
How big brands fooled consumers with plastic
A seasoned reporter, Chaudhuri traces the rise of plastic over the last 100 years while detailing how corporate greed, deceptive marketing, and unfulfilled recycling promises have fuelled a gargantuan environmental crisis for the world.
The questions the book raises are all around us in India as well; in the giant landfills that pockmark our cities. 'Why were taxpayers picking up the expense of sending bulky plastic packaging to landfills even though McDonald's was the one choosing to use it?" asks the author. Long-suffering Indians having to live with the toxicity of the giant landfills of Bhalswa in Delhi, Dhapa in Kolkata or Pirana in Ahmedabad, have been asking the same question without any answers.
Time was when plastics were hailed as a revolutionary, eco-friendly alternative to materials like paper and glass, which were resource-intensive to produce. It was believed that by replacing ivory and tortoiseshell in products such as snooker balls and combs, plastic would save the lives of animals like elephants and tortoises. The journey from those hopeful beginnings in the 1950s to today's disposability nightmare is a cautionary tale of short-term gains trumping long-term consequences.
The billions of polystyrene clamshell containers that McDonald's sent to landfills annually, falsely claiming they would 'aerate the soil", was all part of its grand plan to cut costs, push more of its fast foods while earning huge profits. Meanwhile, Procter & Gamble was using psychological marketing to convince parents that cloth diapers were inferior, locking generations into a cycle of waste with its disposable diapers.
Besides holding companies to account, Chaudhuri humanises the issue by drawing attention to the people affected by the phenomenon as well as those responsible for it. While the constant descriptions of functionally relevant but otherwise unimportant characters, such as Scott Stewart, a public relations manager for Procter & Gamble, are a bit of an irritant, they ensure that it isn't just a book about the macro picture.
Chaudhuri also dismantles persistent myths. Making park benches and picnic tables with recycled waste isn't viable since the price they fetch does not justify the collection and cleaning in big enough volumes. Her big reveal—if it can be called that—is the prevalent deceit around recycling. Coloured plastic bottles often end up as low-value grey plastic for pipes and not for new bottles, which leaves the demand for virgin plastic undiminished.
The analysis of single-use sachets in markets like India is particularly eye-opening. These tiny packets, used for everything from shampoo to mouth fresheners, are nearly unrecyclable. But having unlocked billion-dollar markets by targeting the bottom of the pyramid consumers, these tiny plastic sachets are now ubiquitous.
The book makes a persuasive case that recycling, far from being a solution, is often just savvy marketing dressed up as sustainability. Thus, products made from ocean plastic may be easy on the conscience but their price tags make them so prohibitive that they make no dent in the problem. Actor Rahul Khanna may cut a striking figure pulling waste from the ocean in an advertisement for 100 Pipers, but the only winner is Pernod Ricard India.
Equally scathing is the author's critique of 'greenwashing", the sly manner in which companies deflect their environmental responsibility through lobbying and funding dubious science to confuse consumers. It is a tactic likened by author Michael Moss in his book Hooked: Food, Free Will, and How the Food Giants Exploit Our Addictions to the well-rehearsed corporate playbook of 'denial, delay, and pretense."
Chaudhuri approaches her subject like an investigative journalist rather than an activist. That gives the book a balance often missing in discussions related to big MNCs like McDonalds, which, not surprisingly, features prominently. Rather than taking a flamethrower to plastic, it acknowledges the convenience and benefits of polymer, including savings on carbon emissions as compared to other materials like paper.
In a 2019 Wall Street Journal article, Chaudhuri highlighted how consumer goods makers struggle to replace plastic with alternatives like paper, which often fall short in functionality. That doesn't deflect from the fact that single-use plastic is technologically difficult and often uneconomical to recycle. Which is why plastic products are often left untreated in dumps.
Part indictment, part urgent manifesto, Consumed leaves readers not just disturbed by the scale of corporate complicity in the proliferation of plastic but also armed with the clarity to demand change. While charting how we got here, Chaudhuri also sketches what it will take to get out in a closing chapter on what we can all do to mitigate the disaster.
Sundeep Khanna is a business columnist and author of business books.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
11 minutes ago
- Hans India
UPI Hits Record 707 Million Daily Transactions, Marks a New Digital Milestone for India
In a landmark moment for India's digital economy, the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) surpassed 707 million transactions in a single day on August 2, 2025, according to data shared by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI). This sets a new all-time high and highlights the massive growth of digital transactions across the country. July had already seen UPI average around 650 million transactions daily. Experts say the surge in early August can be attributed to routine financial activity such as rent payments, utility bills, and salary disbursements, which typically peak at the beginning of each month. The achievement marks a doubling of UPI's usage since 2023, when it was averaging 350 million transactions a day. That figure rose to 500 million by August 2024 and now comfortably crosses 700 million, putting India on track to meet the Government's target of 1 billion daily UPI transactions by 2026. But what exactly is UPI, and why is it so widely used? Developed and maintained by NPCI, UPI (Unified Payments Interface) is a real-time mobile-based payment system that links multiple bank accounts into a single platform. It enables seamless peer-to-peer as well as merchant transactions, allowing users to transfer money using just a mobile number or a UPI ID — without needing to share sensitive banking details. Major apps like PhonePe, Google Pay, Paytm, BHIM, and even banking apps such as SBI Yono, ICICI iMobile, and HDFC PayZapp support UPI payments. What makes this milestone more significant is the growing contribution of merchant payments, which now make up approximately 62% of UPI transactions. This indicates that UPI has moved far beyond personal payments and is now a crucial tool for businesses of all sizes — from local vendors to large retailers. In fact, nearly 85% of all digital payments in India are now processed through UPI, reflecting its deep integration into the financial habits of Indians. The system's real-time settlement feature also gives it an edge over traditional card networks like Visa and Mastercard, which follow delayed settlement processes. However, the rapid rise of UPI does raise sustainability concerns. At present, there is no Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) applied to UPI payments, which means that banks and payment apps earn very little from facilitating these transactions. Industry players and fintech companies have been urging the government to reinstate MDR for large-value merchant payments, a move also supported by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to ensure the long-term viability of the ecosystem. As UPI continues to expand, its influence is gradually reducing the reliance on cash and debit cards, especially in urban areas. Although traditional banking remains essential for larger financial decisions like loans or investments, UPI is fast becoming the preferred choice for daily financial interactions. That said, the shift is less pronounced in rural areas, where cash usage remains strong among older populations. India's digital payment landscape is clearly undergoing a significant transformation — and UPI is leading the charge.


Economic Times
39 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Gurgaon has slum-like infra: Suhel Seth slams Millennium City's urban planning a ‘shame on the country'
Author Suhel Seth has criticised urban planning in India. He focused on Gurgaon's infrastructure. Seth called it slumlike despite housing big companies. He compared India's planning to a '1947 mindset'. Seth also criticised the quality of civil engineers. He highlighted the lack of technology use. Seth urged for reform and better leadership. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads India still builds with a '1947 mindset' Gurugram has big companies, but lacks basic planning Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads 'Worst civil engineers' and no use of technology Delhi-NCR's flooding compared to 'two Venices' Seth calls for reform and better leadership Author and entrepreneur Suhel Seth has criticised India's urban planning and infrastructure, especially in Gurugram , calling it an example of failed governance. Speaking on an ANI podcast, Seth questioned the quality of civil engineering in the country and said that despite housing some of India's wealthiest firms, Gurugram's infrastructure is 'slumlike'.Drawing a comparison with China, Seth recalled a visit with the British Airways advisory board to Beijing, before the Olympics. 'When we reached the airport, we saw 60 per cent of it shuttered. I asked why. They said it was planned for 2040. In India, we still build using 1947 thinking,' he pointed out that Gurugram is home to major companies such as Coca-Cola, EY, Hero MotoCorp , Apollo, Max, and Fortis . However, he said the city has 'slumlike' infrastructure and lacks basic civic facilities.'It's bizarre. The richest people live in slumlike environments,' he also criticised how Gurugram developed, saying it did not come from a vision or planning framework. 'It didn't grow because of Hindustan Lever. It grew because GE and Genpact came in first for back-office operations. The city boomed around that, not planning.'On the state of engineering in India, Seth said, 'We have the worst civil engineers in India. Absolutely. We've obliterated the use of technology in civil planning and infrastructure. We have no care.'He blamed poor civic outcomes on a lack of accountability and planning, saying the approach to building cities in India is outdated and another remark aimed at Delhi-NCR, Seth posted on X that the region is the 'only place on the planet that can boast of two Venices side by side. Gurugram and Delhi.' He pointed to regular waterlogging, garbage, and lack of traffic infrastructure, adding that 'liquor vends outnumber working traffic lights in the city.''Every year, without government help, we create a Venice for people to enjoy,' he said during a panel hosted by The Indian Express, where he called Gurugram 'a shame on this country'.Seth urged for a 'non-hostile takeover' to restore basic governance in Indian cities. He ended his remarks by saying, 'We've become a country of suffering and sufferers,' calling for forward-thinking leadership and a complete change in how cities are built and managed.


NDTV
41 minutes ago
- NDTV
Kneel, Deal, Or Bleed: The Trump-enomics Wrecking The World
This is a national crisis, one not of India's making. In the wake of US President Donald Trump's latest outburst on Monday - his threat to further hike tariffs on Indian goods over its oil trade with Russia - it is essential that all Indians rally behind the government, regardless of their political leanings. This is not the moment for partisan sniping. Just as we stood united during the India-Pakistan military standoff after the Pahalgam terror attack and during the 2020 Galwan clashes with China, we must now close ranks again. Why call it a crisis? Because what unfolded yesterday (August 4) was pure Trump: theatrical, provocative and unfair. In a sweeping accusation, Trump charged India with profiteering from Russian oil while war rages in Ukraine, alleging that New Delhi resold Russian crude for a hefty profit. The implication was that India valued margins over morals. He threatened to slap even higher tariffs on Indian exports, higher than 25% that he imposed arbitrarily on August 1. For him, it was moral posturing. For India, it was a punch laced with hypocrisy. India responded with rare fire. In a sharp rebuttal, it called Trump's accusations both misleading and unjustified, defending its right to safeguard national interests. Indian officials pointed to America's own ongoing imports of Russian uranium, palladium and industrial chemicals - quiet deals that don't seem to rile Washington's moral compass. It was a deft move, exposing the duplicity in Trump's rhetoric and holding up a mirror to America's own contradictions. Let's be honest. India's oil trade with Russia is no secret arrangement hidden in some shadowy backroom. It is a transparent, market-driven strategy aimed at stabilising energy costs in a time of global volatility. When Western sanctions disrupted oil flows, India, like many other countries, stepped in to soften the blow, preventing a full-blown price shock. Indian refineries, both state-run and private, made commercial decisions based on cost, supply security and export needs. There was no geopolitical agenda, only the economics of energy security. But in Trump's second act, facts matter less than theatre. On A Rampage His first presidency lit the fuse. The second is blowing up what remained. Since returning to the Oval Office in January, Trump has been on a tariff rampage. Seven months in, the global trading system is unrecognisable. Tariffs have become weapons, trade partners have been reduced to negotiators, and the World Trade Organization - already quite weakened - is now functionally comatose. The numbers tell their own dystopian tale. The average US tariff now exceeds 18%. For some countries, it's closer to 40%. Canada, the European Union, Mexico, India, Japan - even Taiwan - have all been hit. No economy is too friendly or too small to escape the Trump treatment. As August 1's all-out tariff expansion showed - targeting over 90 nations in one stroke - this isn't policy. It's punishment. There is no coherent strategy behind these tariffs - no roadmap, no mutually beneficial agreements. Instead, Trump offers threats and one-page handshake deals with vague promises to "Buy American" and "reinvest in US jobs". He bullies smaller nations into accepting lopsided trade conditions while larger economies are left floundering in uncertainty. India Won't Beg Or Bow India's case is emblematic. Despite not being among America's top-tier trade dependencies, it finds itself in Trump's crosshairs - partly for its growing alignment with Russia, and partly because it is an easy punching bag for domestic optics. Yet, unlike other US allies with vulnerable supply chains, India has leverage. Its economy is surging and its strategic importance - from Indo-Pacific security to chip manufacturing and pharmaceuticals - makes it harder to sideline. India may suffer tariff pain, but it's not begging at the table. It's negotiating with its own cards. That might be why Trump's attack on India's Russian oil imports feels more like performance than genuine concern. The reality is far murkier. The US itself continues to import vital Russian materials, often through quiet backchannels or third-party entities. If morality were truly the yardstick, America's own trade behaviour would need a full audit. Trump's tariffs aren't about correcting trade imbalances or defending American workers. They're about power projection. In April, when he threatened to "liberate" America from bad trade deals, it wasn't economic policy, but a flex. Some journalists have likened Trump's global tariff crusade to a protection racket, and the metaphor holds. His "deals" work like tribute systems: agree to arbitrary terms or face economic punishment. In Trump's trade order, rules and treaties are for the weak. The cost is already visible. The WTO is a ghost of its former self - budget slashed, dispute resolution mechanisms hollowed out. Trade diplomacy, once driven by negotiation and multilateralism, has been replaced by intimidation. Economies have stopped planning for prosperity and begun bracing for the next tariff bombshell. Consequences Come Knocking It's August 2025, and the world is living in Trump's new economic jungle. In April, his dramatic tariff rollout sparked a market panic. Wall Street tanked. Governments blinked. Trump, ever the showman, walked it back, slightly. A few nations got sweetheart deals: the UK secured relatively lenient 10% duties, while the EU and Japan swallowed 15%. For others - Cambodia, Pakistan, even strategic partner South Korea - there was no mercy. Tariffs surged with no clear recourse. America's import duties have jumped from 2% in 2020 to nearly 18% today, bringing in over $100 billion in revenue. MAGA loyalists cheer, seeing a flood of money into federal coffers and a resurgence of American pride. But beneath the jingoism, the economic strain is beginning to show. Consumer prices are rising. Investment forecasts are softening. For the middle-class American, patriotic slogans don't pay the grocery bill. In Washington, it is believed some lawmakers are already pushing back, proposing rebates for low-income households to cushion the tariff fallout - an irony given the GOP's usual disdain for government handouts. But Trump has never been beholden to ideology. His political identity is built on spectacle and exceptionalism. The bigger concern is structural. Trade partners are adapting - quickly and strategically. India, for instance, has begun filling the manufacturing void left by China in American smartphone supply chains. With Chinese goods now heavily tariffed, India's tech sector is outperforming. But even India knows this is a temporary high. Vietnam and the Philippines - favoured by Trump's trade hawks - may ultimately enjoy smoother market access. The message to the world is chilling. Trade with the US only if you are in favour. Otherwise, you are on your own. New World Disorder Germany, long dependent on auto exports, is reeling. Canada is exploring deeper integration with the EU and Asia. Latin American economies are tightening regional trade ties. And China, though wounded, is doubling down on its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) push, offering cash and credit where the US offers tariffs and threats. The new global order Trump is creating isn't one of American dominance - it is one of fragmentation. He may be winning tactical battles, but he is losing the war for global trust. If allies continue to retreat and trade routes reroute away from Washington, Trump's tariff empire could turn out to be a pyrrhic victory - loud and dramatic, but ultimately self-defeating. What the world needs now is collective defiance. A coalition of countries must step up in resolve and rise to build alternative frameworks. Whether through strengthening regional trade blocs, launching new digital economies, or pushing legal challenges at whatever's left of the WTO, the time for appeasement is over.