World Utilities Congress 2025: Exhibitors and speakers show how innovation is powering the future of utilities
30 May 2025 00:16
SARA ALZAABI (ABU DHABI)Exhibitors and speakers at the World Utilities Congress 2025 offered Aletihad insights into breakthrough technologies and bold strategies redefining the future of energy.The Technology Innovation Institute (TII) has introduced Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) drone-mounted technology that has been used in detection of underground water leaks at depths up to 40 metres without the need to dig trenches.TII Lead Researcher Luciano Oliveira said: 'The origin of TII SAR began with a clear and urgent challenge: how can we see what's happening beneath the surface accurately, efficiently and at scale?'TII's drone-based SAR differs from conventional satellites with its low altitude - a flexible way of operating and deeper ground penetration.'We integrated SAR into UAV platforms, allowing for high-resolution subsurface imaging,' he said.Explaining how it works, Oliveira added: 'TII SAR sees underground using radar waves. When water leaks, it changes the soil's properties, much like how a cloth darkens when wet. With AI, we can distinguish actual leaks from natural moisture and detect issues long before they reach the surface.'He highlighted the system's precision: 'We combined long-wavelength radar with drone flexibility. It is capable of identifying buried features, including moisture anomalies and underground structures.'After field testing, Oliveira said the tool 'performed well in detecting subsurface changes across different environmental conditions.'This technology reduces non-revenue water loss and boosts infrastructure efficiency.'Presenting the breakthrough at the World Utilities Congress, Oliveira said: 'We are not just unveiling a new tool; we are presenting a strategic solution to global challenges around infrastructure resilience and water security.'François Xavier Boul, Managing Director for ENGIE's Renewables and Batteries division in the MENA region, highlighted the company's focus on developing large-scale solar PV, battery storage systems and low-carbon desalination to help decarbonise critical infrastructure and support national transition goals.At the Congress, ENGIE highlighted its full project lifecycle capabilities: 'We are developing, financing, constructing, owning and operating power and water projects. We bring the most advanced technologies and secure projects from the early stages,' he said.He said ENGIE's current projects include photovoltaic (PV), wind and battery storage projects, as well as advanced reverse osmosis (RO) desalination technologies.'Batteries are evolving fast - similar to how PV progressed a decade ago,' he said.ENGIE is also exploring high-efficiency gas turbines with lower carbon footprints to support decarbonisation goals.'We are offering decarbonised solutions throughout the energy chain,' Boul said. 'That is the future.'He also highlighted the shifting trends in the energy sector in Abu Dhabi.'Abu Dhabi has been a pioneer. There has always been a strong focus on energy efficiency, and the grid here is among the most efficient in the world. With more renewables and nuclear coming online, Abu Dhabi continues to lead the energy transition.'He pointed to rising investments in grid stability and battery storage, including ENGIE's recent 800 MWh bid: 'We're seeing more battery deployment as part of building the energy systems of the future.'Boul added: 'The future is decarbonised. ENGIE's 2045 net zero target is one of the world's most ambitious - and we are on track, pushing boundaries to deliver innovative, low-carbon solutions.'Charles-Edouard Mellagui, CEO of the Cable Business Unit at Ducab, explained the company's vital role in clean energy: 'Without our cables, this transition cannot happen. You can build capacities, but you cannot use them unless power is transmitted.'Ducab aligns with the UAE's 2030 energy vision.'We are part of the UAE's mission to triple renewable energy capacity by 2030 - from 4,000 to 12,000 gigawatts,' he said, but warned, 'Copper is limited. That is why circular economy and innovation are crucial.'He highlighted rising energy demand driven by AI: 'A Chat GPT query consumes 3MWh compared to 0.3 for a Google search. That's 10 times more power. This is a megatrend.'On grid reliability, he said: 'Solar and wind are intermittent. We need storage and intelligence to avoid waste… That is the power of interconnectivity.'Mellagui continued: 'Our focus is on sustainable solutions, not just products… What if there's no copper left? That's why recycling is our future.'Factories emit CO2, but that CO2 can become a resource… It is not waste; it is opportunity,' he added.'Sustainability, interconnectivity, smart energy, storage and carbon capture - these are the pillars shaping the future of energy.'Speaking at the World Utilities Congress 2025, Oxana Dankova, Partner and Global Lead of Energy Networks at BCG, outlined how technology and consumer behaviour are reshaping energy systems.'The concept of flexibility today is about solving two key challenges,' she said.'First, matching supply and demand in time. Second, maintaining the grid's stability as we scale volatile renewables.'She stressed the importance of digital solutions: 'AI is essential. We need to simulate and react in real time... and no human can do that manually.'On storage, she said: 'Storage helps shift generation to meet demand, and it can inject power instantly to stabilise the grid.'Noting the infrastructure hurdles, Dankova said: 'We need to build five to six times more grid… That creates huge pressure on supply chains and skilled labour.'She added: 'Hydrogen could be a long-term storage solution… But the cost of electrolysers must drop.'
Turning to the future, she noted: 'Abu Dhabi has the land, sun and ambition… Consumer flexibility - like when we charge EVs - will help us avoid overburdening the grid.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
a day ago
- Arabian Post
US Accelerates Build-Out of Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Infrastructure
Bo Hines, digital asset policy adviser at the White House, confirmed that the United States is actively constructing the infrastructure necessary to support a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. This initiative follows the executive order signed by President Trump on 6 March 2025, which established both a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a broader Digital Asset Stockpile. Hines highlighted that federal agencies have completed accounting for Bitcoin holdings, marking a pivotal step in consolidating treasury-held assets and enabling future acquisitions. Hines explained that although the order does not compel public disclosure of cryptocurrency holdings, the Treasury may choose to publish a report voluntarily. He emphasised the administration's inclination to increase government Bitcoin holdings in a budget-neutral way—likely by reallocating existing seized assets or surplus resources—without burdening taxpayers. The crack team in Washington, including Hines and figures such as David Sacks, are framing Bitcoin as 'digital gold'. They contend that, like traditional gold reserves, Bitcoin offers a durable store of value with no central issuer, making it strategically significant for national financial security. Experts point out that such an asset could act as a hedge against inflation and strengthen financial sovereignty, though critics warn of its volatility and speculative nature. ADVERTISEMENT Infrastructure efforts have focused on establishing systems for secure custody, interagency transfer, and real-time accounting of government-held Bitcoin. Hines noted that laying this groundwork is essential before scaling up acquisitions. These efforts reflect a growing shift from regulatory wariness to strategic embrace of digital assets in U.S. policymaking. Congress is also moving ahead with supporting legislation. The GENIUS Act, jointly advanced by Senators Cynthia Lummis and Tim Scott, is expected to be introduced before the August recess, while further crypto market structure legislation is targeted for completion by September. Hines pointed to this timeline during a session with the senators, underscoring a coordinated push to regulate and support the digital asset space. State governments and private corporations have already launched Bitcoin-reserve-like initiatives, but the federal programme marks the first national-level effort. This move may be partly inspired by El Salvador's state-level Bitcoin holding, a model that Hines reportedly examined during conversations with President Nayib Bukele. Opposition to the federal SBR persists. Economists from the University of Chicago survey unanimously rejected borrowing to acquire crypto assets, citing the speculative nature of Bitcoin. International finance officials—with the European Central Bank in particular—warn that embracing Bitcoin could undermine conventional reserve strategies and monetary stability. The initiative's long-term success hinges on robust regulatory clarity. The executive order tasked agencies with full crypto asset accounting and mandated that the Treasury explore budget-neutral acquisition strategies, potentially reallocating portions of gold reserves. These moves aim to balance innovation with fiscal prudence. As infrastructure construction progresses, the Treasury's potential publication of federal Bitcoin holdings could signal a new era of transparency and mainstreaming of digital assets in public balance sheets. For stakeholders across government and finance, the outcomes of legislative drafts in the Senate and House will be watched closely.
Middle East Eye
2 days ago
- Middle East Eye
Iran won this war with defiant strikes. Israel lost
On Monday night, US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran that took effect within hours. Of course, as with any of Trump's schemes, this has to be taken with a sizeable grain of caution. But for now at least, this development appears to have ended two hectic weeks that started with Israel attacking Iran. We then saw Tehran retaliating, the US jumping into the fray by striking Iranian nuclear facilities, and Iran's largely symbolic response against US military bases in the region. Israel had already signalled its wish for de-escalation last weekend. Perhaps Israeli planners had not anticipated the harsh Iranian response, or had put excessive confidence in the damage inflicted upon the Islamic Republic's s military capabilities. It also emerged that US envoy Steve Witkoff had been maintaining direct contact with the Iranian side the entire time. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters What has occurred in the last few days between the US and Iran looks more like theatrics than war, similar to the choreographed clash that played out five years ago after General Qassem Soleimani's assassination. US political leaders made bombastic claims about delivering a devastating blow to Iran's nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Military assessments, however, appeared more cautious about the damage inflicted, especially in the case of the Fordow enrichment site, which is buried under a mountain. Time will tell, but the general sentiment does not seem optimistic. Beyond western media spin Fordow is the core of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme, with advanced centrifuges that could enrich uranium up to the military threshold of 90 percent. Iran is already estimated to own 400 kilogrammes of uranium enriched to 60 percent. To increase it to 90 percent seems eminently feasible, but this does not imply that Iran will soon own a nuclear bomb; rather, it has enough material to potentially assemble a few, but according to some estimates, that process could take a couple of years. This past March, the vast US intelligence community, through director Tulsi Gabbard, assured Congress that Iran was not in the process of building nuclear weapons - a conclusion also reached, amid other clumsy moves, by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Israel's failure to subdue Iran shows it can no longer dictate the regional order Read More » Last weekend, by ordering strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, Trump ignored this assessment. When challenged by journalists, his secretary of state, Marco Rubio, remarked that the intelligence assessment was irrelevant. Tens of billions of dollars spent annually by US taxpayers for the biggest intelligence apparatus on earth, just to see top officials dismiss their findings as irrelevant. Hours after Iran carried out its largely symbolic retaliation on Monday, a deal was announced. If the ceasefire stands, and if from here it paves the way for a new nuclear deal, Trump will bombastically portray himself as the winner, the dealmaker, the man of peace - while also recovering some credibility among his disappointed Maga base. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may emerge as the biggest loser. He apparently did not achieve the destruction of Iran's nuclear programme, nor was he able to drag the US into a prolonged military confrontation with Iran - and it is highly likely that his decades-long dream of regime change in Tehran will remain just that: a dream. Beyond all the western media spinning, however, the real winner - unrecognised of course - could be Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Iran ultimately resisted the joint military pressure of Israel and the US, displaying a remarkable capacity to retaliate by severely depleting Israel's missile-defence system. This will be the key takeaway for the region, and for those around the world - especially in the Global South - who grasp its significance. As for Europe, the dystopian statements of its top leaders issued after the Israeli-US strikes on Iran will go into history's dustbin for their sheer hypocrisy. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Middle East Eye
2 days ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel-Iran ceasefire: Tehran's resistance sends a message to the world
On Monday night, US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran that took effect within hours. Of course, as with any of Trump's schemes, this has to be taken with a sizeable grain of caution. But for now at least, this development appears to have ended two hectic weeks that started with Israel attacking Iran. We then saw Tehran retaliating, the US jumping into the fray by striking Iranian nuclear facilities, and Iran's largely symbolic response against US military bases in the region. Israel had already signalled its wish for de-escalation last weekend. Perhaps Israeli planners had not anticipated the harsh Iranian response, or had put excessive confidence in the damage inflicted upon the Islamic Republic's s military capabilities. It also emerged that US envoy Steve Witkoff had been maintaining direct contact with the Iranian side the entire time. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters What has occurred in the last few days between the US and Iran looks more like theatrics than war, similar to the choreographed clash that played out five years ago after General Qassem Soleimani's assassination. US political leaders made bombastic claims about delivering a devastating blow to Iran's nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Military assessments, however, appeared more cautious about the damage inflicted, especially in the case of the Fordow enrichment site, which is buried under a mountain. Time will tell, but the general sentiment does not seem optimistic. Beyond western media spin Fordow is the core of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme, with advanced centrifuges that could enrich uranium up to the military threshold of 90 percent. Iran is already estimated to own 400 kilogrammes of uranium enriched to 60 percent. To increase it to 90 percent seems eminently feasible, but this does not imply that Iran will soon own a nuclear bomb; rather, it has enough material to potentially assemble a few, but according to some estimates, that process could take a couple of years. This past March, the vast US intelligence community, through director Tulsi Gabbard, assured Congress that Iran was not in the process of building nuclear weapons - a conclusion also reached, amid other clumsy moves, by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Israel's failure to subdue Iran shows it can no longer dictate the regional order Read More » Last weekend, by ordering strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, Trump ignored this assessment. When challenged by journalists, his secretary of state, Marco Rubio, remarked that the intelligence assessment was irrelevant. Tens of billions of dollars spent annually by US taxpayers for the biggest intelligence apparatus on earth, just to see top officials dismiss their findings as irrelevant. Hours after Iran carried out its largely symbolic retaliation on Monday, a deal was announced. If the ceasefire stands, and if from here it paves the way for a new nuclear deal, Trump will bombastically portray himself as the winner, the dealmaker, the man of peace - while also recovering some credibility among his disappointed Maga base. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may emerge as the biggest loser. He apparently did not achieve the destruction of Iran's nuclear programme, nor was he able to drag the US into a prolonged military confrontation with Iran - and it is highly likely that his decades-long dream of regime change in Tehran will remain just that: a dream. Beyond all the western media spinning, however, the real winner - unrecognised of course - could be Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Iran ultimately resisted the joint military pressure of Israel and the US, displaying a remarkable capacity to retaliate by severely depleting Israel's missile-defence system. This will be the key takeaway for the region, and for those around the world - especially in the Global South - who grasp its significance. As for Europe, the dystopian statements of its top leaders issued after the Israeli-US strikes on Iran will go into history's dustbin for their sheer hypocrisy. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
