Covid PPE left gathering dust by Tory failings cost taxpayer £762million
Tory failure to check the viability of PPE for up to two years has cost the taxpayer £762million, the Mirror can reveal.
Boris Johnson's Government panic ordered mountains of protective kit as the pandemic took hold, which was piled up in shipping containers as storage facilities were overwhelmed.
But long delays on checking the surplus surgical gowns, masks and visors meant that warranties had expired by the time the faulty PPE was found. This means that taxpayers' cash cannot be recovered through the courts and must be written off.
The failure has been uncovered as part of a year-long probe by Covid counter-fraud commissioner Tom Hayhoe. Chancellor Rachel Reeves tasked him in December with trying to claw back public money lost to fraud and waste during the pandemic.
READ MORE: Rachel Reeves to splash billions of pounds in North and Midlands under major rule change
His first challenge was to review £8.7billion of Covid PPE that then had to be written off the government's books.
Department of Health accounts revealed in 2022 that £673 million worth of equipment was completely unusable, and £750 million was wasted items that were not used before their expiry date.
MPs were told that the Government planned to burn mountains of unusable gear. Nearly £2.6 billion was spent on 'items not suitable for use in the NHS" but could be sold or given to charities.
The remaining stock plummeted in value because demand for PPE had dropped.
A Treasury source said: "The Chancellor has been clear that she wants this money - that belongs to the British people, back in our public services.
"Tom Hayhoe is gripping the carnival of waste that we saw under the Tories and has already uncovered millions of taxpayer pounds wasted on PPE that was left to gather dust.
"Unlike the Tories, Labour won't let fraudsters who sought to profit off the back of a national emergency line their pockets."
The commissioner's final report will be published later in December, which will cover waste and fraud linked to PPE, the furlough scheme, bounce-back loans, business support grants and Rishi Sunak's Eat Out to Help Out.
His initial work on PPE waste was contained in an interim report sent to the Chancellor.
The National Crime Agency (NCA) is separately probing possible criminal offences committed in the PPE procurement system.
Mr Hayhoe is also believed to be looking at whether cash can be recouped from £674million in contracts that the Tories had written off.
The award of lucrative contracts during the pandemic attracted controversy.
PPE Medpro, a firm linked to peer Baroness Michelle Mone and her husband Doug Barowman, was awarded government contracts worth more than £200million through a so-called VIP lane that allowed MPs, officials and ministers to make referrals.
The Government and PPE Medpro are locked in a legal battle over a contract to supply gowns, with a High Court trial due to begin in June.
Mr Barrowman previously accused the Government of trying to "scapegoat" the couple for its own failings.
The Tory Government has always maintained that it was operating in a crisis, with global PPE shortages driving up prices for kit that was essential for frontline workers.
Former Health Secretary Matt Hancock told the Covid Inquiry in March: "I have been subject to enormous amounts of conspiracy theories about what went on here, when in fact what happened was so many people working as hard as they could to save lives, and they bought more PPE as a result. And therefore people are alive who would otherwise be dead."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
How Angela Rayner has become the most influential figure in Starmer's government
As Keir Starmer gathered his top ministers for a special away day in Chequers for a team-building reset on Friday, one figure arrived in a much more powerful position than she was in just two weeks ago. It is now widely recognised by Labour MPs, across the different wings of the party, that deputy prime minister Angela Rayner 's influence in this government is greater than almost anybody else. Certainly more than the wounded chancellor Rachel Reeves, who has been beset by economic woes, and even more than health secretary Wes Streeting who, like Rayner, has been tipped as a future contender for the leadership. She was, though, completely unprepared for the shot fired by the Unite union, after its general secretary announced it had suspended her membership for failing to resolve the Birmingham refuse collectors dispute. But while a trade union that looks set to peel off and back Jeremy Corbyn's new party gave her a headache, Ms Rayner nevertheless is enjoying a surge in influence – for now. Welfare rebellion The biggest reason for her rise is the result of the welfare rebellion just over a week ago. As one party whip put it: 'There's nobody more powerful in the government than Angela at the moment. 'She was the one who brokered the deal with Labour rebels, she was the one who talked people off the ledge from voting against the government.' As another ally pointed out that she did not even want the disability cuts and had already sent a leaked memo to Ms Reeves suggesting wealth taxes instead of austerity. Now, after last Wednesday's PMQs, it seems like the government has no option but to raise taxes. But the turnaround for Ms Rayner actually started with her holdout in the spending review, where she got a £39bn for housing and more than expected for local government. A spot of union bother Some may see the recent decision by Unite the union to suspend her membership (even though she left the union in April) as a problem. But behind the scenes it has confused people on the left and other unions, who believe Ms Rayner has turned Starmer's government leftward on disability benefits and steering through the bill on workers' rights. As a TUC source noted: 'The main metric we are judging this government by is the workers' rights legislation and that is on course.' Unite took action because of her position on the Birmingham bins strike. But an ally of Ms Rayner said: 'It's wild! They know full well that Angela cannot directly intervene in the way that they say, and to attack one of the few remaining cabinet members who is standing up for workers rights and real labour values is simply mad.' However, it remains to be seen if the escalating clash with Unite will halt Ms Rayner's rise. A rival court to Downing Street How the tide can turn. Just over a month ago, there was talk about Ms Rayner being demoted and losing the housing part of her portfolio. Now there is speculation in Westminster that the deputy prime minister could soon have her own official office, with its own staff and comms team. There is some scepticism, especially over what it would mean for Sir Keir himself and his chief of staff Morgan McSweeney. As one ally of Ms Rayner noted: 'Morgan will hate the idea and do everything he can to stop it. An Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) would create a rival court, an alternative centre of government.' The last person to have an ODPM was John Prescott under Tony Blair, but unlike Ms Rayner, Prescott was never seen as a candidate to replace Sir Tony. All about the leadership There is still a lot of fevered speculation about whether Sir Keir can survive as prime minister. The image of his chancellor in tears while he failed to guarantee her future this month became the image of a government spiralling out of control after just a month. There are many waiting to see the results of the elections in Scotland, Wales and English councils next May to decide whether to launch a putsch. If he is forced out, Ms Rayner is now the clear favourite to take over, despite her protestations that she does not want the job. Beware the 'Rayner's rise' trap While Ms Rayner is on top at the moment, there is some speculation that the spending review with Ms Reeves has laid a trap for her much more problematic than the issues with Unite. In getting her cash for local government and housing it appears that the deputy prime minister has signed up to council tax rises of 5 per cent. At the housing and local government select committee hearing this week in the Commons she denied that the increase was 'baked in', but MPs from her own party and the opposition were not convinced at all. The Independent has been told that already the term 'Rayner's rise' is being used for hefty council tax increases not seen since the Blair era two decades ago. Back in the Blair government it was Prescott and his Office of the Deputy PM which took the brunt of the anger over rising bills - it will be the same for Ms Rayner. Among her allies there is genuine concern that Ms Rayner's opponents inside and outside the party are 'preparing to weaponise' it as an issue when council tax bills land at the end of the year. There are fears that it will not take much to turn the public against her.
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why becoming a republic would be financially stupid
Leave aside what you think of the social merits of the Royal Family and look at the economics. £130 million is a lot of money, about half a CalMac ferry in fact. That money would be better spent on the health service etc etc say the detractors. Read More: The reality is that if we didn't have a Royal Family then in purely financial terms we should invent one. Looked as a business the Royal Family is a market leading and highly profitable British product, with large export earnings and no effective competition. The Royal Family doesn't cost us a penny; it is hugely profitable for Britain and contributes to our national income many times more than it costs. Take non-doms as another example. People from elsewhere who live in this country but pay less tax than British people do. Seems unfair so let's nail them for more tax. Exactly what Rachel Reeves has done but now it is dawning on her that driving these people away by taxing more of their earnings and assets means we collect less tax rather than more. Why would an Indian Citizen who bases themselves in Britain and pays full tax on their British income and assets stay here if we want to charge Inheritance Tax on their global assets when India and lots of other places don't have Inheritance Tax? The answer is that they would be crazy to stay and, in many cases reluctantly, they are leaving. So less tax revenue for us here. Well done Rachel. (Image: PA) What Governments have got to focus on is increasing the amount of tax we actually get not pandering to people's prejudices by turning the screw on people they are envious of. Becoming a republic would be tragic in many ways but it would also be financially stupid. The non-dom tax regime needs to be looked at again. We want people from other countries who can contribute very positively to our economy to base themselves here, we want more of them not fewer. Governments need to realise that people who have very significant wealth tend to have interests in many countries. Basing themselves in Britain is a choice they make rather than something they can be compelled to do. Rachel Reeves needs to realise this and act sensibly. So what about Scotland? What can we do here other than continue to demand more money and more powers which we then misuse? Scotland has control over its own income tax rates and so far, other than virtue signalling tweaking at the bottom end to give lower paid workers a few extra pence a month, it has chosen to increase income tax rates so that somebody earning from about £45,000 upwards pays markedly more tax than they would elsewhere in the UK. Nigel Farage has come up with an idea for the UK to charge non-doms a one-off £250,000 fee and then distribute this money directly to lower earners. Gimmicky it is but entirely daft it isn't. Scotland could learn from it. Only about 30,000 taxpayers in Scotland pay the top rate of tax which starts at income of roughly £125,000. The exact number is not available but the number of Scots earning over £500,000 will be vanishingly small, perhaps only 1,000 people, certainly less than 5,000. What if we could attract a net additional 10,000 very high earners by putting a cap of £250,000 on the amount of Scottish income tax anybody resident in Scotland has to pay? To pay that amount of tax you would have to earn just over £500,000. If we could do this we would raise the tax collected in Scotland by £2.5 billion pounds every year. Nobody already here would pay more, nobody loses out, it's pure good news. Read More: This boost is before the positive knock-on effect of those extra taxpayers spending money on goods and services in Scotland which in turn creates more jobs and tax revenue to pay for public services. The rest of the UK cannot follow us down this road because it has too much to lose because there are so many more very high earners already there. You could argue that the £250,000 cap on tax payment is too high. A taxpayer paying £100,000 in tax is contributing more than 20 times as much as an average earner. "But it's not progressive" the socialists will wail. Indeed it is not. It's just smart. Our public services in Scotland are crumbling and our tax rates are stifling enterprise and driving people away. If we could attract very high earners to make their homes in Scotland - 10,000 seems a relatively modest target - we could transform our ability to fund public services as well as attract people who will help our nation's economy grow. Why not give it a try? Guy Stenhouse is a notable figure in the Scottish financial sector. He has held various positions, including being the Managing Director of Noble Grossart, an independent merchant bank based in Edinburgh, until 2017
Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Moment alleged Russian spy ‘drops off USB stick in bike seat to leak Grant Shapps's sensitive details'
Personal details such as his home address, phone number, and the location of his private plane were allegedly stored on the stick 'SPY PLOT' Moment alleged Russian spy 'drops off USB stick in bike seat to leak Grant Shapps's sensitive details' THIS is the moment a man accused of being a Russian spy dropped off a USB stick - allegedly containing sensitive details about Grant Shapps - underneath a bike seat. A court has been shown photographs that allegedly see Howard Phillips, 65, delivering a secretive message for his "Russian handlers". 6 Newly released pictures reveal the moment Mr Phillips allegedly dropped a USB stick containing private information about Grant Shapps inside a bike Credit: Solent 6 Mr Philips being arrested at a Black Sheep Coffee outlet in London Credit: Solent 6 Grant Shapps served as defence secretary from August 2023 to July 2024 Credit: AFP Mr Phillips is currently on trial accused of trying to spy for the Kremlin by leaking Shapps' personal information, including the location of his private plane. Pictures shown to Winchester Crown Court allegedly show him following his handlers' instructions by dropping off a message inside a USB stick in the opened seat shaft of a bike. Prosecutors alleged that Mr Phillips wanted to "offer services" to Russian intelligence but unknowingly was corresponding with undercover British security service agents - whom he believed to be from the Kremlin. Another image shows the alleged spy, and previous insolvency worker, being arrested at a Black Sheep Coffee outlet in London. Other pictures display a phone and hotel rooms he allegedly bought on behalf of the Russian "agents". The court heard how the dad of four - who was due to start a job with UK Border Force - handed the operatives a bag containing a USB stick with Shapps' personal details. These included his home address, phone number, and the location of his private plane. Mr Phillips, from Harlow, Essex, denies engaging in conduct to assist a foreign intelligence service. Prosecutors argue that the former insolvency worker boasted he could get government clearance, as a result of his new job with Border Force. The court heard how Mr Phillips said he wanted the "agents" and him to be like "family", adding they could all "help and look after each other". Moment ringleader of bed-hopping Russian spy ring is snared as cops storm UK guesthouse He also allegedly claimed to have been in Shapps' home and had met him several times. In one meeting with the "agents", Mr Phillips said: "I have something. I don't know if you want it or don't want it. "What do you know about the Secretary of Defence in the UK? Because, I have personal information which may be useful." Jurors were shown a letter Mr Phillips was allegedly handed during that same meeting, which read: "Dear Howard, thank you for your continued cooperation. Moscow very pleased with ongoing progress." He reportedly asked that, going forward, the officers refer to Moscow as "mother" in their messages. It is alleged that after this point, Mr Phillips continued to assist the supposed agents and did not withdraw his Border Force job application, which prosecutors say would have provided him with further access to Government information. A note that promised "100 per cent loyalty" to the Russian Intelligence Service (RIS) was also contained in the USB stick he allegedly dropped in the bike. 6 Mr Phillips is accused of engaging in conduct to assist a foreign intelligence service Credit: Facebook 6 A close-up of the moment Mr Phillips allegedly dropped off the USB Credit: Solent 6 The USB stick in Mr Phillips' posession Credit: Solent It also claimed Mr Phillips could move "under the radar" if he gained a valid government security vetting pass. The trial had heard previously how the dad had applied for a job with the UK Border Force in October 2023. However, he was unemployed at the time of the alleged spying, with Jocelyn Ledward KC, prosecuting, saying his "financial struggles" contributed to his "eagerness and desire" to help the RIS. Messages between Mr Phillips and the "Russian spies" began in March 2024, starting first over email before moving to WhatsApp, and eventually Signal. Shapps served as defence secretary from August 2023 to July 2024 and would have been involved in countless important communications with Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The trial continues.
