MPs urge ministers to introduce long-awaited rules on supply chain deforestation
Under the previous Government's proposals, businesses will be prohibited from using or selling goods containing palm oil, cocoa, beef, leather and soy linked to deforestation.
This due diligence system was part of the 2021 Environment Act but ministers are yet to bring forward the necessary secondary legislation or set a timetable for when they will do so.
EAC chairman Toby Perkins asked Mr Reed to set out a specific date for introducing the legislation 'ideally before the New Year' so that the rules can be in place for the new financial year in April.
The letter said: 'Delays in bringing forward this legislation makes the Cop15 agreement to halt and reverse biodiversity loss, and the UK's commitment to ending deforestation and forest degradation by 2030, harder to achieve.
'However, it also leaves businesses with uncertainty and will leave them with less time to prepare and comply with the regime.
'On 2 June, in your response to the Committee, you recognised the urgency of taking action to ensure forest risk commodities are not driving deforestation and stated you would set out the Government approach in due course.'
Several British supermarkets recently warned that they are in 'limbo' waiting for the Government to introduce the new rules.
In an open letter earlier this month, retailers such as Tesco, Sainsbury's and Lidl said deforestation presents an increasing risk to supply chain stability as well as food security.
But they also said the UK could suffer millions in export losses to the European Union if Government inaction leaves businesses unprepared to comply with the bloc's own deforestation rules, which are due to come into force at the end of this year.
Asked recently whether the Government has a timetable for introducing the legislation, the Environment Secretary told the PA news agency: 'Currently no, but we are working at pace so we can do this as quickly as possible.'
On the supermarkets' letter and whether the Government is looking to speed up progress on introducing the rules, Mr Reed said: 'Absolutely.'
'I agree with the supermarkets,' he said. 'The previous Government was just dragging their heels without ever coming to a conclusion about what we do about protecting forests in other countries as well as in our own country.
'And of course forests, trees, woodlands were very important for capturing carbon and cleaning the atmosphere so we don't want to be importing food that has been grown where the forests have been destroyed.
'The Government is working with supermarkets, with food producers and internationally to make sure we get the outcome and we can do that as soon as possible to give everybody certainty about how we move forward on this.'
PA has contacted the Environment Department for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
17 minutes ago
- Metro
Tech secretary suggests Nigel Farage is on side of Jimmy Savile over online law
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Science Secretary Peter Kyle has said Nigel Farage is on the side of modern-day equivalents of Jimmy Savile, over his opposition to the Online Safety Act. One of the most contentious parts of the law, introducing age verification to websites hosting porn and other 'adult content', came into effect on Friday. The changes have generated backlash from internet users, and Farage used a Reform UK press conference yesterday to pledge his party would repeal the act if elected to government. In an appearance on Sky News this morning, Kyle said the move would stop 'strange adults getting in touch with children'. He said: 'We have people out there who are extreme pornographers peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side. Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online, and Nigel Farage is saying he's on their side, not the side of children.' Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. Asked twice to clarify if he was claiming the Reform leader was on the side of Savile, one of the worst sexual predators in British history, the Science Secretary did not backtrack. Kyle added: 'Nigel Farage is on the side of turning the clock back to the time when strange adults, strangers can get in touch via messaging apps with children.' In a post on X following the broadcast, Farage called the minister's comments 'disgusting', writing: 'He should do the right thing and apologise.' Kyle responded by quoting the post and adding: 'If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that.' More Trending Speaking on Sky News later in the morning, former Reform chairman Zia Yusuf said the comments were 'one of the most outrageous and disgusting things a politician has said in the political arena that I can remember'. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video He continued: 'Levelling that allegation, talking about Jimmy Savile in that way, does nothing other than denigrate the victims of Jimmy Savile.' Yusuf previously suggested the Online Safety Act was turning the UK in a 'dystopian Chinese surveillance state'. A petition calling on the government to repeal the act has gathered more than 380,000 signatures online, meaning Parliament will consider it for a debate. Hello, I'm Craig Munro and I'm Metro's man in Westminster. Every Wednesday, I write our Alright, Gov? newsletter with insights from behind the scenes in the Houses of Parliament – and how the decisions made there will end up affecting you. This week we had a look at concerns from those in power about potential riots this summer – and had room for an exclusive warning about care worker visas and a quiz about Tory frontbenchers. Click here to sign up Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Buying gluten free costs me hundreds of pounds – it's not my fault MORE: Readers discuss migrant protests, Labour's left-wing, water systems and wealth tax MORE: The 100-word emergency alert system message being sent to millions of phones in weeks
Scottish Sun
17 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Putin strikes Ukraine maternity ward & kills 17 in prison blitz in outrageous snub to Trump… as Kremlin threatens US WAR
Trump said on Monday that the US would do secondary sanctions on Russia SICKENING ATTACK Putin strikes Ukraine maternity ward & kills 17 in prison blitz in outrageous snub to Trump… as Kremlin threatens US WAR VLADIMIR Putin heinously hit a Ukrainian maternity ward and killed 17 in a prison strike overnight. The vile blitz comes as an ex-Kremlin leader has warned of war with the United States after "disappointed" Don cut Putin's 50-day peace deadline to just the end of next week. Advertisement 12 The damaged ward in a hospital which was hit by a Russian missile strike Credit: Reuters 12 A view of the penal colony hit by a Russian air strike Credit: Reuters 12 Major disruption hit Russian Railways as a station and foreign train was hit in Salsk, Rostov region, triggering a major inferno Credit: East2West 12 President Donald Trump reacts as he meets with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (not pictured) at Trump Turnberry golf club Credit: Getty Mad Vlad's forces yet again defied the US President and carried on killing in Ukraine overnight. Two tragically died and five were injured in Russian strikes hitting a maternity hospital and a separate hospital ward in Kamianske, Dnipropetrovsk region. Two women, one of whom is pregnant, are in a serious condition, with a total of four killed in the region. And at least 17 people have died and 42 "seriously wounded" in an aerial bomb strike on a prison in Zaporizhzhia. Advertisement Some 40 more people sustained injuries of varying severity. The horror attack on the correctional colony with eight bombs also hit private houses, governor of the region Ivan Fedorov said. Head of the Ukrainian president's office, Andriy Yermak, called the strike 'another war crime by the Russians'. He said: 'The Putin regime, which through certain individuals also threatens the USA, must face economic and military strikes that will deprive it of the ability to wage war.' Advertisement The overnight blitz came imminently after Trump slashed the 50-day deadline for Putin to cut a peace deal down to just the end of next week. Trump slammed the tyrant - who has not taken Trump's peace efforts seriously - saying he was "very disappointed" with him during a press conference with Sir Keir Starmer in Scotland yesterday. Furious Trump says he'll CUT Putin's 50-day peace deadline and says he's 'disappointed' after latest ruthless Kyiv blitz The US President said Putin's new deadline had been reduced down to "10 to 12" days from Monday, which would be August 6 to 8. He said: "I'm disappointed in President Putin, very disappointed in him. Advertisement "So we're going to have to look and I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number." He later clarified saying: "I'm going to make a new deadline of about 10 or 12 days from today. There's no reason in waiting, we just don't see any progress being made." Trump said that the US would do secondary sanctions on Russia - slapping sanctions on those who buy oil from Moscow. But that could all be avoided if Putin cuts a peace deal - which Trump thinks could still happen. Advertisement Following the deadline announcement, Putin puppet Dmitry Medvedev threatened the White House that "each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war". He chillingly added: "Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with [Trump's] own country.' Putin's state faced both rail and air delays today due to Ukrainian strikes on a key train route in Rostov region and ongoing problems from a massive hack by Kyiv supporting groups on state airline Aeroflot. 12 Russia's Security Council's Deputy Chairman Dmitry Medvedev attends a meeting of the Council for Science and Education Credit: Reuters Advertisement 12 A damaged prison in the village of Bilenke, in Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia region Credit: AP 12 The prison strike has resulted in numerous deaths and injuries Credit: Reuters 12 A woman cleans the damaged ward in a compound of hospital Credit: Reuters 12 Maternity hospital damaged in a Russian attack on Kamianske in Dnipropetrovsk region. Credit: East2West Advertisement Ukrainian drones struck a military 'resource base' and train in Salsk, Rostov region, exploding two wagons in a dramatic blitz. A passenger train was moved to a safe distance. Multiple trains reported delays - including those carrying tourists to Black Sea holiday hotspots. One driver died when his car was hit by a drone in the same region. Advertisement Aeroflot continued to face delays with hundreds of flights now disrupted by the giant hack. Astonishingly, the Russian airline used out of date Windows XP and Server 2003, while employees ignored basic cybersecurity rules. What's more, Aeroflot's boss used the same password for three years. Now the Kremlin and security services face embarrassment as travel details of the Russian elite during the war are likely to be leaked. Advertisement Some 42 per cent of its flights were cancelled on Monday impacting more than 20,000 passengers. In Donetsk, there was a blackout after two dozen explosions from Ukrainian drone strikes on the Russian-occupied territory. More than 150,000 were left without electricity in Donetsk, Makiivka and Yasynovata. 12 An empty hospital room following Russia's missile attack that hit a hospital killing two in Kamianske Credit: AP Advertisement 12 Russian railways have been severely disrupted Credit: East2West
Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Milei-style shock therapy may be needed to save Britain from fiscal disaster
The Office for Budget Responsibility's latest report on UK finances paints a grim picture. Economic growth has flatlined, unemployment has risen to 4.7pc – the highest since early 2021 – inflation stubbornly lingers at 3.6pc and government spending is spiralling out of control. Every household understands a simple rule: you must earn more than you spend, or eventually hit the rocks. Yet the UK has long been living beyond its means, maxing out its credit card. For the year ending April 2025, borrowing reached £148bn – a staggering 70pc higher than the £87bn forecast in March 2024. Debt levels are now at heights not seen since the post-Second World War era, and once again, taxpayers are being asked to foot the bill. Worse still, the Government shows no sign of reining in expenditure. The Chancellor is widely expected to announce new tax hikes in the autumn. And when implemented, the real damage will have already occurred following months of speculative debate – 'will-we-won't-we' tax rises that create uncertainty and undermine confidence, dampening economic activity before any policy is even introduced. Those advocating further tax increases misunderstand basic economics, what people need and how to get the best out of them. Beyond a certain point, higher taxes reduce revenue by curbing economic activity – a lesson all too familiar amid rising employer National Insurance contributions, minimum wage increases, and other cost pressures. Businesses across the country are already shedding jobs, particularly among lower-paid workers feeling the squeeze. We may well have passed the point of optimal taxation. Yet instead of easing the burden, the Government whispers about even more tax, including proposals for a wealth tax. This would be disastrous, as the wealthiest 1pc already are estimated to contribute roughly 28pc of income tax. Imposing a wealth tax risks driving more mobile top earners away. As Walter Wriston, the late chairman and chief executive of what was Citicorp, once said: 'Capital goes where it is welcome and stays where it is well treated.' The UK, like many European nations, has lived beyond its means for too long. Month after month, deficits grow. The yield on the UK's 30-year government bond recently topped 5.5pc – far above the 4.85pc seen in October 2022 – reflecting investor wariness. The Bank of England has been forced to adjust and review its quantitative easing reversal following pressure from investors. Political will to cut spending appears scarce. Parliament's handling of the welfare reform bill signals that no meaningful spending reductions will occur, meaning taxpayers will again bear the cost. The debate narrowly focused on trimming a few billion pounds, when the circumstances call for far deeper cuts. And nobody asks how to deliver better public services for less or how it can be fair that taxpayers fund ever-expanding budget black holes. The UK has become addicted to the notion that government should expand its role endlessly – that bigger government automatically means a better society. As a result, spending cuts are politically toxic: the knee-jerk response to every problem is to raise taxes to fund more spending. This is more than policy – it's philosophical, big state versus small state. To say 'I'm from the government, and I'm here to help' remains as dangerous as ever. Borrowing is set to rise significantly over this parliament, even as growth falters. Despite the rhetoric of engineering growth in the economy, the UK faces the prospect of a smaller economy at the end of this parliament. The only way out is to grow the economy. Real, sustained economic growth reduces debt-to-GDP ratios over time and generates the tax revenues needed to fund essential services. Achieving this requires a hard balancing act: cutting spending, committing to fiscal discipline, slashing burdensome regulation, scrapping costly and anti-growth policies like net-zero mandates, and lowering taxes over time. The UK simply cannot rely on ever-higher tax-takes to bail out unchecked spending. We might start to look to Argentina for a solution. Once an economic basket case with inflation soaring over 200pc and poverty affecting more than 40pc of its population, Argentina has faced nine sovereign defaults since independence, caused by persistent fiscal deficits in 57 of the past 65 years. Over half the population relied on government transfers in 2022. Then came Javier Milei, a political outsider who was not expected to win Argentina's 2023 presidential election. Upon victory, he declared bluntly, 'there is no money', and since taking office, Milei has worked aggressively to balance the budget. While many economists initially derided his approach, it is now bearing fruit. Argentina's economy is forecast to grow over 5.7pc this year. Inflation has dropped to 1.6pc monthly as of June, and poverty has fallen significantly – Unicef estimates 1.7 million children have been lifted out of poverty since Milei assumed power. Milei's diagnosis is clear: 'The public sector is the illness. If a body has a virus, a germ, a bug, a parasite, you extract the parasite – you don't feed it. If you feed the parasite, you end up worse off. We got the state out of the way, and things are working better.' Fiscal discipline, slashed public spending, ending monetary financing of deficits, and deregulation have shrunk the state dramatically. These measures are not without pain, with over 50,000 public sector workers laid off, government departments merged or closed, infrastructure spending frozen, and energy and transport subsidies cut. But the result is a state budget surplus and a transformed economy – all within 18 months. Being fiscally responsible also means attracting investment. If the UK is seen as a balanced, prudent economy living within its means, capital will flow in. Right now, the notion that the UK is poised for a global investment bonanza is wishful thinking. To fix the UK's economy and become an attractive destination for investment, we must balance our books. Like Argentina, we need a complete reset – a new philosophy and a radically different approach. This will require an honest conversation with the public about 'there is no money,' and a commitment to sustainable spending plans aligned with growth and fairness. Failing to act risks the UK ending up in the hands of the IMF – a fate best avoided.
