logo
Marlborough residents speak against council's preferred water plan

Marlborough residents speak against council's preferred water plan

RNZ News10-06-2025

By Kira Carrington, Local Democracy Reporter
Brendan Kearney speaks at the Marlborough District Council's Local Water Done Well hearing.
Photo:
LDR/Kira Carrington
Residents have spoken against the Marlborough District Council's preferred water services model at a Local Water Done Well hearing on Monday.
The Government requires councils to choose from five water service delivery options ‒ a modified status quo (an in-house council department), a single council-controlled organisation, a multi-council-controlled organisation, and two types of trusts.
The Marlborough District Council's preferred option is to create a standalone Water Services Organisation owned and controlled by the council.
The council said it would find greater efficiencies to deliver better service at a lower cost, and have more borrowing capacity to maintain and improve the region's water infrastructure.
But Marlborough residents aren't convinced. Of about 45 submissions made, 58 percent wanted to keep water services in-house, compared to 13 percent who preferred the standalone organisation. The remainder did not indicate a preference.
Five people spoke on their submissions at a hearing in the council chamber on Monday, and they were all opposed to a standalone organisation.
Brendan Kearney, who used to be chief executive of a council-controlled organisation in Canterbury, said there was no proof that a separate organisation would be more efficient, and setting up and funding a separate entity could cost ratepayers more.
It would "inevitably duplicate some overhead costs", Kearney said.
He said he saw no reason for water services to be removed from a council that had maintained its water systems relatively well.
"[Water] assets are in good or very good condition. That's a credit to the current council and past councils as well. Council also has low debt relative to its peers.
"This is compelling evidence, in my view, that the council has performed well and will continue to do so."
To create a separate organisation, Kearney said the council would need to appoint directors, manage a new relationship with the organisation, and manage the organisation's own agenda.
"A standalone company is no guarantee of good governance."
Kearney said there also needed to be balance in who footed the water infrastructure bill between the ratepayers of today and of tomorrow.
"It's unfair to gift hundreds of millions of dollars ... to the next generations completely debt free. That means the past generations paid too much.
"On the other hand, it's unfair to get those assets, billions of dollars of assets, fully debt funded ... it's unfair on future generations.
"Something in between those two extremes needs to happen."
Submitter Lauchy Hynd said that creating a separate organisation to take on debt outside the council books was not sustainable.
"What happens when we default?" Hynd said. "We're leveraging [water assets] by three to five times to borrow money against them.
"This looks to me like Three Waters from the back door.
"You can kick the can down the road and borrow recklessly, but I appeal to you to act boldly on behalf of the people."
Submitters also voiced concerns about allowing an unelected and "unaccountable" organisation to take control of water services.
"How do we maintain the ownership and the status of [water] assets in the hands of the people of Marlborough, when we're divesting them to an unelected group?" Hynd said.
Submitter Bob Watson said he was worried about the potential to more easily privatise a separate organisation, pointing how the United Kingdom's water management became privatised.
Ten regional water authorities were formed in 1974, which the UK government then sold to the private sector in 1989.
"I think that the potential for private ownership ... basically our water utilities to be sold off to another entity, and for us to lose the democratic voice, would be terrible," Watson said.
"I like the idea that [we're] here with people that have represented the community who can speak for us."
The coalition Government had previously said that privatisation of water services was not on the table.
The council would make its final decision on water services delivery on June 26, and submit its plan to the Government for approval by 3 September .
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Political commentators Gareth Hughes and Fletcher Tabuteau
Political commentators Gareth Hughes and Fletcher Tabuteau

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Political commentators Gareth Hughes and Fletcher Tabuteau

Gareth Hughes is the Director of the Wellbeing Economy Alliance Aotearoa is a former Green MP and is no longer a member of any political party. Fletcher Tabuteau is a former NZ First MP from 2014 to 2020, former deputy leader of the party, and former Parliamentary Under-Secretary to the then Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and the then minister for regional development Shane Jones. He now works for lobbying and communications firm Capital Government Relations. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

Former financial advisor admits theft charges for stealing money from clients
Former financial advisor admits theft charges for stealing money from clients

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Former financial advisor admits theft charges for stealing money from clients

Murray McClune took about $1.7m from clients on the basis he would invest it on their behalf but instead used some of the funds for personal purposes. Photo: 123RF A former financial advisor has admitted theft charges for stealing money from elderly clients, following an investigation by the Financial Markets Authority. The FMA said Murray McClune stole from two sets of elderly clients between 2016 and 2022. It said he took about $1.7 million from the clients on the basis he would invest it on their behalf, but instead used some of those funds for personal purposes. The case against McClune was originally brought by the FMA but became a Crown prosecution case after McClune initially elected trial by jury, before pleading guilty to two charges of theft by a person in a special relationship - charges that carried a maximum penalty of seven years' imprisonment. The FMA said McClune had worked in the insurance industry since the late 1960s, and had an established book of clients, including some loyal customers who considered him a friend and used his services for decades. In addition to providing insurance advice, McClune also offered investment opportunities for clients. The FMA said he provided falsified statements to clients to hide his offending, until he was caught when he could not repay the funds on demand. FMA head of enforcement Margot Gatland said McClune "took advantage" of elderly and vulnerable investors. "In addition to being devastating to the victims, offending of this nature undermines public confidence in registered advisers and harms their reputations," Gatland said. McClune mainly offered his services through his business Insurance Plus Limited, which was registered in Whangaparāoa, north of Auckland. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

PGG told to pay $780,000 for farm sale misrepresentation by Supreme Court
PGG told to pay $780,000 for farm sale misrepresentation by Supreme Court

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

PGG told to pay $780,000 for farm sale misrepresentation by Supreme Court

Rural realtor PGG Wrightson Real Estate has been ordered to pay more than $780,000 in damages and other costs for the overpayment of a $2.8m farm sale in 2010. File picture. Photo: Adam Simpson PGG Wrightson Real Estate has been found liable for negligence for "carelessly" misrepresenting details about a West Coast dairy farm it sold 15 years ago, the Supreme Court of New Zealand has found. The rural realtor was ordered to pay more than $780,000 in damages and other costs on Thursday, for the overpayment of the $2.8 million farm sale in 2010. Court documents showed the sale featured incorrect descriptions about the herd size and milk production at the 105 hectare site near Hokitika. It was found the farm had never averaged the 103,000 kilograms of milk solids over three seasons as advertised, which was later calculated to be more like over 98,000 kilograms of milk solids. Despite the new owners borrowing more from the bank and spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on fertiliser and re-grassing, production never reached these levels. At their highest the new owners reached over 88,500 kilograms of milk solids and just under 60,600 at its lowest. Amid increasing debt and falling returns, the new owners were forced to sell the financially-unviable farm in 2020, a decade after the purchase. Documents showed they said they would have never bought the farm if they knew its true performance. The court has dismissed PGG's cross-appeal. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store