Supreme Court declines to hear appeal from Christian fire chief who wanted to make it easier to sue for discrimination
Ronald Hittle, a 24-year veteran of the fire department in Stockton, California, said he was fired after attending a two-day Christian conference on city time. The city countered that Hittle had been instructed to attend a 'leadership' conference and told the high court in a brief that the chief had a long history of disobeying direction from superiors.
Two conservative justices – Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch – dissented from the decision to deny the case.
Represented in part by the First Liberty Institute, which has filed several successful religious claims at the Supreme Court in recent years, Hittle asked the Supreme Court to toss out a 1973 precedent, McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, that has for decades dictated how discrimination claims are reviewed in federal courts.
Thomas wrote the precedent targeted by the case was 'producing troubling outcomes on the ground.'
'I am not aware of many precedents that have caused more confusion than this one,' he added.
Discrimination claims are reviewed under a three-step process under the precedent. First, an employee alleging discrimination must show they belong to a class of people protected under the law — based on race or sex, for instance — and that the company appeared, at first impression, to have engaged in discrimination. In step two, the employer must then show that it had legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for the actions it took against the plaintiff.
In the third step, the burden shifts back to the employee to show that the company's stated reasons aren't simply a pretext for discrimination. Hittle asked the court to toss out McDonnell entirely or, alternatively, make it easier for employees to win under the third step.
'The court should take the opportunity to overrule this unworkable and egregiously wrong test without further delay,' Hittle's attorneys told the Supreme Court. The approach, they said, 'has rightly been criticized by judges and scholars alike.'
A federal district court in California sided with the city and the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that decision. Hittle appealed to the Supreme Court in October.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Karoline Leavitt details $200M ballroom plans at White House
Construction is set to begin in September on a new ballroom inside the White House, press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced Thursday. The $200 million ballroom will be built adjacent to the White House where the East Wing sits. Leavitt said the East Wing will be 'modernized,' with offices in that area relocated during construction. The cost of the project will be covered by Trump and other donors, the White House said. 'The White House state ballroom will be a much needed and exquisite addition of 90,000 square feet,' Leavitt said, adding that it would have a seated capacity of 650 people and would elminate the need for a 'large and unsightly tent' to host state dinners and other large events. Trump has met in recent weeks with the National Park Service, Secret Service and other agencies to discuss the project. Leavitt said it would be completed before the end of Trump's term in January 2029. 'The president and the Trump White House are fully committed to working with the appropriate organizations to preserving the special history of the White House while building a beautiful ballroom that can be enjoyed by future Administrations and generations of Americans to come,' White House chief of staff Susie Wiles said in a statement. Trump has spoken in recent months about his desire for changes to the White House, including the addition of a ballroom. The grass in the Rose Garden has been uprooted in recent weeks and replaced with stone pavers. Obama White House officials confirmed in 2016 that Trump had offered to build a $100 million ballroom in the building, but said they did not seriously consider the proposal.
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Many Americans favor Jeffries, Mamdani, Lander among New York politicians: Survey
Many Americans outside New York favor House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani and New York City Comptroller Brad Lander among the state's prominent politicians, according to a new poll from YouGov. The trio each had a one percentage point net favorable rating. Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D), who lost to Mamdani in the mayoral primary, was the least popular politician on the poll's list, at 35 percent underwater. In the poll, Jeffries was viewed as either 'very favorable' or 'somewhat favorable' by 31 percent of respondents, while 'somewhat unfavorable' and 'very unfavorable' views of the Democratic leader came in at 30 percent. Thirty-eight percent said they didn't 'know' Jeffries. Mamdani, who recently shocked political observers with a win in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor, was seen as either 'very favorable' or 'somewhat favorable' by 30 percent of respondents, compared to 29 percent 'somewhat unfavorable' or 'very unfavorable.' Forty-two percent didn't 'know' who Mamdani was. Lander, who also ran in the mayoral primary, garnered 13 percent favorable and a similar number of unfavorable responses. Seventy-three percent of people didn't know Lander. Some other high-profile Democrats, such as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D) and Gov. Kathy Hochul, had more respondents in the poll who disliked them, with Ocasio-Cortez three points underwater and Hochul 10 points. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer had a 22-point gap between his favorables and unfavorables. While New York remains a safe blue state for most statewide races, it is a key battleground in the 2026 race for the House. Mamdani is the favorite heading into the general election for mayor, with both Cuomo and Mayor Eric Adams running and independents, and has become a rising star in the progressive wing of the Democratic party. Adams has a -21 percent net favorable rating, with only 1 percent holding a very favorable view of the incumbent mayor. The YouGov poll took place from July 14 to 16, with 1,107 respondents and plus or minus 4.1 percentage points as its margin of error.
NBC News
26 minutes ago
- NBC News
A key U.S. inflation gauge rose last month as Trump's tariffs lifted goods prices
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Reserve's preferred inflation gauge ticked higher last month in a sign that President Donald Trump's broad-based tariffs are starting to lift prices for many goods. Prices rose 2.6% in June compared with a year ago, the Commerce Department said Thursday, up from an annual pace of 2.4% in May. Excluding the volatile food and energy categories, prices rose 2.8% in the past year, the same as the previous month, which was revised higher. The figures are above the Fed's 2% goal. The uptick in prices helps explain the central bank's reluctance to cut its key interest rate this week, despite repeated demands from Trump that it do so. On Wednesday, the Fed left its key rate unchanged at 4.3%, and Chair Fed Powell suggested it could take months for the central bank to determine whether the import duties will cause just a one-time rise in prices, or a more persistent increase in inflation. Trump has attacked Powell personally and repeatedly, and did so again on Thursday for the Fed's reluctance to cut rates, calling him 'TOO ANGRY, TOO STUPID, & TOO POLITICAL, to have the job of Fed Chair.' On a monthly basis, prices ticked up 0.3% from May to June, while core prices also rose 0.3%. Both figures are higher than consistent with the 2% target. 'The above-target rise in core prices in June, upward revisions to previous months' data and the sharp rise in core goods inflation will do little to ease the Fed's concerns about tariff-driven inflation,' said Harry Chambers, assistant economist at Capital Economics, a forecasting firm. 'If these pressures persist, as we expect, a September cut looks unlikely.' The government's measure of gas prices jumped 0.9% from May to June, while grocery costs rose 0.3%. Many longer-lasting goods that are heavily imported saw clear price increases, with furniture prices up 1.3% just last month, appliances up 1.9%, and computers up 1.4%. The cost of some services fell dramatically last month, offsetting some of the price pressures from goods. Air fares dropped 0.7% from May to June, while the cost of hotel rooms plunged 3.6% just in one month. Thursday's report also showed that consumer spending rose 0.3% from May to June, a modest rise that suggests Americans are still spending cautiously. Adjusted for inflation, the increase was just 0.1%, the government said. Americans' incomes also picked up just modestly, rising 0.3% last month, a rebound after a 0.4% drop in May. But adjusted for inflation and taxes, incomes were flat in June. Consumers have been cautious all year. On Wednesday, the government said the economy expanded at a 3% annual rate in the second quarter, a solid showing but one that masked some red flags. Consumer spending, for example, rose at a lackluster 1.4% pace, after an even smaller gain of 0.5% in the first three months of the year. A sharp drop in imports in the April-June quarter, which followed a surge in the first quarter, provided a big lift to the government's calculation of U.S. gross domestic product. Earlier this month, the government reported that its more closely-watched consumer price index, its primary inflation measure, also ticked higher in June as the cost of heavily-imported items such as appliances, furniture, and toys increased.
