Commerce minister Piyush Goyal confident of US trade pact ahead of tariff deadline
Piyush Goyal
said he was optimistic that India could reach an agreement with the US ahead of an August 1 deadline to avert threatened tariffs of 26%.
"I'm always confident," Goyal said in an interview Thursday with Bloomberg TV in London, when asked how he was feeling about prospects for a pact.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Cybersecurity
PGDM
Data Science
MCA
Operations Management
Public Policy
Product Management
Finance
Leadership
Data Science
MBA
Others
Artificial Intelligence
Project Management
Degree
Healthcare
healthcare
Data Analytics
Management
others
Digital Marketing
CXO
Technology
Design Thinking
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
10 Months
MIT xPRO
CERT-MIT xPRO PGC in Cybersecurity
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
"I've had some wonderful engagement with my friend and colleague from the US," he said, calling
US Commerce Secretary
Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer "very dear friends."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
Goyal insisted there weren't any sticking points in the US-India relationship or in current
trade talks
, and clarified that immigration rules - including around H-1B visas for skilled workers - had not come up in this year's talks.
"We have very robust negotiations going on with several countries," including with the US, EU, New Zealand, Peru, and Chile, Goyal said Thursday.
Live Events
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
MEA ‘nearly lost the plot' on Indus Treaty negotiations, says former Finance Secretary Subhash Garg
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) nearly 'lost the plot' over the Indus Water Treaty talks with Pakistan in 2016, as senior MEA officials entered into a tussle with the World Bank, before the issue was retrieved — the claim is made by former Finance Secretary Subhash Chandra Garg, India-appointed Executive Director at the World Bank (2014-2017), in his latest book, which recounts for the first time the tensions between the Modi government and World Bank President Jim Kim over the Kishenganga hydropower project. The point of contention was whether the World Bank, which has a limited role in guiding any disputes or differences between India and Pakistan, would decide to appoint the 'court of arbitration' Pakistan had asked for, or a 'neutral expert', as India wanted. After his controversial first book about his unceremonious exit from the Union Finance Ministry, Mr. Garg has now taken aim at the MEA in his new book, No, Minister: Navigating Power, Politics and Bureaucracy with a Steely Resolve, where he says he was sidelined during the initial stages of the Indus Water Treaty negotiations in 2016. He also claims that he was told to 'keep off the matter', and only attend meetings to be led by India's Deputy Chief of Mission Taranjit Sandhu (later the Ambassador to the U.S. before he retired and joined politics). '[However], by the middle of November, the MEA team was getting nervous. It was not able to nudge the World Bank team in the direction it wanted, i.e., to appoint a neutral expert and began to sense that the Bank was tilting towards Pakistan,' Mr. Garg wrote, in the chapter titled 'Bringing Indus Waters Arbitration Back From the Brink'. At this point, the book claims that Mr. Jaishankar made a visit to Washington and asked Mr. Garg to take charge of matters. Mr. Garg accepted the request, but insisted that no MEA official join the discussions, and even turned back then MEA Joint Secretary Gopal Baglay (now India's High Commissioner to Australia) from the meeting with Mr. Kim, although he had travelled non-stop for 20 hours to reach Washington. According to Mr. Garg, it was his own intervention, in a one-on-one meeting with Mr. Kim, that eventually helped ensure a neutral expert, Ian Solomon, was appointed, after the World Bank accepted Pakistan's demand for a court of arbitration at The Hague. The MEA did not respond to a request for comments on Mr. Garg's claims. The Hindu also reached out to Mr. Sandhu and Mr. Baglay for a comment, and they did not respond to or deny the claims. In Washington, World Bank officials privy to the negotiations confirmed the tussle between the World Bank and the Indian government, but said they could not comment on whether it was Mr. Garg's meeting with the World Bank chief or other interventions that eventually changed the course of events. The World Bank first ruled that having a neutral expert and court together could lead to 'contradictory outcomes'. However, subsequently, it facilitated the setting up of both an expert as well as a Chairperson to the Court of Arbitration. India has refused to attend the proceedings in the Court of Arbitration at The Hague. Pakistan has maintained that it is working within the terms of the treaty, whereas India says the treaty does not allow such parallel dispute mechanisms. When asked by The Hindu, Mr. Garg said this should not have been an 'institutional turf battle', and that he did not want India's case to be 'compromised' even as the World Bank, the U.S. and the U.K. had gone ahead with appointing experts to take the Pakistan application for arbitration forward. Allowing Pakistan's diplomats to continue the process unchallenged would have an impact on other negotiations, he added. After the Pahalgam terror attacks in April this year, India has decided to 'suspend' the Indus Water Treaty, but some of the book's revelations are significant for future decisions on similar issues. The book recounts Pakistan's campaign against the Kishenganga and Ratle hydropower projects in Jammu-Kashmir; India's objections to the International Monetary Fund/World Bank funding of the Gulpur hydropower project in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir; and China's objections in 2010 to multilateral funding for a hydropower project in Arunachal Pradesh, leading Mr. Garg to conclude that the government and the World Bank needed better communication between themselves. Mr. Garg also pointed out that Mr. Kim and Mr. Modi had a good relationship, and Mr. Kim's plan to fund schemes for 'stunted' or malnourished children had not gone down well with Mr. Modi. In Parliament this week, the Union Ministry of Women and Child Development said that about 37% of children under five years registered on their tracker were found to be stunted. 'I believe India's approach of not fine-tuning its stance in line with World Bank policies has harmed its own interests more than serving it,' Mr. Garg, who moved to India as Economic Affairs Secretary after his tenure at the World Bank ended, said. Differences with Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman led to his transfer as Secretary in the Union Ministry of Power in August 2019. He applied for voluntary retirement that same day, and retired after serving the mandatory notice period on October 31, 2019. (With inputs from Jacob Koshy and T.C.A. Sharad Raghavan in New Delhi.)
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Probably will know in an hour…': Donald Trump and EU chief begin trade deal talks in Scotland; seen as make-or-break
Donald Trump trade deals (AI image) US-EU trade deal: US President Donald Trump has begun trade deal talks with European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland. Ahead of the talks, Trump spoke of the likelihood of a trade deal saying, '. .probably will know in an hour.' Trump and Ursula von der Leyen are looking to resolve a prolonged transatlantic trade dispute as the deadline approaches. Earlier Trump indicated a 50 percent probability of reaching an agreement with the European Union, which faces a reciprocal tariff of 30% unless a trade agreement is secured by August 1, with US officials confirming on Sunday that "no extensions" would be granted. Von der Leyen's European Commission, representing EU member states, is actively pursuing an agreement to protect trade relations valued at $1.9 trillion annually in goods and services. An EU diplomatic source told AFP that a framework for agreement emerged following late-night discussions on Saturday, several crucial matters remained unresolved. The ultimate decision remains with Trump. A diplomatic source was quoted as saying that while a political agreement exists, it awaits Trump's approval, who is maintaining negotiations until the final moment. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If you have a mouse, play this game for 1 minute Navy Quest Undo The suggested arrangement includes a standard 15% tariff on European Union exports to the US, matching Japan's agreement, with exemptions for crucial industries such as aircraft and spirits, excluding wine. EU member states must ratify any agreement. Their ambassadors, whilst in Greenland, received updates from the commission and planned subsequent meetings following potential agreement confirmation. The EU representative indicated that the 27 nations broadly supported the proposed arrangement, whilst maintaining their established negotiating positions. The summit between Trump and von der Leyen is taking place at Turnberry along Scotland's southwestern shoreline, at the president's golf establishment, where he spent considerable time playing over the weekend. Trump, aged 79, expressed on Friday his aspiration to achieve a significant agreement with the EU. "I think we have a good 50-50 chance," the president stated, noting approximately 20 unresolved matters. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
SIR: EC gets 7.24cr responses, faces flak over 57L likely deletions
Patna: The Election Commission (EC) on Sunday said it received enumeration forms from over 91.69% of the Bihar's 7.89 crore electors even as its special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in the state has come under intense criticism from political leaders, academics and civil society members. The controversy arose from the EC's revelation that around 57 lakh electors have been marked as either "untraceable" or "dead" during the drive, raising serious concerns over the methodology and execution of the exercise. While the EC hailed the participation as significant, highlighting that 7.24 crore forms were collected, including 29 lakh submitted online, critics argued that the exclusion of such a large number of electors indicates potential systemic flaws in voter roll maintenance. "The untraceable section of 35 lakh electors are none other than our own migrant workers who have struggled for existence for years," said DM Diwakar, former director of A N Sinha Institute of Social Studies. "These people could not return home to submit documents manually or online. This is a denial of their constitutional right," he added. The EC, on the other hand, claimed that booth level officers (BLOs) visited every household thrice and held special camps in 5,683 wards across 261 urban local bodies to ensure no elector was left out. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Brain tumor has left my son feeling miserable; please help! Donate For Health Donate Now Undo It further said no deletions would be made from the draft electoral rolls, set to be published on Aug 1, without due process. "As per Para 5(b) of SIR guidelines, no name can be deleted without notice and a speaking order of the ERO/AERO," the EC said, adding that any elector aggrieved by a decision may appeal to the district magistrate and subsequently to the chief electoral officer. Despite these assurances, scepticism abounds. "While the EC claims to increase voter participation, it is ruthlessly deleting names without giving people time or opportunity," said Diwakar. "No one can be deprived of voting rights due to lack of documents," he added. CPI-ML state secretary Kunal accused the EC of carrying out a "deletion campaign" rather than a revision. "SIR kuchh aur nahin, balki chhatni abhiyan hai," he said, citing the example of Khopira village in Bhojpur district where the number of registered voters dropped from 1,200 to 911 after the revision. "Three hundred villagers had only temporarily migrated for work, but they were wrongly marked as permanently gone," he alleged. RJD spokesperson Chitranjan Gagan questioned the EC's count of 22 lakh deceased voters. "How can 22 lakh people die within six months of the last summary revision in January?" he asked, pointing out that only 12.43 lakh deaths were recorded in Bihar between 2022 and 2024, according to official state data. "Where has this inflated death toll come from?" Gagan also expressed concern over the fate of nearly 45% of Bihar's electorate who reportedly lack any of the 11 identity documents required by the EC. "Deletion of their names looks inevitable," he said. The EC defended its outreach, saying that it issued full-page advertisements in 246 newspapers across India and instructed state CEOs to reach out to temporarily migrated Bihar workers. "Meetings were also held with political parties and BLOs engaged with booth level agents to facilitate form submissions. Each BLA was permitted to file up to 50 enumeration forms daily to ensure full party involvement," the EC said on Sunday. The commission added the scrutiny of received forms would continue till Aug 1 and the claims and objections period would run from Aug 1 to Sept 1. Volunteers are being trained to assist in filing appeals and a standardised format for this will be widely circulated.
