
Letters to the editor, June 29:‘Aging egomaniacs around the world … dropping bombs on their perceived enemies. What do we do?'
Re:'What was the point of the conflict in Iran? To keep three men in power'(June 26): When kids fight and one hits another with a bat, a thoughtful parent would take the bat away, put them in separate corners to cool down and eventually shake hands to make peace.
Now we have aging egomaniacs around the world, whose powers are waning, dropping bombs on their perceived enemies. What do we do?
Do we take away the toys from oppressors acting like children? There is the opposite happening, and countries on the sidelines of the conflict are also encouraged to weapon up themselves.
Shouldn't countries get together and encourage mutual disarmament? After all, who profits? The arms industry is making a killing.
What countries and corporations are investing in planes and bombs? Is it in their financial interest to plead for peace?
Of course Donald Trump wants other countries to contribute to the arms industry. War is big business.
Melody Wales Squamish, B.C.
Re 'Shifting winds' (Letters, June 26): A letter-writer argues that Doug Ford's controversial comments about Indigenous peoples, for which he apologized, are simply a reflection of a shift in public opinion away from sympathy for reconciliation.
He describes himself as 'a tax-paying citizen and descendant of immigrants' who expected and received nothing from the government. I think, however, that immigrants to this country expected and received rather a lot from Indigenous peoples: Canada with all of its resources. The government may have had something to do with that.
If only land acknowledgments, apologies and thank yous were enough.
Anne Morris Mississauga
Re 'Cambodia allowing 'slavery and torture' in scam compounds, report says' (June 26): The Khmer Movement for Democracy urges the Canadian government to take urgent action in response to a damning report on human rights abuses and cybercrime operations in Cambodia.
Canada should move swiftly to protect not only Canadian victims of cyberscams, but also the countless individuals trapped and exploited in these brutal scam compounds.
A crucial first step would be to impose sanctions on the Huione Group, which is reported to have facilitated up to US$4-billion (about $5.5-billion) in illicit transactions since 2021. While the United States has proposed banning the group from accessing its financial system, Canada has yet to respond – despite reports that Huione is now seeking a new licence.
Canada has not participated in new sanctions against such cyberscams since 2023. The time has come for an independent investigation to identify those enabling these abuses, as well as co-ordinated international action to prevent further exploitation and uphold human rights.
Mu Sochua Former Cambodian politician; president, Khmer Movement for Democracy; Providence, R.I.
Re 'As Trump plans to overhaul manufacturing, U.S. factories struggle to fill nearly 400,000 jobs' (Report on Business, June 24): Why aren't younger people going into manufacturing jobs?
For the last 40 years, many thousands of manufacturing jobs were eliminated by automation and outsourcing to countries with cheaper labour such as China. So with that in mind, can we blame younger people for not going into a field that looked like it had no future?
Did no one look to the future to see the possible consequences of eliminating these jobs?
Doug Payne London, Ont.
Re 'How to crack open Canada's coddled egg market' (Editorial, June 20): While the number of farms in this country is generally on the decline, Canada's egg sector has seen the opposite outcome.
Programs such as Egg Farmers of Alberta's new entrant program are actively adding egg farms to our food system. Why? Because the stability of supply management ensures egg farming is a viable career and this co-operative model supports their success.
The administration of the system through provincial quota is critical in safeguarding the distribution of farms across the country, driving rural economic activity, enabling rapid response to disease outbreaks and delivering the fresh, local eggs Canadians want. This approach supports smaller farms and maintains a steady supply of high-quality, affordable eggs.
That's not coddling, that's informed agricultural policy.
Roger Pelissero Chair, Egg Farmers of Canada; West Lincoln, Ont.
Re 'B.C. First Nations offer haven for Texada grizzly, but officials say relocation not an option' (June 21): Don't watch and wait, help Tex now.
Inaction gets my goat. This grizzly's fate is at the mercy of the Minister of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship, Minister of Environment and Parks and the B.C. Conservation Officer Service. He needs new management.
Tex is not a body of water, resource or park. He is someone who finds himself in the wrong place.
Government stewards have no business leaving him on Texada Island to make a mistake, collide with humans and be killed. The chances of him leaving the island on his own are slim, so what are they waiting for?
Decision-makers should accept help from other professionals who are knowledgeable, capable and willing to relocate Tex. Why is that so hard?
Jennifer Azizi West Vancouver
Re 'Amateur conductor pays Toronto Symphony Orchestra to lead Mahler performance, shocking some musicians' (June 20): I've heard far worse from bigger names for more money. It had some great moments and they nailed the end.
I saw Mandle Cheung rely heavily on section heads and not immersed in the tempo. But it was, as the Toronto Symphony Orchestra's principal timpanist predicted, a solid performance.
Unless we find ways to fund more classical performances, Mahler's Symphony No. 2 in C minor and other pieces requiring vast numbers of performers will likely go unheard. It was a casual, accessible night.
Galas performances are year-long projects for donors. They take up large overhead and immense staff hours, with very little in the way of hard cash at the end. They often don't attract new audiences and their dollars.
I don't like that extremely wealthy people exist and hold this kind of power in our time, but this is our reality – and hardly a fiasco here, as portended.
Rosalind Robertson Toronto
Re 'Billionaire founder of FedEx revolutionized freight transport' (Obituary, June 25): In the mid-1970s, I was with World Airways in Oakland, Calif. We had a guy come from Memphis who had flown in himself.
This was Fred Smith, a plain-talking southerner who, even when seated, exuded energy. He wanted three DC-8 stretch aircraft on a wet lease with our crew, our fuel and landing and uplift costs.
He wanted these in cargo configuration and explained that he planned to use them for a hub-and-spoke package delivery system in the United States, initially, then in Canada and elsewhere.
He had the initial deposit, so the deal was signed. When he left, we mused as to whether or not the deal would survive.
Of course it did work. Mr. Smith then bought his own planes which now fly the skies around the world.
In the words of writer Hilaire Belloc: 'From quiet homes and first beginning, out to the undiscovered ends.'
Jim Mulrooney Toronto
Letters to the Editor should be exclusive to The Globe and Mail. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. Keep letters to 150 words or fewer. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. To submit a letter by e-mail, click here: letters@globeandmail.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Globe and Mail
33 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Toronto Pride likely smaller in 2026 because of lack of funding, executive director says
The streets of Toronto will be filled with rainbows as the annual Pride parade winds through the city, but there's a cloud hanging over future festivities. Today's event will see more than 25,000 marchers from some 250 groups make their way from the Rosedale neighbourhood through the downtown core to Nathan Phillips Square. The parade will serve as Canada's biggest show of solidarity with the LGBTQ community this year. It's been an annual, summer fixture in Toronto since 1981, when the first Pride parade was born out of protests linked to the city's bathhouse raids. LGBTQ refugee group says number of requests for help has spiked since 2020 Opinion: Queer folks can find common ground across generations Since then it's grown steadily in scope and prominence, blossoming into a full month of activities that draw people to the Church-Wellesley area, which is known as the gay village. However, the parade remains the buzziest and most vibrant of the Pride month spectacles thanks to the colourful outfits, pulsing beats, fierce dance moves and sense of community it delivers. But that status has come under threat. In the lead up to this year's parade, Pride Toronto executive director Kojo Modeste warned next year's Pride will likely be scaled down if organizers can't drum up more financial support. 'One hundred per cent, Pride will look a lot smaller,' Modeste said in mid-June. 'We would not have the same impact, both financially and culturally, that we normally do.' Earlier this year, Modeste revealed organizers were facing a $900,000 funding gap. The loss of cash was blamed on rising costs and the departure of sponsors Google, Nissan, Home Depot and Clorox. Modeste attributed the pullback to backlash against diversity, equity and inclusion efforts that materialized in the U.S. and beyond under President Donald Trump. In the wake of the pullback, others stepped up. Some 175 people have donated close to $10,000, Pride Toronto has said. The city also named the organization a multi-year recipient of cash through a festival funding program, which hands out $350,000. Modeste has said this funding is 'going to go a long way,' but doesn't eliminate the need for other levels of government to pitch in. 'What we need to see is the province and the federal government taking lead from the city and following up and also providing some support,' said Modeste. With files from Vanessa Tiberio


Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Republican senate tax bill would add $3.3 trillion to the U.S. debt load, CBO says
The changes made to President Donald Trump's big tax bill in the Senate would pile trillions onto the nation's debt load while resulting in even steeper losses in health care coverage, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said in a new analysis, adding to the challenges for Republicans as they try to muscle the bill to passage. The CBO estimates the Senate bill would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034, a nearly $1 trillion increase over the House-passed bill, which CBO has projected would add $2.4 to the debt over a decade. The analysis also found that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law, an increase over the scoring for the House-passed version of the bill, which predicts 10.9 million more people would be without health coverage. The stark numbers are yet another obstacle for Republican leaders as they labor to pass Trump's bill by his self-imposed July 4th deadline. Story continues below advertisement Even before the CBO's estimate, Republicans were at odds over the contours of the legislation, with some resisting the cost-saving proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid and food aid programs even as other Republicans say those proposals don't go far enough. Republicans are slashing the programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks put in place during his first term. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The push-pull was on vivid display Saturday night as a routine procedural vote to take up the legislation in the Senate was held open for hours as Vice President JD Vance and Republican leaders met with several holdouts. The bill ultimately advanced in a 51-49 vote, but the path ahead is fraught, with voting on amendments still to come. Still, many Republicans are disputing the CBO estimates and the reliability of the office's work. To hoist the bill to passage, they are using a different budget baseline that assumes the Trump tax cuts expiring in December have already been extended, essentially making them cost-free in the budget. The CBO on Saturday released a separate analysis of the GOP's preferred approach that found the Senate bill would reduce deficits by about $500 billion. Democrats and economists decry the GOP's approach as 'magic math' that obscures the true costs of the GOP tax breaks. In addition, Democrats note that under the traditional scoring system, the Republican bill bill would violate the Senate's 'Byrd Rule' that forbids the legislation from increasing deficits after 10 years. Story continues below advertisement In a Sunday letter to Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley, the top Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, CBO Director Phillip Swagel said the office estimates that the Finance Committee's portion of the bill, also known as Title VII, 'increases the deficits in years after 2034' under traditional scoring.


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Intercepted Iranian communications downplay damage from U.S. attack, Washington Post reports
This satellite picture by Planet Labs PBC shows Iran's underground nuclear enrichment site at Fordo following U.S. airstrikes targeting the facility, on Sunday, June 22, 2025. (Planet Labs PBC via AP) WASHINGTON — Intercepted Iranian communications downplayed the extent of damage caused by U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear program, the Washington Post reported on Sunday, citing four people familiar with classified intelligence circulating within the U.S. government. A source, who declined to be named, confirmed that account to Reuters but said there were serious questions about whether the Iranian officials were being truthful, and described the intercepts as unreliable indicators. The report by the Post is the latest, however, to raise questions about the extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear program. A leaked preliminary assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency cautioned the strikes may have only set back Iran by months. President Donald Trump has said the strikes 'completely and totally obliterated' Iran's nuclear program, but U.S. officials acknowledge it will take time to form a complete assessment of the damage caused by the U.S. military strikes last weekend. The White House dismissed the report by the Post. 'The notion that unnamed Iranian officials know what happened under hundreds of feet of rubble is nonsense. Their nuclear weapons program is over,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was quoted as saying by the Post. In an interview broadcast on Sunday on Fox News, Trump reiterated his confidence that the strikes had destroyed Iran's nuclear capabilities. 'It was obliterated like nobody's ever seen before. And that meant the end to their nuclear ambitions, at least for a period of time,' he said on the 'Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo' program. Reporting by Phil Stewart and Katharine Jackson; Editing by Chris Reese