
As Snacking Surges, Subway Launches $5 Footlong Nachos. Say What?
Subway, the 37,000-restaurant sandwich chain most synonymous with its iconic $5 footlong subs of the past, is taking a bold step into uncharted territory.
This time, it won't be a sandwich but a snack that grabs headlines: footlong nachos.
Yes, you read that right.
Subway has partnered with Doritos to introduce a 12-inch $5 Dorito nacho creation as a new addition to its growing Sidekicks menu, a move intended to attract both the budget-conscious and the snack-loving consumer.
Designed to be customized and shared, these footlong nachos start with a base of nacho cheese–flavored Doritos chips, layered with cheddar cheese, jalapeño slices, diced tomatoes, red onions, and chipotle sauce. For those looking to make it a meal, you can add rotisserie-style chicken or steak at no extra charge. Or upgrade with avocado for an additional cost.
Subway's Sidekicks menu has been steadily expanding since being introduced last year. It includes a variety of 12-inch treats, from footlong cookies and Cinnabon churros to soft pretzels from Auntie Anne's.
Given the lack of a consistent definition of a snack, most Americans define a snack as 'eating or drinking something between meals.'
Over the past decade, Americans' snacking has surged in popularity, with 74% snacking at least once every day and more than half of all Americans replacing traditional meals with snacking or smaller meals. Which foods are most popular for snacks? Sweet (59%), salty (58%) and crunchy (48%) foods take the top slots, and nearly half of snacks are paired with a beverage.
Subway's foray into nachos is calculated and designed to tap into these shifting consumer preferences around snacking.
The Data confirms, people love snacking now more than ever. Group of Sweet and Salty Snacks.
According to Douglas Fry, Subway's North America president, younger customers are increasingly gravitating toward snacking. They want food that's convenient, portable and, most importantly, budget-friendly. Over the past year, restaurant chains have been scrambling to attract customers who are feeling the pinch of inflation.
The $5 price point for the nachos is a nod to the chain's famous $5 footlong subs, which debuted in 2008. The promotion helped define its brand in the 2000s, and for many, it put sandwiches on the fast-food map. But in many ways, it also put the brand in a box, and with the addition of controversies around their 'yoga matt' ingredient, their spokesperson Jared and the death of their cofounder Fred Deluca, Subway was no longer an option for many clients.
The launch of footlong nachos is just the latest in a series of moves aimed at reinventing Subway's brand. From adding customization options to its menu, pushing app-based orders and increasing international presence—to perhaps, most notably, offering freshly sliced meats—the brand is seeking a major departure from its previous practice of using presliced cold cuts to stay relevant in a highly competitive fast-food landscape.
CRYSTAL RIVER, FLORIDA - DECEMBER 19: Irresistible new Subway Sidekicks include a Footlong Cookie, ... More Footlong Cinnabon Churro, and Footlong Pretzel from Auntie Anne's on December 19, 2023 in Crystal River, Florida. (Photo byfor Subway)
By diversifying its menu and leaning into trends like snacking and customization, Subway is positioning itself as more than just a sandwich chain.
The big question, of course, is whether footlong nachos will resonate with customers. The chain's forays into non-sandwich territory haven't always been successful. Remember its ill-fated attempt at pizza? Exactly. There's also the risk of alienating core customers who see Subway as a sandwich-first brand. While Sidekicks are designed to complement the chain's main offerings, there's always the possibility that these new offerings could dilute the brand's identity.
In an industry where innovation is often the key to survival, the chain is betting that its willingness to experiment will pay off. And who knows? If the $5 footlong nachos catch on, they could become as iconic as the subs that inspired them.
With big news recently on Jersey Mike's agreeing to sell a majority ownership position to private equity funds managed by Blackstone, valuing the food chain at $8 billion, and with Chipotle's founder making the Forbes billionaire list, there's a lot of growth, movement and opportunity in on-the-go food. Subway's latest creation is a reminder that even the most established brands need to evolve to stay relevant.
In a world where consumers are looking for value, convenience and a little bit of fun, footlong nachos just might be the perfect recipe. Say what you will about the idea, but one thing's for sure: it's got people talking. And in the fast-food game, that's half the battle.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
5 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump, Xi may meet ahead of or during APEC summit October: report
President Trump might visit China before going to the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit between Oct. 30 and Nov. 1, or he could meet Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the APEC event in South Korea, the South China Morning Post reported on Sunday, citing multiple sources. The two countries have been trying to negotiate an end to an escalating tit-for-tat tariff war that has upended global trade and supply chains. The two sides have discussed a potential meeting between the leaders in the region this year, but they have not confirmed a date or location yet, according to a person familiar with the matter. President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in 2019. REUTERS Trump has sought to impose tariffs on US importers for virtually all foreign goods, which he says will stimulate domestic manufacturing and which critics say will make many consumer goods more expensive for Americans. He has called for a universal base tariff rate of 10% on goods imported from all countries, with higher rates for imports from the most 'problematic' ones, including China: imports from there now have the highest tariff rate of 55%. Trump has set a deadline of Aug. 12 for the US and China to reach a durable tariffs agreement. President Donald Trump has set a deadline of Aug. 12 for the US and China to reach a durable tariffs deal. Costfoto/NurPhoto/Shutterstock A spokesperson for Trump did not respond to a request for comment about the reported plans for a meeting with Xi in the autumn. The two countries' most recent high-level meeting was on July 11, when Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi had what both described as a productive and positive meeting in Malaysia about how trade negotiations should proceed. Rubio said then that Trump had been invited to China to meet with Xi, and said that both leaders 'want it to happen.' On Friday, China Commerce Minister Wang Wentao said China wants to bring its trade ties with the US back to a stable footing and that recent talks in Europe showed there was no need for a tariff war.

Indianapolis Star
an hour ago
- Indianapolis Star
Critics said Trump would ruin America. Six months in, he's proving them wrong.
Halfway through 2025, I can't help but recall the bevy of lies that progressives and the mainstream media told me about Donald Trump before and after he won a second term as president. I was told Trump would be the end of American democracy, the beginning of American fascism, the ruin of our economy and the best thing ever to happen to Russian President Vladimir Putin. None of that has happened, and I don't know whether to be disappointed or elated. But I must ask: What happened? And why have things gone so right when they were supposed to be so wrong? Progressives have persistently forecast imminent economic doom since Trump was reelected in November. In April, the Associated Press reported: "President Donald Trump has panicked global financial markets, raised the risk of a recession and broken the political and economic alliances that made much of the world stable for business after World War II." That same month, Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, declared that "Donald Trump is ruining the economy on purpose." And The American Prospect, in an article headlined, "The Great Trump Crash?," predicted that tariffs would "mean an instant, near-total halt of trade between China and the U.S." None of those dire predictions proved to be true. The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq recently reached record highs. Employers added more jobs than expected last month. The inflation rate ticked higher in June, but remains far below the 40-year high that Americans suffered under during the Biden administration. Hicks: Trump's tax bill will crush the rural voters who chose him Progressives' scary predictions about international affairs also have proven to be false. Trump was supposed to be the green light Putin needed to pummel Ukraine into submission. Trump's America first stance also was supposed to embolden China and splinter NATO. In reality, Trump has been a peacemaker, pushing for meaningful ceasefires in conflicts from Gaza to Pakistan, Ukraine to Iran. Trump's efforts in the Middle East alone are worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize. Trump set back Iran's development of nuclear weapons, then forged a ceasefire between Iran and Israel. Diplomatic efforts to broker a lasting peace in Gaza also continue. If there is to be a World War III, it doesn't appear imminent. Once again, progressives' claims about Trump were nothing but fearmongering. Probably the biggest lie the left has told about Trump is that his election would be an "extinction-level threat" for democracy. Six months into Trump's second term, I'm happy to report that democracy is still alive and well. Just look at recent headlines: New York Democrats exercised their right to vote for a socialist to run America's largest city. Millions of Americans marched in "No Kings" protests to criticize the president. Other protestors have taken to the streets to demonstrate against enforcement of our nation's immigration laws. Opinion: Trump's deportation flip-flop reveals America's dirty economic secret Despite liberals' oft-repeated fears, the evidence overwhelmingly points to a healthy democracy, where Americans vote for the candidates of their choice and raise their voices to call out politicians and policies they don't like. Trump isn't a king; he's a duly elected president chosen by a healthy plurality of voters. His election was democracy in action. It's not just that progressives' worst fears turned out to be far from reality. The left tried to gaslight Americans into believing they'd regret voting for Trump. The fearmongering on the left was wrong, then and now. And I won't let liberals forget it.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
What a GOP bill banning central digital currency means for consumer banking
A proposed GOP ban on a central bank digital currency (CBDC) could pump the brakes on grand visions to reshape electronic payment access around the Federal Reserve. Republican lawmakers pushed the ban through the House on Thursday over concerns the government could use a CBDC to surveil Americans' financial transactions. The banking industry has also lobbied against the currency, arguing the public already has sufficient access to easily usable and safe digital money. 'Nobody yet knows whether a CBDC is a good idea or not,' Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), who has pushed for the government to explore a CBDC, said following the House's vote. 'There is potential for abuse and corruption, but also for extraordinary modernization that could serve unbanked communities, support the primacy of the U.S. dollar, and much more,' he added. Fed floated idea in 2022 white paper In 2022, the Federal Reserve issued a study of CBDCs that outlined their risks and benefits. 'All options for private digital money, including stablecoins and other cryptocurrencies, require mechanisms to reduce liquidity risk and credit risk. But all these mechanisms are imperfect,' the report notes. A traditional bank account is backed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which guarantees individual deposits up to $250,000 in the event a bank fails. But there are also riskier forms of digital financial services. In 2024, a financial technology company called Synapse collapsed and left customers unable to access some $265 million in deposits. A CBDC, backed with the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, would be the safest possible digital asset. The Fed paper said that a CBDC could make cross-border payments easier and potentially improve access to banking for low-income households. A 2022 study by Himes, the Connecticut Democrat, proposed that CBDCs could be used for depositing paychecks or even be integrated into federal programs like Social Security. A more ambitious version of a CBDC could allow Americans to hold digital dollars at a bank account with the Fed, enabling them to make digital payments without an account at a traditional bank. That could, as the Fed paper noted, 'fundamentally change the structure of the U.S. financial system, altering the roles and responsibilities of the private sector and the central bank.' A government-backed digital dollar — especially one that could bear interest — could also drive consumers away from traditional commercial bank accounts. A CBDC still would require significant study, from the impacts on the banking system to the technology that it would run on. A hypothetical CBDC could use existing technology, or it could be distributed on a blockchain, similar to how Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are issued. In 2022, former Federal Reserve Vice Chair Lael Brainard estimated that it would take ' a long time ' — at least five years, she said — to launch a digital currency if Congress decided to do so. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in February that the bank would not develop a CBDC under his tenure. His term expires in May 2026. The bill, which now heads to the Senate, would bar the Fed from directly or indirectly issuing a CBDC or studying the issue. Other federal agencies are already barred from studying a CBDC due to a January executive order from President Trump. Republicans cite privacy concerns Privacy is the biggest concern about CBDCs aired by Republican lawmakers. House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), who led the CBDC ban through the House, said on the floor that a digital dollar would be tantamount to government surveillance. 'It is government-controlled programmable money that, if designed without the privacy protections of cash, this could give the federal government the ability to surveil and restrict Americans' transactions and monitor every aspect of our daily lives,' he said. In contrast to cash, which is essentially untraceable, a CBDC would likely leave a digital record of some form. If the government pursued a CBDC, it would have to balance concerns about privacy with safeguards to curb its use in money laundering or other illegal activities. Many lawmakers have cited China's digital yuan as a worrying example. Tech and China experts, as reported by WIRED, have raised concerns that the Chinese government could use its digital currency to track individual transactions or otherwise scoop up tranches of consumer data. Other Republicans have issued starker warnings about CBDCs. 'CBDC is an existential threat to Western civilization,' Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) wrote on the social platform X. Banking, crypto lobbies strongly oppose Banking and cryptocurrency lobbying groups are staunchly against a centrally issued digital currency. In a letter to Emmer in April, the American Banking Association argued that Americans already had sufficient access to digital payments. Alongside other digital transfer systems pioneered in the private sector, the Fed launched FedNow, an instant payment system that can operate 24/7, in 2023. Banks have to opt in to using the service, whose major clients include JPMorganChase and Wells Fargo. More broadly, the bank lobby argued that a CBDC would undercut the role banks play in the country's economic system. 'For example, a CBDC would be an advantaged competitor to retail bank deposits that would move money away from banks and into accounts at the Federal Reserve, severely limiting the ability of commercial banks to make loans that power economic growth in communities across the country,' the group wrote. A CBDC could also dampen hopes that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or privately developed stablecoins — cryptocurrencies whose value is pegged to a reference asset like the U.S. dollar — could become the primary form of digital money. 'You wouldn't need stablecoins; you wouldn't need cryptocurrencies, if you had a digital U.S. currency,' Powell said at a congressional hearing in 2021. 'I think that's one of the stronger arguments in its favor.'