Trump, Zelensky discuss weapons, air defence
An explosion during a Russian drone and missile strike on Kyiv. Photo: Reuters
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said he discussed air defences in a conversation with U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday, and agreed to work on increasing Kyiv's capability to "defend the sky" as Russian attacks escalate.
He added in a message on Telegram that he discussed joint defence production, as well as joint purchases and investments with the US leader.
Ukraine has been asking Washington to sell it more Patriot missiles and systems that it sees as key to defending its cities from intensifying Russian air strikes.
A decision by Washington to halt some shipments of weapons to Ukraine prompted warnings by Kyiv that the move would weaken its ability to defend against Russia's airstrikes and battlefield advances. Germany said it is in talks on buying Patriot air defence systems to bridge the gap.
One source briefed on the call told Reuters they were optimistic that supplies of Patriot missiles could resume after what they called a "very good" conversation between the presidents.
US outlet Axios reported, citing unnamed sources, that the call lasted around 40 minutes, and that Trump told Zelensky he would check what US weapons due to be sent to Ukraine, if any, had been put on hold.
Zelensky, speaking later in his nightly video address, said he and Trump had agreed to "arrange a meeting between our teams to strengthen air defences.
"We had a very detailed discussion on joint production. We need it, America needs it."
The conversation came a day after Trump said he had a disappointing call with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Russia pummelled Kyiv with the largest drone attack of the war across the capital, hours after Trump's conversation with Putin on Thursday.
Zelensky called the attack "deliberately massive and cynical." (Reuters)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Will US strikes on Iran tighten North Korea's nuclear resolve? Why China might be worried
Last month's US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities could strengthen North Korea's view that nuclear weapons are vital for its survival, deepening Pyongyang's distrust and reinforcing its commitment to nuclear arms, security experts have warned. They added that the attacks were likely to undermine denuclearisation efforts on the Korean peninsula, a goal shared by Beijing , and that increasing US pressure on North Korea risked destabilising the region and encouraging nuclear proliferation. Stephen Costello, a non-resident fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said, 'North Korean leaders may confirm their previous assessment: that [US President Donald] Trump acts for reasons that are not 'security' or geopolitical-related. He is therefore an emotional, unpredictable force, and not one that is trustworthy at all.' According to Niklas Swanstrom, executive director of the Stockholm-based Institute for Security and Development Policy, the US strikes on Iran are likely to drive North Korea to make its nuclear arsenal more 'mobile and dispersed', prioritise second-strike capability, and invest heavily in deep underground facilities and redundant production capabilities. 'Any remaining possibility of North Korean denuclearisation will be effectively terminated, as the regime will view nuclear weapons as the ultimate guarantee of survival,' Swanstrom said. During his first term, Trump held a series of historic talks with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un on the issue. The first summit in Singapore in 2018 resulted in a joint statement with vague commitments to denuclearisation, while a second a year later in Hanoi, Vietnam, ended abruptly without a deal.
South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Donald Trump says US and China will hold talks on TikTok deal early next week
US President Donald Trump has reaffirmed his interest in visiting China and announced that talks between Beijing and Washington were set to start early next week on a possible TikTok deal that could determine the future of the popular video-sharing platform. The fate of TikTok, which faces a potential ban in the US over national security concerns, has long been a sticking point in US-China relations. Under a law passed by the US Congress last year, ByteDance Ltd, the Beijing-based parent company of the social media app, is required to divest TikTok and secure a local buyer in the US. Trump, who has extended the divestment deadline three times to allow more time for negotiations, said on Friday that the US 'pretty much' had a deal on the sale of the app. 'I think we're gonna start Monday or to China, perhaps President Xi [Jinping] or one of his representatives, but we pretty much have a deal,' Trump told reporters on Air Force One, according to Reuters. When asked how confident he was that China would agree to a deal, he said, 'I'm not confident, but I think so. President Xi and I have a great relationship, and I think it's good for them. I think the deal is good for China and it's good for us.'
AllAfrica
16 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Ukraine mess: finding a way forward
The recent massive bombings on Ukrainian territory and advances by the Russian army are harbingers of the end game that will befall Ukraine unless that country can find a way out. One solution is to make Ukraine a flexible actor, meaning to insulate Zelensky. The best way to do that is a coalition government to carry the burden of negotiations with Russia. Today we keep hearing from Zelensky and his cohorts that they can win the war without America, that they won't yield even one meter of Ukrainian territory to the hated Russians, that they can buy American military equipment 'on rental' or buy American hardware by using Germany as a front. Does the Ukrainian leadership actually believes what they are saying? My guess is they don't believe any of it but are trying to reassure their people. But it is hard to be reassuring when missiles and drones are exploding everywhere and you are sleeping in a shelter or a cold basement. The great blunder came in on or about March 30, 2022. That is when Boris Johnson allegedly convinced Zelensky to back out of the peace deal agreed to by the parties in Istanbul. My own reading is that Johnson gave a sort of legitimacy to a Zelensky decision to walk away from a deal with Russia, fearing that his army would topple his presidency and maybe kill him. Prior to that, as former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett reported, Zelensky was afraid the Russians would kill him, and Bennett secured a pledge from Vladimir Putin not to do so. But no such pledge was possible if the threat was from ultras in the Ukrainian army. Putin (l) with Naftali Bennett . Photo: RIA Novosti Since then, Zelensky has taken a fully irredentist position on any settlement with Russia, demanding the Russian army leave Ukraine and that Putin be punished for war crimes. By his total inflexibility Zelensky has foreclosed successful mediation by the United States. To cover his tracks, Zelensky has demanded a 60 day cease fire, something the Russians would never accept, but Trump tried to sell it to Moscow, to no effect. The idea was again floated as recently as July 3rd when Putin and Trump talked for more than an hour by telephone. The problem for Ukraine, not just Zelensky, is that Ukraine is running out of weapons and soldiers and starting to lose territory at an alarming rate. As supply roads and ammunition dumps, along with command centers and factories, are destroyed, the situation worsens on a daily basis. The Russians have a number of aces in their hands. First, they have a large army with a significant reserve that they have not committed to the war yet. That compares with Ukraine's serious problems not only in recruiting new soldiers, but also in keeping them, as desertion rates have grown at an alarming pace. Russia also is bringing in more North Koreans, something that appears to strengthen North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, who recently held a tearful public funeral for his soldiers killed in the Ukraine war (there were only five coffins) and a big celebratory concert extolling the virtue of sacrificing your life for the Fatherland. Russian war production is also reportedly at an all time high while Ukraine's suppliers are floundering badly. The recent 'show cause' letter the army sent to the US defense company General Dynamics, which partnered with a Turkish company, Repkon, threatened to cancel the project tasked with building a 155mm artillery production plant in Mesquite, Texas. Mesquite Ammo Plant . Photo Alan Scaia The US-government-owned new factory (the first of three) was supposed to buck up US 155mm shell production enough to comfortably supply Ukraine. Now the US Army is on the verge of firing GD because the facility is not on schedule and there are serious shortfalls in the machinery for the plant, some of which comes from Turkey. Around the same time the Army released its 'show cause' letter to GD, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that certain supplies, some of them missiles and other high tech equipment, and 155mm shells, would not be delivered to Ukraine – including some supplies already shipped to Poland. The Trump administration has been building up US capabilities in the Middle East. The Hegseth cancellation, based on badly depleted US weapons' stocks, is part of a growing concern that replenishing important systems, including Patriot air defense missiles, has not worked out as expected. The US faces manufacturing delays, supply chain problems, and labor shortages. The best that can be said is that the United States is far away from a defense industrial base that can produce sufficient war fighting equipment for extended conflict periods. Various think tanks and numerous simulations have always said the US would run out of smart weapons in a major conflict in only a few weeks. When you add that the US also cannot keep up with straightforward traditional ammunition production, the problem is seriously compounded. This leaves Ukraine in a cascading mess. Something has to give, and soon, for Ukraine to survive as an independent state. NATO is not going to intervene because the risk outweighs the benefit, as Europe would become a war zone. What is the answer? The first step is to give Trump tools he can use to barter with Russia. Zelensky has done the opposite up till now – but that game, if it continues, is suicidal. The best place to begin is to signal a willingness to accept the Istanbul agreement reached in 2022. The Russians will try to say that the Istanbul agreement is now water under the dam, but there is a chance Putin would accept it as a starting point. He has said in many speeches that the Istanbul agreement would have ended the war and Russia would have accepted it. Obviously there are Russian demands not accounted for at Istanbul that must be taken account of by the parties. The important point is that by accepting Istanbul as a starting point, US President Donald Trump would have something 'real' to start a real diplomatic process, not just a plethora of 'plans' none of which is going anywhere until the starting positions change. Ukrainian Defence minister Oleksii Reznikov (L) shakes hands with Russian negotiators prior the talks between delegations from Ukraine and Russia in Belarus' Brest region on March 3, 2022, following the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Photo: MAXIM GUCHEK/BELTA/AFP via Getty Images) The second point is the US has real leverage that includes access to markets for Russia, technology sharing, commercialization and investment and rebuilding in Ukraine. Putin says he is committed to rebuilding the areas in Donetsk, Zaphorize, Kherson and Crimea that have been destroyed by the fighting. But Russia does not have either the resources or the money to do much on its own. US assistance is needed. The Russians are seeking a high level deal with the United States. The third point is the nature of Ukraine's government, which rules by decree as the Zelensky government has frozen elections and jailed, restricted or exiled opposition politicians. While it is important for Zelensky to end martial law and permit elections, an immediate step is to form a coalition government to negotiate with Russia. A coalition government spreads responsibility for any deal to all the pertinent political players, making it easier for them to make concessions. Another key benefit is that it helps protect Zelensky from accusations of a sellout. Ukraine is at an inflection point. Either it can continue and lose the war, perhaps leading to regime change and a political crisis, or it can take steps to put realistic proposals on the table, something that may require a coalition to achieve. Stephen Bryen is a special correspondent to Asia Times and a former US deputy undersecretary of defense for policy. This article, which originally appeared on his Substack newsletter Weapons and Strategy, is republished with permission.
