
When did divorcing parents become so toxic?
Wrong. In the poisonous atmosphere of the family courts, quarrelling parents are known to plant devices on their children to covertly record their rows to then put before a judge as evidence. The practice has become so routine it prompted the Family Justice Council to issue guidance against it last month.
The majority of divorcing rows focus on money
The phenomenon of parents using children as pawns in divorce proceedings is neither new nor rare: In 2023, there were 80,000 children caught up in family court proceedings, according to court statistics. Although fewer couples are divorcing, more of them are having to go through the courts to sort out their acrimonious split.
Divorce is widely recognised as an adverse childhood experience (ACE), which is why recent findings about almost half (45 per cent) of teenagers living with one parent alarmed children's charities. Some of those teens will have witnessed a civilised separation, but too many will now suffer through their parents' bitter divorce: analysis by the Ministry of Justice found that 10,300 financial remedy orders were contested in the family courts last year – a 66 per cent rise over two years.
Julia Margo, director at the domestic violence advocacy group Fair Hearing, has mentored more than 100 mothers through their family court hearings. 'Family court' sounds like a kind and gentle annexe of our justice system, where benevolent magistrates dot the i's and cross the t's of domestic arrangements. In reality these courts are battlegrounds where warring parents tear strips off each other, usually about who will have care of the children and sometimes who can have any contact with them. Julia herself was dragged through the courts 37 times by her ex-partner who, despite being a convicted paedophile, sought unsupervised contact with their children. She warns:
Even when there are no allegations of domestic abuse, many parents now struggle to negotiate separation and co-parenting without a court order: in the UK, more than 10 per cent of separating families end up in the family courts, far higher than in previous decades.
The acrimony she has found in court exposed couples incapable of conflict resolution, emotional articulacy, or just plain respect. This has no resemblance to the 'conscious uncoupling' of Gwyneth Paltrow – whose friendly take on separation strikes one as the wisdom of Solomon by contrast.
The majority of divorcing rows focus on money. But new ingredients – online pornography addiction, cost of living stress, surging infertility – also risk fraying relationships in an unprecedented way. Our 'selfie' culture has infected too many parents, who regrettably share their psychodramas on X, Instagram and TikTok.
Once it goes public, it goes nuclear, with families torn apart and children (even grown up ones) traumatised. Worse, they risk re-enacting the relational model they grew up with.
Families function as petri dishes where children first experiment with relationships. They learn whether their tears bring parents rushing over to comfort them or have no impact on the grown-up glued to their phones. They learn, too, whether screaming obscenities at each other over an unpaid bill or coming to blows over an affair is the best way to resolve an argument.
Children's copy-cat behaviour makes the latest Office for National Statistics figures – one in four women and one in five men have been subject to domestic abuse – truly alarming: how many of the younger generation will abuse their partners? Or, as one senior judge explains, anyone who has sat as a judge for more than 20 years will find themselves at some point face-to-face in court with a domestic abuse perpetrator whom they recognise from years before: the child of an abusive parent, taken into care.
Carey Philpott, CEO of the Kent-based charity SATEDA, says that 'Breaking these cycles is a key focus for our specialist interventions'. The SATEDA programme is one-on-one, or in small groups, offered in schools, to pupils referred to the charity by parents, teachers or specialist organisations. Julia argues:
Given parents' inability to forge healthy relationships and the detrimental impact this has on children, instilling relationship skills in the next generation feels like a national priority.
This chimes with young people's own wishes. When the Children's Commissioner ran her recent 'Big Ask' national survey of children and young people 4 to 17, they put 'family' as their number one priority and poor family relationships as the root of their unhappiness.
Parents' separation too often exposes villains and victims – and those victims too often are their children. Even when they are not tasked with spying on a parent, children risk an emotional tug of war that for some casts a long shadow over their lives.
No one would wish to return to the days when two people would stay locked in a bitter, sometimes abusive, relationship. 'For the sake of the children' is no reason to stay bound to a vicious spouse or partner, but those children's welfare should be at the heart of family relationships – when they break down as well as when they stay strong. Those who ask a child to spy on their other parent seem to forget this. We are not living in the era of Nicolae Ceausescu, thank goodness, so let's not adopt any of that dictator's strategies.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
37 minutes ago
- BBC News
Preston probation officer stabbing treated as attempted murder
A man has been arrested on suspicion of attempted murder after a probation officer was stabbed at work. Lancashire Police said a woman in her 30s was treated for stab wounds in hospital following the attack at The Pavilions in Ashton, Preston, at 14:30 BST on Tuesday."A 35-year-old man of no fixed address was arrested at the scene on suspicion of attempted murder, possession of a firearm with intent to cause alarm or distress and causing grievous bodily harm with intent," the force added: "This is being treated as an isolated incident and there is no wider threat to the public." A spokesman for the Ministry of Justice said: "Police are investigating an attack on a probation officer in Preston, and our thoughts are with them, their family and their colleagues."The spokesman added: "We will not tolerate assaults on our hardworking staff and will always push for the strongest punishments against perpetrators." Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Universal Credit cash rule change means benefit payments won't be stopped
Under the current rules, benefit claimants who have received compensation after a criminal conviction may find themselves ineligible for some means-tested benefits Victims of miscarriages of justice will no longer have their compensation taken into account when claiming benefits such as Universal Credit. Under the current rules, benefit claimants who have received compensation after a criminal conviction may find themselves ineligible for some means-tested benefits, which are issued to people depending on their income and how much money they have in savings. For example, you are not eligible for Universal Credit if you have more than £16,000 in savings or investments. But moving forward, a rule that meant compensation payments were included as part of your capital has now been scrapped. This applies to six means-tested benefits including: Universal Credit, Income-based Jobseeker's Allowance, Income-related Employment and Support Allowance, Income Support, Housing Benefit and Pension Credit. It comes after the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) increased the maximum amount miscarriage of justice victims can receive through the Miscarriage of Justice Compensation Scheme from £1million to £1.3million. Sir Stephen Timms MP, minister for social security and disability, said: "Rebuilding trust in our systems begins by restoring trust with those the system has failed. "We can't return the years lost by miscarriage of justice victims — but we can, and must, ensure they have every opportunity to restart their lives so they can make the most of the years ahead." Alex Davies-Jones, minister for victims and violence against women and girls, added: "Miscarriages of justice steal irreplaceable time and devastate lives. "Better benefit support combined with the uplift of the compensation cap will make a real difference, providing not just financial redress but rightfully deserved recognition to individuals affected." If you claim Universal Credit and you have over £6,000 in money, savings and investments, your benefit is normally be reduced by £4.35 for every £250 you have between £6,000 and £16,000. If the amount you have saved doesn't add up exactly to £250, but is over the threshold, another £4.35 is deducted from your Universal Credit. For example, if you have £6,300 in savings, the first £6,000 would not be subject to any deductions, but the other £300 would see your payments deducted by £8.70. This would be £4.35 deduced for the first £250, then another £4.35 for the remaining £50 that makes up the £300. These figures apply if you're a single claimant, or claiming as part of a couple. You are normally not eligible for Universal Credit if you have more than £16,000 in savings. If you claim Tax Credits and you've been asked to move to Universal Credit, you may still be able to get Universal Credit for up to a year if you have more than £16,000.


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Teenager searched on Tiktok for 'ways to make yourself pass out' before he was found dead aged 16, inquest hears
A teenager searched for 'ways to make yourself pass out' on Tiktok before he was found dead at his family home, an inquest has heard. Described by his mum as 'my angel', 16-year-old Maxwell Mills - known as Max - passed away in Christchurch, Dorset in February. In a statement to Bournemouth Coroners' Court, Isobel Hawkins said her 'respectful, caring, son' had 'never shown any indication of wanting to take his own life'. She said he was predicted to do well in his GCSEs and was already working part-time at a garage where he was planning to become an apprentice mechanic after leaving school. In the days leading up to his death Max had already arranged shifts for the following week at the garage. The schoolboy had been referred to CAMHS - Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services - after he acted 'out of character' by walking out of school weeks before he died. But a form he had completed on January 31 had led the service to categorise him as 'low risk' as he said he had no thoughts of self-harm or suicide. But on the morning of February 2 Max was found by his mother in the kitchen of their home at Briar Close. Paramedics were called but they could not save him. A post-mortem found he had died of hanging. His father Ben Mills later found Max had searched on a computer for TikTok videos on 'how to make yourself pass out'. TikTok is currently being sued by the parents of four British teenagers believed to have died after taking part in a 'blackout challenge' circulating on the platform - though there is no evidence Max had taken part in this. Max's mother said she did not have concerns her son was 'feeling depressed' before his death and she had 'always encouraged him' to talk to her about anything. She also said there were no signs he was being bullied at school where he had 'a wonderful group of friends'. The coroners' court heard she had earlier had concerns about how much time he was spending talking on the phone to his girlfriend. She said he would be up all hours talking to her, 'constantly video calling each other'. As a result he would be 'very tired' the next morning. But the two had broken up before Max died, and his parents said he appeared to be coping well with the split. On January 31 Max had refused to go to school saying he felt 'unwell and exhausted' and went to his father's house to do homework, staying overnight. Ms Hawkins said she picked him up the next day and they went home to watch TV together. She said as she passed his bedroom door later, she called out to him, and he had answered 'goodnight'. The next morning she found him in the kitchen. A search of Max's phone after his death found a WhatsApp conversation between him and his ex-girlfriend which had lasted nearly 90 minutes in the early hours of February 2. In it his girlfriend seemed 'concerned' that Max might harm himself, but he had assured her he would not do that. Coroner Brendan Allen said it was 'not clear' what Max's 'intentions' had been on the day he died, saying he had a 'strong and supportive group of friends at school and clearly a loving relationship with his family'. Although he had been referred to CAMHS he had 'expressed no thoughts of self-harm, or suicide'. Mr Allen said the TikTok searches showed 'there is a possibility that Max had not intended to lose his life, his intention was to pass out'. The coroner ruled his death as 'use of a ligature in circumstances where his intention is not explained by the evidence'.