Heathrow unveils £49bn expansion plan for 3rd runway
Heathrow, Europe's busiest airport by passenger numbers, said the expansion would provide at least 30 new daily routes, more domestic connections and improved flight times. The increased capacity would almost double the number of annual passengers from 84 million currently to up to 150 million passengers annually. 'It has never been more important or urgent to expand Heathrow,' said chief executive Thomas Woldbye. 'We are effectively operating at capacity to the detriment of trade and connectivity,' he added.
Despite fierce opposition from environmentalists and local residents, London mayor Sadiq Khan and some Labor MPs, the Labor government backed the new runway in January in a bid to boost UK economic growth. It would be a rare expansion in Europe, where countries are split between efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the needs of a strategic sector that has seen demand grow. Heathrow has submitted its proposal for the 3,500 metre runway to the UK government, which has also invited a rival proposal.
Heathrow's proposal includes £12 billion to fund a new terminal and £15 billion for modernization. 'A third runway and supporting infrastructure can be ready within a decade, and the full investment across
all terminals would take place over the coming decades,' Heathrow said in a statement. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is determined to deliver major infrastructure projects to revive the UK economy that has struggled to take off since the party came to power a year ago.
The government is expected to also back expansion at Gatwick airport, south of the capital, in October - having recently approved upgrades to London's Stansted, Luton and City airports. Britain's Supreme Court ruled at the end of 2020 that Heathrow could build the third runway, overturning a legal decision to block construction on environmental grounds. Local residents 'will see their lives put on hold for a few more years while more money and time is wasted on a doomed scheme,' said Douglas Parr, policy director for Greenpeace UK.
He added the plans 'export more tourism wealth out of the UK in the most polluting way possible.' Arora Group, one of Heathrow's largest landowners, on Thursday said it will submit a rival bid to build a shorter third runway, promising lower costs and less disruption to local residents and the environment. 'This is the first time the government has invited a competing proposal for Heathrow expansion,' the UK-based property and hotel firm said in a statement.
British Airways owner IAG's chief executive Luis Gallego said the rival bid was 'credible' as the group announced its net profit jumped 44 percent to 1.3 billion euros ($1.5 billion) in the first six months of the year on 'strong demand'. 'We always think that competition is good to improve things, and we have seen that in commercial aviation in the past,' he added. Airport-owner Heathrow's latest investment proposal comes in addition to plans to invest £10 billion over the next five years in upgrades to boost passenger numbers, which would be largely funded by higher charges on airlines.- AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab Times
16 hours ago
- Arab Times
Brazil's Supreme Court orders house arrest for former president Bolsonaro
SAO PAULO, Aug 5, (AP): Brazil's Supreme Court on Monday ordered the house arrest for former president Jair Bolsonaro, on trial for allegedly masterminding a coup plot to remain in office despite his defeat in the 2022 election - a case that has gripped the South American country as it faces a trade war with the Trump administration. Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who oversees the case against Bolsonaro before the top court, said in his decision that the 70-year-old former president had violated precautionary measures imposed on him by spreading content through his three lawmaker sons. Bolsonaro's lawyers said in a statement that he will appeal the decision. They said his words "good afternoon, Copacabana, good afternoon my Brazil, a hug to everyone, this is for our freedom" - broadcast from a cell phone of one of his sons during a Sunday protest in Rio de Janeiro - cannot "be regarded as ignoring precautionary measures or as a criminal act.' The trial of the far-right leader is receiving renewed attention after U.S. President Donald Trump directly tied a 50% tariff on imported Brazilian goods to his ally's judicial situation. Trump has called the proceedings a " witch hunt,' triggering nationalist reactions from leaders of all branches of power in Brazil, including President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Hours after the decision, the US State Department's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs said on X that the Trump administration "condemns (de) Moraes' order imposing house arrest on Bolsonaro and will hold accountable all those aiding and abetting sanctioned conduct.' "Putting even more restrictions on Jair Bolsonaro's ability to defend himself in public is not a public service. Let Bolsonaro speak!' the US State Department body said. Brazil's government has not commented on the case. Brazil's prosecutors accuse Bolsonaro of heading a criminal organization that plotted to overturn the election, including plans to kill Lula and Justice de Moraes after the far-right leader narrowly lost his reelection bid in 2022. Monday's order followed one from the top court last month that ordered Bolsonaro to wear an electronic ankle monitor and imposed a curfew on his activities while the proceedings are underway.
Kuwait Times
a day ago
- Kuwait Times
What happens next in US court battle over Trump's tariffs?
WASHINGTON: A federal appeals panel on Thursday appeared skeptical of US President Donald Trump's argument that a 1977 law historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets gave him the power to impose tariffs. Regardless of how the court rules, the litigation is almost certainly headed to the US Supreme Court. Here is what you need to know about the dispute, which Trump has called 'America's big case,' and how it is likely to play out in the months ahead. What is the case about? The litigation challenges the tariffs Trump imposed on a broad range of US trading partners in April, as well as tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico. It centers around Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives the president the power to address 'unusual and extraordinary' threats during national emergencies. Trump has said that trade imbalances, declining manufacturing power and the cross-border flow of drugs justified the tariffs under IEEPA. A dozen Democratic-led states and five small US businesses challenging the tariffs argue that IEEPA does not cover tariffs and that the US Constitution grants Congress, not the president, authority over tariffs and other taxes. A loss for Trump would also undermine the latest round of sweeping tariffs on dozens of countries that he unveiled late Thursday. Trump has made tariffs a cornerstone of his economic plan, arguing they will promote domestic manufacturing and substitute for income taxes. What's the status of the litigation? The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments on Thursday in the case. The panel of 11 judges sharply questioned the government about Trump's use of IEEPA, but did not rule from the bench. The Federal Circuit has not said when it will issue a decision, but its briefing schedule suggests it intends to move quickly. Meanwhile, the tariffs remain in effect after the Federal Circuit paused a lower court's ruling declaring them illegal. Will Trump's tariffs be blocked if he loses in court? A Federal Circuit ruling would almost certainly not end the litigation, as the losing party is expected to appeal to the Supreme Court. If the Federal Circuit rules against Trump, the court could put its own ruling on hold while the government appeals to the Supreme Court. This approach would maintain the status quo and allow the nine justices to consider the matter more thoroughly. The justices themselves could also issue an 'administrative stay' that would temporarily pause the Federal Circuit's decision while it considers a request from the Justice Department for more permanent relief. Is the Supreme Court likely to step in? The Supreme Court is not obligated to review every case appealed to it, but it is widely expected to weigh in on Trump's tariffs because of the weighty constitutional questions at the heart of the case. If the Federal Circuit rules in the coming weeks, there is still time for the Supreme Court to add the case to its regular docket for the 2025-2026 term, which begins on October 6. The Supreme Court could rule before the end of the year, but that would require it to move quickly. How might the supreme court rule? There is no consensus among court-watchers about what the Supreme Court will do. Critics of Trump's tariffs are optimistic their side will win. They point to the Supreme Court's decision from 2023 that blocked President Joe Biden from forgiving student loan debt. In that ruling, the justices limited the authority of the executive branch to take action on issues of 'vast economic and political significance' except where Congress has explicitly authorized the action. The justices in other cases, however, have endorsed a broad view of presidential power, especially when it comes to foreign affairs. Can importers seek refunds for tariffs paid? If Trump loses at the Supreme Court, importers are likely to seek refunds of tariffs already paid. This would be a lengthy process given the large number of anticipated claims. Federal regulations dictate that such requests would be first heard by US Customs and Border Protection. If that agency denies a refund request, the importer can appeal to the Court of International Trade. There is precedent for tariff refund requests being granted. Since May, CBP has been processing refunds to importers who inadvertently overpaid duties because of tariff 'stacking' — where multiple overlapping tariffs are applied to the same imports. And in the 1990s, after the Court of International Trade struck down a tax on exporters that was being used to finance improvements to US harbors, the court set up a process for issuing refunds. That decision was upheld by both the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court. Would a courtroom defeat unravel Trump's trade deals? Trump has used the threat of emergency tariffs as leverage to secure concessions from trading partners. A loss at the Supreme Court would hamstring Trump in future negotiations. The White House, however, has other ways of imposing tariffs, like a 1962 law that allows the president to investigate imports that threaten national security. Trump has already used that law to put tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, and those levies are not at issue in the case before the Federal Circuit. Some legal experts say a loss for Trump at the Supreme Court would not impact bilateral trade agreements the US has already inked with other countries. Others say that the trade deals alone might not provide sufficient legal authority for taxes on imports and may need to be approved by Congress. — Reuters
Kuwait Times
2 days ago
- Kuwait Times
GCC market sees $92.04bn in primary issuances in H1
KUWAIT: In its Fixed Income Report, Kuwait Financial Centre (Markaz) states that primary debt issuances of Bonds and Sukuk in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries amounted to $92.04 billion through 215 issuances during H1 2025, a 5.5 percent decrease from the same period last year, where issuances in H1 2024 amounted to $97.36 billion. Issuances by Geography: Saudi-based issuances led the GCC during H1 2025, raising $47.93 billion through 71 issuances, down from $59.73 billion in H1 2024 a decrease of 19.8 percent, and representing 52.1 percent of issuances during the year. UAE-based issuances ranked second, with $24.03 billion through 69 issuances, representing 26.1 percent of the market, an increase of 22.2 percent from the same period last year. Qatari entities were the third largest issuers in terms of value, with $10.0 billion issued through 58 issuances, representing 10.9 percent of the issuances over the period. Bahraini issuers follow, with a total issuance size of $5.62 billion through 7 issuances, a 49.7 percent increase from the same period last year. Kuwaiti issuances recorded a 48.0 percent increase from the same period last year, recording a total value of $3.39 billion through 4 issuances. Omani entities recorded the lowest value of issuances during the year, with $1.08 billion raised through 6 issuances, representing 1.2 percent of the total value of issuances. Sovereign vs Corporate: Total GCC corporate primary issuances increased by 67.7 percent in H1 2025, amounting to $60.20 billion raised, compared to $35.91 billion raised in H1 2024. Corporate issuances represented 65.4 percent of total issuances for the first half of 2025, contrasting with the preference of issuances in H1 2024 where more sovereign entities raised capital (corporate issuances H1 2024: 36.9 percent). Government related corporate entities raised $11.2 billion through 11 issuances during the year, an increase of 1.8 percent from H1 2024 ($11.0 billion through 10 issuances). Total GCC sovereign primary issuances decreased by 48.2 percent in H1 2025, raising $31.85 billion throughout the year, representing 34.6 percent of total issuances. Conventional vs Sukuk: Conventional issuances increased by 7.8 percent in H1 2025 compared to H1 2024, raising a total of $51.61 billion for the year. Sukuk issuances, meanwhile, decreased by 18.2 percent in H1 2025, resulting in a total value of $40.43 billion for the year so far. As for issuance preferences, H1 2025 saw an increased appetite for conventional issuances in the GCC, representing 56.1 percent of total issuances for the year. This is a change in issuance preferences from H1 2024, where more Sukuk were issued than conventional bonds. Sector Segmentation: The Financial sector led the bond and sukuk issuances in H1 2025, with total value of $40.1 billion through 167 issuances representing 43.6 percent of total issuances. Government issuances follow, with $31.9 billion through 25 issuances, representing 34.6 percent of total issuances. This represents an increase for the financial sector (31.1 percent) and a decrease for government issuances (-48.2 percent) when compared to the same period last year. The energy sector follows, with $8.6 billion through 9 issuances, representing 9.4 percent of total issuances, with the remaining sectors together representing a small portion of total issuance (12.5 percent). Maturity profile: In H1 2025, primary issuances with less than 5-year tenors represented 46.9 percent of GCC debt capital markets with a total value amounting to $43.2 billion through 154 issuances. Primary issuances with 5-10-year tenors followed, raising $31.1 billion through 43 issuances, representing 33.8 percent of total issuances. Primary issuances with 10-30-year tenors represented 9.6 percent of GCC debt capital markets with a total value of $8.8 billion through 5 issuances during the year. One issuance came in with a maturity greater than (GT) 30 years with a value of $1 billion, while perpetual issuances saw an increase in both the size and number of issuances when compared to H1 2024, with a total value of $8.0 billion through 12 issuances. Issue size profile: During H1 2025, GCC primary issuances ranged in size from $2.0 million to $5.0 billion. Issuances with issue size of $1 billion or greater raised the largest amount, totaling $54.5 billion through 32 issuances and representing 59.2 percent of the total amount issued in the GCC. Issuances sized between $500 million and $1 billion followed, with a total issuance size of $27.0 billion through 44 issuances. The highest number of issuances was under $100 million issue size, where there were 105 issuances that raised a total amount of $3.2 billion during H1 2025. Currency profile: US dollar-denominated issuances led the GCC bonds and sukuk primary market again in H1 2025, raising a total of $73.1 billion through 146 issuances, representing a substantial 79.4 percent of the total value raised in primary issuances during the year so far. The second largest issue currency was the Saudi Riyal (SAR), where SAR denominated issuances raised a total of $7.0 billion through 8 issuances. As for currencies bucketed under 'Other' which totaled $2.0 billion, the Hong Kong Dollar (HKD) represented 0.74 percent of total issuances with a total value of $682 million through 20 issuances. Rating: In terms of value, a total of 74.0 percent of GCC Conventional and Sukuk bonds were rated in H1 2025 by at least one of the following rating agencies: Standard & Poor's, Moody's, Fitch and Capital Intelligence, an increase from H1 2024 (57.2 percent of all issuances rated). Issuances rated within the Investment Grade accounted for 67.7 percent of the total issuances during the year, while Sub-Investment Grade accounted for 6.3 percent of rated bonds.
