Should states use an 'odor tool' to keep farms away?
Senate Bill 2174 establishes the Agriculture Department's odor modeling tool as the way to determine how often smells from a farm will be a problem in nearby areas.
The discussion comes as two large dairy farms are planned for the Red River Valley and as North Dakota tries to catch up to neighboring states on animal agriculture.
The model will use data such as the number and type of animal, terrain, odor-reducing practices, wind and other weather conditions to determine how far away from the animals that odor may be noticeable.
Ag groups testifying on the bill on Jan. 23 in front of the Senate Agriculture and Veterans Affairs Committee were mostly supportive of the plan as a way to make it clear where livestock operations can and can't be established.
More: Watertown's new Latin fusion restaurant serves up savory Central American cuisine
Feeding livestock is seen by groups that grow corn and soybeans as a way to develop local markets for their crops.
The odor tool is being developed by South Dakota State University. South Dakota, which has leapt ahead of North Dakota in animal agriculture, uses a similar tool.
The bill would limit the ability of counties and townships to establish setbacks — how close a livestock operation can be to a residence — setting maximum distances depending on the size of the operation or the odor model.
More: LaRue's brings authentic French pastries, cuisine to Aberdeen's historic Ward Hotel
Larry Syverson, executive director of the North Dakota Township Officers Association, said the group generally supports the bill but is disappointed that it doesn't include a way for townships to collect fees for additional road use associated with large livestock operations.
The barns and other ag-related facilities are exempt from property taxes under North Dakota law, meaning there is no extra tax revenue to the township or county.
The bill comes out of work done by a task force that studied zoning ordinances for animal agriculture.
Sam Wagner of the Dakota Resource Council testified against the bill.
'It feels like these standards are too industry friendly,' Wagner said.
He added that the task force was too weighted toward ag groups and lacked input from health and environmental groups. Wagner also said the bill strips away township rights.
Among the others testifying against the bill was Erik Olson, a resident of Abercrombie Township near Wahpeton. The township is the site of one of two large dairy farms planned for North Dakota by Riverview Dairy of Morris, Minnesota.
'This seems as a way for these mega dairies to reduce setback distances,' Olson said. 'Townships should have the allowance to regulate and assure the people that we are protected and not forced out by any mega animal feeding operations.'
The committee did not take action on the bill.
Deputy editor Jeff Beach is based in the Fargo area. North Dakota Monitor is part of States Newsroom, the nation's largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.
This article originally appeared on Aberdeen News: Should US states use an 'odor tool' to keep livestock, farms away?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
3 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Senate Passes Key Funding Bills, Reasserting Power Over Spending
WASHINGTON—The Senate late Friday passed more than $180 billion in funding for veterans programs, new military facilities, the Agriculture Department and the Food and Drug Administration, as lawmakers moved to reassert their control over federal spending amid challenges from the Trump administration. The Senate approved the bulk of the spending in a 87-9 vote. It separately cleared a measure funding Congress's own operations as well as related entities that audit federal spending and evaluate the budgetary implications of federal laws. The legislation must go back to the House, which is on recess and will return for legislative business in September.
Politico
5 hours ago
- Politico
Senate passes first funding package ahead of shutdown cliff
'It's taken a great deal of work, good faith and negotiation to get to this point,' Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine). 'Congress has a responsibility, a constitutional responsibility under Article I, for the power of the purse. We are executing that responsibility.' The package would provide almost $154 billion for military construction and veterans programs. It would send more than $27 billion to the Agriculture department and FDA. Both represent a roughly 2 percent boost over current levels. The Senate rejected an amendment from Sen. Jeff Merkley, an appropriator and the top Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, that would bar the rescission, or clawback, of funds in the bill by the White House. Democrats are worried that the administration will send another rescissions package ahead of the fall funding deadline, which would likely implode any hopes of getting a larger funding deal. Still, Sen. Patty Murray, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, defended the smaller deal reached among senators, saying that the package 'rejects damaging cuts from Trump and House Republicans.' The Senate adopted by voice vote an amendment from Democratic Sens. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and Alex Padilla of California that would bar the use of any funds in the bill to reduce services provided by the Veterans Crisis Line. Senators rejected other amendments from Democrats including one that would have halted funding of the Agriculture Department reorganization and another to require a report on staffing reductions at the VA. They also rejected amendments from Sens. John Kennedy (R-La.) and Rick Scott (R-Fla.) that would have made deeper cuts to the Agriculture-FDA bill. The chamber also voted 75-21 to reject a proposal from Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin that would bar lawmakers from taking credit for earmarks. It would require the funding to be revoked if a lawmaker were to ever tout their earmarks in interviews, mailings, speeches or even on the campaign trail.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mistral in talks with VC firms, MGX to raise funds at $10 billion valuation, FT reports
(Reuters) -French artificial intelligence startup Mistral is in talks with investors, venture capital firms and Abu Dhabi's MGX to raise $1 billion at a valuation of $10 billion, the Financial Times reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter. The company launched in June Europe's first AI reasoning model, which uses logical thinking to create a response, as it tries to keep pace with American and Chinese rivals at the forefront of AI development. The funding would accelerate the commercial rollout of Mistral's Le Chat chatbot and support continued development of its large language models, the report said. MGX and Mistral did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment. The startup raised 600 million euros in a Series B funding round that valued the company at 5.8 billion euros last year. Industry observers consider Mistral as Europe's best-positioned AI company to rival Silicon Valley leaders, though the French firm has yet to achieve comparable market traction or revenue scale. Mistral counts Nvidia, Andreessen Horowitz and Lightspeed Venture Partners among its investors. Sign in to access your portfolio
