes like sacred geography and the Maha Kumbh. Government initiatives like Make in India and 'Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao' have also been included. Designed as per the National Education Policy and NCFSE 2023, the book aims to reflect Indian traditions and knowledge systems. Earlier, during syllabus rationalisation in 2022-23, NCERT had already reduced Mughal-related content significantly.

Sharad Pawar looks outside family, picks low-key Maratha leader for Maharashtra chief
Sharad Pawar looks outside family, picks low-key Maratha leader for Maharashtra chief

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Sharad Pawar looks outside family, picks low-key Maratha leader for Maharashtra chief

With the appointment of Shashikant Shinde, seen to be a non-controversial, low-key Maratha leader from Western Maharashtra as its state unit chief, the NCP (Sharadchandra Pawar) has signalled its intent to regain its presence in its traditional strongholds. A Mathadi (porter) union leader, 61-year-old Shinde hails from Satara and will take over from Jayant Patil, the party's longest serving state president and a fellow Maratha leader from neighbouring Sangli district. After his appointment, Shinde, who is the leader of the Mathadi community in the Navi Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), visited the union's office. 'I paid my respects to the late (Mathadi union leader) Annasaheb Patil, who has guided me and showed me the way forward,' he said. Shinde also assured that he would work 'day and night' to build the NCP (SP) so that 'it could reclaim power'. 'There is a huge political vacuum that needs to be filled by the Opposition. I am sure that the people of Maharashtra will come to us in large numbers if we stand strong as an organisation. It is a great honour that someone like me, who comes from a simple background, climbed up the political ladder and is now given the opportunity to lead the party,' he said. While Shinde's appointment has put to rest speculation that the party would appoint a member of the Pawar family as the state chief, it also signals party president Sharad Pawar's intent on restructuring and rebuilding the NCP (SP) to regain ground, which it had ceded to Ajit Pawar post the split in 2023. An MLC since 2020, Shinde had been seen as close to Ajit and served as Minister of State for Water Resources between 2013 and 2014 in the Congress-NCP government. However, during the split, Shinde had sided with Sharad Pawar. Before he became an MLC in 2020, Shinde won four Assembly elections, twice from the Jaoli seat, in 1999 and 2004. Post the 2008 delimitation, he won the Koregaon Assembly seat in 2009 and retained it five years later. However, he lost the seat in 2019 to Mahesh Shinde of the Shiv Sena (then united), and again in 2024. Ahead of the Lok Sabha polls last year, Shinde was accused of misappropriation in the APMC, which he headed, and faced the prospect of arrest. 'I am not scared and will continue to fight. Let them arrest me. They are using all possible means to trouble me. This is the second revolution after Independence to keep democracy alive, and every one of us should fight together,' he said in a rally in Karad. After he lost from Satara in the Lok Sabha polls to the BJP's Chhatrapati Udayanraje Bhosale by around 32,000 votes, Shinde claimed that the fact that there was an Independent in the race with a symbol similar to the NCP (SP)'s had cost him the seat. Gade secured 37,000 votes in the contest. While he is seen as non-controversial among political circles, Shinde has had his brushes with controversy. In 2021, his supporters pelted stones at the party office in Satara after Shinde lost the Satara District Central Cooperative Bank elections by one vote. Shinde later told the media that the incident was 'a result of emotional outburst' of his supporters and that he had apologised to Pawar senior for it. While rebuilding the NCP (SP) is Shinde's big challenge, he may also find it difficult to retain his MLC seat, after his tenure ends in August next year. The NCP (SP) has only 10 MLAs in the 288-member Assembly.

'Udaipur files': SC defers hearing to July 21; asks police to assess threats to film makers and Kanhaiya Lal's son
'Udaipur files': SC defers hearing to July 21; asks police to assess threats to film makers and Kanhaiya Lal's son

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

'Udaipur files': SC defers hearing to July 21; asks police to assess threats to film makers and Kanhaiya Lal's son

File Image NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed the Centre committee to decide on the release and certification of 'Udaipur Files,' "immediately without delay," understanding the urgency expressed by the makers of the film. The committee is scheduled to address the matter at 2:30 pm, with the Court deferring further hearings until Monday. "The Competent Authority (of the Central government) has taken cognisance of the revision petition over the release of the film pending before it and will be heard at 2:30 pm today," stated a bench led by Justice Surya Kant, scheduling the next hearing for July 21, Monday. "Having regard to the nature of the proceedings, we expect that the committee constituted by the CG will decide the revision petition immediately without delay. Post the matter for further consideration on Monday", the Court said in its order. The Court permitted Mohammad Jawed, the accused in the matter, to present his concerns regarding a fair trial before the Central committee. The committee was instructed to provide him with a fair hearing. The film producers and the deceased Kanhaiya Lal's son reported receiving death threats. The Court authorised them to seek protection from their respective Superintendent of Police (SP), who were instructed to evaluate the threats and take necessary protective measures. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Senior Advocate Gaurab Bhatia, representing the filmmakers, argued for the Supreme Court to decide the matter, citing financial losses and infringement of free speech rights due to the stay on release. The petitioners' counsels, Kapil Sibal and Maneka Guruswamy, contended that the film's release would compromise the accused's right to a fair trial and portrayed the Muslim community negatively. "Once I saw the movie, I was shaken. If any judge were to see that, it is a complete thematic desecration of the case. It's the vilification of an entire community. Violence, homosexuality, denigration of women, and child abuse have been attributed to the community. It is unthinkable that a democratic nation will allow this movie to be certified," Sibal and Maneka Guruswamy said. Bhatia responded by highlighting the beheading incident and subsequent video uploads. He noted that the film had incorporated all 55 CBFC-directed cuts before certification. The Court concluded by directing the Central government committee to make an immediate decision while scheduling the next hearing for Monday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store