FBM KLCI opens sideways after US rate hold
The domestic benchmark index eked out a 1.05-point gain to 1,512.94 at the start of trading, suggesting investors remained stolidly in wait for catalysts.
TA Securities maintained its view that the local market will continue to consolidate with a downside bias.
"Investors are likely to hold back from taking significant positions, as they await greater clarity regarding US trade deals and potential American involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict," it said in its market commentary.
"Immediate index support stays at 1,490, with stronger supports found at 1,465 followed by 1,444. Immediate resistance is maintained at 1,564 with next upside hurdles seen at the recent high of 1,586, followed by 1,610 ahead."
Commenting on the market's low trading volume, Rakuten Trade said it was reflective of investor caution as they avoided long positions due to persistent global risks and volatile market conditions.
"We foresee trading will remain muted due to lack of catalysts and heightened market risks. Hence, we anticipate the benchmark index to trend within the range of 1,500-1,520 for today," it said in its daily note.
Leading blue-chip laggards included PETRONAS Gas down 14 sen ot RM18.02, PETRONAS Chemicals shaving four sen to RM3.24 and Public Bank down three sne to RM4.21.
Of actives, HLT was down 0.5 sen to five sen, Magma rise 1.5 sen to 47.5 sen and SNS gained 1.5 sen ot 55 sen.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysian Reserve
2 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
OPEC's oil output climbs as Saudis lead pursuit of market share
OPEC bolstered crude production by the most in four months as Saudi Arabia led a surge of Middle East exports in a bid to reclaim market share, a Bloomberg survey shows. Riyadh is steering the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its partners to revive supplies swiftly despite faltering oil demand and an impending global surplus. The policy is adding downward pressure on crude prices — a potential salve for consumers and a fixation of President Donald Trump. The Saudis — along with Gulf neighbors Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates — also rushed out oil shipments last month amid fears that the Israel-Iran conflict could disrupt flows through the Persian Gulf and its critical sea corridor, the Strait of Hormuz, though traffic ultimately continued unabated. READ: Race to Move Oil Sees Flows Leap Above 40 Million Barrels a Day Production from OPEC's 12 members increased by 360,000 barrels a day in June to an average of 28 million per day, according to the Bloomberg survey. About two-thirds of the hike was provided by the Saudis. The wider OPEC+ coalition has stunned oil traders in recent months with a pivot from defending crude prices to opening the taps, agreeing to revive production in May, June and July at three times the initially-scheduled pace. Delegates say they plan to discuss another similar-sized hike of around 411,000 barrels a day for August at a video-conference on Sunday. The latest boost indicates that, after the restraint shown by many members during the first of their accelerated increases in May — when several tried to atone for earlier over-production — the OPEC+ alliance is now committing more fully to the supply revival. The output flood, coming at a time of slowing demand in China and plentiful output across the Americas, is taking a toll on prices. Brent crude futures traded near $67 a barrel on Wednesday, having slumped 12% last week as a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran eased concern over the risk to regional energy exports. Saudi Arabia raised output by 240,000 barrels a day last month to 9.37 million a day, pumping in accordance with its new target, the survey showed. The addition was complemented by several other OPEC members such as the UAE, Kuwait and Iraq. Abu Dhabi delivered the second-biggest gain, adding 90,000 barrels a day to pump an average of 3.4 million barrels a day, according to the survey. Iraq raised output by 30,000 to produce 4.21 million a day. Bloomberg's data indicates both countries are producing considerably above their agreed OPEC+ quotas, but the cartel's own estimates suggest they are pumping broadly in line with their obligations. The duo are among several members that have pledged extra restraints to make up for previous excess output, with Kazakhstan remaining by far the biggest offender. Exports from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE appeared to surge considerably more than production last month, potentially to position supplies away from the regional turmoil. The three nations loaded 11.9 million barrels a day onto tankers in June, the most in just over two years, ship-tracking data compiled by Bloomberg show. The difference could have been made up by drawing from stockpiles. Bloomberg's production survey is based on ship-tracking data, information from officials and estimates from consultants Rapidan Energy Group, FGE, Kpler Ltd. and Rystad Energy. –BLOOMBERG
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
PTPTN allocates RM47.8mil in advance loans for July 2025 intake
KUALA LUMPUR: The National Higher Education Fund Corporation (PTPTN) has allocated RM47.8mil in Loan Advance Payment (WPP) to 31,850 students pursuing diploma studies at public universities and polytechnics for the July 2025 intake. In a statement on Wednesday (July 2), PTPTN said each eligible student will receive RM1,500 to assist with initial preparation costs, ensuring their welfare is safeguarded as they begin their higher education. WPP is offered to Malaysian students who consented to receive the advance loan during their application to public higher education institutions (IPTA) via UPUOnline or the official admission portals, and whose parents or guardians are recipients of the government's Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah (STR) aid, subject to eligibility criteria. Since its introduction in 1999, WPP has benefited 990,638 students with total disbursements amounting to RM1.46bil as of May 31 this year. As an agency under the Higher Education Ministry (MOHE), PTPTN said it remains committed to supporting students in gaining access to tertiary education. Students can check their WPP offer through the myPTPTN app and redeem the funds at any Bank Islam Malaysia Bhd (BIMB) branch nationwide from today until Sept 1, by presenting their WPP offer letter and MyKad, although representatives are not allowed. PTPTN chairperson Datuk Seri Norliza Abdul Rahim led a delegation to personally visit WPP recipients in Bukit Gelugor, Penang, where a total of 1,419 students were offered assistance mounting to RM2.13mil. Norliza advised students to use the funds responsibly and encouraged them to apply for full PTPTN loans according to their institution's application timeline to ensure timely processing and approval. Applicants are also required to open a National Education Savings Scheme (Simpan SSPN) account via the app before submitting their PTPTN loan applications. - Bernama
Focus Malaysia
2 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Coherent SST reform requires zero exemptions for policymakers
THE Malaysian government's recent changes to the Sales and Service Tax (SST) are true to an at least decade-old tradition of self-defeating consumption tax policies. Raising taxes is a thankless but necessary task that requires astute policy design and nuanced messaging to manage both economic and political narratives. Both the 1 July changes and the case for them have left policymakers open to justifiable but needless criticism. Malaysian policymakers have long recognised the need to significantly increase revenue collections but have struggled to convince Malaysians. Tax reforms repeatedly adopt a narrow, small-target strategy that—by lacking both vision and tangible economic sustainability and equity objectives—instead become lightning rods for critics. Malaysians worried about their household budgets naturally fear higher taxes and do not count fiscal sustainability among their chief concerns. Making the case for consumption tax reform needs and deserves better than pointing to unsustainable budget deficits and delivering patronising rebukes of SST critics. It requires a consistent, coherent and non-condescending narrative that garners public support for changes that will improve not threaten their livelihoods. Policymakers should be explaining the importance of taxing consumption, how it supports a tax strategy that balances fairness, competitiveness and sustainably, and how the money raised will be used to benefit Malaysians. Consumption taxes have advantages that are especially relevant to Malaysia's circumstances. Malaysia has a large visiting and undocumented population whose income cannot be taxed but whose consumption can be. It has a sizeable informal sector contributing around a quarter of gross domestic product, whose income likewise escapes direct taxes but whose inputs may be partially captured by consumption levies. Shaping consumption choices through price signals will be essential to making Malaysia's future economic development less carbon intensive and more sustainable. Consumption taxes progressed alone cannot address Malaysia's revenue needs or be implemented equitably. Consumption taxes are regressive as low-income households consume more of their disposable incomes and therefore experience a greater relative impact. Attempts to neutralise these impacts by exempting or setting to zero the rate for basic goods introduces complexity for businesses and consumers, exempts rich and non-Malaysian consumers at the same time, and opens policymakers to arguments of inconsistency or bias. Accompanying changes to income taxes, transfers or welfare for low-income households would be a superior approach. Malaysians would be more receptive to tax hikes if their purpose were more tangibly linked to spending for their benefit. Public wariness remains high in the shadow of 1MDB and other newsworthy examples of funds being misused, with the government's fiscal challenges explicitly associated with corruption. At the same time Malaysians want better schools and hospitals, greater access to safe and efficient transport and technology, more generous social welfare and more. Transparent and well communicated spending intentions are an essential enabler of tax reform. The SST reforms have thus far been mapped poorly in these regards. Far from presenting a coherent vision for equitably, efficiently and sustainably raising revenue to spend in the interests of Malaysians, the reforms adopt a piecemeal and discriminatory approach to taxation. Two particularly concerning elements that have attracted fair criticism are the inclusion of basic goods and differential rates for local and imported goods. Malaysia is a net importer of food including many staple products, with openness to trade a critical contributor to food security both at the household and national levels. SST increases that represent an implicit import tariff, especially on basic and healthy goods like fruit, send precisely the wrong signal at a time when Malaysia is trying to counter global economic policy uncertainty. Malaysia must reinforce its openness to trade and investment by avoiding discriminatory taxes on overseas goods. Bowing to public backlash to provide post-announcement tax exemptions for imported apples and oranges (among other changes) further illustrates the policy development and communication shortcomings. Policymakers were either unaware of or misread public sensitivity on the price and availability of basic food imports, and in the absence of a compelling defence for the proposed SST increase were forced to make concessions. Evident is both a need for wider consultation and that complex and subjective tax design leaves policymakers exposed. Making the case for tax reform in Malaysia should also stick to message not mechanism. Long-running arguments comparing the SST with a restored GST are of greater distraction than consequence to the current debate. Either mechanism can be tailored to achieve comparable coverage and revenue outcomes, and tax incidence (who ultimately pays: consumers or producers) is determined by markets not tax design. Differences in administrative efficiency and effectiveness are important considerations that are adaptable to a consumption tax with either (or any) name. What Malaysia needs from policymakers is greater tax policy reform coherence, communication and ambition. And the leadership to design and deliver tax strategies and mechanisms that benefit Malaysia and Malaysians. ‒ July 2, 2025 Dr Stewart Nixon is the deputy director of research at the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS). The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Bigstock
