Vatican could be a venue for Russia-Ukraine talks, Rubio says, after pope renews an offer to help
Speaking to reporters in Rome before meeting with Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, the Vatican point man on Ukraine, Rubio said that he would be discussing potential ways the Vatican could help, 'the status of the talks, the updates after yesterday (Friday) and the path forward.'
Asked if the Vatican could be a peace broker, Rubio replied: 'I wouldn't call it broker, but it's certainly — I think it's a place that both sides would be comfortable going.'
'So we'll talk about all of that and obviously always grateful to the Vatican for their willingness to play this constructive and positive role,' he said at the U.S. Embassy in Rome.
The Vatican has a tradition of diplomatic neutrality and had long offered its services to try to help facilitate talks, but found itself sidelined during the all-out war, which began on Feb. 24, 2022.
Pope Francis, who often angered both sides with his comments, had entrusted Zuppi with a mandate to try to find paths of peace. But the mandate seemed to narrow to help facilitate the return of Ukrainian children taken by Russia, and the Holy See also was able to mediate some prisoner exchanges.
Leo, who was elected history's first American pope on May 8, took up Francis' call for peace in Ukraine in his first Sunday noon blessing as pope. He appealed for all sides to do whatever possible to reach 'an authentic, just and lasting peace.'
Leo, who as a bishop in Peru had called Russia's war an 'imperialist invasion,' vowed this week personally to 'make every effort so that this peace may prevail.'
In a speech to eastern rite Catholics, including the Greek Catholic Church of Ukraine, Leo begged warring sides to meet and negotiate.
'The Holy See is always ready to help bring enemies together, face to face, to talk to one another, so that peoples everywhere may once more find hope and recover the dignity they deserve, the dignity of peace,' he said.
The Vatican secretary of state, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, repeated the Vatican's offer to serve as a venue for direct talks, saying the failure of negotiations in Istanbul to reach a ceasefire this week was 'tragic.'
'We had hoped it could start a process, slow but positive, toward a peaceful solution to the conflict,' Parolin said on the sidelines of a conference. 'But instead we're back to the beginning.'
Asked concretely what such an offer would entail, Parolin said that the Vatican could serve as a venue for a direct meeting between the two sides.
'One would aim to arrive at this, that at least they talk. We'll see what happens. It's an offer of a place,' he said.
'We have always said, repeated to the two sides that we are available to you, with all the discretion needed,' Parolin said.
The Vatican scored what was perhaps its greatest diplomatic achievement of the Francis pontificate when it facilitated the talks between the United States and Cuba in 2014 that resulted in the resumption of diplomatic relations.
The Holy See has also often hosted far less secret diplomatic initiatives, such as when it brought together the rival leaders of South Sudan in 2019. The encounter was made famous by the image of Francis bending down to kiss their feet to beg them to make peace.
Winnipeg Jets Game Days
On Winnipeg Jets game days, hockey writers Mike McIntyre and Ken Wiebe send news, notes and quotes from the morning skate, as well as injury updates and lineup decisions. Arrives a few hours prior to puck drop.
Perhaps the Holy See's most critical diplomatic initiative came during the peak of the Cuban missile crisis when, in the fall of 1962, Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev ordered a secret deployment of nuclear missiles in Cuba that were soon detected by U.S. spy planes.
As the Kennedy administration considered its response, with the threat of nuclear war looming, Pope John XXIII pleaded for peace in a public radio address, in a speech to Vatican ambassadors and also wrote privately to Kennedy and Khruschev, appealing to their love of their people to stand down.
Many historians have credited John XXIII's appeals with helping both sides step back from the brink of nuclear war.
___
Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Special delivery
The postal service has an unofficial motto: 'Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed rounds.' American management and marketing consultant Stephen Starring Grant's excellent first book chronicles a year of far more varied obstacles to mail delivery: 'This world we've built for ourselves is complex to the point of being paralyzing.' Laid off by his company in March 2020, months after being diagnosed with prostate cancer, Grant needed work for expenses and for health coverage. Tim Smith / Brandon Sun files In a seismic shift from his remote, white-collar career, he became a 'Rural Care Associate' with the United States Postal Service (USPS): a substitute mailman. From basic training through learning, despising and eventually embracing the job, Grant's year of blue-collar work helped him 'find' his home as he navigated his way around mail routes, grounding his discovery geographically, culturally and psychologically. Mailman provides many insights into the job of delivering the mail and often soars into truths about society, politics and other human interactions. It is hilarious, touching and often inspirational. 'America is the greatest country in the world, a shining city on a hill,' Grant says. Also, 'America is a steroidal monster… exporting our misery to the world.' Mailman goes about proving, says Grant, that '(b)oth versions of America are true.' This paradoxical view of the world prompts many of Grant's insights into personal and civic pride and patriotism, showing difficult but necessary ways to improve what needs improving. Insisting that the USPS does not receive taxpayer subsidy (although its health benefits are federally funded), Grant introduces the complex people who dedicate themselves to delivering the mail, which is both 'dumb and anachronistic' and also 'a vital act of normalcy.' Promised at least one day a week, substituting ended up being virtually a full-time job. COVID's effect on home deliveries was profound. A dispute between Amazon and courier UPS meant the post office suddenly had to deliver far more parcels than usual. Grant the consultant came up with an idea for clearing the backlog of packages, but was criticized when he brought it to management. Later, his ideas were instituted; he never expresses resentment that someone may have taken credit for his work. For many months, Grant hated the difficulties and uncertainty. Sorting mail, delivering from different official and personal vehicles, in uncomfortable and dangerous weather, to unpredictable people around the southern university town of Blacksburg, Va. nearly broke him more than once. Alicia Kratzer photo Stephen Starring Grant In rollicking and outrageous stories about his developing understanding of people and their needs, Grant's insights elevate Mailman to a book of philosophy which is also a page-turner. The odd feeling of delivering mail to people he knew is clear when he sees a former therapist on a route he is covering. She keeps saying, 'You are not a mailman.' But his joy when he goes out of his way to help a couple renting her Airbnb convinced him: 'I had become a mailman.' His original incompetence and failures led him to an epiphany: 'Being great hadn't led me to my essential selfhood. Sucking did.' Still, after an encounter with a seemingly deranged person who insists that '(n)obody ever takes responsibility!' Grant texted his wife, 'HOW HAS THIS BECOME MY LIFE?' Her gentle but firm insistence that such reactions were hurtful saved him, 'the way that people who love you will always form a rescue party and come looking for you.' One customer, receiving Grant's 'dream subscription list' of magazines, was delighted for 'all these periodicals to get a second life' and passed them back to him by the grocery bag full. Grant describes both fellow postal workers and customers of all classes and identities with compassion. Many human problems result from not realizing that, as Grant says, 'the problem is less that the world is malign than that it's complicated.' In response to political polarization during the 2020 election, delivering the mail proved that, Grant notes, 'when you work with people, when you get to know them as people, it becomes harder to hate them, at least for 99% of folks. We don't have to agree with each other. We have to agree to work and live together.' Mailman Weekly A weekly look at what's happening in Winnipeg's arts and entertainment scene. Grant's reminiscences look hopefully toward a world not 'sorted into groups where we hold each other at arm's length, naked with uninformed disgust.' Vaccination and time began opening things up and Grant went back to familiar work with an HR firm. 'But I returned without the sense that it was everything. That it was me.' Grant finds the dichotomy between white-collar and blue-collar work a distraction: 'One form is no more or less noble than the other…. The real distinction is between work and service… while we all work, few of us serve.' Grant's truly touching pages of acknowledgments in Mailman show his deep gratitude for his, and others', service. Bill Rambo is a retired teacher who still loves checking for mail at the Landmark post office.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Musk, Trump and Mao
Opinion The only place where some people still see Elon Musk as a political genius is China. 'Brother Musk, you've got over a billion people on our side backing you,' wrote a fan on Weibo, China's biggest social media site. 'If Elon Musk were to found a political party,' wrote another, 'his tech-driven mindset could inject fresh energy into politics.' Distance lends enchantment, but the home market is a harder sell. Back in the U.S. a few days later, when Musk announced the foundation of the 'America Party,' the public response fell considerably short of rhapsodic. Tesla shares fell 7.5 per cent the next day and Musk's personal stake in the company fell by US$10 billion. U.S. President Donald Trump pretended pity for his former ally for about 10 seconds — 'I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely off the rails' he posted online — before reverting to form: 'The one thing third parties are good for is the creation of complete and total disruption and chaos.' Like a stopped clock, Trump is occasionally right, and this may be one of those times. Musk may seem completely out of control, but if he gets the strategy right, his new political party could spread disruption and chaos right within the ranks of the Republican Party. Most American political analysts have dismissed the electoral prospects of Musk's new party. After all, new third parties have not broken the grip of the two-party system in the United States for more than a century. However, third parties have often determined the outcome in races between the two big parties. There isn't time for Musk to build a countrywide third party in the 20 months between now and the midterm elections for the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives in November 2026. That's when he plans to launch his first challenge to Trump, but he doesn't need a nationwide party for that. Indeed, he probably never intends to go that route. All Musk has to do in 2026 is unseat two or three Republican incumbents in the Senate and half a dozen in the House, and the Republicans lose control of both houses of Congress. Concentrate on 20 Republican-held Senate seats and 50 marginal House seats and spend a hundred million dollars in each one. That ought to do the trick. Would Musk really do that? It would be one of history's biggest tantrums, and all he would get out of it is the satisfaction of creating a potential majority in congress that might repeal or at least modify Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Trump would still be president, but Musk really seems to believe that an extra US$3 trillion on the national debt matters. Would Musk get away with it? Of course not. However, the measures Trump would take to thwart Musk's strategy might mark a decisive break with the current constitutional order. Many people fear it's coming anyway, but in practice it needs a crisis. This could be it. Foreign analysts can sometimes see analogies and parallels in American politics that Americans themselves miss. Some Chinese scholars, in particular, make disturbing comparisons between Trump and Mao. Zhang Qianfan, a constitutional law professor in Beijing, calls the rapid Trumpist takeover of U.S. politics against only feeble resistance 'America's Cultural Revolution.' Ding Xueliang, once a Red Guard and now professor of Chinese politics at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, says 'It's not identical, but there are certainly parallels.' Many people in China see the war on 'woke' and on elite universities in America, the mistrust of bureaucracy, the hatred of the 'deep state,' and the cult of the leader as symptoms of an anti-intellectual drive as strong as that in China under Mao. Above all, they remember that Mao destroyed the bureaucracy, purged the Party, and effectively made himself emperor. 'During Trump's presidential inauguration speech, Republican lawmakers all stood up and applauded with such fervor that it rivaled North Korea. These are deeply troubling signs,' Zhang said. Or as Trump said when Xi Jinping abolished term limits and made himself president-for-life: 'I think it's great. Maybe we'll have to give that a shot someday.' Gwynne Dyer's new book is Intervention Earth: Life-Saving Ideas from the World's Climate Engineers.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Another day, another Trump tariff threat
Opinion We apologize. We apologize deeply for going back to the same ground we worked in our July 11 editorial, when we said, about U.S. President Donald Trump's 50 per cent tariff levy on Brazil, 'It was Canada a couple of weeks ago, when Trump was railing about the unfairness of a Canadian dairy tariff that he actually agreed to in the last Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade pact and that hasn't been levied, and it's Brazil's turn now. And it will be Canada again.' Because it is Canada. Again. Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post U.S. President Donald Trump Thursday night, on his own social media outlet, Trump posted a letter that he was sending to Prime Minister Mark Carney, decrying drugs 'pouring into our Country' from Canada, and complaining about the aforementioned tariff on dairy products. (Which American dairy exporters would face if they reached certain export levels — which they never have reached, and hence, are tariffs they never have paid. But why bother to worry about facts?) The letter starts out 'It is a great honour for me to send you this letter in that it demonstrates the strength and commitment of our trading relationship, and the fact that the United States has agreed to continue working with Canada, despite Canada having financially retaliated against the United States…' Trump then goes on to say that he is ordering a 35 per cent tariff on Canadian products to come into effect on Aug. 1, over and above tariffs already announced on steel, aluminum and auto parts, and threatens to increase that rate if Canada retaliates with tariffs of its own. It doesn't explain whether, like his last threat of 10 per cent or 20 per cent, the tariff only applies to products outside the CUSMA trade agreement. 'If Canada works with me to stop the flow of fentanyl, we will, perhaps, consider an adjustment to this letter. These tariffs may be modified upwards or downwards, depending on our relationship with your country. You will never be disappointed with the United States of America. Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Far from never being disappointed, we are, in fact, deeply disappointed with the United States of America. Or, at least, with its threatener-in-chief. He does not negotiate in good faith, he changes his demands and the reasons for them at the drop of a hat, and seems to think that disrupting global trade, roiling global financial markets and upending relationships with long-standing friendly nations is somehow 'doing business.' It's not. At this point, we should be looking at cutting our losses in the best way we can. It's time to leave Trump behind: we can make nice in trade talks, do our best to mollify a president who can't even be bothered to use facts to bolster his 'national security' tariffs, but in every possible way, we should be moving to separate ourselves from trade with the United States under Trump. Wednesdays A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom. We should avoid American products, decline to vacation or travel in the United States, and refuse to absorb American tariffs into the prices Canadian sellers charge American customers. Americans should feel the full cost of their president's unilateral 'negotiations.' As well, we should look to enter trade agreements with nations that negotiate honestly and fairly, and that then live up to the terms and spirit of those negotiations. And move every bit of trade we can to those countries. It took just seven hours from when our earlier editorial was written until Trump proved the editorial's central thesis to be correct: 'There is a simple truth President Trump is making more and more clear with each passing day and each passing edict. If you give in to blackmail, the blackmailer will just come back later for more.' He'll be back, demanding even more. Depend on it.
