
The RAC sent us a measly £40 after we waited two days for a rescue that never came: SALLY SORTS IT
We spent two days waiting for action from the RAC – which it failed to take.
Now it says we have no claim.
We paid £409 for cover this year which includes a 'get you home' service.
When we complained it sent us a £40 cheque. We haven't cashed it. Please help.
P.F., Shrewsbury.
Sally Hamilton replies: This was a serious breakdown in your recovery service that landed you with an unexpected £510 bill for recovery, storage and taxis.
You felt extra miffed by the rejection of your claim as your husband, aged 92, has been with the RAC since owning his first car in 1972.
You have rarely called it out and certainly not in the last five years. The paltry sum offered as an apology riled you further, not helped by the fact it came with no explanation or apology.
A letter was only sent to you later after your son intervened on your behalf. In this, the RAC simply stated that its terms say it cannot guarantee attendance times but agreed it 'fell short' in your case, for which it sent you the £40 cheque.
While saying it understood this must have been distressing, it did not uphold your complaint about the police having to intervene. It said this can be necessary in dangerous situations.
It certainly was dangerous. You described how your breakdown nightmare began one day in late February, when you were driving to your local Tesco.
The car lost power, forcing you to pull on to a narrow grass verge with large volumes of traffic roaring past. With no power, your hazard lights didn't work.
It must have been frightening. Fortunately, a highways maintenance vehicle came to your aid and offered protection by parking behind your car.
Scam Watch
Households should beware a scam email that impersonates high-street bank NatWest, consumer website Which? warns.
Fraudsters say that your account needs to be 'reauthenticated' by clicking on the link in the email. While it may look genuine, it is sent from a random email address and has nothing to do with the bank.
Do not click on the link in the email as it is an attempt to steal your personal and financial information. Instead, forward it to report@phishing.gov.uk
When you phoned the RAC, it said there would be a two-hour delay and so advised you to call the police. They arrived half-an-hour later, put cones up and allowed you to sit in their vehicle while you waited for the RAC.
The officer also called the firm but again was told it would take at least two hours. As he couldn't wait, he called a local recovery service to tow the car to a compound 30 miles from where you live. This cost you £192. The officer kindly drove you home.
The next day you had to pay the compound a fee in cash to release the car. Luckily you had enough notes between you. You took a taxi costing £50 to the compound.
You sat there all day until the facility closed. The RAC did not appear, so you took another taxi home and arranged recovery to a local garage.
I was shocked that the RAC didn't take your situation seriously and as you had hit a roadblock with your complaint, I asked it to take a fresh look at your case.
I am pleased to say it didn't take long to see the failure of its service to you that day. It made a U-turn and met your £510 claim in full, to which £75 was added as an apology.
A spokesman says: 'We've apologised to Mr and Mrs F and reimbursed all their costs and added a gesture of goodwill in recognition of their valued long-standing membership.
'This doesn't reflect the high level of service we provide to the thousands of members we rescue every day, and steps have been taken to ensure this doesn't happen in the future.'
Opened standard account thinking it was an Isa
I found online what I thought was an excellent 4.25 per cent one-year fixed rate Individual Savings Account (Isa) from MBNA and opened an account with £20,000.
I received a text offering me the possibility of further investment into the account. This set off alarm bells as £20,000 is the maximum allowable in an Isa in a tax year.
When I queried this, MBNA said I had opened a standard account and that it doesn't offer Isas. I asked if I could cancel the arrangement. But they said the money could not be withdrawn.
I.S., Gloucestershire.
Sally Hamilton replies: You were annoyed with yourself for the blunder but after doing some research online, believed that under consumer law you would be permitted a cooling off period of at least 14 days, allowing you to change your mind without penalty.
And since you had realised your mistake within days, you believed there was plenty of time to get out of the arrangement.
But it was not to be. MBNA said it sympathised with your predicament, but its hands were tied.
Under the Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013, a cooling off period does apply to many products and services bought online, including certain savings accounts.
Variable rate accounts typically offer this benefit but providers are not obliged to provide it for fixed rate deals like the one you accidentally picked.
Some do so voluntarily, but not MBNA. There are exceptions to the fixed-rate rule. Cash Isas – even fixed-rate ones – can be cancelled within 14 days if a saver has a change of heart.
I felt MBNA could have been more flexible, so I asked them to reconsider. A few days later, it came back with the news that it had decided, as a gesture of goodwill, to let you close the account after all with no penalties.
A spokesman says: 'This type of account [opened by Mr S] is not covered by the cooling off period as set out by the Consumer Contracts Regulations.
As part of the account opening process, we explain withdrawals can't be made during the fixed one-year term.
Appreciating that Mr S made a mistake on this occasion, as a gesture of goodwill, we'll help him move the money to an alternate account.'
When we caught up last week, you confirmed the money had been released and that you have opened a cash Isa with another bank.
Straight to the point
I sold four Decleor products on Vinted for £17.50 and posted it to the buyer.
But when they received the parcel Vinted messaged me to say the order was suspended as the buyer reported it was empty.
Vinted wants a photograph of the package, which I don't have. The buyer is going to get a refund and I am out of pocket.
A.H., Coventry.
The money has now been sent to your Vinted account.
***
I Bought a John Lewis leather bed frame back in 2013 for £699. But it recently started peeling and shedding.
It's clear it's not leather at all but a vinyl surface coating with woven mesh underneath, which an upholsterer has confirmed.
John Lewis are taking the side of the supplier which claims it is leather. I know the warranty is up but it seems so morally wrong.
C.L., via email.
John Lewis says the bed frame is out of warranty and it has limited product information available, but it has given you a gesture of goodwill.
***
Last May I bought and moved into a new flat. I have since been receiving letters from a bank addressed to women I don't recognise, which I have been returning.
I accidentally opened one as I hold a credit card with the same bank. It said this person held an offset mortgage at my address.
The bank won't tell me anything, citing data protection.
D.G., West Midlands.
The bank says it does not hold a mortgage on your property and the letters have now stopped.
They were sent to you due to an administrative mistake by another customer.
Write to Sally Hamilton at Sally Sorts It, Money Mail, Northcliffe House, 2 Derry Street, London W8 5TT or email sally@dailymail.co.uk — include phone number, address and a note addressed to the offending organisation giving them permission to talk to Sally Hamilton. Please do not send original documents as we cannot take responsibility for them. No legal responsibility can be accepted by the Daily Mail for answers given.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Alex Jones reveals she was completely unaware about complaints made against her The One Show co-host Jermaine Jenas
Alex Jones has revealed she was completely unaware about complaints made against her The One Show co-host Jermaine Jenas. Jenas, 42, was taken off the show after being fired by the BBC for sending inappropriate messages to female employees during his time at the corporation. The sexting scandal also cost Jenas his 13-year marriage after his wife Ellie, the mother of three of his four children, announced the pair were divorcing earlier in March. Someone who was oblivious to the complaints was Welsh presenter Alex, who used to host The One Show alongside Jenas. Speaking to The Big Issue, she said: 'I very much take people on face value. But with JJ I didn't know what was going on. I thought he was taking extended leave. 'If that was my daughter and she felt uncomfortable with someone's behaviour, I hope that whatever company she was working for would deal with it swiftly as well.' Jenas, who also has a daughter from a previous relationship, was sacked by the BBC in August, which resulted in him losing his hosting gig on The One Show and punditry work on both Match of the Day and 5 Live. The BBC confirmed their decision while he was on air guest hosting talkSPORT's drive time show. His agency MC Saatchi also cut ties with him before he brought in a crisis PR team to handle the aftermath of the scandal. Jenas revealed he lied to wife Ellie during a family holiday in order to sneak off and take a Zoom call with BBC bosses after news of his X-rated messages was first revealed within the broadcaster. And he also told how she had kicked him out of their £1million home in Hertfordshire after he admitted sending inappropriate messages to two female colleagues. Speaking to the Filthy Rellas podcast last month, Jenas claimed historical problems within the relationship also contributed to the break up. He said: 'The reality is, me and my wife haven't split up because I sent some text messages to some people at work. 'We had issues for a period of time, it all comes to a head and you eventually make a decision to say, as adults, we will be better parents for our children if we just remain friends and that's it. 'We had 16 amazing years together, me and my wife, how many people last that long? Sixteen years. Ups and downs. She caught the wrong end of my [playing] career, bless her.' During an interview with The Sun shortly after he was sacked by the BBC, Jenas admitted his wife was 'raging' over the incident. He said: 'We've not really spoken properly since. She's absolutely raging.' Jenas continued: 'It's just about the children right now. It's the school holidays and they're trapped in the house because photographers are outside my house. 'They're like, 'What's going on, Daddy?'. It's tough.' He added: 'I've got to take responsibility and I've apologised to all of them. 'I don't know what to say about that, to be honest with you. It's just hard at home for the kids right now. My wife's a real one 'My wife is solid and she's amazing. She is kind. She just needs some time.' Jenas bombarded a woman working at the World Cup in Qatar two years ago with unwanted messages asking 'You want my boy now?' During the interview, Jenas insisted Ellie should not fear more women coming out of the woodwork with tales of further inappropriate behaviour. However, weeks after the scandal broke, MailOnline revealed Jenas bombarded a woman working at the World Cup in Qatar two years ago with unwanted messages asking 'You want my boy now?' before sending her a picture of his manhood, despite her making clear she was not interested in his advances. The following week, we also told how he repeatedly pestered a junior make-up artist for sex - and when she told him she had a boyfriend replied: 'Just come to my dressing room early and I'll [perform a sex act] on u… that's not cheating.' That incident took place when he was working for BT Sport in 2017, where he was a rising star as a football pundit.


BBC News
5 minutes ago
- BBC News
Further concerns raised over new maritime legislation in Jersey
A scrutiny panel in Jersey has again raised concerns over proposed rule changes aimed at strengthening maritime legislation on the Economic and International Affairs Scrutiny Panel already raised doubts over the legislation not being able to stop people using boats while under the influence of drink or drugs. Now it has asked for clarity on who would be carrying out breath tests if alcohol was suspected to have contributed to causing death or serious panel said it understood there was a Memorandum of Understanding between the police and harbour to undertake breath tests, but it had "not yet been completed". 'Lack of clarity' The panel said it would like to see a copy of the agreement so it can "better understand the impact on the resources available".It has also requested details on the current legislation around careless or dangerous operation of a commercial vessel while under the influence of drugs or of the panel, Deputy Montfort Tadier, said the proposed legislation put forward by the Minister for Sustainable Economic Development has a "lack of clarity".He said there were questions over how it would be policed and where the different responsibilities will fall. Mr Tadier said: "The panel is aware that budget constraints mean the States of Jersey are having to carefully consider how their resources are used."The panel has already made it clear that we are concerned that a specific offence relating to the operation of a vessel while intoxicated has not been included in the draft regulations." He added: "Before we make any further recommendations or amendments to the proposition, we need to better understand how the current proposals would impact existing resources and what any further changes could mean for the police or Harbour Master."The panel will present its findings and recommendations to the States Assembly ahead of further debate on the draft regulations, which is due to take place in October.


BBC News
5 minutes ago
- BBC News
Warning of 'trouble' in Trowbridge without more youth facilities
A small business owner has warned politicians and police to "expect trouble" unless more money is invested in youth Witter, who co-founded Food Amore restaurant in Trowbridge, Wiltshire, said she regularly witnessed anti-social behaviour among young people in the town. Police and crime commissioner (PCC) Philip Wilkinson has vowed to tackle the issue as well as introducing a Public Spaces Protection Order. "We just need more resource and more grants and more money to do more," said Wiltshire councillor Jo Trigg. Trowbridge residents, businesses and councillors met with the PCC at an event last week to discuss their concerns about crime in the town. Ms Witter said she was particularly concerned about young people's behaviour during the summer holidays."Apart from the skate park, where is there for these children to go? So don't be surprised when they're hanging out outside The Shires making the place look a bit risky."The children that don't tend to hang out, will hang out. That will become their culture. Then they'll start mixing with the wrong crowd, and then what? "Kids are easily influenced," she added. "You need to nip it in the bud, because you're dragging good kids into bad trouble." Ms Witter suggested a share of the £9m invested on restoring the town hall would have been better spent on a community centre. Kowann O'Neill, an 18-year-old from the town, said he frequently sees underage drinkers. He said: "Lots of kids would rather go out, get drunk and do drugs because there's not enough entertainment or any fun activities."These kids are going to grow up with the worst reputation, their education is ruined. "They're not going to have good jobs. It is just sad." Police community support officer Harry Brain patrols the town centre, speaking to intoxicated people and drug users to signpost them to the help available. He said there was an increase in this type of behaviour over the past year, but described a "massive decrease" in recent weeks. However, Mr Brain said business owners told him they see anti-social behaviour "24/7". Mr Brain said it was vital anybody who had concerns about behaviour in the town reports it to the police."There has been a few issues in the past with communication between the agencies and who's responsible for what," he said."I think we are seeing that the responsibilities are more shared and we know exactly what we should be doing and where we should be going," he added. He said reporting problems will help police in the long-term by showing them where patrols should be carried out. Ms Trigg is also a trustee for the charity Trowbridge Future, which runs youth activities.A venue on Mill Street opened last year following an award of more than £430,000 in National Lottery Trigg has said "more and more" teens are going to the building to seek a safe space to hang out.