Nearly 50 XL Bully dogs surrendered since dangerous breed outlawed in Ireland
Since February 1, it has been illegal to own the dangerous dog without a 'certificate of exemption'.
The decision by the last Government followed a number of high-profile attacks by the XL Bully dogs.
This includes the tragic fatal attack on Nicole Morey, 23, in Limerick in June 2024.
In November 2022, nine-year-old Alejandro Mizsan was savagely attacked by a 10-month-old XL Bully dog, suffering injuries to his face, body and legs.
From October 2024, it became illegal to import, breed, rehome or resell an XL Bully dog.
In February, it became illegal to own an XL Bully dog unless you have a Certificate of Exemption. The certificate means a person can keep their XL Bully at their address until the end of their natural life.
In response to queries from Fine Gael TD Maeve O'Connell, Rural Protection Minister Dara Calleary confirmed that 'over 1,800 applications for 'Certificates of Exemption' were received, and to date almost 1,000 have been granted'.
Mr Calleary said: 'A 'Certificate of Exemption' cannot be granted for an XL Bully that has not yet been neutered or deemed medically unfit for neutering.
'As it is not advised to neuter an XL Bully type dog until it has reached full maturity, the number of 'Certificates of Exemption' granted is likely to increase each month going forward and will not be definitive until the June 2026 figures are provided by local authorities.'
Minister Calleary told Deputy O'Connell that local authorities do not provide his Department with details of the number of XL Bully-type dogs seized.
However, he confirmed that 48 dogs had been surrendered between the ban's effective date and the end of March. This included 11 in Dublin City Council and 10 in Limerick.
Dogs were also surrendered in 16 other local authority areas including Cavan (two), Cork city (four), Donegal (two), Fingal (two), Galway city (one), Kildare (four), Longford (one), Louth (one), Mayo (one), Meath (one), Sligo (one), South Dublin (two), Tipperary (two) and Waterford (three).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
Man allegedly put tracker in child's car seat to ‘monitor' his ex-partner in ‘insidious' safety order breach
The man, who is aged in his 30s and from Dublin, appeared before Judge Patricia McNamara at Tallaght District Court. Garda Gavin Cribbin objected to bail under the O'Callaghan principles, citing eight alleged breaches of a safety order during June and July 2025. The court heard the most serious breach involved a small tracking device allegedly hidden in the seat where the couple's child usually sits. The device was discovered on June 29, after the injured party's relative - a passenger in her car - received an alert on their phone warning that a tracker was nearby. The complainant used two separate apps to confirm the presence of the device and eventually located it tucked into the child's car seat. The court heard the accused had allegedly borrowed the seat to facilitate a custody exchange - and it was alleged he later admitted to a relative that he had planted the tracker. Detective Sergeant Ruth Finnegan told the court it was "an AirTag-type of device". Judge McNamara described the tracker incident as 'particularly insidious' and said it formed part of a worrying pattern of behaviour that posed a real risk of interference with the complainant. The accused is facing eight alleged breaches of the safety order, four of which relate to email contact. The court heard the man was only permitted to contact the injured party regarding child access but allegedly sent around 50 emails a day over three consecutive days - some of which were described as abusive and made no reference to child access. One message allegedly contained repeated verbal abuse, and the complainant eventually blocked his email address. The injured party gave evidence in court, saying she had been in a relationship with the man for almost a decade and that they share children. ADVERTISEMENT She was granted a two-year safety order in April 2025, after applying earlier in the year. 'He won't stop contacting me or intimidating me,' she said. 'I feel like he's going to snap one day.' The woman described how daily life had become fearful and tense, saying she felt sick when she realised she was being tracked. 'I don't know what it will take for him to leave me alone,' she told the court. She also described a custody handover on July 12, where the man allegedly shouted abuse in front of the children, followed her on foot, and initially refused to hand the children over. Garda Cribbin said that while no explicit threat had been made, the tracking incident was of particular concern and reflected what he called an 'evolution of behaviour' that was becoming more serious and invasive. Defence solicitor John O'Leary said his client maintains the presumption of innocence and pointed out there was no history of violence. Refusing bail, Judge McNamara said she was satisfied there was a real risk of interference with the injured party and refused bail under the O'Callaghan principles. She said: 'There is a presumption of innocence, but I am satisfied from what I've heard that there is a possibility of interference with the applicant in the safety order.' She described the tracker allegation as 'particularly insidious,' adding: 'It's not even the emails, even though they're quite abusive - it's the allegation that he borrowed a car seat and put a tracker in there to monitor her movements.' Judge McNamara noted that the injured party had expressed fear and that the behaviour appeared to be escalating. The man was remanded in custody to appear via video link at Cloverhill District Court at a later date. Funded by the Courts Reporting Scheme.
Irish Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
'Flowerbed plan for Molly Malone statue is beyond ridiculous'
The Molly-coddlers are back again. The Irish Mirror revealed on Monday how the new plan to protect pneumatic Molly Malone from gropers was to put a load of plant pots around her. After trying out chaperones on the statue - in the form of stewards - and mooting putting her up on a plinth and out of reach of happy hands, the latest brainwave is flowerbeds. There seems to be no limit to the lengths the authorities will go to in order to protect the brass statue of Ireland's most famous fishmonger. Wait: perhaps there is, someone was on a telly talk show during the week, half-joking about how we should - ha ha - connect her to a mains and electrocute anyone who touches her. Ray Yeates, arts officer for Dublin City Council had to draw the line there, pointing out we couldn't harm actual humans in the aim of keeping a statue safe. That he had to make that clear is indicative of the hysterical turn this debate has taken. Members of the public brave the weather whilst passing The Molly Malone Statue in Dublin's City Centre (Image: Collins Photo Agency) The Chronically Offended deemed touristic touching of Molly's bountiful boobs as effectively proof of rape culture. The council itself previously said it was "the mimicking of behaviours we wouldn't approve of" and a historian said Molly represents the women of the city and shouldn't be treated like this. The council is now trying to move this angle of the discussion on from a culture war battle and into being a serious matter of preserving public art. But it hasn't stopped edgelord WhatsApp jokes going around, like the meme of Molly in a burka and the caption: "Dublin City Council has solved the problem of Molly Malone being groped." The whole thing beyond ridiculous, and I wonder how mad we look to international visitors, with our little officials giving petty lectures on why you shouldn't pose provocatively with an effigy. But it has captured the national imagination. Everyone from the Irish Times to RTE, Newstalk and Virgin Media followed up on our exclusive this week, by reporter Danny de Vaal. Council chiefs are now focused on how all that vigorous rubbing is wearing the brass patina off her cleavage and is costing too much to repair. Why not leave it as it is? Why the need to repair it? We should own this, instead of fighting it, and be proud of Molly's boobs being worn off. She'd be like the bronze statue of St Peter in the Vatican City, whose foot is eroded to a stump due to centuries of pilgrims touching and kissing it as a sign of devotion. I have to admit, I feel a sense of admiring envy for Molly, who's obviously still got it after all these centuries. Honestly, you get to the age as a woman where you can only think wishfully back on the glory days when your décolletage had such a magnetic power. I believe the new tradition of touching Molly's thrupenny bits is a fine and fitting legacy for the Tart with the Cart. There's a brilliantly refreshing version of Molly in the new, interactive Little Museum of Dublin, who'd love the saucy tradition. She's a mischievous maiden with a mad Dublin accent and bold jokes. Someone needs to do a poll on this as I reckon most would agree. Correspondence to Dublin City Council showed as many people were annoyed by the over-protection of Molly as the touching of her. One letter writer summed it up: "Rubbing the statue is a silly, slightly risque piece of nothingness. I can't say I've been bothered to engage, but I see it for what it is. If you don't need the budget, give it to one of the departments that deal with general matters of urban decay." Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.
The Journal
2 days ago
- The Journal
First static speed camera in Dublin city to become operational next week
THE FIRST STATIC safety speed camera in Dublin city will become operational next week. It's going to be located on Dolphin's Barn in Dublin 12 and will be placed alongside the Maxol garage on the Crumlin Road. Location of where the new speed camera will be Google Maps Google Maps It will commence operation from Friday 1, August. A garda spokesperson said Dolphin's Barn was identified as part of a wider national analysis as being a road 'which could benefit from the implementation of a safety camera'. Advertisement The spokesperson added that the location was selected based on fatal and serious injury collision data from the last seven years, as well as speed data and feedback from stakeholders. Vehicles detected driving in excess of the speed limit will be subject to prosecution from 12pm on Friday, 1 August. Prosecution of speeding offences takes place by Fixed Charge Notice (FCN) and the current FCN is a €160 fine accompanied by three penalty points. Meanwhile, Dublin City Council said it is 'pleased to see the introduction of the first ever static speed camera within the Council area'. A spokesperson said the Council worked closely with An Garda Síochána to facilitate the installation and initial operation of the camera. 'Dublin City Council will continue to work together with An Garda Síochána on road safety and measures which can help to improve road safety for all,' added the spokesperson. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
