
Posts mislead with claims of Nigeria's southeast being excluded from development projects
'When they cry, you call them IPOB,' concludes the post, published on May 19, 2025.
The post was shared by a page belonging to Nigerian singer Charles Oputa, popularly known as 'Charly Boy', to his 180,000 followers.
AFP Fact Check has previously debunked claims by Charly Boy (here, here, here and here).
Image
Screenshot of the misleading Facebook post, taken on June 16, 2025
Nigeria's southeast comprises the states of Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu and Imo.
A previous unilateral declaration of independence in the region and the creation of the republic of Biafra in 1967 led to a 30-month civil war that claimed more than one million lives, most of them Igbos, from the effects of conflict, starvation and disease.
In 2015, renewed protests for Biafran independence re-emerged after decades, with Nnamdi Kanu as a leading figure. He was arrested in Kenya and extradited to Nigeria on June 27, 2021. He faces charges related to treason (archived here).
His trial began afresh on March 21, 2025, after the former judge recused herself (archived here).
However, the posts claim that the region has been excluded from infrastructural and development projects is misleading.
Loan programme
The claim that the southeast region was excluded from a national student loan programme is false.
The programme was introduced by the Bola Tinubu administration in May 2024 to encourage more people to pursue higher education (archived here). As of May 2025, the Nigeria Education Loan Fund (NELFUND) said it had received over a million loan applications for tuition and upkeep from about 629,000 students (archived here).
Data published by the fund showed that a little more than 40,000 students from the southeast had submitted over 57,000 loan applications.
Image
Screenshot of the loan disbursement dashboard taken on June 18, 2025
JAMB failure
The claim about JAMB failure refers to the entry examination taken by teenagers who want to pursue tertiary education. The exam, Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME), is coordinated by the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB).
JAMB reported mass failure in the 2025 edition of the examination, where 78% of the candidates scored less than 200 out of the maximum 400 points (archived here).
The failure was later attributed to a technical glitch that affected students in the Lagos and southeast zones. About 206,000 students were affected in Lagos and 173,387 students were affected in the southeast zone (archived here). So this claim is true, though not limited to the southeast.
Seaport
The claim that there is no seaport in the southeast region of Nigeria is correct.
Nigeria currently has seven seaports, which are all located in the southwest and south-south regions due to their proximity to the Atlantic Ocean (archived here). The southeast region, meanwhile, has rivers that run into the ocean but no coastal land.
However, the Onitsha River Port – while not a seaport – is located in Anambra state in southeast Nigeria. The river port has reported receiving barges and containers in recent years (archived here and here). There is also an inland dry port under construction in Aba, Abia state (archived here).
Inclusion in agencies
The claim that there is no one from the southeast region in the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPCL), the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and the Nigerian Customs Service is misleading.
Although the heads of these agencies are not from the southeast, there are other people from the southeast in top positions at these agencies, including the vice president of business services at the NNPCL (archived here).
The FIRS Act also mandates that the management team must have a representative from each geopolitical zone, one of which is the southeast (archived here). This rule also applies to the Nigeria Customs Service (archived here).
International airport
The claim about the absence of an international airport in the southeast is false. The Akanu Ibiam International Airport is located in Enugu (archived here). However, the airports in Lagos and Abuja enjoy more passenger traffic (archived here).
Railways
The claim that there are no rail lines in the southeast region is false. In November 2024, the government completed and handed over the Port Harcourt-Aba Railway to the Nigeria Railway Corporation to start operations (archived here).
In December 2024, the NRC said the trains transport between 500 and 900 passengers per trip (archived here).
Military checkpoints
The claim that military checkpoints are common in the southeast is true. Due to insecurity (archived here), Mohammed Abubakar, the minister of defence, last year pledged to ramp up security measures in the region with the stated aim of ensuring stability for businesses (archived here).
Military checkpoints are also common in the northern region due to efforts to flush out armed groups like Boko Haram and conflicts between Fulani herders and farmers that have resulted in significant casualties (archived here).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
Inside the world of the Yahoo Boys, Africa's most infamous romance scammers
For half a second, it was unclear if the interview was veering off course. Ben's voice (those interviewed requested anonymity) suddenly became warm and persuasive. "I need a girlfriend that I can trust. Like, I need you. Can you be my girlfriend?" The man was explaining how, from a working-class neighborhood in Lagos, he subtly manages to win over the hearts of his "clients" – as Nigerian scammers call their victims – thousands of kilometers away. Ben used to repair generators for a living. But since his income was too low, he turned to romance scams two years ago – one of the most widespread online frauds in Nigeria. "When I wake up in the morning, I try to see that you're up, check you over, see how you're doing here, I get to know everything about you," he continued, sitting on a plastic chair amid a maze of metal shacks. In the stifling heat, two men lay on the ground less than a meter away. The most important thing, Ben went on, unfazed, is to "build trust."


AFP
a day ago
- AFP
Video shows restaurant fire in Tajikistan, not Iran's attack on Israel
reads a Hindi-language Facebook post shared on June 21, 2025. Image Screenshot of the false Facebook post, taken on June 27, 2025 with a red X added by AFP The clip was shared on Facebook and X with similar claims. The video surfaced after Israel fired missiles at Iranian nuclear and military facilities on June 13, while Iran retaliated with a barrage of missiles targeting Tel Aviv (archived link). Iran's judiciary said at least 935 people were killed in the country during the war, while But the circulating video is unrelated to the recent exchange of fire between the two countries. A of the video's keyframes reveals a clip showing the same scene was posted on YouTube on June 19, 2025, with Tajik-language text giving the same date and (archived link). Image Screenshot comparison of the false post (left) and the video on YouTube Google imagery in the area also matches the scene in the false video (archived link). Image Screenshot comparison of the imagery of the location in Tajikistan on Google Maps (left) and false post video, with matching elements marked for verification Local media in Tajikistan reported on June 20 that the building was completely destroyed in the blaze (archived link). Israel's government department responsible for domestic affairs is called the Ministry of Interior, not "Ministry of Home Affairs" as claimed in the false post (archived link). AFP has debunked more misinformation related to the Iran-Israel conflict here.


AFP
a day ago
- AFP
AI-generated videos do not show Iran relocating nuclear facilities before US strikes
A Facebook post published with a video on June 23, 2025, contains a text overlay in Amharic that reads: 'The nuclear weapons that America claimed to have struck were found in another underground facility.' 'Iran claims that everything is safe,' adds the text overlay at the bottom of the video. Image Screenshot of the false post, taken on June 25, 2025 The post, shared more than 210 times, contains eight seconds of footage showing what appear to be dozens of nuclear warheads with Iranian flags in an underground facility. The post was also shared here on Facebook on June 24, 2025. The same account repeated the claim with a different video a day earlier. 'Iran moved the uranium enrichment facilities to other locations 24 hours before the US attack,' reads the Amharic post shared more than 180 times and dated June 23, 2025. Image Screenshot of the false post, taken on June 25, 2025 It includes a 10-second video that appears to show large containers being transported by a vehicle, while people watch from the roadside. 'The Iran of Islam, the Islamic Republic, in this battle, can destroy Israel in a few hours or perhaps days,' says a man's voice in Arabic. US strikes Israel began attacking Iran on June 13, 2025, hitting nuclear and military facilities and residential areas, and triggering a wave of Iranian missile attacks on Israel that continued until a ceasefire came into effect on June 24, 2025. On June 22, 2025, the US attacked three key Iranian nuclear facilities, including an underground uranium enrichment facility in Fordo, using massive bunker-busting bombs. This was followed by an Iranian missile strike on the largest US military facility in the Middle East, the Al Udeid air base in Qatar (archived here). It remains disputed whether Iran may have moved enriched uranium before the US strikes and whether these caused significant damage after reports indicated that they did not destroy key components and that Iran's nuclear programme was set back only months at most (archived here). However, the videos purporting to show Iranian nuclear facilities being moved to other sites were generated with AI. AI-generated clips The first indications that the video was created artificially are several glitches typical of AI tools. In the first video, for example, there are glitches in the rendering of the nuclear missiles. Some have no heads, only tails, while others have only heads. For some, the design simply breaks off in the middle, making them appear partially suspended in the air. The texture of the concrete walls also morphs as the camera moves along. In the second video, the movement of the vehicle's wheels is inconsistent. At one point, the wheels appear static while the vehicle continues moving. Additionally, the hand movements of people seen waving and taking photos along the roadside appear unnaturally stiff and unrealistic. AFP Fact Check also used the video verification tool InVID-WeVerify to conduct reverse image searches on keyframes from both videos. The search result established that the first clip with a higher resolution was published on YouTube on June 19, 2025 (archived here). The YouTube version has a clear 'Veo' watermark in the bottom right corner. In the Facebook post, the watermark has been cropped out. Image Screenshots of the YouTube video with the 'Veo' watermark (left) and the Facebook post, taken on June 25, 2025 Google's new AI-powered video creation tool, Veo, allows users to generate realistic-looking videos that are currently eight seconds maximum in length, the same as the clip (archived here). Similarly, the search results for the second video revealed that it was AI-generated using another program called InVideo. The tool helps users to create up to 10 seconds of video (archived here). The video was originally published on the Facebook page 'Ayoub Ennachat' on June 4, 2025 — more than two weeks before the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities (archived here). A review of the page shows that it regularly shares AI-generated videos made with InVideo. Image Screenshots of the YouTube video with the 'InVideo AI' watermark (left) and the Facebook post, taken on June 25, 2025 The original video, which has been shared more than 7,500 times, features a 10-second clip with a visible 'InVideo AI' watermark in the top-right corner. The text accompanying the video also mentions 'InVideo'. In the version shared on Facebook with the false claim, the 'InVideo' watermark is covered with Iranian flags. Additionally, the original video features background sounds of wind and passing vehicles. In the false claim, this audio was replaced with a man speaking in Arabic about Iran fighting Israel.