Iran Says "Can't Give Up" Nuclear Program Despite "Serious Damage"
WHY IT'S IMPORTANT
Prior to the war, Tehran and Washington held five rounds of nuclear talks mediated by Oman but could not agree on the extent to which Iran should be allowed to enrich uranium. Israel and the United States say Iran was close to enriching to levels that would allow it to quickly produce a nuclear weapon, while Tehran says its enrichment program is for civilian purposes only.
KEY QUOTES
"It is stopped because, yes, damages are serious and severe. But obviously we cannot give up of enrichment because it is an achievement of our own scientists. And now, more than that, it is a question of national pride," the foreign minister told the Fox News show "Special Report with Bret Baier" in a clip aired on Monday.
The foreign minister said the damage to the nuclear facilities in Iran after U.S. and Israeli strikes was serious and was being evaluated further.
"Well, our facilities have been damaged, seriously damaged, the extent of which is now under evaluation by our atomic energy organization. But as far as I know, they are seriously damaged."
CONTEXT
U.S. ally Israel attacked Iran on June 13 and the Middle Eastern rivals then engaged in an air war for 12 days in which Washington also bombed Iran's nuclear facilities. A ceasefire was reached in late June.
Iran is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. The U.N. nuclear watchdog says it has "no credible indication" of an active, coordinated weapons program in Iran. Tehran maintains its nuclear program is solely meant for civilian purposes.
Israel is the only Middle Eastern country believed to have nuclear weapons and said its war against Iran aimed to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
25 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
India calls for ceasefire in Gaza, says temporary pauses in hostilities not enough
India on Wednesday called for a ceasefire in Gaza, saying that 'intermittent pauses in hostilities' amid Israel's war on the Palestinian territory were inadequate to address the scale of challenges faced by its residents. Highlighting the 'persisting humanitarian crisis' in Gaza at a United Nations Security Council debate, Parvathaneni Harish, India's permanent representative to the United Nations, said that residents of the country are grappling daily with 'acute shortages of food and fuel, inadequate medical services and lack of access to education'. There is a need to deliver humanitarian assistance in a safe, sustained and timely manner, Harish said during the Security Council debate on the 'Situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian question'. 'There is no substitute to peace,' the diplomat said. 'A ceasefire must be put in place. All hostages must be released. Dialogue and diplomacy remain the only viable paths to achieving these objectives. There are no other fixes or solutions.' Israel's military offensive in Gaza began in October 2023 after Palestinian militant group Hamas killed 1,200 persons during its incursion into southern Israel and took hostages. Israel has been carrying out unprecedented air and ground strikes on Gaza since then, leaving more than 61,000 persons dead. Tel Aviv has also enforced a severe blockade on humanitarian aid, which UN officials say has brought the population to the verge of famine. On Wednesday, Harish also told the Security Council that the health and education situation in Gaza was 'particularly troubling', citing World Health Organization estimates that around 95% of hospitals in the region had been damaged or destroyed. He said that more than 6.5 lakh children have had no schooling for over 20 months as per reports by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. #IndiaAtUN PR @AmbHarishP delivered 🇮🇳's statement at the @UN Security Council Quarterly Open Debate on the Situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian question. @MEAIndia @IndianDiplomacy — India at UN, NY (@IndiaUNNewYork) July 23, 2025 Harish added that India's commitment towards the Palestinian cause is 'unwavering' and expressed hope that an upcoming UN conference on the Israel-Palestine conflict would lead to 'concrete steps' towards achieving a two-state solution. The conference on the matter is scheduled from July 28 to July 30. India's longstanding position has been to support a two-state solution for establishing a sovereign, viable and independent state of Palestine within recognised and mutually agreed borders, living side by side with Israel in peace. The diplomat's remarks on Wednesday came more than a month after India on June 12, along with 19 other countries, abstained from voting on a resolution that the UN General Assembly adopted demanding a ceasefire in Gaza. Hundred and forty-nine countries voted in favour of the non-binding resolution demanding an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Israel's war on the besieged Palestinian territory. Israel and the United States were among the 12 countries that voted against it. The resolution reiterated demands for the unconditional release of remaining hostages held by Hamas and unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid in Gaza. It also condemned the use of starvation and the denial of aid as tactics of war and demanded that Israel immediately lift the blockade on Gaza and open all border crossings for aid deliveries. In December 2023, India was among 153 nations that voted in favour of a resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly to demand a humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza. New Delhi had in July 2024, reiterated its call at the UN for an immediate and complete ceasefire in Gaza. Meanwhile, Israel and Hamas have been holding ceasefire talks in Qatar. Earlier efforts to reinstate a brief ceasefire that took effect in January had stalled due to major disagreements between Hamas and Israel.
Deccan Herald
25 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Is there famine in Gaza? Let's not wait to find out
By Marc ChampionIs there famine in Gaza? The Israeli authority for the strip says no; the Hamas-run health ministry says about 10 people are dying of malnutrition every 24 hours. Warring parties can rarely be taken at their word, and without access for independent journalists, little can be confirmed first hand. Even so, we know more than enough to Tuesday, 111 signatories from international aid organizations issued a statement warning that 'mass starvation' was now spreading in Gaza. The previous day, 29 countries, including France and the UK, jointly condemned Israel's 'drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians.'We know that the number of aid distribution points in Gaza has reduced to four — three in the south and one in the north — from about 400, as Israel seeks to control the flow. Israel also acknowledges that aid deliveries have plummeted since its new system took effect, with only the question of who to blame in dispute. But the 'who' and the 'why' don't matter when it comes to the 'what,' which is the impact this man-made hell is Jazeera appeals to global media community to protect journalists in Gaza from 'forced starvation'.It is self-evident that having so few aid points for 2 million people means that large numbers of civilians are forced to travel long distances in a war zone. They are being targeted en route. Israel says Hamas is responsible, hoping to collapse a system that was created to prevent the group from seizing and selling aid to finance their war effort. Palestinians say Israel Defense Force snipers are doing the shooting as part of a larger plan to make Gaza uninhabitable and force them out. The IDF acknowledges it has fired warning shots at crowds, but it's near impossible to prove what happened because even victims may not see the sniper who shot who commits such monstrous acts is largely irrelevant to their impact on aid distribution and hunger. Clearly, Gaza's civilian population is desperate enough to keep trying, despite the dangers Blackman, a nurse from the British frontline charity UK-Med told the BBC that one of the 30 patients who passed through her field hospital after such an incident was a five-months-pregnant woman, shot in the abdomen while trying to get food. A male patient was beaten with bricks to rob him of the package he'd just managed to officials say more than 1,000 people have now been killed trying to reach the distribution points run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which is backed by the US and Israel. These numbers also are hard to prove without independent media present, and now even the flow of information from local sources may be drying up. This week, the French news agency AFP issued a press release to say their Gaza freelancers could no longer continue reporting news, because they were too weak for lack of food and water. Meanwhile, Rieke Hayes, an Irish physiotherapist working with the International Red Cross in Gaza, posted a blog on the ICRC website describing the change in her work since she arrived in March. Back then, she'd get roped in to treat mainly shrapnel wounds. Now she says it's bullets, and the day-to-day numbers she cites are shocking. 'One morning, we had 179 dead and wounded brought to the field hospital. Another day, we had 50. Another day after that, 184 — 99% of whom had gunshot wounds. A few days later, we received over 240 patients within a few hours,' she are, of course, many other accounts, but these two struck me. The AFP notice because this is an organization with a reputation for covering wars even when others don't. The agency has lost journalists to conflict, but it never before had to worry about losing one to starvation. And Hayes's blog was striking because it was so matter of fact. At no point does she claim to know who is doing the shooting or accuse anyone of anything. She just tells what she saw. Read down the social media comment sections on such accounts, and you quickly find several ideas in common. For pro-Palestinians, there is a disgust that anyone is debating anything, because a genocide is underway. Pro-Israel accounts ask: What about the hostages? Why not call on Hamas to release them and lay down their arms, instead of complaining about the IDF? Or, how can you cite Palestinians and international aid workers as evidence of anything? They're either Hamas terrorists themselves or Hamas sympathizers, they write. People do, of course, lie, especially in times of war and even to themselves. Polls show that as many as 90% of Palestinians don't believe Hamas fighters were responsible for the atrocities committed on Oct. 7, 2023. Those denying hunger in Gaza or calling Israel's current escalation of the war justifiable self-defense are lying to themselves, is a terrorist organization that has been using Palestinian civilians as pawns in a deadly game since day one. Israeli cabinet ministers are increasingly open about how they see Gaza's future — annexed, run by Israeli security forces, and resettled by Jewish Israelis. Palestinians, they say, should 'voluntarily' leave what the IDF is turning into a foodless, waterless wasteland so that settlers can build Donald Trump's beachfront paradise in if allowed to succeed, must be called by its name, which is ethnic cleansing. Right now, though, the only priorities for US and Arab mediators should be to silence the guns in Gaza, get food and medical aid in, and bring the hostages out. Nothing else should be allowed to stand in the way.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Columbia University To Pay $220 Million In Deal With Trump To Restore Federal Funding
New York: Columbia University announced Wednesday it has reached a deal with the Trump administration to pay more than $220 million to the federal government to restore federal research money that was canceled in the name of combating antisemitism on campus. Under the agreement, the Ivy League school will pay a $200 million settlement over three years, the university said. It will also pay $21 million to resolve alleged civil rights violations against Jewish employees that occurred following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, the White House said. "This agreement marks an important step forward after a period of sustained federal scrutiny and institutional uncertainty," acting University President Claire Shipman said. The school had been threatened with the potential loss of billions of dollars in government support, including more than $400 million in grants canceled earlier this year. The administration pulled the funding because of what it described as the university's failure to squelch antisemitism on campus during the Israel-Hamas war. Columbia has since agreed to a series of demands laid out by the Republican administration, including overhauling the university's student disciplinary process and applying a contentious, federally endorsed definition of antisemitism not only to teaching but to a disciplinary committee that has been investigating students critical of Israel. Wednesday's agreement - which does not include an admission of wrongdoing - codifies those reforms while preserving the university's autonomy, Shipman said. Education Secretary Linda McMahon called the deal "a seismic shift in our nation's fight to hold institutions that accept American taxpayer dollars accountable for antisemitic discrimination and harassment." "Columbia's reforms are a roadmap for elite universities that wish to regain the confidence of the American public by renewing their commitment to truth-seeking, merit, and civil debate," McMahon said in a statement. As part of the agreement, Columbia agreed to a series of changes previously announced in March, including reviewing its Middle East curriculum to make sure it was "comprehensive and balanced" and appointing new faculty to its Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies. It also promised to end programs "that promote unlawful efforts to achieve race-based outcomes, quotes, diversity targets or similar efforts." The university will also have to issue a report to a monitor assuring that its programs "do not promote unlawful DEI goals." In a post Wednesday night on his Truth Social platform, President Donald Trump said Columbia had "committed to ending their ridiculous DEI policies, admitting students based ONLY on MERIT, and protecting the Civil Liberties of their students on campus." He also warned, without being specific, "Numerous other Higher Education Institutions that have hurt so many, and been so unfair and unjust, and have wrongly spent federal money, much of it from our government, are upcoming." The pact comes after months of uncertainty and fraught negotiations at the more than 270-year-old university. It was among the first targets of Trump's crackdown on pro-Palestinian campus protests and on colleges that he asserts have allowed Jewish students be threatened and harassed. Columbia's own antisemitism task force found last summer that Jewish students had faced verbal abuse, ostracism and classroom humiliation during the spring 2024 demonstrations. Other Jewish students took part in the protests, however, and protest leaders maintain they aren't targeting Jews but rather criticizing the Israeli government and its war in Gaza. Columbia's leadership - a revolving door of three interim presidents in the last year - has declared that the campus climate needs to change. Also in the settlement is an agreement to ask prospective international students "questions designed to elicit their reasons for wishing to study in the United States," and establishes processes to make sure all students are committed to "civil discourse." In a move that would potentially make it easier for the Trump administration to deport students who participate in protests, Columbia promised to provide the government with information, upon request, of disciplinary actions involving student-visa holders resulting in expulsions or suspensions. Columbia on Tuesday announced it would suspend, expel or revoke degrees from more than 70 students who participated in a pro-Palestinian demonstration inside the main library in May and an encampment during alumni weekend last year. The pressure on Columbia began with a series of funding cuts. Then Mahmoud Khalil, a former graduate student who had been a visible figure in the protests, became the first person detained in the Trump administration's push to deport pro-Palestinian activists who aren't U.S. citizens. Next came searches of some university residences amid a federal Justice Department investigation into whether Columbia concealed "illegal aliens" on campus. The interim president at the time responded that the university was committed to upholding the law. Columbia was an early test case for the Trump administration as it sought closer oversight of universities that the Republican president views as bastions of liberalism. Yet it soon was overshadowed by Harvard University, which became the first higher education institution to defy Trump's demands and fight back in court. The Trump administration has used federal research funding as its primary lever in its campaign to reshape higher education. More than $2 billion in total has also been frozen at Cornell, Northwestern, Brown and Princeton universities. Administration officials pulled $175 million from the University of Pennsylvania in March over a dispute around women's sports. They restored it when school officials agreed to update records set by transgender swimmer Lia Thomas and change their policies. The administration also is looking beyond private universities. University of Virginia President James Ryan agreed to resign in June under pressure from a U.S. Justice Department investigation into diversity, equity and inclusion practices. A similar investigation was opened this month at George Mason University (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
