logo
DNA of woman involved in alleged murder plot ‘found on gun parts sent to UK'

DNA of woman involved in alleged murder plot ‘found on gun parts sent to UK'

Yahoo3 days ago
The DNA of an American woman alleged to have been involved in a failed assassination attempt was found on gun parts illegally sent to the UK more than a month later, a court has heard.
Aimee Betro, 45, is alleged to have flown from Wisconsin as part of a plot orchestrated by co-conspirators Mohammed Aslam, 56, and Mohammed Nabil Nazir, 31, of Elms Avenue in Derby, to attack a rival family on September 7 2019.
A trial at Birmingham Crown Court heard that Betro disguised her appearance with a niqab when she tried to shoot Sikander Ali at point blank range outside his home in Measham Grove, Birmingham, but the gun jammed, allowing Mr Ali to flee.
She is alleged to have returned to the scene hours later in the early hours of September 8 and fired three shots into Mr Ali's house, which was empty at the time, before leaving the UK and flying back to the US the next day.
The court heard father and son Aslam and Nazir, who were jailed last year for their part in the bungled assassination plot, were involved in a feud with Mr Ali's father, Aslat Mahumad.
Nazir and Aslam had been injured during disorder at Mr Mahumad's clothing boutique in Birmingham in July 2018, which led them to conspire to have someone kill him or a member of his family.
Prosecution counsel Tom Walkling KC said on Tuesday that Betro had been involved in 'yet another' of Nazir's plots to get revenge on a rival when she is alleged to have sent three parcels full of ammunition and gun parts to the UK on October 16 2019.
The court heard the parts, which were wrapped in foil and paper inside three cardboard boxes, were addressed to a man named Faris Quayum, from Derby, with Nazir tipping off the police with intent to frame him.
While the packages were intercepted and Mr Quayum arrested as part of Nazir's 'devious scheme', Mr Walkling said his involvement in the plan eventually came to light.
Mr Walkling said a woman, who the prosecution say was Betro, was seen at a post office 100 miles away from her home address in the US posting the parcels under a fake name.
He said: 'In the case of each of those three packages, Aimee Betro's DNA has been found on the gun parts and ammunition inside them. There is no doubt, we say, that she handled the contents of those boxes.
'She may not have known the full extent of Nazir's devious scheme, but there is no doubt that when she sent prohibited ammunition into the UK, she broke the law.'
Betro was allegedly in Armenia when Nazir was jailed for 32 years and Aslam for 10 years in November, but was returned to the UK in January this year to face her own criminal proceedings.
Mr Walkling said: 'The prosecution say that the evidence in this case is compelling and strong.
'Aimee Betro was the would-be assassin on the 7th September 2019.
'She was the shooter on Measham Grove in the early hours of the next day, and she was the person who furthered another of Nazir's vendettas when she sent ammunition to the UK in October 2019.'
Betro denies conspiracy to murder, possessing a self-loading pistol and a charge of fraudulently evading the prohibition on importing ammunition.
The trial continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Serial butt sniffer arrested in California
Serial butt sniffer arrested in California

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Serial butt sniffer arrested in California

A registered sex offender in California was arrested again on Tuesday after allegedly sniffing a woman's rear end at a Nordstrom Rack in Burbank. Calese Carron Crowder, 38, of Glendale, was detained after a report of a suspicious man loitering in the women's department of a Nordstrom Rack at the Empire Center on North Victory Place. Security footage showed Crowder following a female shopper before crouching behind her and appearing to sniff her buttocks, authorities said. Police found Crowder on Tuesday at a Walmart in the same shopping center as Nordstrom Rack , where he was also allegedly seen sniffing women. Crowder is on active parole and is a registered sex offender with a history of similar 'lewd conduct' in Glendale and Burbank dating back to 2021, police said. He is charged with loitering with intent to commit a crime and is being held in custody on $100,000 bail. His next court appearance is scheduled for August 1. Crowder first gained media attention in August 2023, when content creator Michaela Witter posted a viral TikTok showing him allegedly sniffing her behind at a Barnes & Noble in Burbank. He claimed he was bent down to tie his shoe when confronted by Witter. The woman said she also observred him sniff another woman in the bookstore. Witter said other women contacted her about Crowder after her video, claiming they had also been targeted by him at stores like Urban Outfitters and Marshalls. Crowder was arrested in 2023 for peeping and prowling at a Glendale home with children present. Crowder had previously served prison time for burglary and robbery and was sentenced in February 2023 to a year in jail for indecent exposure in Santa Clarita, but was released early, according to law enforcement. He was arrested again that August for peeping and prowling at a Glendale home with children present.

Hudson corrections officer gets 50 years in death of 2 women, including Randolph girlfriend
Hudson corrections officer gets 50 years in death of 2 women, including Randolph girlfriend

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Hudson corrections officer gets 50 years in death of 2 women, including Randolph girlfriend

A former Hudson County corrections officer was sentenced to 50 years in prison for allegedly killing his girlfriend and her friend in Newark, announced the Hudson County Prosecutor's Office. On Feb. 16, 2017, John Menendez, 27, of West New York, picked up his girlfriend Anna Shpilberg, 40, of Randolph and her friend Luiza Shinkarevskaya, 40, of Newark, at Newark Liberty International Airport. Menendez is accused of driving both women to a parking lot near the airport where he shot and killed them, said the HCPO. Authorities said Mendez turned himself in and admitted to shooting both women. The former officer claimed "he was taking large amounts of anabolic steroids, and that made him unable to plan or intend to kill." Police said past text messages between him and Shpilberg revealed "he was angry and jealous about their trip to Mexico without him," according to the press release from the Hudson County Prosecutor's Office. On March 4, Menendez pleaded guilty to two counts of first-degree aggravated manslaughter. He was sentenced on July 22. He will serve his sentence in New Jersey State Prison. This article originally appeared on 50 years for corrections officer in death of Randolph woman and friend

Analysis: Trump just made a problematic Ghislaine Maxwell situation look even worse
Analysis: Trump just made a problematic Ghislaine Maxwell situation look even worse

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Analysis: Trump just made a problematic Ghislaine Maxwell situation look even worse

Interviewing Ghislaine Maxwell is the Trump administration's first big move to allay concerns about its hugely unpopular handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Friday wrapped up two days of interviews with Epstein's convicted associate. But there were already all kinds of reasons to be skeptical of this move and what it could produce, given the motivations of the two sides involved. And President Donald Trump epitomized all of them in a major way on Friday. While taking questions on his way to Scotland, Trump repeatedly held open the possibility of pardoning Maxwell for her crimes. 'Well, I don't want to talk about that,' Trump said initially. When pressed, he said, 'It's something I haven't thought about,' while conspicuously adding, 'I'm allowed to do it.' This wouldn't be the first time Trump has appeared to dangle a pardon over someone providing evidence that could impact him personally and politically. (In this case, he has demonstrated past personal ties to Epstein, and his administration is scrambling to clean up its botched handling of the Epstein files after previously promising to release them.) A similar situation played out during the Russia investigation, when Trump repeatedly left open the possibility of pardoning key witnesses like Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn and Michael Cohen. Critics alleged this amounted to obstruction of justice. Special counsel Robert Mueller's report didn't draw conclusions on possible obstruction, but it did cite Trump's pardon comments as 'evidence' that Trump's actions 'had the potential to influence Manafort's decision whether to cooperate with the government.' Manafort indeed wound up being a decidedly uncooperative witness, with a bipartisan Senate report saying his repeated lies hamstrung its own investigation. And Trump later pardoned him in a move that could certainly be understood as a reward for his lack of cooperation. That bit of history looms large here, given the parallels. But Trump is really just exacerbating an already dubious situation. There were already plenty of reasons to be skeptical of this move to interview Maxwell, and nobody involved seems particularly bothered to address those problems or even combat the perception of them. The first reason is the state of play in Maxwell's criminal case. It might seem far-fetched that Trump would ever pardon a convicted child sex-trafficker like Maxwell (even though he did 'wish her well' after she was charged). But there are other things his administration could do to help her. Among them would be taking actions in her ongoing appeal of her 2021 conviction. The Trump Justice Department has already taken highly suspect actions in another criminal case involving someone Trump wanted something politically from: New York Mayor Eric Adams. The administration earlier this year moved to dismiss the charges against Adams while suggestively citing its desire for the New York Democrat to assist in its crackdown on illegal immigration. Multiple prosecutors resigned in protest, with one claiming it was a 'quid pro quo' in her resignation letter. And the judge in the case appeared to sympathize. 'Everything here smacks of a bargain: Dismissal of the indictment in exchange for immigration policy concessions,' the judge said. Maxwell's lawyer, David Oscar Markus, has also been remarkably solicitous of Trump and the administration. Last week he called Trump the 'ultimate dealmaker' while claiming that the Justice Department had violated a deal with Maxwell. This week, he praised the Trump administration's 'commitment to uncovering the truth in this case' and said he and Maxwell were 'grateful that the government is trying to uncover the truth.' Markus on Friday also suggested an openness to a pardon. 'The president this morning said he had the power to do so,' Markus said, 'and we hope he exercises that power in a right and just way.' Indeed, also relevant here are the lawyers involved. Critics have cried foul that the DOJ official interviewing Maxwell was Blanche, rather than a non-political prosecutor who has been involved in the case who would have much more expertise. Not only is Blanche a top political appointee of Trump's; he's also his formal personal lawyer. 'The conflict of interest is glaring,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Thursday on X. 'It stinks of high corruption.' What's more, Blanche appeared on a podcast last year with Markus and labeled him a 'friend.' 'You are by far the best out there,' Blanche said. But one of the biggest reasons to be skeptical is that Maxwell is someone the Trump Justice Department – the first one, at least – labeled a brazen liar. Back in 2020, the DOJ charged Maxwell with two counts of perjury – on top of the more serious charges she faced – while citing a 2016 civil deposition she gave. In the deposition, Maxwell claimed no knowledge of Epstein's 'scheme to recruit underage girls for sexual massages,' despite later being convicted of helping in the effort. She also claimed she didn't know about Epstein possessing sex toys, which was contradicted by witnesses at her trial. Maxwell's lawyers at the time said 'the questions asked were confusing, ambiguous, and improperly formed.' She was never actually tried for perjury. After her conviction on the more serious charges, prosecutors agreed to dismiss the perjury charges if her conviction stood, citing a desire to avoid further emotional trauma for the victims. But the Trump Justice Department in 2020 still called her credibility into question. In a 2020 filing, it said Maxwell's lies 'should give the Court serious pause' about trusting her. It also said Maxwell's 'willingness to brazenly lie under oath about her conduct … strongly suggests her true motive has been and remains to avoid being held accountable for her crimes.' All of that would seem relevant to today, especially given Trump's demonstrated willingness to wield his power to help people who help him – whether using pardons or anything else. Maxwell, who has years left in her 20-year prison sentence, clearly has motivation to say things Trump wants. That doesn't mean the interviews of Maxwell couldn't glean something important. Even witnesses with credibility problems can provide important information, if it's corroborated with other evidence. But right now, Trump and Co. aren't trying very hard to make this situation look kosher. And Trump's pardon comments take that to another level.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store