&w=3840&q=100)
Garena Free Fire Max: July 23 redeem codes to win weapon skins and diamonds

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
10 minutes ago
- Hans India
Free Fire Max Redeem Codes for July 28, 2025 – Claim Gold, Diamonds, Skins
Garena Free Fire Max has again released new redeem codes forJuly 28, 2025. Players can use these codes to get free rewards like gold, diamonds, weapon skins, and characters. The codes are available for a limited time. Redeem Codes: GHTY89VCX2LK BVCX45LKJHG6 LKJH78GFDSA3 POIU12MNBVCX TREW90QAZXCV YUIO34LKJMNB ASDF67GHJKL9 ZXCV23BNMLKP HJKL56POIUYT QWER89ASDFGH BNML12ZXCVBN CVBN45QWERTY GFDS78POIUAS JHGF01LKJHGF MNBV34ASDFZX LKJH67QWERTB POIU90ZXCVNM TREW23ASDFGH YUIO56BNMLKJ How to Redeem: 1. Visit the Garena Free Fire Rewards Redemption site. 2. Log in with your Facebook, Google, or X (Twitter) account. 3. Enter the code and submit. 4. Rewards will be sent to your in-game mail. Diamonds and gold go to your wallet. Other items will appear in the Vault tab.


Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
The chatbot culture wars are here
For much of the past decade, America's partisan culture warriors have fought over the contested territory of social media — arguing about whether the rules on Facebook and Twitter were too strict or too lenient, whether YouTube and TikTok censored too much or too little and whether Silicon Valley tech companies were systematically silencing right-wing voices. Those battles aren't over. But a new one has already started. This fight is over artificial intelligence, and whether the outputs of leading AI chatbots such as ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini are politically biased. Conservatives have been taking aim at AI companies for months. In March, House Republicans subpoenaed a group of leading AI developers, probing them for information about whether they colluded with the Biden administration to suppress right-wing speech. And this month, Missouri's Republican attorney general, Andrew Bailey, opened an investigation into whether Google, Meta, Microsoft and OpenAI are leading a 'new wave of censorship' by training their AI systems to give biased responses to questions about President Donald Trump. On Wednesday, Trump himself joined the fray, issuing an executive order on what he called 'woke AI.' 'Once and for all, we are getting rid of woke,' he said in a speech. 'The American people do not want woke Marxist lunacy in the AI models, and neither do other countries.' The order was announced alongside a new White House AI action plan that will require AI developers that receive federal contracts to ensure that their models' outputs are 'objective and free from top-down ideological bias.' Republicans have been complaining about AI bias since at least early last year, when a version of Google's Gemini AI system generated historically inaccurate images of the American Founding Fathers, depicting them as racially diverse. That incident drew the fury of online conservatives, and led to accusations that leading AI companies were training their models to parrot liberal ideology. Since then, top Republicans have mounted pressure campaigns to try to force AI companies to disclose more information about how their systems are built, and tweak their chatbots' outputs to reflect a broader set of political views. Now, with the White House's executive order, Trump and his allies are using the threat of taking away lucrative federal contracts — OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and xAI were recently awarded Defense Department contracts worth as much as $200 million — to try to force AI companies to address their concerns. The order directs federal agencies to limit their use of AI systems to those that put a priority on 'truth-seeking' and 'ideological neutrality' over disfavored concepts such as diversity, equity and inclusion. It also directs the Office of Management and Budget to issue guidance to agencies about which systems meet those criteria. If this playbook sounds familiar, it's because it mirrors the way Republicans have gone after social media companies for years — using legal threats, hostile congressional hearings and cherry-picked examples to pressure companies into changing their policies, or removing content they don't like. Critics of this strategy call it 'jawboning,' and it was the subject of a high-profile Supreme Court case last year. In that case, Murthy v. Missouri, it was Democrats who were accused of pressuring social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter to take down posts on topics such as the coronavirus vaccine and election fraud, and Republicans challenging their tactics as unconstitutional. (In a 6-3 decision, the court rejected the challenge, saying the plaintiffs lacked standing.) Now, the parties have switched sides. Republican officials, including several Trump administration officials I spoke to who were involved in the executive order, are arguing that pressuring AI companies through the federal procurement process is necessary to stop AI developers from putting their thumbs on the scale. Is that hypocritical? Sure. But recent history suggests that working the refs this way can be effective. Meta ended its long-standing fact-checking program this year, and YouTube changed its policies in 2023 to allow more election denial content. Critics of both changes viewed them as capitulation to right-wing critics. This time around, the critics cite examples of AI chatbots that seemingly refuse to praise Trump, even when prompted to do so, or Chinese-made chatbots that refuse to answer questions about the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. They believe developers are deliberately baking a left-wing worldview into their models, one that will be dangerously amplified as AI is integrated into fields such as education and health care. There are a few problems with this argument, according to legal and tech policy experts I spoke to. The first, and most glaring, is that pressuring AI companies to change their chatbots' outputs may violate the First Amendment. In recent cases like Moody v. NetChoice, the Supreme Court has upheld the rights of social media companies to enforce their own content moderation policies. And courts may reject the Trump administration's argument that it is trying to enforce a neutral standard for government contractors, rather than interfering with protected speech. 'What it seems like they're doing is saying, 'If you're producing outputs we don't like, that we call biased, we're not going to give you federal funding that you would otherwise receive,'' Genevieve Lakier, a law professor at the University of Chicago, said. 'That seems like an unconstitutional act of jawboning.' There is also the problem of defining what, exactly, a 'neutral' or 'unbiased' AI system is. Today's AI chatbots are complex, probability-based systems that are trained to make predictions, not give hard-coded answers. Two ChatGPT users may see wildly different responses to the same prompts, depending on variables like their chat histories and which versions of the model they're using. And testing an AI system for bias isn't as simple as feeding it a list of questions about politics and seeing how it responds. Samir Jain, a vice president of policy at the Center for Democracy and Technology, a nonprofit civil liberties group, said the Trump administration's executive order would set 'a really vague standard that's going to be impossible for providers to meet.' There is also a technical problem with telling AI systems how to behave. Namely, they don't always listen. Just ask Elon Musk. For years, Musk has been trying to create an AI chatbot, Grok, that embodies his vision of a rebellious, 'anti-woke' truth seeker. But Grok's behavior has been erratic and unpredictable. At times, it adopts an edgy, far-right personality, or spouts antisemitic language in response to user prompts. (For a brief period last week, it referred to itself as 'Mecha-Hitler.') At other times, it acts like a liberal — telling users, for example, that human-made climate change is real, or that the right is responsible for more political violence than the left. Recently, Musk has lamented that AI systems have a liberal bias that is 'tough to remove, because there is so much woke content on the internet.' Nathan Lambert, a research scientist at the Allen Institute for AI, told me that 'controlling the many subtle answers that an AI will give when pressed is a leading-edge technical problem, often governed in practice by messy interactions made between a few earlier decisions.' It's not, in other words, as straightforward as telling an AI chatbot to be less woke. And while there are relatively simple tweaks that developers could make to their chatbots — such as changing the 'model spec,' a set of instructions given to AI models about how they should act — there's no guarantee that these changes will consistently produce the behavior conservatives want. But asking whether the Trump administration's new rules can survive legal challenges, or whether AI developers can actually build chatbots that comply with them, may be beside the point. These campaigns are designed to intimidate. And faced with the potential loss of lucrative government contracts, AI companies, like their social media predecessors, may find it easier to give in than to fight. 'Even if the executive order violates the First Amendment, it may very well be the case that no one challenges it,' Lakier said. 'I'm surprised by how easily these powerful companies have folded.'
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
40 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Garena Free Fire Max: July 28 redeem codes to win skins, diamonds, and more
Garena Free Fire Max has revealed redeem codes for July 28. Players can follow the step-by-step guide below to redeem today's codes New Delhi Garena Free Fire Max has rolled out a fresh set of redeem codes for July 28, offering players a chance to unlock exclusive rewards such as premium outfits, weapon skins, diamonds, and more. Since these codes are valid only for a limited time and have a restricted number of uses, players are advised to redeem them quickly before they expire. You'll find the latest active codes below, along with a step-by-step guide to help you claim your rewards. Garena Free Fire Max redeem codes for today As per a report by India Today Gaming, active redeem codes for July 28 are: NPTF2FWSPXN9 RDNAFV2KX2CQ FF6WN9QSFTHX FF4MTXQPFDZ9 FFMTYQPXFGX6 FFNFSXTPVQZ9 FVTCQK2MFNSK FFM4X2HQWCVK FFPURTXQFKX3 FFYNCXG2FNT4 QWER89ASDFGH BNML12ZXCVBN FFMTYKQPFDZ9 FFPURTQPFDZ9 FFRSX4CYHXZ8 FFDMNQX9KGX2 FFSGT9KNQXT6 XF4S9KCW7KY2 Garena Free Fire Max redeem codes: How to use Visit the official Rewards Redemption website for Garena Free Fire Max. Log in using your preferred platform — Facebook, X, Google, or VK ID. Copy the redeem codes from the list and paste them into the provided text box. Once a Free Fire Max redeem code is claimed successfully, the associated rewards are delivered straight to the player's in-game mailbox. Any included gold or diamonds are instantly added to the account balance. These codes can unlock a range of time-limited items, including Rebel Academy costumes, Revolt Weapon Loot Crates, Diamond Vouchers, and other exclusive cosmetic upgrades.