
Who is Sade Perkins? Ex-Houston official removed for 'all white' comment on Camp Mystic
Perkins' comments, posted on TikTok, went viral, with many accusing her of racism. On Monday, the Houston Chronicle reported that Mayor Whitmore is taking steps to remove her permanently from her position in the city's Food Insecurity Board.
On Saturday (July 5), Perkins posted a video on her TikTok handle where she pointed out that the Camp Mystic is an "all white" conservative Christian Camp. The comments came amid Camp Mystic becoming the national headline after multiple campers went missing as the Guadalupe River surged overnight on Friday (July 4), leading to floods in multiple camps in Kerr County. On Monday, Camp Mystic confirmed the deaths of 27 campers and staff members in the devastating flood.
Who Is Sade Perkins And What Did She Say?
Sade Perkins has been working in Houston's Food Insecurity Board, a body that is responsible for making recommendations to the city authorities about the issues of food insecurity in the city of Houston. She was appointed to the board by former Houston Mayor, Mayor Sylvester Turner in 2023. Her term in is the board has expired in January 2025, as per the board's website.
What Did She Say About The Missing Girls?
Perkins posted a video on her TikTok account, which has over 9,000 followers, alleging that the national attention the missing Camp Mystic girls received was because they were white and Christian, as Camp Mystic is an "all white" and conservative Christian summer camp.
Also read: Ex-Houston official says flood-hit Camp Mystic, where girls went missing, is 'all-white'
'I know I'm probably going to get cancelled for this, but Camp Mystic is a whites-only, girls' Christian camp,' Perkins. 'They don't even have a token Asian, they don't have a token Black person. It is an all-white, white-only, conservative Christian camp. If you ain't white, you ain't right, you ain't getting in, you ain't going. Period.'
'If this were a group of Hispanic girls out there, this would not be getting this type of coverage that they're getting. No one would give a f---,' she added. 'And all these white people, the parents of these little girls, would be saying things like, 'They need to be deported, they shouldn't have been here in the first place.''
Perkins added that she has a "big problem" with it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
China's Shanghai Composite index rise 0.48%
Asian stocks ended Thursday's session mostly higher, unfazed by U.S. President Donald Trump's latest tariff salvos. After threatening tariffs on copper and pharma, Trump upped the stakes in his global trade war with a fresh round of tariffs on imports from eight nations. He imposed a 50 percent tariff on Brazilian imports over Jair Bolsonaro's prosecution, prompting sharp retaliation from President Lula. Gold edged higher on a softer dollar and lower bond yields while oil prices were little changed in Asian trade on signs of rising U.S. stockpiles and concerns about global economic outlook. China's Shanghai Composite index rose 0.48 percent to 3,509.68 and Hong Kong's Hang Seng index climbed 0.57 percent to 24,028.37 as investors looked through the latest tariff headlines. EV and real estate stocks rallied after Beijing pledged policy support for job stability.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Iranian MAGA supporter detained by immigration authorities still backs Trump
From her suburban home in Los Angeles County, Arpineh Masihi proudly flew the Trump flag and stocked her shelves with MAGA hats. A lifelong immigrant and devout supporter of the president's hardline immigration policies, she believed in his promise to deport 'criminals' and 'make America great again.' Then ICE knocked on her door. But her support for Donald Trump remained intact. 'He's doing the right thing because lots of these people don't deserve to be here,' Arpineh, the mother of four US-born children, told the BBC over the phone from the Adelanto immigration detention centre in the Mojave Desert. 'I will support him until the day I die. He's making America great again.' Arpineh, 39, moved to the US as a toddler and has spent nearly her entire life in California. In 2008, she was convicted of burglary and grand theft and served a two-year prison sentence. A judge revoked her Green Card, a common consequence, but allowed her to remain in the country due to the dangers she might face as a Christian Armenian Iranian if deported. 'We are Christians. She can't go back, there's no way,' said her husband Arthur Sahakyan, watching their 4-year-old daughter run through the house. Since then, Arpineh rebuilt her life, starting a business, raising four children, and volunteering in the community. She is part of Southern California's vast Iranian diaspora, with areas like West Los Angeles, nicknamed 'Tehrangeles,' hosting the largest population of Iranians outside Iran. Yet even among that community, Arpineh's arrest has sparked unease. Immigration raids have ramped up, detaining people from around the world. While most detainees in LA are Mexican nationals, Department of Homeland Security updates show arrests of individuals from dozens of countries. Trump's pledge to launch 'the largest deportation programme of criminals in the history' helped win him the White House. Arpineh and her family still support that promise — but they're hoping she's not among those ultimately removed. 'I don't blame Trump, I blame Biden,' Arthur said. 'It's his doing for open borders, but I believe in the system and all the good people will be released and the ones that are bad will be sent back.' Though many detainees have no criminal history, Arpineh's 2008 conviction makes her a prime target. ICE declined to comment on her case. Arthur points he never asked for details about the burglary; he saw it as a youthful mistake. Instead, he focuses on her contributions over the past 17 years. 'We all make mistakes,' he said. 'But she's been volunteering, feeding police and firefighters. She's a good person.' On 30 June, while the family was having breakfast, Arpineh got a call from ICE. At first, they thought it was a prank. But within 30 minutes, immigration officers arrived. Despite public service campaigns urging immigrants not to open the door without a warrant, the couple stepped outside to talk. Arpineh showed them documentation from a judge's decision allowing her to remain in the US, provided she committed no further crimes and regularly checked in — her last check-in had been in April. The officers told her her circumstances had changed. They had a warrant. Arthur said the agents allowed her to say goodbye to their children, aged 14, 11, 10, and 4, and warned: 'No matter what, we're going to catch you – maybe if you're driving on the street with your kids.' 'They told us no matter what we're going to catch you – maybe if you're driving on the street with your kids – so we thought, what we'd been seeing on the news: flash bombs, cornering cars,' Arthur said. 'She came and kissed the kids goodbye,' he recalls. 'She came outside like a champion and said, 'Here I am'.' Arthur asked them not to cuff her in front of the children. They agreed to do it on the far side of the vehicle. 'I knew my kids were watching from upstairs,' he said. 'I didn't want them to see their mom handcuffed.' Arpineh was taken to a federal ICE facility in downtown LA, where protests against detention conditions have raged for weeks. She told the BBC she was held with 28 other women in a freezing, brightly lit room for three days, surviving on snacks and one bottle of water a day. She pointed they 'were treated like animals,' huddling together for warmth and sleeping on the floor. After three days, she was transferred to Adelanto, a privately-run ICE facility known for its harsh, prison-like conditions. Still, she said, it's an improvement. She now gets three meals a day, a shower, and a bed. 'But it's still very challenging,' she said. Despite her detention, Arpineh remains loyal to Trump and optimistic about her fate. 'I'm not deportable to any country,' she told the BBC. But recent precedents are worrying. In February, ICE deported a group of Iranian Christians — not to Iran, but to Panama. She calls her husband every hour to share updates, though there's little progress to report. Their older children understand what's happening. The youngest just keeps asking when her mother will return. 'I have four citizen children. I own a business. I own a property. I own cars,' Arpineh says. 'I haven't done anything wrong in so many years.' Inside, the house Arthur struggle to remain composed. 'Our home is broken,' Arthur says.


The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Tejas must not meet the fate of India's first indigenous fighter jet
In the long-term, the Jaguar is to be replaced by the indigenous Light Combat Aircraft Tejas. But that project unfortunately has seen delays that could have been avoided with greater preparation. The Jaguar ground attack aircraft was in a two-seater training configuration, and the mishap unfortunately cost the lives of both pilots. This versatile aircraft has flown for five decades and is due for regular updates. The yet another tragic death of two Air Force combat pilots in Rajasthan's Churu district comes as a cruel reminder that the mastery of the air extracts a cruel price, unexpectedly. The Tejas development programme came in for much criticism on account of continued delays. Initiated in the early 1980s and finally flying in early 2000s, the Tejas has the distinction of having the best safety record during development. In all these years, there has only been one known flying accident involving a Tejas. The tragic Jaguar accident on Wednesday was preceded by a report that the inordinate delay in deliveries of the Tejas Mk1A were on account of engine supplies running behind schedule. Development of an indigenous engine has been a long–running saga of despair and frustration, but it needn't have been. India's R&D Manufacturing defence systems in India, or anywhere else, is directly proportionate to the research and development efforts into which investments are made. In India, R&D has been a government–run initiative from the earliest times. And it had to be so since a newly independent country did not have a private sector developed to that degree, while it also had an economic model which was state–directed. The Soviet Union also had a similar R&D system since it was an avowedly communist country. The state ran the show, and did remarkably well, both in defence and space. India also had a head start over Asian countries in terms of R&D in various advanced technologies in the early years. It had by far the most developed atomic energy programme in the region, and also a space effort that has continued to impress and pay dividends globally. The atomic energy programme was just a screwdriver away from progressing to the next essential step of providing a nuclear umbrella, but the anti-bomb lobby held sway until 1998. Had it progressed along the expected path of technological advancement, India could have been a nuclear power before restrictive treaties kicked in. The same twists of the screwdrivers could have given India a missile capability of intercontinental proportions long before a selective and obstructive international regime delayed India's progress. The launch capabilities, after all, only had to be tweaked so as to ensure rockets, with or without nuclear warheads, would not go into space, but return to earth on selected targets. The missile development programme subsequently came into being, and has given India a modicum of security cover. It remains a work in progress, as it must. The same should have been the case with defence R&D, but alas, not so. India flew its first jet combat aircraft in 1961, a mere five years after launching the project. The HF-24 Marut was then Asia's first modern jet combat aircraft designed and produced domestically by India, and this was years before China exploded its first atomic weapon. The head start was well and truly a good one, but along the way, something went wrong in long-term vision, a well–rounded threat perception analytical framework, and above all, an implementation process that was just as firm as it was determined. Even as Hindustan Aeronautics promised more than it could deliver, the Air Force didn't help matters. Also read: IAF needs a transformation. Bring in 5G fighters, fast-track Tejas Mk2, upgrade AMCA to 6G An endless cycle Constantly shifting the goal posts has been an allegation that can be made against the service, and it seems the charge still sticks. Defence equipment is bought on the basis of Staff Quality Requirements issued by the armed forces headquarters, after which the Ministry of Defence begins its search. Starting within, the megalithic domestic defence scientist bureaucracy doubles down to claim ownership of the project. Domestic always sounds best, and sentiment sells, so the project becomes indigenous. The Air Force, in particular, and the Army's Armoured Corps, generally, prefer equipment that is available off the shelf, which means foreign, so goalposts shift. The arguments now put out are that 'it would be foolhardy to assume that the IAF would not revise ASQRs (air staff quality requirements) as the deliveries are delayed and newer, more potent threats emerge…The threat is not static—the ASQR shouldn't be either'. So when ASQRs are revised, the project under R&D gets further delayed. And the cycle goes on and on until obsolescence, as was the case with the HF-24 Marut, when the baby and bath water were thrown out together, with its fundamental excellence lost in stored files. Similar cannot be allowed to happen with the Tejas, for lives are at stake. Manvendra Singh is a BJP leader, Editor-in-Chief of Defence & Security Alert and Chairman, Soldier Welfare Advisory Committee, Rajasthan. He tweets @ManvendraJasol. Views are personal. (Edited by Aamaan Alam Khan)