S-400 vs Iron Dome: How India's air defense system stacks up against Israel's famed missile shield?
Home
News
S-400 vs Iron Dome: How India's air defense system stacks up against Israel's famed missile shield?
S-400 vs Iron Dome: How India's air defense system stacks up against Israel's famed missile shield?
How does India's air defense systems, including the S-400 Triumf, stack up against Israel's famed Iron Dome missile defense shield? Let us find out.
S-400 vs Iron Dome (File)
India-Pakistan tensions: Amid heightened India-Pakistan tensions post Operation Sindoor, India's air defense systems, including the Russian-made S-400 Triumf and the Israeli Barak-8, have successfully thwarted missile and drone attacks by Pakistan on multiple Indian cities.
But how does India's air defense systems stack up against Israel's famed Iron Dome missile defense shield? Let us find out.
S-400 Triumf
The S-400 'Triumf' is a vital part of India's air defence system. The surface-to-air missile system currently has three operational squadrons in India, and is capable of intercepting incoming projectiles at a range 400 kilometers and an altitude of 30 kilometers. The S-400 system is designed to intercept a wide range of aerial threats, including ballistic and cruise missiles, and is integrated with the IACCS network of the Indian Air Force (IAF).
The Russian-built system is can intercept virtually an aerial attack from the enemy, including missiles, drones fighter jets and rocket attacks. The system is highly mobile and can be easily transported and deployed at any location, where it can be ready for operational use within minutes.
The S-400 system is equipped with an advanced 92N6E electronically-steered phased array radar, which enables the system to detect multiple enemy targets from a distance of 600 km. The system is capable of tracking as many as 160 targets simultaneously, and can fire two intercepting missiles at each target to ensure its neutralized.
India acquired the S-400 system from Russia in 2018 under a deal worth Rs 40,000 crore for five units, three of which have been delivered so far and are in operational use.
Akash Missile System
The indigenously-built Akash Missile System perfectly complements the S-400 air defense system. The Akash system is designed for short-range aerial defence, with a capability to take down aerial threats up to a range of 25-30 kms. The low-level interception system is a low-cost option to engage multiple short-range targets, and is equipped with anti-jamming technology, making it difficult for the enemy to disable using electronic warfare capabilities.
Barak-8 missile system
Jointly developed by India and Israel, the Barak-8 is a medium-range air defense system that can target fighter jets, helicopters, drones, anti-ship and cruise missiles at a distance ranging between 70-150 km. The Barak-8 missile system is equipped with ctive radar homing, advanced data link, allowing blazing fast response to threats.
How Israel's Iron Dome varies from India's air defense systems
Notably. India's air defense strategy markedly different from Israel. The Jewish nation's famed Iron Dome missile defense is specifically designed to intercept short-range aerial threats, especially rocket attacks by Hamas from the Gaza Strip, while India's multi-level air defense is designed to provide protection against long-range ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, stealth aircraft and hypersonic projectile.
For breaking news and live news updates, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram. Read more on Latest India News on India.com.
More Stories
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
Indian Embassy clarifies Navy officer's remark on IAF ‘losses' during Operation Sindoor: ‘Misrepresented'
The Indian Embassy in Indonesia issued a clarification on Sunday, addressing reports concerning comments made by its Defence Attaché, Navy Captain Shiv Kumar, regarding Indian Air Force losses during Operation Sindoor. The embassy stated that the captain's remarks had been taken out of context and misrepresented by the media. In a statement posted on X, the embassy emphasised that the presentation delivered by Captain Kumar at a recent seminar was misunderstood. 'We have seen media reports regarding a presentation made by the Defence Attaché at a seminar. His remarks have been quoted out of context and the media reports are a misrepresentation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker,' the embassy said. The statement further clarified that the presentation highlighted the principle that the Indian Armed Forces operate under civilian political leadership, unlike some other countries in the region. It also explained that the objective of Operation Sindoor was to target terrorist infrastructure, and that India's response was deliberately non-escalatory. During a presentation on 10 June, India's Defence Attaché to Indonesia, Captain Shiv Kumar of the Indian Navy, disclosed that the Indian Air Force (IAF) lost 'some aircraft' during Operation Sindoor, the May 7 strikes targeting terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). He claimed that these losses occurred because the political leadership had instructed the armed forces not to target Pakistani military infrastructure or air defences in the initial strike. 'Only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishment or their air defences,' Captain Kumar said, clarifying why the IAF suffered fighter jet losses. He further stated that following these losses, the Indian armed forces adjusted their tactics. 'We went for the military installations... we first achieved suppression of enemy air defences and then... all our attacks could easily go through using BrahMos missiles,' he added. The Defence Attaché's candid remarks sparked criticism from the opposition Congress party, which accused the BJP-led government of misleading the nation. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh questioned, 'Why is the PM refusing to preside over an all-party meeting and take the Opposition into confidence? Why has the demand for a special session of Parliament been rejected?' Senior Congress leader Pawan Khera also took to X, calling the defence attaché's comments a 'direct indictment.' He asserted, 'They know they've compromised national security, and they're terrified of what the Congress Party will expose before the people of India.' Captain Kumar's statements came during a seminar titled 'Analysis of the Pakistan-India Air Battle and Indonesia's Anticipatory Strategies from the Perspective of Air Power'.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Turkey-US arms spat likely to be settled 'by year's end': US envoy
US sanctions on Turkey's defence sector over its purchase of a Russian air defence system are likely to be ended by the year's end, the US envoy to Ankara said Sunday. Speaking to state news agency Anadolu, Tom Barrack said US President Donald Trump and his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan would instruct their top diplomats to "figure out the way and end it and Congress will support an intelligent solution". With both sides committed to drawing a line under the dispute, which has dragged on for five years, the issue could be resolved within six months, Barrack said. "My belief is that by the year end, we have the possibility of having a solution, my belief is they're going to solve the problem," he said. Washington imposed sanctions on Ankara in 2020 over its purchase of an S-400 Russian surface-to-air missile defence system under a 2017 law known as CAATSA, which aims to limit Russia's military influence. It also booted Turkey out of its F-35 programme, with Washington saying the presence of the S-400 would allow the Russians to collect information on the stealth jet's capabilities -- a move that further soured ties between the NATO allies. "All these things that have been discussed for five years, F-35s, F-16s, S400s, sanctions, tariffs... Enough. We have to put that aside, and Congress is willing to take a fresh look at it," Barrack said. In March, Erdogan spoke to Trump about the need to finalise a deal to let Turkey buy US F-16 fighter planes and be readmitted to the development programme for F-35 warplanes. And last month, he said he saw an end in sight to the sanctions, saying Turkey had seen them eased under Trump. On Tuesday, Erdogan met Trump on the sidelines of a NATO summit in The Hague and called for increased defence industry cooperation with Washington, which he said could significantly boost trade between them. "Advancing cooperation in the defence industry would facilitate achieving the goal of a $100 billion trade volume," he said. Turkey, which wants to modernise its air force, has also been seeking to buy 40 Eurofighter Typhoons built by a four-nation consortium of Germany, Britain, Spain and Italy.
Scroll.in
27 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
India lost jets in Operation Sindoor due to ‘political constraint': Defence attaché to Indonesia
The Indian Air Force lost fighter jets to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor on May 7 because the political leadership had directed that no military establishment across the border was to be attacked that day, The Times of India quoted India's defence attaché to Indonesia as having said earlier this month. A controversy erupted after a purported video of Captain Shiv Kumar's remarks from June 10 surfaced online on Sunday. Following this, the Indian Embassy in Jakarta stated that the Navy officer had only said that India's armed forces serve under ' civilian political leadership ', unlike some neighbouring countries. 'It was also explained that the objective of Operation Sindoor was to target terrorist infrastructure and the Indian response was non-escalatory,' it added. The Indian Embassy also said that Kumar's remarks were 'quoted out of context' and 'the media reports are a misrepresentation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker'. The officer had made the comments while speaking at a seminar titled 'Analysis of the Pakistan-India Air Battle and Indonesia's Anticipatory Strategies from the Perspective of Air Power' at a university in Jakarta. Kumar's statement came more than a month after Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan's May 31 comments that were seen by some as an acknowledgement of the Indian Air Force's loss of aircraft during the operation. General Chauhan had told Bloomberg that what was important was 'not the jet being down, but why they were being down'. The Narendra Modi-led Union government has yet to officially state the number of fighter jets lost during Operation Sindoor. Kumar made the statement in response to Pakistan's claim of having downed six aircraft, including three Rafales. 'I may not agree…that India lost so many aircraft,' The Print quoted him as having said. 'But, I do agree that we did lose some aircraft and that happened only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishments'. Kumar added that the tactics were changed after the loss and 'we went for their military installations'. After a video from the seminar surfaced online, the Congress accused the Union government of having 'misled' the country. Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh, in a social media pos,t asked why the prime minister was 'refusing' to preside over an all-party meeting to take the Opposition into confidence and why the demand for a special session of Parliament has been rejected. He added: 'First the Chief of Defence Staff makes important revelations in Singapore. Then a senior defence official follows up from Indonesia.' Tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad escalated on May 7 when the Indian military carried out strikes – codenamed Operation Sindoor – on what it claimed were terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The strikes were in response to the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam, which killed 26 persons on April 22. The Pakistan Army retaliated to Indian strikes by repeatedly shelling Indian villages along the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir. At least 22 Indian civilians and eight defence personnel were killed in the shelling. India and Pakistan on May 10 reached an 'understanding' to halt firing following the four-day conflict. The Indian government has maintained that Operation Sindoor targeted only terror camps, intentionally avoiding military installations.
