Department of Housing did not consult with tenants on plans to shrink minimum apartment sizes
Under the changes, which take effect immediately, the minimum size of a studio apartment will be reduced from 37 sq m to 32 sq m, while developers will no longer have to provide a mix of unit sizes in apartment blocks.
Fewer windows and balconies will also be required, while a requirement to have indoor 'communal, community and cultural facilities' has been scrapped.
The Department of Housing did not consult with tenant organisations, homeowner organisations or members of the public ahead of the changes.
It is understood the changes were kept under wraps due to the fact that they were 'extremely commercially sensitive' and may have led to developers pausing building that is currently underway ahead of the changes being confirmed.
As part of the changes signed off today, a rule that required that half of apartments in a development be somewhat bigger than the minimum standard has been reduced to 25 per cent.
While another rule that required half of apartments in suburban developments and 33 per cent of apartments in urban developments to be 'dual aspect' (which means having windows that can be opened on at least two walls) has now been reduced to 25 per cent in all settings.
Housing Minister James Browne said the changes come in an effort to unblock blockages in apartment delivery.
He said he wants to clear away red tape and address 'viability issues', which he blames on delays in the housing system.
Advertisement
'We are taking decisive action, without compromising on any essential regulations, to ensure apartments are viable to build,' he said.
Speaking on his way into Cabinet this morning, the minister said apartment delivery in Dublin has 'collapsed'.
'We've looked at the housing delivery from last year, it was certainly lower than we hoped, lower than we expected, and it was very disappointing,' he added, arguing that the government has tied itself in 'regulatory knots' in recent years.
Department officials believe the changes announced today could lead to a cost reduction of between €50,000 and €100,000 per apartment.
It was also confirmed today that apartment buildings that have already received planning permission but are not yet complete will not have to be sent back to the beginning of the planning process if they wish to tweak their designs to align with the new rules.
Reacting to the new rules, Sinn Féin's housing spokesperson Eoin Ó Broin said they prove that the government has been 'captured by the institutional investor lobby'.
'This policy was tried and tested in 2018 by then Fine Gael Housing Minister, Eoghan Murphy. It was such a disaster that Darragh O'Brien reversed it in 2022.
'That government is reintroducing it again now shows the absolute poverty of ideas from Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael when it comes to housing,' he said.
Meanwhile, Social Democrats housing spokesperson Rory Hearne said the changes would allow developers to build 'glorified shoeboxes'.
'It will only result in increased profits for developers – and unaffordable apartments that nobody wants to live in,' he said.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
State's ‘shameful' treatment of thalidomide survivors criticised
A Government backbencher has accused the State of behaving 'appallingly' towards the victims of thalidomide and criticised the 'glacial pace' with which the issue is being dealt. Fine Gael TD Barry Ward said the Government has 'dragged its heels' in apologising to the affected mothers and their children, now in their mid to late 60s. The treatment of the survivors 'is fundamentally wrong and shameful and is a stain on the recent history of this State', he said. He believed a 'basic justice' has 'never been met', more than 60 years after pregnant women were prescribed the drug, originally developed in Germany in the 1950s as a sedative and later promoted to treat morning sickness. It was withdrawn from most markets in 1961 following evidence of its link to birth defects. However, it was still sold in Ireland until 1964. READ MORE Many children were born without limbs or with shortened limbs, with hearing and vision impairment and injuries to internal organs. Mr Ward said since then there has been 'no apology, acknowledgment, full suite of treatment and no compensation'. The Dún Laoghaire TD said he was highlighting the issue because this week marks a year since the three former coalition leaders wrote a letter to thalidomide survivors, which was 'not in fact an apology or an acknowledgment, but really a communication in respect of some supports that have been put in place'. At the time the letter angered members of the Irish Thalidomide Association, still waiting for a State apology following a long-running campaign in which they are also seeking compensation and supports. [ Jacqui Browne obituary: Thalidomide survivor and leading advocate for the disabled Opens in new window ] There are fewer than 40 survivors still alive, and only five of their mothers who were prescribed the drug. In September 2024 the then government appointed retired High Court Judge Mr Justice Paul Gilligan to engage with thalidomide survivors. Mr Ward said he did not want 'in any way to interfere with that process'. But raising the issue of thalidomide in the Dáil this week, he condemned the lack of apology for what had happened to the women. 'These are people who have lived throughout their lives with debilitating issues as a result of the fact that they survived thalidomide while their mothers were pregnant,' he said. 'The glacial pace with which the State is actually addressing this problem is shameful' and 'the treatment of thalidomide survivors by allowing the matter to go on for as long as it has is a very poor reflection on the State'. He said most of the women who took the drug and 'bore that burden throughout their lives', have died. Minister of State for Justice Niall Collins told Mr Ward the Government 'is committed to supporting people affected by thalidomide' as he referred to the 'enhanced package' of health supports and personal social services. Enhanced healthcare, social care and independent living supports are currently available, he said. Mr Collins also pointed to the establishment last year of the national thalidomide advocacy office, set up to liaise with thalidomide survivors and assist them to access health and social service supports. 'The support provided is on a one-to-one basis, tailored to the specific needs of the person and in response to contact received from survivors,' with liaison from relevant HSE and other personnel to ensure the services are provided. He said 'each survivor is also eligible for a medical card on an administrative basis, regardless of means, in addition to aids and appliances, equipment, housing adaptations and access to a full range of primary care, hospital and personal social services'. The Minister also said the German Grünenthal Foundation, established by the drug manufacturer, has 'accepted applications from individuals for compensation for thalidomide-related injury'.
Extra.ie
5 hours ago
- Extra.ie
Presidential race heats up but who are Labour backing?
Labour is 'leaning' towards backing Catherine Connolly in the presidential race – despite her turbulent history with the party. Yesterday, the Independent TD announced she plans to run for the Áras. Labour Party sources have said members will be consulted, with feedback expected within the month. However, the view from certain party quarters is that the idea of a joint left-leaning candidate came from Labour leader Ivana Bacik – and any 'sniping' over the years 'is just politics at the end of the day'. Ms Connolly confirmed her intention yesterday to seek nomination to succeed Michael D Higgins in the upcoming Presidential election. Catherine Connolly. Pic: Arthur Carron/Collins Photos 'I've support from across the spectrum, including the Social Democrats, People Before Profit and Solidarity (PBPS), as well as a number of senators and others,' the Galway TD told the Connacht Tribune. 'I'll be formally launching my campaign next week.' Ms Connolly had been widely seen as a frontrunner in the search among left-leaning parties in the Dáil. A survey of Social Democrats' members found that the vast majority of them – nine in 10 respondents – were in favour of running a Presidential candidate, with Catherine Connolly 'by far the most frequent name to be suggested'. 'Catherine has been a tireless advocate for progressive causes and we believe she would make an excellent President,' the party said. Asked by the Irish Daily Mail if the Social Democrats will be the primary funder of Ms Connolly's campaign, a party source said that she will be managing her own campaign, and details of the Social Democrats' support have yet to be finalised. Ms Connolly is also expected to get the backing of People Before Profit, as well as some independent TDs and senators. Sinn Féin and Labour have yet to indicate whether they will support Ms Connolly in her bid, with both parties undertaking their own internal processes. But numerous sources in Labour told it is 'more likely than not' the party will back her bid for the Áras. Ms Connolly first entered politics in 1999 when she was elected to Galway City Council as a Labour representative. She left the party before the 2007 general election after the party stopped her from running for the Dáil alongside Michael D Higgins, although she previously said this was a case of the party 'leaving her'. Mary Lou has not ruled herself out. Pic: Niall Carson/PA Wire In 2016, she made headlines when she accused Labour of 'losing its soul'. Earlier this week, one member of the party expressed their views about supporting Ms Connolly due to her foreign policy views, describing her as the 'Clare Daly candidate'. A well-placed Labour source acknowledged there are 'mixed feelings' about Ms Connolly in the party, but said 'on the whole, we share many of the same values'. 'Ivana has had multiple conversations with Catherine about the Presidency and we are the ones who were leading on running a joint, left-leaning candidate,' they said. 'Of course we are going to consult with our membership, but Ms Connolly has many good qualities that we can get behind.' Another added: 'It has been clear for a while that the direction of travel for any joint-left candidate was Catherine. Sure, there has been some sniping over the years, but it is politics at the end of the day. No decisions have been made yet, but it is fair to say we are leaning towards backing her.' Catherine Connolly. Pic: Leah Farrell/ A Sinn Féin spokesman said the party is still in discussions about joining the left alliance or fielding a candidate of its own. 'All options are on the table,' they said. Earlier this week, Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald refused to rule herself out of the running to become the next President of Ireland. It appeared to be a change of position from March, when Ms McDonald said she would not be running, and she was focusing on work towards a future Sinn Féin government. Fine Gael's deadline for Presidential candidates will close on Tuesday, and in all likelihood Mairead McGuinness will be the sole nomination after Seán Kelly decided earlier this week not to contest. Fianna Fáil has kept its cards close to its chest on whether it will be running a candidate, having sat out the last two Presidential elections. Minister of State at the Department of Justice Niall Collins said yesterday the party will make its position known by September, but it 'won't be running a candidate for the sake of it'.
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘We should be making homes, not units': Smaller apartments plan could lead to more planning delays and few savings, experts warn
'This is a dumbing-down of standards that should be about making homes, not units. I fear what kind of world we're making.' Architect Gerry Cahill, who has worked on social and affordable housing developments for more than 40 years, is not impressed by the new apartment guidelines issued by Minister for Housing James Browne on Tuesday. 'The fear is that if you create a society of one-bedrooms, where do you go from there? How do you make a family? It works to get you out of your parents' box room, but where next?' Cahill asks. The new guidelines allow for greater density and smaller units in apartment blocks, aimed at closing a viability gap between what they cost to build and what developers can sell them for. READ MORE They will 'get apartment-building moving' and 'ensure [they] are viable to build', Browne said on Tuesday. The guidelines reduce the minimum size of a studio apartment to 32sq m, down from 37sq m. There will also be no restrictions on the specific mix of units within a development. Previously the number of one-bedroom apartments or studios within any apartment scheme was restricted to 50 per cent, with no more than 25 per cent of the entire scheme allowed to be studios. Apartment complexes can also have fewer windows, and there will be more units using one lift. Graphic: Paul Scott The Department of Housing claims the changes will result in an average saving of between €50,000 - €100,000 per unit. But will it work in driving down costs and ramping up construction? And what could be the unintended consequences of this loosening of standards? Many discussions over the last number of days focused on how exactly the department came to this cost savings figure of €50,000-€100,000 per unit, and how accurate it might be. The department said it comes from engagement with the Land Development Agency (LDA), the State's affordable-housing delivery body. Work by quantity surveyors within the LDA showed that when all of these measures were combined they could result in these savings per home, department sources said. The Minister was asked on Wednesday if he would publish these costings, and he said he would - but no such evidence has been produced so far. Other housing experts have crunched the numbers and have come to a very different conclusion. Paul Mitchell, director of construction consultants Mitchell McDermott, ran the numbers on all of the changes combined and says the real savings are €28,000-€39,000 per unit. Taking the newly designed studio as an example, the measures resulting in the largest savings are the reduction in floor space - which makes a saving of between €6,000 and €7,000 - and the reduction in windows, which saves another €4,000 to €8,000. All of which goes to say that a figure of between €50,000 and €100,000 seems a long way off what industry professionals expect to save. Another factor is that land values could increase because it will be possible to build many more units on the same site. 'I think the risk here now is developers will all revalue their sites on the basis of fitting more studios which are much more lucrative. That then increases the site value, and it stops anything else happening except small units,' Orla Hegarty, assistant professor at the UCD School of Architecture, says. Concerns had been raised that this change to standards would result in further delays to building, as developers would have to resubmit planning applications to benefit from them. There was a belief that this in turn would clog up the planning system, put a pause on building and ultimately result in higher costs. The Department of Housing had clearly thought about this, and believes it has a solution: an amendment to planning laws to allow changes to be made to plans without the need for a fresh application. The Minister is expected to bring forward the amendment to the Planning and Development Amendment Bill (2025) next week. This will allow developers who currently have planning permission to submit revised drawings and have their amendments expedited through the planning system and automatically granted on a 'permitted alteration' basis without being subject to an entirely new planning process. There could be a fly in the ointment, however: any change to a planning permission would restart the clock for judicial review appeals to be made, legal sources say. Also, the amendment itself could be challenged in court, the guidelines could be challenged and an individual development could be challenged. 'These aren't minor modifications - you're talking about increasing the density of the development, which means more gardens, more electricity connections, more traffic, more people. There's a constitutional right to participate in the planning system if the development could have a significant effect on you,' explains a legal source, who did not wish to be named in case they were involved in future cases. Then there's the question: what will they be like to live in? It is hard to underestimate just how small a 32sq m studio is for a home, but picture this: you can fit eight of them into a tennis court. [ Apartments with fewer windows sound okay, until you live in one Opens in new window ] Now imagine there is no limit to how many of them can be gathered around one lift shaft, or how many of them are in one apartment block. Designing a block this way often means long, dark corridors not unlike a hotel, with dozens of doors off one hallway. 'If you're that close to your neighbours, you can smell every meal that's cooked. You can hear every argument. It's very bad for your mental health to not have privacy and to have that level of intrusion,' Hegarty says. 'In a space this small there is only one place to put your bed, one place to put your sofa. There's nowhere to put a cot. There's hardly a place to put a washing machine in the kitchen, and if you have to fold a pram or use a walking frame, there's no space,' Hegarty says. 'I always think of Irish families and where they will go for Christmas. There's a presumption that this is just temporary, and they all have middle-class parents who'll take them, and they're only there for a little while. But that's not the case. These are people's homes forever,' Hegarty says. There is a fear among many architects that this high-density, small-space living is unsustainable and does not serve the long-term needs of anyone except those who have no other choice. 'How do you live in one space where you are cooking, cleaning, sleeping; where you can't escape from yourself or your partner?' Cahill asks. 'We're not creating units, we're creating homes, and we need to think about the best way to achieve that.' He designed a development with Sr Stanislaus Kennedy called Stanhope Green in Stoneybatter which converted an old convent into housing for people who were previously homeless. Sr Stanislaus Kennedy at The Sanctuary in Stanhope Street, Dublin. Photograph: Alan Betson The project was deemed a great success, providing a communal garden called The Sanctuary, a library and other community spaces. 'Sr Stan's approach was that everyone deserves a home, not a unit. Stanhope Green was a model for communal living,' Cahill says.
