Project 2025 architect is taking on Trump stalwart Lindsey Graham, 70, for Senate seat
Joining a crowded primary field, Dans said the Trump administration's cuts to the federal workforce and federal programs are what he had aimed for when putting together Project 2025. But he noted that there's 'more work to do.'
'What we've done with Project 2025 is really change the game in terms of closing the door on the progressive era,' said Dans. 'If you look at where the chokepoint is, it's the United States Senate. That's the headwaters of the swamp.'
Dans will formally announce his bid at a campaign event in Charleston on Wednesday. His campaign will launch with a prayer breakfast followed by an event at a historic venue. About Graham, he said, 'It's time to show him the door.'
Trump 2024 co-campaign manager Chris LaCivita, a senior adviser on the Graham campaign, said in a statement that, 'After being unceremoniously dumped in 2024 while trying to torpedo Donald Trump's historic campaign, Paul Dans has parachuted himself into the state of South Carolina in direct opposition to President Trump's longtime friend and ally in the Senate, Lindsey Graham.'
Graham, who has been in the Senate since 2003, has previously beaten challengers who have taken him on.
President Donald Trump has already endorsed Graham, and Sen. Tim Scott and the state's governor, Henry McMaster, are chairing his bid for a fifth term. Graham, 70, also has millions in his campaign account.
With more than a year left until the 2026 midterm elections, former South Carolina Republican Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer and Democrat Dr. Annie Andrews have also announced that they will run for the seat.
During Trump's first term, Dans worked in the White House as the liaison to the Office of Personnel Management. He said he expects to garner the support of Project 2025 allies and Trump supporters who have grown tired of Graham.
Following Trump's departure from the White House, Dans joined the Heritage Foundation, where he organized Project 2025. The nearly 1,000-page plan for a new Republican administration includes chapters authored by several conservatives and argues for dismantling the federal government and reducing its workforce.
'To be clear, I believe that there is a 'deep state' out there, and I'm the single one who stepped forward at the end of the first term of Trump and really started to drain the swamp,' said Dans, adding that he put together large parts of the tome at his Charleston kitchen table.
Dans said one of the goals was to 'deconstruct the administrative state,' which he argued the Trump administration has been doing, noting former Trump adviser Elon Musk 's leadership at the Department of Government Efficiency, which took the lead in shutting down the United States Agency for International Development.
As Project 2025 came under scrutiny in July last year, Dans departed from the Heritage Foundation. The plan gained notoriety last summer as Democrats highlighted the proposals as a warning of what would be forthcoming if Trump were allowed to return to the White House.
Trump, then a presidential candidate and former president, put some distance between himself and Project 2025, claiming that it wasn't connected to his 'Agenda 47.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Finextra
16 minutes ago
- Finextra
Barclays follows HSBC out of the Net Zero Banking Alliance
Barclays has followed HSBC in withdrawing from the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), claiming that the departure of a host of other global lenders means the organisation "no longer has the membership to support our transition". 1 Founded in 2021, the UN-convened NZBA requires members to commit to "transition the operational and attributable greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from their lending and investment portfolios to align with pathways to net-zero by 2050 or sooner". At its peak it had around 150 members, including most of the world's largest banks. However, that number has dwindled in the last few months. At the beginning of 2025, ahead of Donald Trump's return to the White House, a host of US banks, including JPMorgan, Bank of America, Citi, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo, pulled out of the global climate-focused alliance. The American banks quit amid attacks from Republicans on "woke" capitalism, with the House Judiciary Committee, led by Republican Jim Jordan, claiming that financial environmental alliances have created "a climate cartel". Now, UK-headquartered HSBC and Barclays have joined their US counterparts. Barclays says it is committed to its "ambition" to be a net zero bank by 2050. Says a statement: "Our targets to mobilise $1 trillion of Sustainable and Transition Financing and for financed emissions remain unchanged. We continue to work with our clients on their transition, finance the transition and scale climate tech, while helping to ensure energy security for our customers and clients." Earlier this week, the CEO of Standard Chartered, Bill Winters, hit out at banks that have rowed back on their climate commitments. 'People that said a lot of stuff, but [when] it was fashionable to say it, [and] who are saying either nothing or the opposite now: shame on them,' said Winters, according to the Guardian.
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Corporation behind funds for PBS and NPR says it's ending operations after Trump cuts
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting says it will wind down its operations after the Trump administration and Congress slashed its funding. The organization funds PBS and NPR, as well as more than 1,500 local TV and radio stations. 'Despite the extraordinary efforts of millions of Americans who called, wrote, and petitioned Congress to preserve federal funding for CPB, we now face the difficult reality of closing our operations,' Corporation for Public Broadcasting President and CEO Patricia Harrison said in a statement.
Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump's nuclear submarine statement doesn't actually change anything
US President Donald Trump says he has moved two 'Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions ' in response to threats from former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, a close ally of the dictator Vladimir Putin. It's an almost completely meaningless gesture, however. The United States has 14 Ohio class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines: at least two of them will already have been ready to strike Russia before the current war of words between Medvedev and Trump began. Each boat carries up to 24 Trident II missiles, each of which generally carries four warheads – each one powerful enough to rip the guts out of a city. For many decades now, every second of every day, around the clock, every day of every year, there have been US (and French, and British) submarines ready and in position to destroy Russia. There was no need to move any of them to achieve that. Indeed, there would be good reasons not to do so, at least in the case of the subs already in place. A deterrent submarine on patrol is trying extremely hard not to be found: that's the whole point of putting ballistic missiles on submarines – doing so means they are all but impossible to locate, and so all but impossible to knock out in a pre-emptive strike. A patrolling deterrent boat, therefore, moves through the water very slowly and stealthily. Changing location significantly would probably involve speeding up and becoming easier to find, which would not be a particularly good idea. The President might, of course, have ordered additional boats onto station: but the ones already on duty would be plenty. And of course, as commander-in-chief, Mr Trump could perfectly well claim to 'have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned' simply in the normal course of business. Words matter, especially in the context of nuclear armageddon. Mr Trump's intention is no doubt to signify that he is not cowed by Medvedev's bluster. But as a practical matter, the action he says he has taken doesn't change anything very much.
