Restore Passenger Rail Climate Protest Charges Dropped 6 May
In the Wellington District Court today the Crown prosecution withdrew all outstanding charges against twenty-five Restore Passenger Rail supporters who temporarily and repeatedly stopped traffic on Wellington roads and motorways in 2022-23.
The climate defender group demanded that the government restore a nationwide, affordable passenger rail service for New Zealanders.
Police originally charged the road-sitters with obstruction, later bumping it up to the criminal offence of endangering transport, carrying a maximum penalty of 14 years in prison. Three of the group each spent two weeks in prison and five, including a great-grandmother, a grandmother and a grandfather, wore electronic monitoring bracelets for up to 13 months.
Earlier this year the first of seven jury trials ended after three weeks with one not-guilty verdict (Andrew Sutherland) and a hung jury for three others (Michael Apáthy, Te Wehi Ratana and Tāmati Taptiklis). During the trial, jurors heard from climate experts Dr Kevin Anderson, Professor of Energy and Climate Change at the University of Manchester, and James Renwick, Professor of Physical Geography at Te Herenga Waka. When asked what three degrees Celcius of warming above pre-industrial levels would be like, Professor Anderson replied, 'We haven't seen that for millions and millions of years. … Huge parts of the planet will be uninhabitable.'
Professor Renwick explained that in the worst-case scenarios, sea level rise could reach three to four metres. 'Most of downtown Wellington will be underwater, downtown Auckland – most of it will be underwater,' he said.
'Today's decision is an important moment for the climate movement,' said Climate Liberation Aotearoa (formerly Restore Passenger Rail) spokesperson Michael Apáthy. 'In March, the hung jury result showed that New Zealanders do understand the seriousness of the climate emergency. Today's decision backs that up. It is also not only a vindication of our democratic right to protest but a criticism of the police charge which was out of all proportion to our actions.'
The group said that their actions in 2022-23 were an attempt to match the urgency of the climate catastrophe, which was, and is still, being largely ignored by the government. They said that a nationwide passenger rail service would begin to bring down New Zealand's out-of-control transport emissions, while at the same time reducing road congestion, connecting communities and improving the quality of life for New Zealanders.
'We are living through the world's sixth mass extinction,' said Michael Apáthy. 'Climate breakdown is daily news. Floods, wildfires, and droughts are accelerating. Temperatures in Pakistan last week, pre-summer, reached 50 degrees Celsius. That is unsurvivable. Yet instead of working to help safeguard a liveable future this government has downgraded climate change in its 2025 Defence Capability Plan and is spending an extra $12 billion on making our military more 'modern and combat-capable'.'
'We hope today's decision will help steer police away from the international trend of increased repression of peaceful protest. When our government continues to fail us on its path of climate denial and erosion of the democratic process and environmental protections, it is left to ordinary people to stand up for our youth and all living creatures. This moment in history calls on all of us to fight for the transformative change needed for our survival. Climate Liberation Aotearoa will continue that fight. Climate action is needed now more than ever.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
12 hours ago
- Scoop
FSU Nominates InternetNZ Board Candidates And Proposes Constitution To Defend Online Speech
Free Speech Union has nominated two candidates to the InternetNZ Council and drafted key constitutional amendments to safeguard free speech online. The internet must remain a free and open space for all New Zealanders, not a platform for ideological gatekeeping, says Jillaine Heather, Council Member of the Free Speech Union. 'These days, speech rights mean little if they don't include online speech. Recent moves by InternetNZ threaten to undermine this core freedom by shifting the organisation away from its essential technical mission. A campaign led by the Free Speech Union has led to a huge influx of InternetNZ memberships, giving individuals voting rights. 'We have nominated Free Speech Union CEO Jonathan Ayling and Canterbury-based lawyer Douglas Brown, who also serves on our Council, for the InternetNZ board election on 31 July. Both candidates are committed to defending an open internet and resisting attempts to expand content moderation powers beyond legal requirements. 'In recent years, InternetNZ declared itself 'institutionally racist' and proposed constitutional changes that could pave the way for greater censorship. We have instead drafted constitutional amendments that keep InternetNZ focused on its vital role managing New Zealand's internet infrastructure – not deciding what speech is acceptable. 'We aren't standing to take over or impose our worldview on InternetNZ – it's the exact opposite. We're working to ensure intellectual diversity and to protect the rights of all Kiwis to participate online, regardless of how popular or controversial their views may be.' Note: InternetNZ's AGM will be held on 31st July. For InternetNZ members, voting starts on 14th July. See nominations here:
Scoop
12 hours ago
- Scoop
Business Gives Clear Backing To RSB
Minister for Regulation Regulation Minister David Seymour is welcoming BusinessNZ's strong support for the Regulatory Standards Bill as a means to deal with red tape and regulation. 'After all the misinformed opposition we've heard, the people who get up in the morning to make an honest buck and deliver goods and services to New Zealanders want red tape and regulation dealt to and believe this Bill will help them do that. 'Submitting on the Bill at select committee today, BusinessNZ said it was an important step towards improving the quality of regulation and reducing the compliance burden on businesses by putting more scrutiny on politicians when law is made. 'The academics who have been so loud about this Bill are so far removed from reality partly because many of Parliament's damaging laws don't frustrate their ability to make a living. If they were held back by red tape and regulation on a daily basis, like many businesses are, they would support this Bill. 'Too often, politicians find regulating politically rewarding, and we need to make it less rewarding by putting more sunlight on their activities. 'The Bill doesn't stop politicians or their officials making bad laws, but it makes it transparent that they're doing it. It makes it easier for voters to identify those responsible for making bad rules. Over time, it will improve the quality of rules we all have to live under by changing how politicians behave. 'In a high-cost economy, regulation isn't neutral – it's a tax on growth. This Government is committed to clearing the path of needless regulations by improving how laws are made.'
Scoop
13 hours ago
- Scoop
Hipkins' Continues COVID-Era Attitude To Public
Responding to Chris Hipkins' assertion that the expanded COVID inquiry is a platform for conspiracy theorists, ACT Leader David Seymour says: "Chris Hipkins' ought to show some humility towards the COVID inquiry, because it's an inquiry into his own actions. As COVID-19 Response Minister, then Prime Minister, Hipkins called the shots in question, and people deserve a right of reply. 'Instead it sadly seems that he is continuing the very attitudes that people are concerned about. Too often the Government didn't listen, especially to concerns other than COVID. The inquiry is here in part to put that right, people don't serve to be shouted down before they have their say. "Whatever Chris Hipkins thinks of the submitters' opinions, he ought to recognise that the impacts of his policies on these New Zealanders were very real. Chris Hipkins himself was central to extended lockdowns, border closures, and vaccine mandates. His decisions saw businesses shuttered, livelihoods lost, families separated, and our social cohesion scarred. "Until now, New Zealanders have been denied real accountability for the COVID-19 response. In Labour's toothless version of the inquiry, there were no public hearings. Key decisionmakers were not questioned publicly. The narrow terms of the inquiry ignored the real pain of lockdowns and vaccine mandates. "It was a masterclass in dodging accountability, and that's why ACT expanded the inquiry's focus and opened hearings to the public. "Chris Hipkins needs to show respect for the Royal Commission, as he could well be asked to front up to it in public hearings. His willingness to answer difficult questions in good faith will be a measure of his respect for the people and the democratic process."
