
My young comrade died in my arms. It would be immoral if those soldiers who survived were now betrayed - former Special Forces soldier in Northern Ireland speaks out amid Mail campaign
It is choosing to side with former terrorists against veterans of the Armed Forces.
Our politicians risk betraying every soldier who served to keep the peace in Northern Ireland during the decades of the Troubles, when both Republican and Loyalist extremists were intent on mayhem and murder.
And, for me, this is deeply personal. One of my men died in my arms, a youth of 20, killed while doing his job.
For his killers, and people like them, to be allowed to continue their campaign of hatred through the courts is utterly immoral.
With exceptional bravery, professionalism and dedication, men and women from Special Forces, as well as the regular Army, risked their lives every hour to try to bring an end to this senseless violence.
And now they are being punished for it. While the terrorists have long been granted immunity under the terms of the Good Friday Agreement, many soldiers could face prosecution for doing the job they were sent to Ulster to do.
Some of them never came back. The rest live in dread of receiving a summons, and the threat of jail, for doing their duty.
The Northern Ireland secretary, Hilary Benn, and the Attorney General, Lord Hermer, are in the process of tearing up the Legacy Act, the law enacted by the Conservatives to protect veterans from being dragged to court decades later.
If that protection is abolished, every major anti-terrorist operation against the IRA would likely be rebranded as a war crime.
It is beyond iniquitous – this is outright political insanity, or worse. Labour's ministers, and, most of all, Sir Keir Starmer, desperately need to rediscover their moral compass.
If the Prime Minister had witnessed what I saw 42 years ago, he would never have lost his ability to distinguish between right and wrong. The difference would be burned into his memory.
I was a 21-year-old Second Lieutenant leading a patrol on the streets of West Belfast. This was a day after the 1983 General Election at which Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams was elected as an MP for the first time.
That morning, Adams was holding a press conference. Though counting had not yet
finished, and he had no intention of taking up his seat in Westminster, his election win was a foregone conclusion.
The Northern Ireland secretary, Hilary Benn, and the Attorney General, Lord Hermer, are in the process of tearing up the Legacy Act, the law enacted by the Conservatives to protect veterans from being dragged to court decades later, writes the former SAS soldier
My men and I were patrolling part of a nationalist estate a short distance from the publicity event. We were in four units of four, known as 'bricks'.
I was in the forward position with three soldiers, accompanied by two Royal Ulster Constabulary officers.
One of the men in my brick was Private Geoffrey Curtis, a fresh-faced 20-year-old lad with a heart of gold. As we reached a junction, a girl of about five came running out, stared at us, and scooted off.
We carried on – but, two or three seconds later a massive blast rocked the street. I turned to see Private Curtis mortally wounded. The other two soldiers in my brick suffered superficial injuries.
Later, we learned that a 15lb bomb concealed in a lamppost beside a wall had been detonated by a 'command wire' – a thin cable with a battery to trigger the explosion. Private Curtis took the full force of the blast.
This type of bomb is a cold-blooded ambush device, set off by a watcher concealed nearby.
A terrorist murderer had been lying in wait for our patrol. He pressed the button to detonate the bomb, and watched Geoff Curtis die before fleeing like the coward he was. No one has ever been charged with this atrocity.
I believe my life was saved by that little girl. Private Curtis was not the target. It was me, and the two policemen.
But the IRA killers did not dare risk harming the child, because earlier in the year one had died in a bombing by another terrorist group, the INLA, and local families had reacted with fury.
The bomb was meant to send a bloody message to Margaret Thatcher's Conservative government, which had just been re-elected.
Despite Sinn Fein's success at the polls, the IRA had no intention of achieving its aims by democratic means. The terrorists intended to step up their campaign of slaughter.
It's inconceivable to me that Gerry Adams did not know about this bombing in advance. It cannot, however, be proven and never will be.
Yet the Labour Government is now considering the prosecution of veterans who served in Northern Ireland.
Some of them are my former colleagues in Special Forces.
After six years as an infantry officer, I applied for duties with 14 Intelligence Company, which is now renamed the Special Reconnaissance Regiment.
In the 1980s, 14Int was made up of servicemen and women from the Army, Royal Navy and Royal Air Force, and its selection procedure was exceptionally tough. Of the 260 volunteers who applied in my intake, only 11 finished it.
Our role was to blend into the streets and countryside and carry out surveillance on terrorists, building a picture of the operations they were planning.
The death of Private Curtis was a major motivating factor for me, because I knew the IRA would never come to the negotiating table as long as they believed they could succeed through violence.
Soldiers, whether they are officers or not, think about the wider implications of the job they are expected to do.
My experiences showed me it had to be ballots, not bullets, that secured peace. Special Forces, along with MI5 and the RUC Special Branch, led the campaign that forced the terrorists to lay down their weapons. It took courageous, principled men and women to effect this.
All aspects of what was accomplished were considered and measured. We were not above the law. But, importantly, we were directed by senior generals and civil servants – and it was the instructions of politicians and Prime Minister Mrs Thatcher that ultimately dictated our strategy and action.
Mrs Thatcher took a keen interest and visited us on operations on several occasions.
The generals, politicians and civil servants do not face the possibility of prosecution. It is the retired soldiers, who were young then and doing their job for the right reasons, who do.
Today's Labour Government has, it seems, sympathy with Adams and the former terrorists – so much so that, while 100 Special Forces soldiers have been required to give evidence, very few terrorist volunteers and none of their leaders have been asked to explain their actions.
The simple truth is that we all sleep tight in our beds because of the bravery of our Armed Forces.
Everyone who accepts that fact should support the petition to Parliament to stop any proposed legal changes that would enable prosecution of the brave men and women who did their duty.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
36 minutes ago
- BBC News
Family hubs to open in every council in England
Family hubs offering parenting support and youth services will be rolled out across every local authority in England, the government has announced. The £500 million plan aims to support 500,000 more children in the most disadvantaged areas. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said the "Best Start" family hubs would "give a lifeline" to Conservatives said there was "little clarity on what's genuinely new and what simply rebrands existing services". The idea of a family hub dates back to the early 2000s when New Labour introduced "Sure Start" centres - focused on supporting young families with early education, childcare and health advice. Many closed after 2010 when funding was cut by the Tories. But last year the Conservative government under Rishi Sunak rolled out 400 new "family hubs" offering a wider range of services across 75 local authorities. Now Labour say the hubs will be in every local authority by April 2026, before expanding them to up to 1,000 by the end of 2028. They will offer services ranging from birth registration and midwifery support to debt advice and youth clubs. Officials hope the spaces will also provide families access to other services and social Phillipson said: "It's the driving mission of this government to break the link between a child's background and what they go on to achieve - our new 'Best Start' family hubs will put the first building blocks of better life chances in place for more children."Shadow Education Secretary Laura Trott said the lack of clarity about what was actually new was "part of a wider pattern"."This is a government defined by broken promises and endless U-turns," she Save The Children has said it is "pleased" to see the government "making it easier for families to get the help they need".Dan Paskins, executive director of policy, advocacy and campaigns at Save The Children UK, said: "We know from our work in local communities that bringing together parenting, healthcare and education support services in one place is an approach which works, so we are pleased to see the UK government making it easier for families to get the help they need."


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Met police arrest activists holding signs referring to Palestine Action
Twenty-nine people have been arrested after protesters gathered in central London holding signs referencing Palestine Action a day after the group was banned as a terrorist organisation. The direct action protest group was banned on Friday after a last-minute legal attempt to suspend the group's proscription under anti-terrorism laws failed. It means that, from Saturday, being a member of, or expressing support for, the organisation became a criminal offence, punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The campaign group Defend Our Juries, which organised the demonstration, said 'a priest, an emeritus professor and a number of health professionals' were among those arrested. More than two dozen people gathered close to the statue of Mahatma Gandhi in Parliament Square, holding signs that appeared to express support for the group. At about 1.40pm, Metropolitan police officers began arresting people who were holding the signs. In a statement on X, the Met said: 'Officers have arrested more than 20 people on suspicion of offences under the Terrorism Act 2000. They have been taken into custody. Palestine Action is a proscribed group and officers will act where criminal offences are committed.' The force posted another update on X on Saturday evening to say 29 arrests had been made and added that those arrested remain in custody. A spokesperson for Defend Our Juries said: 'We commend the counter-terrorism police for their decisive action in protecting the people of London from some cardboard signs opposing the genocide in Gaza and expressing support for those taking action to prevent it. It's a relief to know that counter-terrorism police have nothing better to do.' On Friday, the group wrote to the Met commissioner, Mark Rowley, to give him advance warning of the demonstration. Before officers made arrests, the Guardian spoke to some of the demonstrators. Tim Crosland, of Defend Our Juries, said: 'What we're doing here as a group of priests, teachers, health workers, human rights lawyers [is] we're refusing to be silenced. Because it goes to the core of what we believe in: that we oppose genocide – I didn't think that was that controversial – and we support the people who resist genocide. 'In theory we are now terrorist supporters and can go to prison for 14 years, which is kind of crazy. I think what we are here to do is just expose the craziness of that.' An environmental campaigner, Donnachadh McCarthy, said: 'To proscribe an organisation of peaceful direct action as terrorists is a huge red line for our democracy. It means that all the rest of us, whether we're climate activists, Greenpeace, women's suffragettes, disabled activists, it means that the government can now declare any act of property damage to be terrorism, which gives you a sentence of 14 years. 'This is worse than Putin's Russia. I don't say that lightly. It's 10 years for doing what we're doing today in Russia; it's 14 years in the UK, because of Yvette Cooper's outrageous betrayal of democracy, liberalism, and what is in my view a step towards fascism.' A retired priest, Sue Parfitt, 83, said the group's ban was 'a very dangerous move that has to be challenged'. 'We are losing our civil liberties, we must stop that for everybody's sake. Whatever you want to protest about,' she said. Cooper, the home secretary, announced plans to ban Palestine Action late last month, days after activists from the group broke into RAF Brize Norton and defaced two military aircraft with spray paint. MPs voted in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday. The House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday. UN experts, civil liberties groups, cultural figures and hundreds of lawyers have condemned the ban as draconian and said it sets a dangerous precedent by conflating protest with terrorism. The ban means Palestine Action has become the first direct action protest group to be banned under the Terrorism Act, placing it in the same category as Islamic State, al-Qaida and the far-right group National Action.


Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
How Prevent is tackling young extremism 20 years after the 7/7 bombings
Radicalised nine-year-olds, teenagers mixing incel culture with extreme right ideologies and a Muslim who idolises Hitler - this is just some of the casework of those tasked with deradicalising young extremists in the UK. Monday will mark 20 years since the 7/7 attacks on the London transport network when four suicide bombers killed 52 people and injured 770 others. A year later the government set up its deradicalisation programme Prevent as part of its counter-terrorism strategy. Sky News has spoken to two leading intervention providers (IPs) at Prevent who both say their work is getting ever more complex and the referrals younger. The Metropolitan Police's Prevent co-ordinator, Detective Superintendent Jane Corrigan, has also told Sky News it is "tragic" that when it comes to terrorism, "one in five of all our arrests is a child under 17". She believes parents should talk to their children about what they are reading and seeing online. "Parents instinctively know when something doesn't feel right when their child is becoming withdrawn or isolated - not wanting to engage," she says. People worried that someone they know has thoughts that could lead to terrorism can refer them to Prevent. 'A pic-n-mix of ideologies' Home Office figures show 11-year-olds are the largest age group to get referred. Concerning cases are passed on to IPs such as Nigel Bromage who told Sky News: "Often there will be a pic-n-mix of ideologies. "From my own examples and experience, we are aware of people looking at the incel culture and mixing that with some far-right elements." Incels, meaning "involuntary celibates" are men who have been unable to have a relationship with women despite wanting one and become misogynistic and hateful as a result. Like many IPs, Mr Bromage from Birmingham comes from an extremist background himself, having once been a regional organiser for the proscribed Neo-Nazi group Combat 18. For him too, it began as a child. "It all started with someone giving me a leaflet outside my school gates," Mr Bromage says. "It told me a horrific story about a mum getting killed by an IRA bomb explosion - and at the end of the leaflet there was a call to action which said: 'If you think it's wrong then do something about it'." He developed a hatred for Irish republican terrorism which morphed into general racism and national socialism. "At the very end I thought I was going to go to prison, or I would end up being hurt or even killed because of my political beliefs," he says. Boy, 9, groomed by his brother Mr Bromage reveals his youngest case was a nine-year-old who had been groomed by his brother. "He was being shown pro-Nazi video games, and his older brother was saying 'when I go to prison or I get in trouble - they you're the next generation - you're the one who needs to continue the fight'," he says. "Really, he had no interest in the racist games - he just wanted to impress his brother and be loved by his brother." Every year, nearly 300 children who are 10 or younger are referred to Prevent. Home Office figures show that over the last six years 50% of referrals were children under the age of 18. Eleven-year-olds alone make up a third of total referrals, averaging just over 2,000 a year, with the figure rising even higher in the most recent stats. Another IP, Abdul Ahad, specialises in Islamic extremism. He says the catalyst for radicalisation often comes from events aboard. Ten years ago, it was Syria, more recently Gaza. "It is often a misplaced desire to do something effective - to matter, to make a difference. It gives them purpose, camaraderie and belonging as well - you feel part of something bigger than you," he says. Clients want someone to 'hear them' Some of his clients "don't fit into any particular box". "I'm working with a guy at the minute, he's a young Muslim but he idolises Hitler and he's written a manifesto," he says. "When you break it down, some people don't know where they fit in, but they want to fit in somewhere." Mr Ahad says the young individual mostly admires Hitler's "strength" rather than his ideologies and that he was drawn to darker characters in history. Often his clients are very isolated and just want someone to "hear them", he adds. Mr Ahad is also an imam who preaches at the Al-Azar Mosque in South Shields, a well-regarded centre for community cohesion and outreach. He uses his understanding of the Islamic faith in his Prevent sessions to help guide his referrals away from extreme interpretations of the Koran by offering "understanding and context". He says: "We quote the correct religious texts - we explain their responsibility as a Muslim living in the UK and we re-direct their energies into something more constructive." Common theme of mental health issues Mental health problems are a common theme among those referred to Prevent including depression and autism. A recent inquest into the death of autistic teenager Rhianan Rudd found she took her own life after being radicalised by two white supremacists. Her mother was critical of Prevent, as well as the police and MI5 after she had referred her daughter to the deradicalisation programme and Rhianan was subsequently charged with terrorism offences. Last month a coroner found some failings in the processes around protecting Rhianan, but none of them attributable to Rhianan taking her own life. Det Supt Corrigan says a referral doesn't mean individuals end up being arrested or on an MI5 watchlist. She says: "You're not reporting a crime, but you are seeking support. I would say the earlier you can come in and talk to us about the concerns you have the better. Prevent is just that - it is a pre-criminal space. "It's tragic when you see the number of young people being arrested for very serious charges. Just look at terrorism - one in five of all our arrests is a child under the age of 17. We need to think about how we respond to that." Prevent has been criticised for failures such as when Southport killer Axel Rudakabana failed to be recognised as needing intervention despite three referrals, or when MP David Amiss' killer Ali Harbi Ali went through the programme and killed anyway. It's harder to quantify its successes. Mr Ahad says he understands why the failures hit the headlines, but he believes the programme is saving lives. He says: "I think the vast majority of people get radicalised online because they are sitting in their room reading all this content without any context or scholarly input. They see one version of events and they get so far down the rabbit hole they can't pull themselves out. "I really wish Prevent was around when I was a young, lost 15-year-old because there was nothing around then. It's about listening to people engaging with them and offering them a way of getting out of that extremism." 'Radicalisation can happen in days to weeks' Det Supt Corrigan says: "I've sat with parents whose children have gone on to commit the most horrendous crimes and they all spotted something. "Now, with hindsight, they wished they had done something or acted early. That's why we created this programme, because radicalisation can happen in days to weeks." Twenty years on from 7/7 the shape of the terrorist threat has shifted, the thoughts behind it harder to categorise, but it is no less dangerous.