Post Office scandal: 'Hugely significant' evidence unearthed in computer expert's garage
The document, known about by the Post Office in 1998, is described as "hugely significant" and a "fundamental piece of evidence" and was found in a garage by a retired computer expert.
Capture was a piece of accounting software, likely to have caused errors, used in more than 2,000 branches between 1992 and 1999.
It came before the infamous faulty Horizon software scandal, which saw hundreds of sub-postmasters wrongfully convicted between 1999 and 2015.
1:49
The "lost long" Capture documents were discovered in a garage by a retired computer expert who came forward after a Sky News report into the case of Patricia Owen, a convicted sub-postmistress who used the software.
Adrian Montagu was supposed to be a key witness for Pat's defence at her trial in 1998 but her family always believed he had never turned up, despite his computer "just sitting there" in court.
Mr Montagu, however, insists he did attend.
He describes being in the courtroom and adds that "at some point into the trial" he was stood down by the barrister for Mrs Owen with "no reason" given.
Sky News has seen contemporaneous notes proving Mr Montagu did go to Canterbury Crown Court for the first one or two days of the trial in June 1998.
"I went to the court and I set up a computer with a big old screen," he says.
"I remember being there, I remember the judge introducing everybody very properly…but the barrister in question for the defence, he went along and said 'I am not going to need you so you don't need to be here any more'.
"I wasn't asked back."
Sky News has reached out to the barrister in Pat Owen's case who said he had no recollection of it.
'An accident waiting to happen'
The report, commissioned by the defence and written by Adrian Montagu and his colleague, describes Capture as "an accident waiting to happen", and "totally discredited".
It concludes that "reasonable doubt exists as to whether any criminal offence has taken place".
It also states that the software "is quite capable of producing absurd gibberish", and describes "several insidious faults…which would not be necessarily apparent to the user".
All of which produced "arithmetical or accounting errors".
Sky News has also seen documents suggesting the jury in Pat Owen's case may never have seen the report.
What is clear is that they did not hear evidence from its author including his planned "demonstration" of how Capture could produce accounting errors.
Pat Owen was convicted of stealing from her Post Office branch in 1998 and given a suspended prison sentence.
Her family describe how it "wrecked" her life, contributing towards her ill health, and she died in 2003 before the wider Post Office scandal came to light.
Her daughter Juliet said her mother fought with "everything she could".
"To know that in the background there was Adrian with this (report) that would have changed everything, not just for mum but for every Capture victim after that, I think is shocking and really upsetting - really, really upsetting."
The report itself was served on the Post Office lawyers - who continued to prosecute sub-postmasters in the months and years after Pat Owen's trial.
'My blood is boiling'
3:09
Steve Marston, who used the Capture software in his branch, was one of them - he was convicted of stealing nearly £80,000 in September 1998.
His prosecution took place four months after the Capture report had been served on the Post Office.
Steve says he was persuaded to plead guilty with the "threat of jail" hanging over him and received a suspended sentence.
He describes the discovery of the report as "incredible" and says his "blood is boiling" and he feels "betrayed".
"So they knew that the software was faulty?," he says. "It's in black and white isn't it? And yet they still pressed on doing what they did.
"They used Capture evidence … as the evidence to get me to plead guilty to avoid jail.
"They kept telling us it was safe…They knew the software should never have been used in 1998, didn't they?"
Steve says his family's lives were destroyed and the knowledge of this report could have "changed everything".
He says he would have fought the case "instead of giving in".
"How dare they. And no doubt I certainly wasn't the last one…And yet they knew they were convicting people with faulty software, faulty computers."
The report is now with the Criminal Cases Review Commission, the body investigating potential miscarriages of justice, which is currently looking into 28 Capture cases.
A fundamental piece of evidence
Neil Hudgell, the lawyer representing more than 100 victims, describes the report as "hugely significant", "seismic" and a "fundamental piece of evidence".
"I'm as confident as I can be that this is a good day for families like Steve Marston and Mrs Owen's family," he says.
"I think (the documents) could be very pivotal in delivering the exoneration that they very badly deserve."
He also added that "there's absolutely no doubt" that the "entire contents" of the "damning" report "was under the noses of the Post Office at a very early stage".
He describes it as a "massive missed opportunity" and "early red flag" for the Post Office which went on to prosecute hundreds who used Horizon in the years that followed.
"It is a continuation of a theme that obviously has rolled out over the subsequent 20 plus years in relation to Horizon," he says.
"...if this had seen the light of day in its proper sense, and poor Mrs Owen had not been convicted, the domino effect of what followed may not have happened."
What the Post Office said
Sky News approached the former Chief Executive of the Post Office during the Capture years, John Roberts, who said: "I can't recall any discussion at my level, or that of the board, about Capture at any time while I was CEO."
A statement from the Post Office said: "We have been very concerned about the reported problems relating to the use of the Capture software and are sincerely sorry for past failings that have caused suffering to postmasters.
"We are determined that past wrongs are put right and are continuing to support the government's work and fully co-operating with the Criminal Cases Review Commission as it investigates several cases which may be Capture related."
A Department for Business and Trade spokesperson said: "Postmasters including Patricia Owen endured immeasurable suffering, and we continue to listen to those who have been sharing their stories on the Capture system.
"Government officials met with postmasters recently as part of our commitment to develop an effective and fair redress process for those affected by Capture, and we will continue to keep them updated."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
9 minutes ago
- Times
Michael Toner obituary: Journalist who wrote famous ‘Murderers' leader
Reflecting on the grudging respect he earned as chief leader writer of the Daily Mail under the exacting editorship of Paul Dacre, Michael Toner remarked with gratitude, 'He never called me a c***'. The veteran political journalist had only intended to cover a period between permanent appointments in the post described by Private Eye as the 'toughest on Fleet Street'. In the event he would stay for a decade until 2006 and write one of the most famous, risky, and some would say notorious, of all newspaper leaders on February 14, 1997. Strong evidence connected five young men with the unprovoked racist murder of the black British teenager Stephen Lawrence as he was waiting for a bus in Eltham, southeast London, on April 22, 1993. The five were arrested and two (Neil Acourt and Luke Wright) charged. In July 1993 the Crown Prosecution Service dropped the charges, citing the unreliability of the chief witness. At an inquest into Lawrence's death in February 1997, the suspects refused to give alibis or answer questions, claiming privilege against self-incrimination.
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Britain is a ‘powder keg' of tensions which could easily ignite once again, report warns after summer riots
The UK is a 'powder keg' of social tensions which could easily ignite once again, a major report has warned a year after riots erupted across the country, sparked by the Southport knife attacks that killed three young girls. One in three adults, the equivalent of 15 million people, say they rarely or never meet people from different backgrounds, according to the findings of research into the nation's community strength and cohesion. It also found that up to seven in 10 have never met or interacted with local asylum seekers amid polarised debate on immigration, struggles with the cost of living and declining trust in politicians. Sir Sajid Javid and former Labour MP Jon Cruddas, who are chairing the new Independent Commission on Community and Cohesion, said the report shows 'clear evidence' that societal bonds are under growing pressure. Without action, the 'very basis of our democracy is at risk', they warned. 'This is leaving our society more fragmented, fragile, and less resilient to internal and external threats,' they said. 'At the same time, forces driving division are intensifying: political polarisation is deepening and trust in institutions is declining, while mounting economic pressures – particularly the cost of living crisis – are fuelling widespread frustration, intensified by a widespread belief that immigration policy is in chaos. 'These trends are inextricably entwined – narrowing the space for constructive dialogue and increasing the risk of further unrest and alienation.' It comes after last summer when far-right riots broke out in towns and cities across the country, with hotels housing asylum seekers targeted. The unrest was triggered after misinformation spread on social media claiming the attacker who launched a knife rampage at a Taylor Swift-themed children's dance class on 29 July, killing three girls, was a Muslim asylum seeker. The perpetrator was later revealed to be 17-year-old Axel Rudakubana, who was born in Cardiff to Rwandan parents who were Christians. The State of Us report, by independent think tank British Future and the Belong Network, described the clashes as the result of a 'tinderbox of long-term social pressures' which remain unaddressed. 'Without urgent action, unrest risks being reignited,' the report said. 'We saw what that can look like in the disorder of last summer. Attacks on visible minorities and people seeking asylum marked the UK's worst targeted violence in a generation. 'High streets, businesses and community spaces were damaged or destroyed and people fought the police in the streets.' The survey of 2,243 UK adults and eight focus groups (with a total of 71 participants) held around the UK, including in areas that faced riots, showed that concern around immigration is the top reason for tensions within local communities. Around half (49 per cent) of respondents believe that divisions between locals and those who have migrated to the UK, including refugees and asylum seekers, are negatively affecting how well people from different backgrounds can get along in their area. But the majority of people (67 per cent) say that they have never met or interacted with asylum seekers in their local area, or are unsure if they have. Divisions over migration were ranked more negatively than religious, ethnic, political and wealth-related divides. One in three adults say they rarely or never have the opportunity to meet people from different backgrounds. Financial security plays a part in this – half of people believe that they don't have enough money to go and meet people in common spaces, like cafes or pubs. During last year's riots, tensions over asylum seekers were central to fanning flames of violence, as misinformation about the identity of the killer was viewed over 420,000 times on social media at the time, an investigation by The Independent found. This resulted in attacks on asylum hotels and incitement of violence online, with subsequent arrests of people including Lucy Connolly, wife of a Tory councillor, who was jailed for 31 months over a tweet. This lack of awareness extends further, as 4 in 10 people do not even know if asylum seekers are being housed in their local area, the survey reveals. The survey also found that although eight in 10 people still believe that people from different backgrounds get along well in their area, this has gone down in the past few years. Those in the most deprived areas are least likely to say that different backgrounds get along (69 per cent), compared to 90 per cent in the most affluent areas. A map of the data in different local authorities shows that a higher perceived lack of social cohesion is recorded in areas in the north, particularly near Manchester and Leeds, in addition to areas east of London. Cohesion between people of different backgrounds is perceived to be worst in Boston, at just 59 per cent; 21 points below the national average. The town was home to racially-motivated riots over two decades ago following the 2004 Euros, a Brexit stronghold, and elected Reform MP Richard Tice.
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK a ‘powder keg' of social tensions a year on from summer riots, report warns
The UK is a 'powder keg' of social tensions, with a third of people rarely meeting anyone from different backgrounds, research has found. A report from the thinktank British Future and the social cohesion group Belong Network found that a year on from last summer's riots, there was a risk of unrest being reignited unless urgent action was taken to address issues of polarisation and division. The research found 31% of adults said they rarely or never had opportunities to meet people from different backgrounds, and a third say they did not frequently get a chance to meet other people at all in their local community. In a foreword to the report, the former Conservative chancellor Sajid Javid and the Labour politician Jon Cruddas said: 'The bonds that hold society together – civic participation and a shared sense of belonging – are under growing pressure. 'This is leaving our society more fragmented, fragile and less resilient to internal and external threats. At the same time, forces driving division are intensifying, political polarisation is deepening and trust in institutions is declining. Unless we address these forces, the very basis of our democracy is at risk.' They said last summer's riots after the Southport knife attack, the more recent racially motivated rioting in Northern Ireland and the findings of the grooming gangs inquiry had 'laid bare the fragility of social cohesion in the UK' and were part of pressures that have been 'building for decades'. The new report, The State of Us, will be a 'foundational input' to the new Independent Commission on Community and Cohesion, chaired by Javid and Cruddas. It was based on the views of 177 UK organisations working on social cohesion and community development, as well as 113 written submissions of evidence, a nationally representative survey and eight focus groups in towns and cities across the UK, including in areas affected by last year's riots. Anti-hate campaigners, meanwhile, say X is amplifying and monetising dangerous content and failing to enforce its own prohibitions against violent incitement. Research by the Centre for Countering Digital Hate found more than 4,300 posts in the past year that promoted violence against Muslims and immigrants, sent in reply to tweets by half a dozen high-profile account holders including Tommy Robinson, Andrew Tate and Laurence Fox. The CCDH chief executive, Imran Ahmed, said: 'One year on from the Southport riots, X remains the crucial hub for hate-filled lies and incitement of violence targeting migrants and Muslims.' If social media firms do not enforce their own rules, governments must confront the 'profit-driven amplification of violent and hateful content', he said, or the 'harm to targeted communities will grow and metastasise, with devastating consequences for British society'. The research follows a warning from MPs that current online safety laws contain 'major holes', as the Online Safety Act does not currently identify misinformation or disinformation as harms that need to be addressed by firms. The government said it did include an offence of false communications 'to target the spread of disinformation online when there is intent to cause harm'. The British Future report stated that successive governments had failed to take sustained, proactive measures to address social cohesion, and that 'a 'doom loop' of inaction, crisis and piecemeal response had failed to strengthen the foundations of communities across the country.' One reason behind the lack of social contact was money, the report found. Half of respondents said they did not always have enough money to go to places where they would meet other people. Jake Puddle, a senior researcher at British Future who led the report, said: 'We are facing a long, hot summer, with a powder keg of tensions left largely unaddressed from last year that could easily ignite once again. People are unhappy about their standard of living and the state of their local area, and don't trust politicians to sort it out. 'Public concerns about immigration and asylum can also be a flashpoint. That's only made worse when people have little contact with new arrivals, where public voices exacerbate division, and where governments fail to support or consult communities in their plans for asylum accommodation.' Kelly Fowler, chief executive of the Belong Network, said: 'Good work is happening across the UK on cohesion and community strength, but it is patchy and often confined to areas of high diversity or where tensions have spilled over into unrest. 'A lack of sustained funding limits its impact. It's time this issue was treated with the urgency it merits, in every part of Britain. We must not wait for more riots to happen.' The research found there was widespread concern about declining public services, inequality, the cost of living and the impact of social media, along with a lack of trust in politicians and institutions to help put things right. It also identified immigration and asylum as key issues raised by research participants, who were often focused on integration and pressures on housing and public services. But it found cause for optimism, with 69% of people feeling their local area was a place where people from different backgrounds got on well together, and many participants recalled moments of togetherness and community strength in adversity during the Covid-19 lockdowns.
