The sole rebel Republican who voted to release Epstein files in bold move defying Trump's administration
California Democrat Rep. Ro Khanna pushed an amendment to upcoming crypto legislation that would have forced Attorney General Pam Bondi to release all Epstein-related documents.
Bondi would have to share the files on a 'publicly accessible website' within 30 days of passage.
However, the effort was foiled, failing five to seven, during a Monday night vote by the House Rules Committee, a group of lawmakers that generally sign off on legislation before it gets a final vote on the House floor.
The sensational files, which Trump promised to release while campaigning, will remain under lock and key at the Justice Department - for now.
The president, if he's caught wind of the nail-bitting legislative maneuver, may be unhappy with how close this effort was to succeeding as he and his Cabinet members have worked to delegitimize calls for transparency in the high-profile case.
South Carolina Republican Ralph Norman, a conservative member of the House Freedom Caucus (HFC) and a member who, at times, ruffles GOP leadership's feathers, stunningly sided with Democrats to release the file.
And another Republican decided not to vote at all, apparently wanting to avoid flak from constituents eager to see who was implicated in the deceased pedophile's affairs.
Texas Republican Chip Roy opted not to vote on the measure. Even if he had sided with his fellow HFC member Norman and Democrats the amendment still would've failed by one vote.
'Rules voted 5-7 to block the full House from voting on my amendment to have a FULL release of the Epstein file,' Khanna wrote on X following the failed vote.
'People are fed up. They are fed up. Thanks @RepRalphNorman. Need to put the American people before party!'
The Republicans who voted against the amendment to release the Epstein files include: Rules Chairwoman Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., Michelle Fischbach, R-M.N., Chip Roy, R-Texas, Erin Houchin, R-Ind., Nicholas A. Langworthy, R-N.Y., Austin Scott, R-Ga., H. Morgan Griffith, R-Va., Brian Jack, R-Ga.
Some MAGA devotees feel betrayed by Republican's sudden and puzzling reversal on the release of the deceased banker and his 'client list.'
Attorney General Pam Bondi said earlier this year that the 'client list' was on her desk, but last week the DOJ and FBI said there is no list at all - an admission clearly at odds with the Cabinet member's past comments.
'America deserves the truth about Jeffrey Epstein and the rich powerful elites in his circle,' firebrand Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., posted on X after the vote.
'The line is drawn with anyone who abuses children and vulnerable innocent people.'
Surveillance footage of Jeffrey Epstein's cell dated August 9, 2019, with a time stamp of 12 midnight.Attorney General Pam Bondi on Tuesday sought to tamp down outrage on the right over the Justice Department's recent memo on disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.The Justice Department and FBI released a roughly 11-hour video Monday recorded outside Epstein's prison cell door to dispel claims Epstein did not die by suicide. Some on the far right have seized on time stamps in the video, which skip from 11:58 p.m. to midnight.
'When George Santos is going to prison for 7 years but Epstein only served 13 months, our justice system is CORRUPT!!!'
Greene said, noting how a the former Republican congressman will soon go to jail for fraud and identity theft.
Trump during his campaign he would release additional files on the disgraced financier if he was elected. But last week he appeared to downplay the importance of the scintillating Epstein saga.
'Are people still talking about this creep? That is unbelievable! I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein,' the 79-year-old president responded to a reporter inquiring about the case last week.
Trump also ridiculed Epstein in a post on his Truth Social app over the weekend.
'We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening. We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein,' he posted.
Earlier this year, the White House hosted influencers over to review files on Epstein, but the documents they triumphantly paraded out with were later found to be previously released files - they were duped.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Backstreet Boys' Brian Littrell sues Florida sheriff's office over beach trespassers
Backstreet Boys singer Brian Littrell says a local Florida sheriff's office isn't doing enough to protect his multimillion-dollar beachfront property from trespassers and is asking a judge for an order commanding deputies to do so. The petition filed last month by Littrell's company in a Florida Panhandle county touches on a perennial tug-of-war between usually-wealthy oceanfront property owners and beach-loving members of the public, especially in Florida, which has 825 miles of sandy beaches. Under Florida law, any sand on a beach below the high tide water mark is public. Many homeowners own the sand down to the average high-water line, though some counties over the decades have passed local ordinances that let the public use otherwise private beaches for sunbathing, fishing and walking if people have historically had access for those purposes. Property records show that Littrell's company purchased the property in Santa Rosa Beach in Walton County in 2023 for $3.8 million. A spokeswoman for the Walton County Sheriff's Office said Wednesday that the office doesn't comment on pending litigation. 'The Walton County Sheriff's Office prides itself on handling every situation, call for service, or interaction with professionalism using a customer service approach,' public information officer Lindsey Darby said in an email. 'This has always been our philosophy and will remain so moving forward.' In the petition, Littrell's company said that chairs, umbrellas and small tables had been put out on the beach, as well as 'No Trespassing' signs, to mark it as private property. But that effort had been in vain 'as numerous trespassers have set out to antagonize, bully, and harass the Littrell family by regularly, every day, trespassing,' according to the petition. The sheriff's office has refused requests to remove trespassers or charge them, and the family has had to hire private security, the petition said. Walton County, which has become home to several famous property owners besides Littrell over the past two decades, has been at the center of a recent fight between private property owners and the public over access to beaches. A 2018 Florida law that stemmed from a Walton County ordinance blocked any local government from passing ordinances dealing with public beach access until affected homeowners were notified, a public hearing was held and a court had determined whether a private beach was historically open to the public. Florida lawmakers this year approved legislation that restored control back to local authorities, and Gov. Ron DeSantis signed it into law last month in Santa Rosa Beach, the beach town where Littrell's house is located. ___ Follow Mike Schneider on the social platform Bluesky: @
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's Turnberry course in Scotland faces issues ahead of British Open return
Donald Trump 's Turnberry golf course will not host the British Open in the near future, with the R&A's new chief executive, Mark Darbon, stating that logistical challenges, rather than political considerations, are the primary obstacle. Turnberry, widely regarded as one of the most picturesque links courses on the Open rotation, is situated along the Ayrshire coast in Scotland, opposite the iconic Ailsa Craig. It last staged the Open in 2009, prior to Mr Trump's acquisition of the resort. Mr Darbon, who succeeded Martin Slumbers at the R&A this year, clarified that Turnberry has not been removed from the list of potential British Open venues. However, significant transportation and other infrastructure issues must be addressed. "I think we've been extremely clear on our position in respect of Turnberry. We love the golf course but we've got some big logistical challenges there," he explained. "You see the scale of their setup here and we've got some work to do on the road, rail and accommodation infrastructure around Turnberry." Mr Darbon confirmed that the R&A held constructive discussions with Eric Trump and other leaders from Trump Golf a few months ago. "I think they understand clearly where we're coming from. We talked through some of the challenges that we have so we've got a good dialogue with them," he added. This follows previous comments from Mr Slumbers, who indicated the R&A would not return to Turnberry until the focus was solely on golf, rather than the owner. Despite speculation that Donald Trump might seek intervention from the British government to bring the Open back to Turnberry, Mr Darbon stated that the decision rests with the R&A. "We have an ongoing dialogue with the UK government given that we're a major event that creates significant value into the UK economy," he said. "We've spoken to them specifically about Turnberry and I think they've made it clear that the decision around where we take our championship rests with us." He added: "I would find it difficult to predict whether there will be any discussion on The Open if the President is making a visit here." Turnberry has only hosted the British Open four times, notably the 1977 "Duel in the Sun" between Tom Watson and Jack Nicklaus. However, the Open has grown considerably, and the existing road infrastructure around Turnberry is limited. Turnberry is not the only Scottish links course currently overlooked by the R&A. Muirfield, located along the Firth of Forth east of Edinburgh, is considered one of the purest links courses, having hosted 15 Opens since 1892, most recently in 2013. Only St Andrews has hosted more Opens. However, Muirfield has not been revisited since 2013 as the R&A prioritises courses capable of accommodating large crowds. While 142,000 spectators attended the last Open at Muirfield, Royal Portrush is expected to draw 278,000 this week, second only to St Andrews in attendance figures. The Open will head to Royal Birkdale next year, followed by St Andrews in 2027, with the 2028 venue yet to be announced. Muirfield has historically never gone more than 11 years between Opens, excluding wartime interruptions. "We love the golf course at Muirfield. We're in a discussion with the venue right now," Mr Darbon confirmed. "There's some things that we need to evolve at Muirfield — the practice ground in particular is a challenge for us with a modern Open and there's some work we need to do with the venue to facilitate some of the infrastructure that we require. But it's a good dialogue and we'd love to be back there in the future." ___
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Nebraska sues neighboring Colorado over how much water it's drawing from the South Platte River
Nebraska is suing Colorado over the amount of water it draws from the South Platte River, the latest in a long history of water rights disputes between the states that have been left increasingly dry by climate change. Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen and state Attorney General Mike Hilgers held a news conference Wednesday to announce the lawsuit, which was filed with the U.S. Supreme Court. 'It's crystal clear. Colorado has been holding water back from Nebraska for almost 100 years and getting more and more egregious every single day,' Pillen said, pointing to Colorado's rapidly expanding population over the past decade. 'So today it's really, really simple: We're here to put our gloves on," Pillen said. "We're going to fight like heck. We're going to get every drop of water.' Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser called the lawsuit 'unfortunate' in a written statement and said Nebraska officials failed 'to look for reasonable solutions.' The lawsuit accuses Colorado of depriving Nebraska of as much as 1.3 million acre-feet (about 160,350 hectare-meters) of water from the river over several years that Nebraska is entitled to under a 1923 compact between the states. The suit also accuses Colorado officials of blocking Nebraska's effort to construct a massive canal — often called the Perkins County Canal — and reservoir project that would see Nebraska seize land in Colorado to divert water into Nebraska, which is also allowed under the compact. Nebraska needs the water not only for agriculture production in its southwestern region — which climate experts predict will grow hotter and drier in the coming decades — but also to feed water supplies in the eastern part of the state, officials said. Nebraska's capital, Lincoln, is expected to get 12% of its water from the proposed canal, Pillen said. The compact entitles Nebraska to 120 cubic feet (3.4 cubic meters) per second from the river during the irrigation season between April 1 and Oct. 15 each year, and 500 cubic feet (about 14 cubic meters) per second during the non-irrigation fall and winter months. Hilgers said Colorado has been shortchanging Nebraska during the irrigation season, allowing only about 75 cubic feet (about 2 cubic meters) per second of water daily into Nebraska this summer. 'I think this may be the most consequential lawsuit that this office will be a part of in my generation,' Hilgers said. 'It is almost impossible to overstate the importance of the South Platte River to the future of the state of Nebraska.' The South Platte, which flows through northeastern Colorado into southwestern Nebraska, has been at the center of a tempest brewing between the two states going back to 2022, when Nebraska announced it would build the canal. Since then, officials from the two states have been haggling over how to carry out both the terms of the compact and land acquisition to build the canal. 'It became clear, despite the very professional and intentional scope of those negotiations, that we were at an impasse,' Hilgers said. Weiser countered that Nebraska officials should have remained at the negotiating table. 'Nebraska's actions will force Colorado water users to build additional new projects to lessen the impact of the proposed Perkins County Canal,' he said. 'When the dust finally settles, likely over a billion dollars will have been spent — tens of millions of that on litigation alone — and no one in Nebraska or Colorado will be better off.' Hilgers said the lawsuit was filed directly with the Supreme Court because it handles disputes between states. The process 'isn't fast,' Hilgers warned. 'We'll probably have a special master appointed within the next 12 months, and under normal litigation timelines, that's maybe 3 to 5 years before we get a result,' he said. That does not mean work on the canal will stop, he said, as he expects work on permitting and design of the canal to continue. Nebraska has been at the center of interstate water disputes for decades. In 2002, Nebraska, Colorado and Kansas reached a settlement over Republican River water allocation after years of legal wrangling. But disputes continued, and new agreements were reached among the states again in 2014. Water disputes could become more common as climate change worsens shortages, said Dr. Carly Phillips, a research scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists — a nonprofit that advocates for climate change solutions. Warmer temperatures affect multiple parts of the hydrological cycle, Phillips said. It is decreasing the snowpack, which is the main way water is stored in the western U.S. Higher temperatures also mean the snow melts earlier each year, changing the availability of stream flow. And states like Nebraska might see increased irrigation demand when it's hotter. 'These patterns are all in the same direction across the board,' Phillips said. 'The trends are really consistent when it comes to snowpack, stream flow, evaporation and irrigation demand.' ____
