
Viral battle of 100 men vs one gorilla goes viral - here's what you need to know
Have you ever wondered who would win in a fight: 100 men or one gorilla? No? Well, you're about to enter down the Internet's most viral rabbit hole.
The question appears to have been first broached on Reddit five years ago as a thought experiment conducted on r/whowillwin. The parameters are simple: 100 men, of average size and ability, versus one gorilla, hand-to-hand, no weapons. The question is: who wins and who dies?
Now, the hypothesis has begun to resurface – but the stakes are higher than ever. Across platforms, users are weighing in, from influencers like Mr Beast to James Charles.
One tweet that really kicked things off said that 100 men could easily beat up one gorilla, they "just gotta be dedicated to the s--t.' It was viewed over 250 million times and the replies were a mix between agreement, bafflement and complete backlash.
'You're tripping bro,' one reply said. Others conceded that it would be possible, but not without heavy losses. 'Bro, [for real], if 100 dudes really locked in, like truly committed — no fear, no second thoughts — they could maybe take the gorilla... after 87 of them get turned into smoothies first. It's not about strength. It's about sacrifice & vibes at that point.'
Of course, gorillas are notoriously strong. The average gorilla is about 1.7 metres tall and can weigh up 220 kg. In fact, according to experts from Wild Gorillas Safaris, one gorilla punch can completely shatter a human skull.
However, these facts have done little to stop the debate. Across multiple platforms, social media users and influencers have been weighing in with their opinions – and stating their allegiances. James Charles recently posted a TikTok in which he stated: 'I'm on Team Gorilla, personally.'
It's also exposed some delusional attitudes towards human ability. One viral tweet reads: 'My husband says 100 men could easily defeat a gorilla by all piling on top of it and 'smothering it' and when I pointed out this would probably lead to a number of human casualties under the crush pile he just said 'bees do it'.'
One commenter responded: 'theoretically if you could get 100 guys on top of it at once then yeah that would work but logistically I don't see it. Maybe if they're all totally blood-lusted and willing to die.' Another reply raised an equally important point: 'You're not killing a mature, angry silverback gorilla without some casualties.'
The species of gorilla in question has also become a pertinent part of the debate. As many have pointed out, silverback gorillas are some of the world 's strongest animals, possessing about the same muscle power as 20 humans combined. One of these giant monkeys can lift over 800 kilograms, which is the same weight as a fully grown horse.
But some have attempted to argue that strength is irrelevant without technique. TikTok user @shayan opened his video: 'Gorillas are what we like to call 'fake demons'.' Pointing to a green screen pic of a gorilla, he stated: 'This is a herbivore, not a hunter, not a predator. This is someone's prey. And last time I checked, I would be damned if 100 men would lose to a f--king vegetarian.'
He continued: 'Gorillas cannot fight. They're not quick, they're not agile, they have no footwork, and they have no punching technique whatsoever.'
Unsurprisingly, comments were quick to disagree. 'Humans have no way to critically injure a gorilla, the only reason humans have been running the earth is because of tools, without them we would've been packed up,' one wrote.
People have even been using computer systems to simulate the scenario. One model, posted by Clip&Tell, shows a gorilla easily punch and barrel his way through a horde of average-sized human men. However, this also provoked backlash, with comments claiming the creator 'nerfed' the humans and gave the gorilla too much stamina.
Women in heterosexual relationships have also been using the debate to figure out how delusional their partners are. Under the hashtag 'team gorilla', one woman captioned a clip of her appearing concerned: 'POV you realise you're married to a '100 guys CAN beat a gorilla' man instead of a 'anyone who thinks that is an idiot' man.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
22 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Emmerdale fans hit out at dullest villain in soap's history
Meanwhile, he then found Owen Michaels (Simon Haines) unconscious during a home visit, but left him to die, as he came up with a plan to attempt to frame him for Nate's death. Instead of calling an ambulance and getting help, John wrote a note on Owen's laptop, 'confessing' he killed Nate. 8 Most Iconic British Soap Characters of All Time Emmerdale fans slam 'boring' villain John Sugden on ITV soap But viewers don't seem too impressed with John's tactics as many on Reddit claim he is the 'most boring 'serial killer/villain' they've ever seen'. Someone's post on the r/emmerdale subreddit said: 'I know this sounds super morbid but c'mon, am I alone in thinking we've been waiting ages for him to get really 'villian-y'?!' They added: 'I've been waiting for this man to go full-on psycho, otherwise, we've just suffered along with this boring story for close to a year now to watch him squirrel around the village with rolled up sleeves 24/7, act like a weirdo, and talk about how great of a medic he is??' This fan agreed: 'You nailed it! He's BORING.' Another wrote: 'I think he bores himself, hence the need to feel that high of bringing folks to the brink of death and then playing hero to revive them.' One person commented: 'His rolled up sleeves are the most interesting thing about him.' While this profile responded: 'Yes, he is so boring easily the dullest and most uninteresting serial killer in soap history.' However, some disagree and think John is an 'interesting' character. This viewer explained: 'The weird need to be a saviour, the fact you can tell he feels guilty about his actions (especially Nate) yet can't bring himself not to do it again or hand himself in. Soaps That Have Won the Most Awards 'I've enjoyed the slow burn and seeing how his actions have managed to go undetected so far. 'I'm very much looking forward to seeing the truth come out and how he reacts and how the rest of the village will react too.' Also in agreement, one viewer shared: 'I enjoy him! He's a quieter, calmer, different kind of villain'. They revealed the character is better than the 'usual' sort of villain the soap has become known for, 'with dramatic murders, unrealistic kidnappings, and over-the-top hostage situations'. The fan continued: 'Of course I say this and John's probably going to kidnap somebody at some point. Hopefully not though. 'But I enjoy that they're playing it like he's just a desperate guy who does kind of bad things for selfish reasons. I think the hero complex angle is quite fresh for soap. 'We are getting a decent insight into his guilt and feelings and such through the helpline calls and just his whole haunted demeanor, which adds to the complexity. I guess it's just not that engaging for some people. 'Maybe it's missing a bit of backstory to tell us why he's like this, I'm not sure.' Recommended reading: This person, who is also a fan of John, said: 'I like him. He's not written or acted like your typical soap villain, which makes him interesting to me. I think if he hadn't been paired with Aaron - who brings down every character he's tied to - his reception would have been better.' Someone else who enjoys John's character chimed in: 'I like him, think he's quite nuanced and layered - hate him but that's what makes him enjoyable.' How do you feel about John Sugden on Emmerdale? Let us know if you think he's a good soap villain in the comments below.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Bride left furious after sister-in-law wears 'wedding dress' to her big day
A bride was left fuming after her sister-in-law wore a 'wedding dress' to her big day. Taking to the popular Reddit forum Wedding Shaming', an outraged guest shared photos of the woman in question, revealing a white, floor-length gown with floral detailing. Looking uncomfortably like a bride, the rebellious attendee claimed she was wearing a sage green dress in accordance with the dress code, which was 'pastel chic'. But the disgruntled bride was not happy, especially as her mother-in-law had already put in a request to wear white, which was denied. The poster wrote: 'The dress code was summer pastel chic, so think Easter colours. 'The girlfriend of the groom's brother wore a sage green (wedding) dress that in no way, shape or form appeared to be sage green, or any other colour. 'The veil she's carrying was the flower girl's (her daughter). This was after the mother-in-law had asked the bride if she could wear a white jumpsuit to the wedding, to which the bride obviously said no.' Aside from the colour, the design of the dress appeared obviously bridal - complete with off-the-shoulder sleeves and a romantic, figure-hugging silhouette. To further undermine the claim that the dress was 'sage green', the sister-in-law is pictured wearing sage green shoes, with which the white dress starkly contrasts. The post racked up thousands of comments and sparked a fiery debate, with many shocked on behalf of the bride. One commenter wrote, simply: 'Wow, that's very bridal,' to which another incredulous user responded: 'Yeah this is straight up a wedding dress.' Another comment dished out some seemingly obvious wedding guest advice, writing: 'To be safe, you should never wear any white dress to a wedding that is not yours. 'That being said, not all white dresses are wedding dresses. This is absolutely a wedding dress.' At first glance, the images tripped many commenters up before they realised what they were looking at. One said: 'I was like "Cool, so what does the sister-in-law look like?"' Another chimed in: 'Exactly what I was going to say. The poster clearly included pictures of the actual bride for comparison then forgot to add pictures of the offending sister-in-law… nope.' A third felt the same, saying: 'My thought before I read the title was, "wow what a beautiful detail shot of the bride and the tablescape"... some people are insane.' Although the rule of avoiding white on someone else's special day seems obvious enough, it is often broken. 'To be safer, as a bride, bring a paintball gun to your wedding,' advised one person. 'No white dresses but the bride. 'This policy will be enforced by the bride via paintball gun. If you do not wish to be painted, please do not wear a fresh white canvas.' Some eagle-eyed followers were quick to spot the difference between the sage green shoes and the supposedly green dress. 'I like how her SHOE was sage green,' said one. 'Like, she had a perfect example of what the color is supposed to look like. 'Instead she went about as white as you can go on the color wheel. Wtf. Who thinks this is appropriate?' A second joked: 'The dress looks like the smell of the color sage from another room.' While holding the flower girl's veil, the sister-in-law's nuptial look goes even further. The poster wrote: 'The flower girl is her daughter, but as a cherry on top: the daughter was also the ring bearer and was too nervous to walk down the aisle so guess who walked down with her? Mommy dearest.' The majority of commenters could not believe the 'insane' decision to wear 'a full on wedding gown,' but others sided with the guest. '"Summer Pastel chic" is simply asking for trouble,' wrote one. 'Honestly yes,' another agreed. 'So many pastels photograph white or look white under some lighting.' A third shared their own story, writing: 'I wore a bright yellow floaty pleated dress with a belt to a friend's wedding. It was so clearly bright yellow, I thought it was a safe choice. Nope! 'A lot of the evening photos were black and white. My dress looked like a wedding dress.' While the memo could be to blame, the comment section is unanimous in their belief that there is no lighting that could redeem the sister-in-law's poor outfit choice.


Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Stunning ring girls share behind scenes footage from Usyk vs Dubois and get hot pants signed by undisputed champ
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE RING GIRLS from Oleksandr Usyk and Daniel Dubois' rematch posted some behind-the-scenes snaps on social media. Usyk, 38, knocked Dubois, 27, out in the fifth round to be crowned undisputed heavyweight champion for the second time in his career on Saturday at Wembley. 9 Ring girls from Oleksandr Usyk and Daniel Dubois' rematch posted behind-the-scenes snaps 9 The ring girls didn't spend much time in the ring for the main event 9 But they did share a series of backstage snaps 9 And Usyk signed their official ring girl uniform 9 The ring girls took social media by storm Credit: EPA/DANIEL HAMBURY Therefore, ring girls Lux Mila Mackay and Patricia Elena Tiparu didn't make a lot of appearances in the headline bout. But that didn't stop them from sharing pics of themselves posing backstage in full uniform as they awaited the main event. They even shared a clip that showed Usyk signing their kit following his second victory over Dubois in London. Lux is a London-based fashion model with a growing social media audience. Standing at 5ft 9", the brown-eyed brunette often leaves fans hot under the collar with her steamy social media snaps. She has almost 10,000 followers on Instagram and more than 24,000 on TikTok. Some of her most striking modelling shoots have seen her wearing lingerie or going topless, as she did in November 2024. Patricia is also a London-based model that shares a number of steamy photos as well, some of which show her trying on different bikinis. CASINO SPECIAL - BEST CASINO BONUSES FROM £10 DEPOSITS The content creator has amassed a large audience across her social media. She has a total of 37,200 followers on Instagram alone. Meet the ring girls for Oleksandr Usyk vs Daniel Dubois with topless model joined by bikini loving content creator And she brought quite a bit of experience as a ring girl having made other similar appearances.. Scroll down for more from Lux and Patricia 9 Lux Mila Mackay was present for Usyk vs Dubois 2 9 The brunette often leaves fans stunned Credit: 9 Patricia Elena Tiparu was also at Wembley Credit: INSTAGRAM