I left the US for Canada. Getting a green card seemed impossible, and the uncertainty overshadowed the positives of living in America.
She felt the pathway to a green card was going nowhere, so she eventually moved to Canada.
As a permanent resident, she feels more secure, and she's fine with having taken a salary hit.
This as-told-to essay is based on a transcribed conversation with Sindhu Mahadevan, who moved from the US to Canada in 2021. The following has been edited for length and clarity.
I moved to the US from India in 2012 to study a master's degree in biology.
I graduated and entered the workforce in the States, but slowly began to grow disillusioned with the US immigration system.
In 2021, I decided to stop fighting the system and move to Canada. Although I've left behind the high salaries available in the US, I've traded it for a sense of belonging as a permanent resident in Canada.
I entered the American workforce, but felt vulnerable as an immigrant
I grew up in a city in western India. I had family who lived in the US. I moved there on an F-1 visa for international students and graduated in 2014.
My visa status made me eligible for two types of work authorization — optional practical training (OPT) and curricular practical training (CPT), both of which I used.
I knew that after my student work authorization expired, I'd require a visa sponsorship. Some companies I applied to told me they wouldn't offer sponsorships or ghosted me after they realized I'd eventually need one.
I started a career in the medical device industry and was employed under my work authorization until 2018.
I was very conscious of my immigration status at work. I struggled to have difficult conversations about aligning everyone on compliance issues because I was worried about my job security. Sometimes, I felt this affected how well I could do my job.
The path to a green card didn't feel possible
I got married in 2015, and my husband, who was also on a visa, and I wanted to try to build a life in the US.
I felt I needed permanent residency to do this. I wanted the freedom to visit India and the flexibility to change jobs, which became complicated on an F-1 visa.
In 2016 and 2017, my company tried twice to get me an H-1B visa, which can be a step toward permanent residency in the US. Petitions are chosen for processing through a lottery selection system, but I wasn't picked either time.
Around that time, I started to find out more information about the green card backlog for Indian nationals. There's a cap per country at 7% of all the green cards allocated that year. India has a large population with a lot of applicants, so there is a very long waitlist to have your applications processed.
I felt I was thrashing against the system just to be able to stay in the country and contribute. In a moment of clarity, I realized I wasn't willing to keep fighting.
In 2018, I no longer had work authorization and had to stop working. I didn't like not making an income at all, and it felt like a hard-won career had been yanked away from me.
I moved to Canada as a permanent resident and have found a sense of belonging
As a temporary solution, I tried changing my status from an F-1 to an F-2 visa, which would make me a dependent of my husband's F-1. I was allowed to remain in the US while my application was pending.
Around the same time I filed the application to change my status, I began looking at backup plans. Moving to Canada was on the cards through the "Express Entry" system. It's a points-based system that scores applicants on things like their education, work experience, and language proficiencies. The highest-scoring applicants receive an invitation to apply for permanent residence.
My work experience was American-centric. Canada was a better fit than Europe or Asia. I applied just before the pandemic hit in 2020, when I still hadn't heard back with a final decision about changing my status to F-2.
I received PR in October 2021, and my husband and I went to Canada straight away.
As a permanent resident, I can work and buy property, but I can't vote in elections or stay outside Canada for longer than 730 days in a five-year window.
In the US, I was a passenger along for the ride. In Canada, with PR status, I'm back in the driver's seat. I feel comfortable and in a solid legal position.
As a permanent resident, I can take chances with my career
I haven't had issues getting employment without Canadian experience, a problem some expats face, perhaps because my US experience is seen as valuable in my industry. I had a job lined up before the move.
I've taken a salary hit, but with my PR status I have the freedom to take a chance working for a startup, something I wouldn't have dreamed of while in the US, where if the startup went under and I lost my job, it could mean the end of the road.
Though more politely presented here than in the US, anti-immigrant sentiment in Canada concerns me, even though I haven't personally experienced negativity. People are expressing concerns around strained healthcare and housing, and Canada is experiencing immigration contraction.
I'm fine with Canada's smaller economy
Living in America shaped me in many ways. I admire Americans for their zeal to fight for what they believe in and to speak up. I don't regret moving there. If you're looking for the best universities or economy, the rational choice is the US.
I moved to the US for my education, but the constraints of the immigration system slowly overshadowed the economic opportunities.
I'm fine being in a smaller economy where I have more security.
In a statement to BI, a spokesperson from the Department of Homeland Security said it was "committed to restoring integrity to the visa program" and ensuring people cannot illegally remain in the US.
Do you have a story to share about immigrating to the US? Contact this reporter at ccheong@businessinsider.com.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
15 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Modi Needs the White House Off His Back
What began as a US-China trade war has suddenly turned into an open and ugly confrontation between Washington and New Delhi. Donald Trump has escalated the conflict, but the onus for defusing it is squarely with Narendra Modi — and both sides know it. With two days to go before the US president's reciprocal trade taxes come into effect, he's doubling down on his threat to impose a 'substantially higher' tariff on India than the 25% already announced.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Beef costs more than ever, but Canadians won't let that ruin barbecue season
As Canadians fire up their grills for the August long weekend, one of the nation's most cherished summer traditions is now facing a costly twist: beef prices have surged 25 per cent over the past year, far outpacing the rate of inflation and putting the price of summer burgers and steaks into uncharted territory. The price of ground beef hit $14.67 per kilogram in May of 2025, according to the latest data from Statistics Canada, a 25 per cent increase over the $11.72 recorded a year earlier and well above the country's current inflation rate of 1.7 per cent. This weekend marks one of the busiest grilling holidays of the year in Canada, as families and friends gather at cottages, campgrounds and in backyards from coast to coast. Even with ground beef hitting historic highs, Canadians seem unwilling to let go of their cherished burger, or trade it in for tofu. If anything, the lingering effects of trade tensions and a growing movement to support local producers have only strengthened demand for homegrown beef, according to some analysts. "Demand for beef is phenomenal. It's really a good news story," Kevin Grier, a Guelph, Ont.-based, economist who specializes in livestock, meat and grocery market analysis, told CBC News. "If you want somebody to blame, really blame the consumer because we keep on coming back." Persistent Western drought shrinks herd Behind the price spike are some familiar factors: smaller herds from prolonged drought in Western Canada and high input costs for feed. "There's been so much drought in southwest Saskatchewan and southern Alberta that some of these farmers have not had any moisture since the snow melted in April," said Stuart Smyth, a professor in the department of agricultural and resource economics at the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon. Smyth said some western producers are choosing to shrink their herds rather than absorb the high cost of feed, which in some cases has to be hauled in from other provinces. Faced with the prospect of spending hundreds of thousands of dollars, many are opting to downsize instead. "That's why we've seen this drop of half a million head of cattle over the last five years, is because this has been a fairly prolonged drought in one of the regions that has the highest number of livestock," he said. Some ranchers see an upside Still, not every farmer is feeling the pinch. Thanks to strong demand, fuelled by barbecue culture's surge in popularity and a renewed push to support local amid ongoing trade tensions, some cattle producers are, for once, seeing a rare upside. Unlike previous cycles of food inflation, this one is offering certain producers a better return. "We don't get to set our prices," said Lee Irvine, a cattle farmer outside of Calgary. He explained that ranchers don't have much control over what they earn for their cattle. Instead, they're price takers, accepting whatever the market offers at auction. "So when consumers are willing to go out and pay higher prices for beef, there's trickle-down effects to the primary producers," he said. "We're selling our cattle at a higher margin right now." Still, not all producers have been able to take full advantage. After back-to-back years of drought, Irvine said his operation didn't receive enough spring rain to sustain a full herd this year. "We're only running about 20 head," he said. "Normally we'd have anywhere from 30 to 60." Cost of cattle puts butchers in a crunch Some butchers said the issue isn't a shortage of cattle; it's the cost of buying them. "We have no problems getting beef, but we just got to pay the higher prices for them," said Andy Trbizan, who runs the Mt. Brydges Abattoir in Mount Brydges, Ont., alongside his daughter and son. "I'm thinking it's got to be about 15 to 20 per cent higher than what it used to be." Despite passing those costs onto the consumer, whether its steak, chuck or a whole brisket, beef has proven resilient. The jump in beef prices hasn't deterred shoppers or wannabe pit-masters. Instead, BBQ culture seems to be enjoying a full-blown heyday. The trade and marketing association Canada Beef says since 1989 demand for beef last year was only higher in 2020 and 2022. "Demand is really high, especially in the summertime," Trbizan said, noting the abattoir often sees lineups that stretch out the showroom door on weekends. "People want to get out, do their barbecues, and they want to entertain." If you want somebody to blame, really blame the consumer because we keep on coming back. - Kevin Grier, livestock, meat and grocery analyst "And smoking meat has become very popular, so everybody has their smokers out and they're trying new things as well," his daughter Nicole Miller said. These conditions are expected to keep beef prices elevated through at least 2027, with little immediate relief in sight, according to a recent industry report. This projection underscores the slow and steady nature of herd rebuilding, which requires time for animals to mature and reach market size. Experts suggest consumers may need to prepare for a prolonged period of higher prices, even as producers work toward stabilizing supply. For now, summer barbecues come at a premium, but it's a price Canadians appear willing to pay.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kelly McParland: Bowing to Trump would betray Canada
Prime Minister Mark Carney's post-midnight response to Washington's latest escalation of its tariff war was calm, measured, sensible and appropriate, everything the current regime in Washington is not. Canada, Carney said, will continue to negotiate in search of a reasonable agreement, notwithstanding the absence of any indication the U.S. is open to reasonable negotiations. What Washington wants is to continue operating what amounts to a global extortion racket, threatening all America's best customers with dire consequences if they refuse to bow to its demands and offer up supplication to whatever notion occurs to President Donald Trump at any given moment. It's well and good that Ottawa should keep up the attempt, even if the odds seem set against success. There's no use pretending this is a situation that can be handled in the traditional manner of friends and trading partners: a search for a fair-minded and equitable agreement that serves the interests of both parties. But we should keep trying, if only to demonstrate that the qualities of civility haven't broken down altogether, despite the U.S. administration's every apparent effort to ignore them. From the Trump administration's point of view, extortion has been working marvelously well to date. Japan has reportedly agreed to more than a half-trillion dollars in investments and loans in return for lowered tariffs. South Korea, according to Trump, will 'give to the United States $350 Billion Dollars for Investments owned and controlled by the United States, and selected by myself.' The European Union accepted a pact to buy US$750 billion in energy and invest US$600 billion in the U.S., a deal virtually none of Europe's leaders were happy with, and which France openly denounced. Lesser entities have been similarly cowed. Paramount Pictures agreed to a $16 million payoff rather than risk challenging a spurious suit that threatened a much-sought US$8 billion merger. Columbia University is to pay the government US$221 million rather than lose access to federal funding. Harvard initially put up a determined effort to resist federal threats, but is said to be open to a $500 million settlement. Many of the agreements are fuzzy and open to interpretation. All have resulted from one thing: the fear and uncertainty generated by the knowledge that the U.S. government has become a one-man operation that operates solely by the whim of a president shown unfailingly to be unpredictable, unreliable and contemptuous of the law, of accepted standards and even of his own word. There is nothing to be gained by betting the prosperity of Canadians on any assurances offered up by Washington as long as Donald Trump remains president. What must be done is to defend the country's integrity, its sovereignty, its independence and its standing as a place where fairness, trust, honesty and dignity are still treated seriously as core values, even if other entities are willing to bargain theirs away. The extent of the danger in bowing to Washington was underlined in the last hours before the supposed Aug. 1 negotiating deadline. Upset that Ottawa would join France and Britain in declaring plans to recognize a Palestinian state, Trump declared it would make it 'very hard' to finalize a trade deal, effectively seeking to control Canada's foreign policy in addition to its economic practices. Trump has been president for just seven months and has been fortunate thus far in avoiding the forecast consequences of his policies. The stock market has been up, overall growth has been reasonable, and his targets have been capitulating rather than retaliating. But it's early days, and no winning streak lasts forever. It takes time for the impact of bad ideas to filter through. Already, the decline in tourism is being felt as people avoid the U.S. 'Where Did All the Las Vegas Tippers Go?' the Wall Street Journal wondered, noting that visits to the gambling mecca have fallen so drastically that Trump's 'no tax on tips' law has had little benefit. The rise in stock prices has been credited largely to Wall Street's belief that Washington wouldn't follow through on its tariff threats — Trump was the TACO president, as in Trump Always Chickens Out. Except this time, he didn't. The latest economic figures aren't encouraging: hiring has slowed, unemployment has risen, imports fell sharply in the second quarter after increasing in the first, sales are struggling, and second quarter growth figures still leave the economy at less than half the rate of a year ago. The U.S. dollar is weakening, the spiralling debt and burgeoning deficit are a direct threat to health and pension benefits many Americans depend on, and which have already been cut back under Trump's 'big, beautiful' mega-bill. The Brookings Institute notes that federal debt is at the highest level since the Second World War, and warns that spending at this level is unsustainable. MAGA world, meanwhile, shows signs of splinters. America being what it has become, the discord arises not from tariffs, economics, or the brutalizing of immigrants, but from anger at Trump's handling of the Epstein affair and his obvious reluctance to share full details of his involvement in it. The U.S. position on Israel is causing similar ructions. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, MAGA to her soul, denounced Israel's actions, asserting that while the October 7 Hamas attack was 'horrific… so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza.' Trump has been forced to backtrack on his relations with Israel's prime minister, his reluctance to ship weapons to Ukraine, his relations with Russian president Vladimir Putin, and on numerous pledges and threats that ran into spirited pushback. Bullying and bluffing are central to his demeanour, but he doesn't recoil from retreat when required; he just insists it's another success. He'll be gone in three years or so. He has effectively humiliated the Republican party, turning it into a personal vehicle of the sort common in the autocracies he admires. It's far from certain whoever succeeds him will manage a similar level of control. Republican heavyweights are frightened of Trump, debasing themselves in their willingness to cower before him, but no one likes to be humiliated, and it's just as likely his departure sets off both an ugly battle to replace him and a determination to ensure no other figure ever gains a similar ability to dictate their actions. Carney is correct in stating that Canada's job now is to focus on 'what we can control.' Our dependence on the U.S. has long been recognized as overdone and dangerous; it's just been too easy to resist. Trump has shown us the consequences of our own lethargy. Caving to Washington now buys us nothing. Trump's unpredictability means nothing he agrees to can be treated with certainty. No one wants to invest in a country whose economy is controlled by a foreign renegade who operates by whim. Canada's task is to set our own course and deal with the short-term consequences, as Ukraine has done in a far deadlier conflict, but one bearing the same choice: to stand by its independence as nation, protect its sovereignty, its pride and its heritage. It will be painful, but a country that values itself too little to withstand temporary distress soon risks being a country at all. National Post Irwin Cotler & Noah Lew: We support a two-state solution. But not this way Michael Higgins: Mark Carney abandons Canadian principles for pinky promises on Palestine Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.
