
John Healey ‘misled' Parliament over Afghan data leak
Three days ago, the Defence Secretary told MPs that no serving member of the Armed Forces had been put at risk by the leak.
However, it emerged on Thursday that the identities of more than 100 British officials, including members of the special forces and MI6, had been compromised.
Sir Ed Davey, the Liberal Democrat leader, demanded Mr Healey come before the House of Commons to face questions on whether he knowingly misled MPs and the public.
'Three days ago, John Healey claimed no one serving in the Armed Forces was put at risk by the data breach,' he said. 'Today, we found out that appears to be false.
'We need to know if any serving members of the armed forces were impacted, and the Defence Secretary must urgently come before Parliament to answer the question of whether he knowingly misled MPs and the public.'
The information about the effect of the data breach on UK personnel was kept secret by an super-injunction until Thursday, when the order was lifted in part by a High Court judge.
It allowed media organisations to reveal that detailed case notes in the database contained personal data of special forces and spies.
The Government had already admitted on Tuesday that the data of nearly 19,000 Afghans who worked with the British during the 20-year war in Afghanistan and applied to resettle in the UK had been inadvertently leaked.
Many were judged to be at risk of serious harm or even death as the Taliban sought retribution against those who had worked with the British government during the conflict.
The data breach occurred in February 2022 but was not discovered by the government until August 2023, when someone in Afghanistan obtained the data and posted part of it on Facebook.
The data on UK personnel that was leaked involved their names, but there were no contact details such as addresses, telephone numbers or email addresses.
It comes after Sir Grant Shapps, who was defence secretary when the injunction was first put in place, said he would 'do the same thing all over again'.
He added: 'You simply can't release everything and this was one of those times where, faced with a decision of protecting lives, both Brits and Afghanis, I would do the same thing all over again.'
Mr Healey made his comment in the Commons in response to a question from Ian Roome, a Lib Dem MP and member of the defence select committee.
He said: 'To the best of my knowledge and belief, no serving member of our armed forces is put at risk by the data loss.'
Speaking on Friday morning, Mr Roome said: 'The Defence Secretary gave me his assurances just three days ago that no serving members of our Armed Forces were put at risk by this appalling data breach. I am very concerned to find out that this appears not to have been correct.
'It is really important to restore public trust, and he now clarifies his remarks. It is the least that our brave armed forces personnel, along with the thousands of Afghans impacted, deserve.'
Downing Street said the Defence Secretary's statement to the Commons that 'no serving member of our armed forces is put at risk' by the Afghan data leak was 'accurate' despite Sir Ed's accusations to the contrary.
Asked if Mr Healey misled the House, a No 10 spokesman said: 'The Defence Secretary's statement to the House… I believe it was an accurate statement.'
He said the Government is 'committed to transparency', adding: 'In terms of security of our personnel, we take that extremely seriously, particularly those in sensitive positions.
'We always have appropriate measures in place to protect their security.'
A Ministry of Defence spokesman said: 'It's long-standing policy of successive governments to not comment on special forces.
'We take the security of our personnel very seriously and personnel, particularly those in sensitive positions, always have appropriate measures in place to protect their security.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
33 minutes ago
- Daily Record
First Minister not informed after massive UK Gov data leak
Defence Secretary John Healey confirmed a super injunction banning the reporting of the Ministry of Defence fiasco was to be lifted last week. A massive data leak and a secret scheme to bring more than 18,000 at-risk Afghans to the UK was kept hidden from Cabinet Ministers and the Scottish Government. Defence Secretary John Healey confirmed a super injunction banning the reporting of the Ministry of Defence fiasco was to be lifted last week. He revealed that the personal details of thousands of Afghans who had applied to resettle in the UK after the Taliban seized power in Afghanistan had been leaked in 2022. They had applied to the UK Government's Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP) scheme – for those who had helped British forces during the 20-year conflict. It has now emerged personal details of special forces personnel and serving spies were also compromised. Dave Doogan, the SNP's defence spokesman said: 'One breach of ARAP data could be considered careless albeit to a callous degree given what we were trying to protect the applicants on this list from, but sadly this was one of [several] leaks we know about. 'It therefore has the appearance of institutional incompetence comp-ounded by a galling lack of ministerial grip by the previous secretary of state.' The Tories' then- defence secretary Ben Wallace was only told of the breach 18 months after it happened when details about the leaked data were mentioned on Facebook. The MoD set up a secret scheme, the Afghan Response Route (ARR), to relocate those named. About 6900 people were relocated using that scheme, estimated to have cost about £800million. Wallace personally applied for an injunction to stop the media from reporting the scandal or parliamentarians being informed. The gagging order was only intended to last four months but when Grant Shapps succeeded Wallace it was upgraded to a superinjunction and remained in place until last week. The Sunday Mail has now learned that no serving Cabinet ministers other than Wallace, Shapps and then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak were told about the scandal. One ex-Cabinet minister said: 'We were not informed.' And despite the MoD setting up an entire scheme to relocate Afghans whose data had been compromised, including housing them in Scotland, they failed to inform Humza Yousaf, who was first minister at the time. Senior Scottish Government sources said they were not told. An adviser said: 'We knew nothing about it until everyone else found out from John Healey and neither did Humza at the time. I'm sure he also learned about it from watching Parliament TV last week.' The Labour government applied to extend the superinjunction three times – in May and November last year and this January – and commissioned a review into what options it had to put an end to the ARR. The report by retired civil servant Paul Rimmer found there was 'little evidence of intent by the Taleban [sic] to conduct a campaign of retribution.' It went on to say the leaked data 'may not have spread nearly as widely as initially feared. We believe it is unlikely the dataset would be the single, or definitive, piece of information enabling or prompting the Taleban to act.' Thousands of Afghans have settled in Scotland since the Taliban took power in 2021. But thousands more are still thought to be living in fear there. Doogan said: 'When the current Secretary of State for Defence took us round the houses on this mess in Parliament his statement included a curious focus on the cost to the taxpayer going forward, with an even more inappropriate stress on any impact on immigration figures. His statement should have been limited to an apology, the steps taken to remedy the apparently sieve-like nature of a government department entrusted with our security and the debt we still owe to those compromised.' He said the government's reliance on the Rimmer Report showed 'a staggering degree of complacency from members of a bureaucracy whose collective and sustained incompetence, I greatly fear, has left brave Afghans, wherever they are hiding, to endure even greater threats'. The MoD said: 'As the Defence Secretary outlined in his statement there was a super injunction in place meaning they could not inform others and knowledge was kept to a narrow compartment.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'We were not made aware of this issue before the UK Minister of Defence's statement to the House of Commons. 'This incident is clearly deeply concerning and we urge the UK Government to ensure it prioritises the safety and protection of people affected.' The 18,714 Afghans fearful of Taliban reprisals due to the leak are unlikely to get compensation. The MoD said any claims will be robustly defended. This month, Armed Forces minister Luke Pollard announced £1.6million in compensation for a separate incident involving the release of Afghan nationals' data. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.


Daily Record
33 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Donald Trump's Scotland visit 'recipe for disaster' for struggling frontline cops
Nearly a third of Police Scotland officers are set to be deployed or on standby for the US president's visit with fears it will stretch force to limit. Donald Trump's visit to Scotland threatens a policing 'disaster' amid staff shortages, cop burnout and stretched budgets, rank-and-file officers warn. The US president arrives in Scotland on Friday and stays until Tuesday, July 29. He is set to meet Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Aberdeen and has scheduled separate talks with First Minister John Swinney. But even a flying visit will rack up a £5million bill for taxpayers – while the threat of mass protests could strain the force further. Police Scotland officer numbers are at near-historic lows of around 16,500 – with almost a third, about 5000, expected to be deployed or on standby for Trump's visit. David Kennedy, general secretary of the Scottish Police Federation, said: 'It's a recipe for disaster. We don't have enough cops. ' President Trump is a magnet to certain groups. There will be protests. "And just because the president is one place doesn't mean that's where the protests will take place. "With this event, it is survival mode. That's the mentality that will set in.' The Stop Trump Coalition is organising a 'festival of resistance' including a major demo in Aberdeen on Saturday. A spokesperson said: ' John Swinney should stand with the people of Scotland and say no to a humiliating photo opportunity with the leader of the international far-right." Trump's last presidential visit in July 2018 prompted widespread protests in Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen, at a cost of more than £3million to Police Scotland. It required 'mutual aid', with forces from around the UK were drafted in. It sparked a cost-sharing row between Holyrood and Westminster. The UK-wide policing bill for the event topped £18million. In his first term in office, Trump spent two nights at his Turnberry resort in Ayrshire before heading to England. Tens of thousands protested, with an 'angry orange baby' blimp in Edinburgh and a paraglider with an anti-Trump banner sailing over Turnberry. In March, Turnberry's clubhouse was vandalised by pro-Palestine protesters. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. This visit will mean police holidays and rest days cancelled and many landed with 12-hour shifts, Kennedy said. He added: 'We'll survive but we shouldn't have to just survive. They will need plenty of help from the UK. 'All this costs money and Police Scotland's budget is already bust. Everybody working longer hours and days has a knock-on effect for months, if not years.' He said a raft of specialist units, including firearms officers, would need to be deployed with help from other UK forces. Kennedy added: "We've only got so many firearms officers in Scotland so we will need more. "Whilst you have those protecting the president, you've also got to have those protecting the public. "We have to make sure we still have that resilience that if something goes wrong, those people are there now. "When I'm getting told my firearms officers are having to work 12-hour shifts, I'm not happy about that. "I think that's extremely long shifts and potentially long days for people carrying guns that may have to use them.' Last week, the force insisted Trump's visit wouldn't 'come at the expense' of communities. But Kennedy said it will. He added: 'We don't have enough officers now to police Scotland. This needs to be a wake-up call for the Scottish Government.' It comes after Police Scotland's controversial move last year to downgrade 'minor' crimes to free up resources, meaning they will no longer investigate offences like vandalism and thefts where there are no leads. The Scottish Government said Swinney's talk with Trump is 'an opportunity to promote the interests of Scotland'.


Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Unite votes to suspend Angela Rayner over Birmingham bin strike
Labour's largest union donor, Unite, has voted to suspend Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner over her role in the Birmingham bin strike row. Members of the trade union, one of the UK's largest, also "overwhelmingly" voted to "re-examine its relationship" with Labour over the issue. They said Ms Rayner, who is also housing, communities and local government secretary, Birmingham Council's leader, John Cotton, and other Labour councillors had been suspended for "bringing the union into disrepute". There was confusion over Ms Rayner's membership of Unite, with her office having said she was no longer a member and resigned months ago and therefore could not be suspended. But Unite said she was registered as a member. Parliament's latest register of interests had her down as a member in May. The union said an emergency motion was put to members at its policy conference in Brighton on Friday. Unite is one of the Labour Party's largest union donors, donating £414,610 in the first quarter of 2025 - the highest amount in that period by a union, company or individual. The union condemned Birmingham's Labour council and the government for "attacking the bin workers". Mountains of rubbish have been piling up in the city since January after workers first went on strike over changes to their pay, with all-out strike action starting in March. An agreement has still not been made. 2:58 Ms Rayner and the councillors had their membership suspended for "effectively firing and rehiring the workers, who are striking over pay cuts of up to £8,000", the union added. 'Missing in action' General secretary Sharon Graham told Sky News on Saturday morning: "Angela Rayner, who has the power to solve this dispute, has been missing in action, has not been involved, is refusing to come to the table." She had earlier said: "Unite is crystal clear, it will call out bad employers regardless of the colour of their rosette. "Angela Rayner has had every opportunity to intervene and resolve this dispute but has instead backed a rogue council that has peddled lies and smeared its workers fighting huge pay cuts. "The disgraceful actions of the government and a so-called Labour council, is essentially fire and rehire and makes a joke of the Employment Relations Act promises. "People up and down the country are asking whose side is the Labour government on and coming up with the answer not workers." Sir Keir Starmer's spokesman said the government's "priority is and always has been the residents of Birmingham". He said the decision by Unite workers to go on strike had "caused disruption" to the city. "We've worked to clean up streets and remain in close contact with the council [...] as we support its recovery," he added. A total of 800 Unite delegates voted on the motion.