logo
Basil Zempilas kicks first goal as he aims to lead WA Liberals back into power

Basil Zempilas kicks first goal as he aims to lead WA Liberals back into power

The Guardian25-03-2025
Basil Zempilas' punt for leadership has sailed straight through the goalposts, in a gameplay by Western Australia's Liberals that surprised nobody.
As the nation waited for the federal budget to drop, Zempilas took centre stage on the steps of the state parliament to announce his unopposed appointment as opposition leader.
By his side was his predecessor, Libby Mettam, who stepped down to deputy.
Barely a fortnight after being elected to parliament, the former football player and sports presenter turned-lord mayor says a Liberal reset is under way.
'The road to 2029 election begins today,' he said. 'I am honoured and humbled to have been elected to lead the Western Australian Liberal party.'
'We will examine, probe and scrutinise and we will demand 'gold standard' transparency and accountability from WA Labor.'
He went on to reveal that earlier this month he severed his employment with billionaire Kerry Stokes' Seven West Media, a role he controversially retained while earning $186,000 a year as lord mayor of Perth.
He said his position as lord mayor ceased automatically when the election results were declared.
But Zempilas admitted he would continue to write unpaid for his former employer and appear on Channel 7's Sunrise program.
'Libby Mettam writes a column in The West Australian, but is not an employee of Seven West Media. Rita Saffioti writes a column in The West Australian,' he said.
The big question now is whether Zempilas' high profile is enough of a silver bullet for the WA Liberals.
Labor won its third successive landslide on 8 March, taking 46 of the 59 lower house seats. The Liberals, while narrowly winning back opposition status – after losing it in 2021 – only hold seven seats in the legislative assembly, one more than the Nationals.
Instead of comfortably winning the once blue-ribbon Liberal stronghold seat of Churchlands, Zempilas limped over the line by 636 votes – with 90% of the ballot now counted.
'It was a humiliating rejection (by many voters),' William Bowe, a political analyst at the University of Western Australia, says. 'It's part of the parcel of evidence that he is not as appealing as his backers assumed that he was.'
But Bowe says Zempilas has 'showbiz pizzazz'. 'He is obviously good on television. It is going to be a learning curve for Basil, who has a lot of experience in the media, but little as a parliamentary strategist.
'I think the early period is going to be quite dangerous for Basil, if he commits a couple of high-profile blunders then it could stick.'
Zempilas, 53, is no stranger to controversy. He raised eyebrows more than once during his mayoral tenure, notably when he wrote in his newspaper column that homeless people should be forcibly removed from Perth city.
He later backtracked on those comments, saying he wanted to turn car parks into safe spaces before again having to apologise for making transphobic comments on his radio 6PR program.
On Tuesday, Zempilas said he was committed to ensuring WA Labor makes decisions to benefit all West Australians.
'We will not allow four more years of failures in delivering quality health services, accessible housing, and reliable, affordable electricity.'
Murdoch University political scientist, Jacob Broom, says Zempilas brings personality and name recognition, but warned that can come with its negatives.
'There is polling that shows that name recognition for Libby Mettam and Shane Love was quite low,' Broom says.
'I think that is why he is perceived as a positive for the party,' Broom says.
'But his (Zempilas') image is kind of divisive to especially middle-class voters that the Liberal party are really trying to get back. Some voters have a reaction to electing a sports or media personality because they perceive him to not have the credentials to make good leadership decisions and govern.'
Zempilas' track record on women's shelters and his notoriety as a major sporting personality may be problematic for a Liberal party working to resuscitate its popularity with women, Broom says.
During his time as lord mayor Zempilas defended a decision to end the trial of a women's night shelter that housed many who were escaping family and domestic violence.
At the time, Zempilas insisted he was acting for the Perth community and cited complaints from nearby residents about anti-social behaviour. He said he asked the state government to fund the service in the future and they had declined.
Today, Zempilas says that the WA Liberal team will prove it is a credible alternative to government.
He promised to lead with fairness, integrity and with an invigorated team that listens to West Australians.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lily Maxwell: How a working-class woman from Scotland changed political history forever
Lily Maxwell: How a working-class woman from Scotland changed political history forever

Scotsman

timea day ago

  • Scotsman

Lily Maxwell: How a working-class woman from Scotland changed political history forever

Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... When women all across Scotland go to vote in next year's Holyrood election, they have the women of the 19th and 20th centuries to thank for being able to participate in democracy. Several of the most prominent suffragists and suffragettes have sealed their legacy in history books. One of the most famous, Emmeline Pankhurst, even has her own statue outside the Palace of Westminster in London. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But the name of an unassuming working-class woman from Scotland is often overlooked, despite changing history forever by being the first female to ever vote in the UK - all thanks to the error of men. As is still too often the case in the 21st century, those involved in 19th-century politics were born into that life, well-connected with a name and a big bank account to back them up. Lily Maxwell had none of these things. Yet she defied society by officially casting her vote in the Manchester by-election of November 1867 thanks to a loophole in the law, something that should have secured her place in history. Lily Maxwell | Supplied Edward James, one of the MPs for Manchester, died from typhoid fever after holidaying in Switzerland, triggering a by-election. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This by-election was to be won convincingly by Liberal MP Jacob Bright, who, along with his wife Ursula Mellor Bright, was an early supporter of the National Society of Women's Suffrage, also known as the suffragists. His campaign team had been leafing through the electoral register when they spotted something out of place - a woman's name. Maxwell had spent decades working as a servant in Manchester. In fact, the one surviving photograph of her had written on the back: 'Lily - an old servant of the family.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She eventually managed to save up enough money to open her own crockery shop in Chorlton-Upon-Medlock. The 66-year-old was widowed, and after her husband's death the property was transferred to her. As a shop owner, she was liable to pay rates to the local council. All male ratepayers were allowed to vote. At this time, women were not allowed to vote. Five months earlier, MPs in the House of Commons had rejected a proposal to extend voting rights to women by 196 votes to 75. Those who supported the move had tried to do this by replacing the word 'man' in the Reform Act 1867 with the word 'person'. Yet the men who had compiled the list of eligible voters had not noticed that voter 12326 was not in fact male. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lydia Becker, secretary of the Manchester suffragists, quickly learned of this mistake and immediately travelled to Maxwell's house to inform her of this loophole and encourage her to vote. Maxwell needed no encouragement. In fact, she already knew who she was giving her precious vote to - the pro-women's suffrage Jacob Bright. Lydia Becker and a host of her fellow campaigners marched Maxwell to Chorlton Town Hall on polling day to watch the historical moment unfold in person. It was said the room erupted in cheers for Britain's first ever female voter. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Bright won the seat with a 1,700 majority and made special mention of Maxwell in his victory speech. He said: '[She is] a hard-working, honest person, who pays her rates as you do. 'If any woman should possess a vote, it is precisely such a one as she.' Two months later, the Englishwoman's Review said: 'It is sometimes said that women, especially those of the working class, have no political opinion at all. Yet this woman, who by chance was furnished with a vote, professed strong opinions and was delighted to have a chance of expressing them.' Not everyone was quite so happy at the occasion. The Yorkshire Post, for example, said the polling staff at Chorlton Town Hall should have ignored Maxwell's right to vote 'as he would have ignored that of a child ten years old'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Word of this loophole soon spread, and thousands of other female property owners tried to register to vote as well. Their suffrage claim was presented to the courts by Richard Pankhurst, the future husband of the suffragette Emmeline Pankhurst. However, the judges rejected this bid and in November 1868 closed this loophole and declared women's suffrage illegal. A small handful of women were still able to vote in the 1868 general election as they had not been removed from the electoral register in time, but for the vast majority it was a bitter blow to their cause. Bright took up his seat on the green benches as a MP and spent his time in Westminster pushing for women's right to vote. He took over the parliamentary leadership of women's suffrage, and in 1869 secured the right for some women to vote in local council elections. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The same good fortunes cannot be said for Maxwell. In the 1870s, her shop began to fail and she fell into poverty. Destitute, she died penniless in 1876 in the Withington Workhouse. Maxwell has largely been forgotten in the history of the women's suffrage movement in Britain. Yet she did something extraordinary more than half a century before women were given the right to vote in the 20th century. Fast forward to 2025 and the Scottish Parliament has the most female MSPs since devolution. There has been a female first minister, three female prime ministers and we now have our first female chancellor.

Will the Tasmanian election put an end to the island's parliamentary chaos?
Will the Tasmanian election put an end to the island's parliamentary chaos?

The Guardian

timea day ago

  • The Guardian

Will the Tasmanian election put an end to the island's parliamentary chaos?

The last Tasmanian state election, in March 2024, produced a very unstable situation – not just a hung parliament, but a parliament where no party was close to a majority. So the state returning to the polls on 19 July shouldn't be much of a surprise. While the parties will be hoping for a more enduring result, it's again unlikely either major party will be given a majority. A YouGov poll published on 30 June gave Labor 34% of the vote with the Liberals on 31%, Greens on 13% and other parties and independents on 22%. That outcome would represent a five-point improvement for Labor compared with the 2024 election, and would probably make it the largest party in parliament, but still without an overall majority. Tasmania's lower house is elected using the proportional Hare-Clark system. There are five electorates, each with seven members. Parties run up to seven candidates in each electorate, with candidates grouped by party. The order of the candidates' names is randomised on different ballot papers, rather than the parties deciding on the order. This produces competition between candidates in the same party, and on occasion, sitting MPs lose their seats to a member of their own party. Parties usually win a share of seats that is close to their share of the overall vote. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The 2024 election produced a parliament of 14 Liberals, 10 Labor, five Greens, three Jacqui Lambie Network (JLN) members and three independent MPs. The three JLN members were largely unheard of and had not worked together before, and it was unclear what they wanted to achieve by agreeing to support the government. With 18 MPs needed for a majority in the parliament, the incumbent Liberal government continued in office after signing deals with the JLN and another member, but found it hard to work with them. The JLN members also struggled to work as a bloc, with Lambie sometimes intervening from her federal office. The JLN members split in late 2024, with Miriam Beswick and Rebekah Pentland leaving the party and continuing to support the government, while Andrew Jenner continued as a JLN member while not supporting the government. The Liberal government has continued to have trouble with the crossbench since this split. A motion of no confidence forced the deputy premier, Michael Ferguson, to resign from the ministry after losing the support of a key independent. By early 2025, it was clear that there were likely to be enough votes on the crossbench to pass a motion of no confidence if supported by Labor. But for some time Labor was reluctant to give the government the nudge it needed to collapse. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion This changed in May, after Labor's resounding victory in the federal election and in Tasmania's upper house elections. The Labor opposition moved a motion of no confidence, which passed and thus triggered a the state election. The JLN will not be contesting this time, creating a vacuum for voters who don't like the Liberal government but don't want to vote for Labor or the Greens. The National party will be hoping to fill that gap, but the position of the Nationals in a post-election negotiation is unclear, with two of the ex-JLN members who found themselves on opposing sides of that party's split now both running for the Nationals. Support for the major parties remains very low in Tasmania, which is likely to result in another hung parliament with a large crossbench. The major parties have struggled to share power and both are reluctant to do deals. Labor and the Greens have a particularly difficult relationship, which means Labor will be reluctant to take government if it would mean relying on the Greens for a majority. For Labor, the best-case scenario is probably a hung parliament where they have the choice of working with the Greens or other crossbenchers to form government and pass legislation. There is a history in Tasmania of Labor-Liberal swing voters moving towards whichever major party has the best chance of governing without requiring crossbench support. Those voters have favoured the Liberals in recent elections, but Labor will be hoping to gain them this time.

‘Real people, real families': Coalition signals dramatic shift away from anti-immigration rhetoric of Dutton era
‘Real people, real families': Coalition signals dramatic shift away from anti-immigration rhetoric of Dutton era

The Guardian

time28-06-2025

  • The Guardian

‘Real people, real families': Coalition signals dramatic shift away from anti-immigration rhetoric of Dutton era

The federal opposition will adopt a more empathetic approach to migrants that seeks to emphasise people's positive contribution to Australia, says the new shadow immigration minister, Paul Scarr, drawing a line under the harsh anti-immigration rhetoric deployed under Peter Dutton. Scarr, who is also shadow minister for multicultural affairs, told Guardian Australia it is a 'profound tragedy' that Chinese, Indian and other diaspora communities have abandoned the Liberals at the past two elections, as in his view, their values should naturally align with the party's core principles. His comments come as the pollster and former Labor strategist Kos Samaras says that to have any hope of winning those voters back, the Coalition would need to abandon an approach to multicultural Australia that acted 'like we are still living in 1996'. 'They have hard-baked a brand that they are not a political party that likes people who have come to the country over the past 15 or 20 years,' Samaras says. Immigration was one of the Coalition's main priorities under Dutton, who promised dramatic cuts to permanent migration and net overseas migration as he sought to directly link a post-pandemic influx of people to the housing supply and affordability crisis. The future of those policies is up in the air as the Liberals, now led by Sussan Ley, review their entire agenda after the election defeat. But one thing Scarr has immediately committed to is a new tone when talking about migrants, signalling a dramatic shift from the sort of inflammatory language associated with Dutton's immigration agenda. At various points during the previous term, Dutton – who has a long history of comments attacking refugees and asylum seekers – called for a temporary ban on people from Gaza coming to Australia and floated the idea of a referendum on deporting dual citizens who committed serious crimes. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Without reflecting on his former leader, Scarr says empathy would drive his approach to the immigration debate. 'One of the things I am passionate about is getting the tone of discussion right – I think that is of critical importance,' Scarr says. 'And any discussion of immigration must proceed, in my view, on the basis of the contribution that's been made to this country by so many people who have come to this country as migrants. 'So [when] we talk about immigration, we talk about numbers in a macro sense, but we should never forget that we're actually talking about real people, real families who have different, varying experiences.' The Queensland senator traces his commitment to multiculturalism to his pre-politics career as a lawyer, working in Papua New Guinea and later for a mining company with interests in Laos, Chile, Myanmar and Thailand among other countries. Scarr says he was aware of how hurtful 'loose', 'harsh' or 'clumsy' comments from politicians could be for migrant communities, and put the onus on his colleagues to be 'ever-mindful' of their language. He says it is hard to rebuild bridges if there is a lack of trust or a disconnect between politicians and communities. Multicultural communities were among voter groups to abandon the Coalition at the past two elections, with Chinese voters, for example, swinging heavily to Labor in seats such as Chisholm, Aston and Menzies in Melbourne and Bennelong and Reid in Sydney. 'It is a profound tragedy that we're currently in this situation where there is that disconnect,' Scarr says. 'The values of so many members of the multicultural communities are absolutely aligned with the values of the Liberal party, in terms of reward for effort, in terms of individual freedoms – because in many cases people have fled countries where they're deprived those freedoms – and in terms of the importance of the family unit.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Scarr has no immediate explanation of why migrant communities had deserted the party but suggests the Coalition's political opponents had been able to successfully weaponise public statements to tarnish their image. Labor seized on Jane Hume's 'Chinese spies' claim in the dying days of the federal election campaign, circulating a video message featuring Penny Wong speaking in Mandarin to voters on the social media app WeChat. Yun Jiang, at the University of Technology Sydney Australia-China Relations Institute, says the Liberal party has traditionally 'appealed' to many Chinese migrants who come on skills visas, set up small businesses in Australia and are socially conservative. But she says it will be 'difficult' for the Liberals to regain the support of the Chinese community, and that they will need to 'tone down their language' on China. 'The Liberals' [2022 election] postmortem said they need to be more mindful of language, but clearly, at the end of the last election campaign … they seemed to forget the lessons they had written down themselves,' she says. 'They [the Coalition] would need to be much more careful about their language around the threat of China, and especially on Chinese [people] being portrayed as spies or nefarious actors influencing the Australian political landscape … I think they also need to tone down the constant talk of war.' Samaras, who now works for research firm RedBridge, says it will take years for the Liberals to rebuild support among multicultural communities. The task is electorally critical, given the party's diminished numbers in parliament as well as the rapid growth in the Chinese and Indian diasporas, particularly in the outer suburbs of Melbourne. 'When we speak to them [voters in focus groups] and they walk through their values, which are all about wealth accumulation, aspiration, small business – these people should be, culturally, Coalition voters,' Samaras says. 'But then we ask them why they are not, [and] their answer is pretty blunt: 'They don't like us'.' Scarr accepts the assessment. 'Every single day between now and election day, and in fact, every single day after I was elected, I do everything I can to change and recalibrate those perspectives,' he says.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store