Angus Robertson hits out as Labour 'keep UK veto on Scottish laws'
In October 2023, the Scottish Parliament passed a motion calling for the IMA to be repealed, saying it had 'undermine[d] democratic decisions of the devolved legislatures … to the detriment of the people of Scotland'.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes calls for Internal Market Act to be scrapped
Scottish Labour MSPs, led by Anas Sarwar, voted for the motion. However, since the Labour victory in the 2024 General Election, they have changed position and now support the IMA.
Labour did pledge a 'fast-track' review of the legislation in December 2024, the results of which were published on Tuesday.
The review's key points deal with exclusions from the IMA, which allow specific laws to bypass the act's rules on mutual recognition and non-discrimination – meaning it can apply even if it restricts trade within the UK.
The review said:
A new process will allow exclusions from the IMA if their economic impact is under £10 million per year. These will be fast-tracked if all UK governments agree.
The UK Government will monitor the total economic impact of MEI exclusions in each sector, triggering a review if the cumulative impact exceeds £50 million. This could block further exclusions in that area.
Exclusion proposals will now be assessed not only on economic grounds but also on environmental protection and public health impacts.
The Office for the Internal Market (OIM) will retain its advisory role without new decision-making powers, but it will be involved earlier and more actively in policy discussions.
Constitution Secretary Angus Robertson said the IMA 'undermines the ability of the Scottish Parliament to use its powers to pursue devolved social and economic objectives in Scotland for the people to which it is accountable'.
He went on: 'It introduces radical new uncertainty as to the effect of laws passed by the Scottish Parliament and effectively provides a veto to UK ministers. Nothing set out in the UK Government's response to the review changes this position, which is completely unacceptable.
'The conclusion of the review falls well short of our stated position of repeal and replace the IMA, and indeed short of the legislative change required to mitigate the most damaging aspects of the operation of the IMA.
READ MORE: Explosive new poll puts Corbyn-Sultana party neck-and-neck with Labour
'It is important also to note that the Scottish Parliament has twice voted to repeal the act – since it is fundamentally misconceived and incompatible with devolution.
'We do welcome the UK Government's intention to address some of the most egregious issues with the function of the IMA exclusions process.
'However, we remain concerned that there is no clear vehicle to give meaningful effect to these changes, which work against our shared interests to promote growth, protect jobs and ensure seamless trade across the UK nations.'
The UK Government has promised 'improvements' to the IMA, with Trade Policy Minister Douglas Alexander conceding there are 'real concerns' about how the laws have operated to date.
He further said: 'A thriving internal market is essential to the UK's economic success, so we've listened to what businesses want — and we're acting ahead of schedule.
'These reforms will keep trade flowing, reduce friction, and unlock growth across all four nations.
'We've also worked closely with devolved governments to ensure they can deliver on their priorities.'
Scottish Labour MP and UK Government minister Douglas Alexander (Image: UK Parliament) The UK Government had been required by law to review elements of the IMA by December 2025.
Jane Gratton, the deputy director of public policy at the British Chambers of Commerce, said: 'Trade between the nations of the UK is vital to the health of our overall economy and a key driver of growth. Businesses want to see devolved and UK governments working together to ensure there are no unnecessary barriers to the flows of goods and services between us.
'The IMA is key to this, setting the foundations which underpin over £100bn of trade. This new streamlined approach to rulemaking will give businesses the certainty they need so they can grow, invest, and prosper.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
6 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Keir Starmer opens door to Budget tax raid after inflation unexpectedly jumps to 3.6 per cent
Ministers in recent days have struggled to say who would escape tax hikes TAXING TIMES Keir Starmer opens door to Budget tax raid after inflation unexpectedly jumps to 3.6 per cent Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SAVERS were last night bracing themselves to be hit in the pocket as Sir Keir Starmer appeared to open the door to a Budget tax raid. The Prime Minister indicated they could be hit when pushed on how he would define a working person - with the Labour manifesto promising to protect them. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 The Labour manifesto promised to protect working people from tax hikes, pictured Chancellor Rachel Reeves who is attempting to balance the books Credit: Reuters It comes as inflation unexpectedly rose to 3.6 per cent for June with petrol and food costs seen as driving factors. Ministers in recent days have struggled to say who would escape tax hikes but Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander at the weekend said people on 'modest incomes' would be safe from hikes. The PM, when asked what to explain a modest incomes, said: 'I think of the working people across this country who put in every day and don't get back what they deserve. 'That is who we are working for… the sort of people that work hard but haven't necessarily got the savings to buy themselves out of problems.' READ MORE ON TAXES TAXING TIMES Wetherspoons boss blasts Rachel Reeves' tax raid, warning more pubs will shut Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said high taxes brought in such as the national insurance hike was the reason why the economy had shrunk. Sir Keir said that his government was 'only just getting started' as he was pushed about decisions at the Budget this autumn. Meanwhile, households could see the brakes put on interest rate cuts after inflation hit its highest rate for 18 months. Petrol and food costs drove the unexpected hike to 3.6 per cent in June, up from 3.4 per cent the previous month, giving Bank of England chiefs a headache in turning around the sluggish economy. Businesses and shops also pushed up prices after the £25 billion national insurance tax raid and the minimum wage hike came in from April. Suren Thiru, of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, expects bank bosses to make a cut next month from 4.25 per cent. Raising taxes will kill off growth, Reeves warned as she pledges to rip up business red tape But she added that 'given mounting worries over economic conditions, these figures may increase caution over the pace of future rate cuts'. The bank's target rate is 2 per cent. The figures will pile more pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves as she attempts to balance the books amid global uncertainty of Donald Trump's global tariffs. One area of concern is core inflation - which excludes energy and food costs - went up from 3.5 to 3.7 per cent in May, the Office of National Statistics said. Ms Reeves said: 'I know working people are still struggling with the cost of living.' She added that she would deliver to 'put more money into people's pockets'.
The Sun
6 minutes ago
- The Sun
Keir Starmer opens door to Budget tax raid after inflation unexpectedly jumps to 3.6 per cent
SAVERS were last night bracing themselves to be hit in the pocket as Sir Keir Starmer appeared to open the door to a Budget tax raid. The Prime Minister indicated they could be hit when pushed on how he would define a working person - with the Labour manifesto promising to protect them. It comes as inflation unexpectedly rose to 3.6 per cent for June with petrol and food costs seen as driving factors. Ministers in recent days have struggled to say who would escape tax hikes but Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander at the weekend said people on 'modest incomes' would be safe from hikes. The PM, when asked what to explain a modest incomes, said: 'I think of the working people across this country who put in every day and don't get back what they deserve. 'That is who we are working for… the sort of people that work hard but haven't necessarily got the savings to buy themselves out of problems.' Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said high taxes brought in such as the national insurance hike was the reason why the economy had shrunk. Sir Keir said that his government was 'only just getting started' as he was pushed about decisions at the Budget this autumn. Meanwhile, households could see the brakes put on interest rate cuts after inflation hit its highest rate for 18 months. Petrol and food costs drove the unexpected hike to 3.6 per cent in June, up from 3.4 per cent the previous month, giving Bank of England chiefs a headache in turning around the sluggish economy. Businesses and shops also pushed up prices after the £25 billion national insurance tax raid and the minimum wage hike came in from April. Suren Thiru, of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, expects bank bosses to make a cut next month from 4.25 per cent. Raising taxes will kill off growth, Reeves warned as she pledges to rip up business red tape But she added that 'given mounting worries over economic conditions, these figures may increase caution over the pace of future rate cuts'. The bank's target rate is 2 per cent. The figures will pile more pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves as she attempts to balance the books amid global uncertainty of Donald Trump's global tariffs. One area of concern is core inflation - which excludes energy and food costs - went up from 3.5 to 3.7 per cent in May, the Office of National Statistics said. Ms Reeves said: 'I know working people are still struggling with the cost of living.' She added that she would deliver to 'put more money into people's pockets'. 2
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Inflation is home-grown: Reeves has the right ambitions, but the wrong execution, says MAGGIE PAGANO
What planet is Rachel Reeves on? Just hours after the Chancellor assured her City audience at the Mansion House dinner that Labour is building a 'Britain that is better off', up pop inflation numbers showing that the country is markedly less well off than a year ago. As the latest figures from the Office of National Statistics show, the UK's inflation rate ticked up to 3.6 per cent in the year to June – nearly double the target rate – and up from 3.4 per cent in May. It's the steepest rise since January last year. Reeves can't have been doing much of her own food shopping recently, or had to handle household bills for her two homes. Otherwise she would have seen for herself that even the most basic of foods like butter and milk have been shooting up, as have energy costs, water bills and rents. As any regular shopper could have told her weeks ago, food prices have been creeping up again for some time. In June, they were 4.4 per cent higher, the third month in a row that prices have risen and the frothiest increase for 18 months. But the biggest driver behind the June price hikes compared to a year ago are rising housing costs – despite interest rate cuts – including rents which are up by 5.8 per cent. Energy costs were up by 6.8 per cent despite an overall fall in fuel prices while water bills shot up by a staggering 26 per cent. And the reason for inflation running hot again? This time energy and raw material costs can't be blamed solely on Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Donald Trump's tariffs or even the Middle East. This time businesses are being more honest – they are passing on higher costs to their customers because of the recent increase in employers' National Insurance (NI) and other tax rises. It's a home-grown problem. An own goal, if you like. In which case, you have to ask whether the Chancellor is either delusional or blind when making other equally extraordinary claims during her speech. Labour, she said, had 'restored Britain's reputation as a beacon of stability by putting the public finances back on a stable footing'. Really? Reeves is pulling our leg. Gilt yields are high, growth is risible if not grinding to a halt, demand is down, the welfare state continues to balloon and the public finances are in dire straits. Figures out today are likely to show a further shake-out in the jobs market triggered by the NI increases, confirming recent warnings by Andrew Bailey, the Bank of England Governor, that the jobs tax is leading to greater unemployment. That is why, despite the latest figures, interest rates are likely to be trimmed in August. When will the Chancellor learn that you can't deliver growth by parroting that you want it? Human endeavour doesn't work like that. If you want entrepreneurs and companies to risk their capital, they must feel confident about a brighter future – and potential rewards – rather than booking flights to Dubai. That's why her much-mooted Big Bang-style Leeds Reforms, aimed at making the 'country more active and more confident', are such a damp squib. Her ambition is the right one, but badly executed. More worryingly, these reforms may lead to another wave of dangerous light-touch regulation – just like we saw under the last Labour administration. She's right that the London Stock Exchange needs to be made more attractive for listings and that households should be encouraged to invest in equities. UK adults own the smallest amount of their wealth in investments of any G7 country at 8 per cent. But you can't order companies to list in London if they can get better valuations across the Atlantic. And you can't order savers to put their money into equities or invest in unquoted companies, however much Sid might tell you to, and certainly not order them to invest more in UK companies, without incentives. So it's not surprising that most City figures are decidedly underwhelmed by her Leeds Reforms, while the rest of us are simply bemused. It would have been much cleverer if Reeves had looked to Sweden where households invest 50 per cent of their assets in equities and investment funds, up from a third just two decades ago. And how was this achieved? First, the government abolished stamp duty on equities, then introduced investment savings accounts which attracted a small flat tax. No capital gains or dividend tax. Big, bold and simple. That's what we should do here instead of the usual fiddling around.
