Reeves: Of course you are going to disappoint people as Chancellor
She told an audience at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival that Labour had got the balance right between tax, spending and borrowing.
But she said that balancing the books meant making tough decisions, even if the are unpopular.
Appearing on the Iain Dale All Talk fringe show, she said: 'The reason people voted Labour at the last election is they want to change and they were unhappy with the way that the country was being governed.
'They know that we inherited a mess. They know it's not easy to put it right, but people are impatient for change.
'I'm impatient for change as well, but I've also got the job of making sure the sums always add up – and it doesn't always make you popular because you can't do anything you might want to do. You certainly can't do everything straight away, all at once.'
Ms Reeves pointed to Labour's £200 million investment in carbon capture in the north east of Scotland, which she said was welcomed by the industry.
At the same time, Labour's windfall tax, she said, was not liked by the sector.
'I can understand that that's extra tax that the oil and gas sector are paying, but you can't really have one without the other,' she said.
Defending Labour's record, she said her party had the 'balance about right'.
'But of course you're going to disappoint people,' she added. 'No-one wants to pay more taxes.
'Everyone wants more money than public spending – and borrowing is not a free option, because you've got to pay for it.
'I think people know those sort of constraints, but no-one really likes them and I'm the one, I guess, that has to sort the sums up.'
Ms Reeves said Labour had to deliver on its general election campaign of change, adding that her party did not 'deserve' to win the next election if it does not deliver the change it promised.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Nigel Farage 'fanning flames of hatred' with 'dangerous' claims of 'cover-up'
One Labour MP described Reform UK leader Nigel Farage as a 'fake patriot' who is seeking to 'exploit division and fan the flames of hate for his own political gain' Nigel Farage has been accused of fanning the flames of hatred across Britain in a repeat of the lead-up to the Southport riots. The right-wing Reform UK leader was branded 'dangerous' on Monday after he suggested there had been a 'cover-up' in a sexual assault case in Warwicksire. The former Ukip chief told a press conference in central London it 'is reminiscent of what happened after the Southport killings last year'. It comes after Mr Farage's appearances on Sky News spark thousands of complaints Last summer swirling misinformation about the supposed suspect in the murder of three young girls at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport in July, led to widespread riots across the country. Mr Farage was accused of stoking tensions after posting a provocative video on social media in the wake of the stabbings questioning 'whether the truth is being held from us'. It triggered mass fury from politicians and campaigners, including from Brendan Cox, the wife of murdered MP Jo Cox, who at the time branded Mr Farage "Tommy Robinson in a suit". Asked at an event in central London whether police should release the names, addresses and immigration status of all people after they have been charged with an offence, Mr Farage said on Monday: "What caused unrest on our streets after Southport last year was us not being told the status of the attacker. That led to crazy conspiracy theories spreading online." Pressed on whether police should be obliged to publish details of someone, Mr Farage said: "I absolutely think that they should." Mr Cox told The Mirror on Monday: 'Farage got the riots badly wrong last year. By seeming to justify the rioters he misjudged the mood of the nation who have absolutely no time for thuggery or conspiracy stories. It seems he hasn't learnt his lesson.' Mike Tapp, the Labour MP for Dover and Deal, also accused the Reform UK leader of seeking to 'fan the flames of hate' with his comments. He told The Mirror: 'Farage is a fake patriot who does not care about this country. He seeks to exploit division and fan the flames of hate for his own political gain - that is anti British and well below our standards.' One left-wing Labour MP accused Mr Farage of 'maliciously fanning the flames'. They said: "Only days ago Farage was forecasting mass civil disobedience. Now he's making unproven dark hints about 'cover-ups'. He's maliciously fanning the flames. But the overwhelming view of the British people is that they want their politicians to cool it, not to inflame feelings." Lib Dem deputy leader Daisy Cooper said: 'Victims must be at the heart of how all such cases are handled, whilst transparency and building public trust in our institutions is also important. But it's pretty rich to hear warnings of a febrile atmosphere from the very person fanning the flames. We are a nation of laws and decency, not hate and lawlessness.' Joe Mulhall, director of research at campaign group Hope not Hate, warned the 'anger and tension' seen in last summer's disorder had not gone away. He told The Mirror: 'In the right conditions, it could explode again. 'And I think it's extraordinarily dangerous, and that's why now is the sort of time when you expect your politicians to behave responsibly, not to try and exacerbate those tensions and create more anger for their own political desires.' Sabby Dhalu, Stand up to Racism's co-convenor, said: 'When most sensible people in positions of authority are thinking how they can prevent a repeat of last year's racist riots, Nigel Farage gets busy doing exactly what he did last year. 'That is stoking up tensions, implying there's been a cover-up, hoping to win votes on the back of this. Him and his are not fit to be anywhere near power.' On Monday, Mr Farage held an hour-long press conference in Westminster as part of Reform UK's 'Lawless Britain' campaign. He said there was 'rising public anger out there in the country', referring to recent protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers across the country. He said the issue was now becoming 'very much about the safety of women and children'. "There is certainly rising public anger out there in the country," he said. "As you can see, the number of protests that are taking place outside migrant hotels, up and down the country is indeed evidence of that. "And increasingly, the migrant hotel issue has moved really from one of fairness - why on earth are people being given all these things - to very much about the safety of women and children." The MP for Clacton went on to discuss the case of two men who are accused of raping a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton, Warwickshire. 'What we will today be talking about is a cover up, a cover up that, in many ways, is reminiscent of what happened after the Southport killings last year,' he said. George Finch, Reform UK's 19-year-old leader of Warwickshire County Council, has alleged the two men charged, Ahmad Mulakhil and Mohammad Kabir, are aslylum seekers. This has been unconfirmed by the police. Mr Finch said he has been warned not to release such information as he would be in contempt of court - a strict rule which tries to ensure a trial is not unfairly influenced. The councillor said: 'Our communities are at a breaking point, and that's why we need Reform to change things. We're the last line of defence against the blob, the cover-ups of the councils, and we have to fight every step of the way against this blob, and this is what we're doing at Warwickshire County Council. "It has to stop. A 13-year-old girl had been raped by two asylum seekers, and I was told that if I release this I would be in contempt of court, that I cannot release this due to this phrase: community cohesion." Warwickshire Police and Crime Commissioner Philip Seccombe had earlier said: "It is essential to state that policing decisions—such as whether to release details about a suspect—must follow national guidance and legal requirements." Police have come under scrutiny over the release of information relating to high-profile crimes amid challenges in the social media age over vigilante inspectors online. Jonathan Hall KC, the UK's independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, earlier this year admitted authorities' failure to "spell out basic and sober facts" after the Southport attacks led to "contagious disinformation about a murderous Muslim asylum-seeker that stoked the ensuing riots". But questions have been raised about serving politicians such as Mr Farage allegedly riling up situations instead of trying to cool tensions. Other MPs - including Conservatives - have also been called out for misinformation related to growing tensions around migrant hotels. Tory MP Nick Timothy was forced to delete a post on X, formerly Twitter, after being told off by the Metropolitan Police for false claims made about an asylum hotel MP for West Suffolk admitted his post was "inaccurate". Earlier border security minister Dame Angela Eagle told protestors outside hotels housing asylum seekers that "anger doesn't get you anywhere". She said she hears the worries of Brits across the country but warned it wasn't easy to deport people without other countries being on board. She promised the Government was "doing the detailed work" to crack down on small boat crossings, after the Home Office unveiled its plan to pump an extra £100million into tackling people smuggling. But Dame Angela warned that protests must not be used to "have a pop at the police". Demonstrations have taken place outside hotels over recent weeks across the country, including in London, Newcastle and Epping in Essex. Police have been forced to make a series of arrests after protests turned violent. On Sunday reports emerged that dozens of young men wearing balaclavas and armed with smoke bombs tried to storm a hotel housing asylum seekers in Canary Wharf. Police said a group of demonstrators have been ordered not to return to the area for 28 days after trying to harass people staying in the hotel, as well as the hotel's staff. Asked what her message was to protesters, Dame Angela told Sky News: "Anger doesn't get you anywhere. "What we have to do is recognise the values we have in this country, the rule of law we have in this country, the work we're doing with the police to protect people. We will close asylum hotels by the end of the Parliament. We'll do it faster if we can."
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
From 'Surveillance society' to ‘papers please' society, readers discuss the OSA
Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments. It's clear that the Online Safety Act (OSA) is paving the way for compulsory digital ID. The government will say that the ID will make our lives easier because websites will automatically know whether we're over 18; rather than us having to manually prove our age each time. This would make our lives easier, at the cost of the government (and various corporations) knowing what we're looking at, where we are and how we're spending our money. Deliberately or not, the people in power have found a way to sweeten the pill of digital ID. And the more power these people get, the more they'll want. That's why we have to take a stand now, before we need to give out our personal details just to buy a pint of milk. It will sound ridiculous until it happens. We already live in a surveillance society. Do we really want to live in a 'papers please' society, too?! Rob Slater, Norfolk The OSA has inadvertently blocked a whole host of important websites, from news outlets to work platforms to resources for victims of sexual abuse. It has forced people to hand over their personal information to unregulated companies and forced people who refuse to do that to use a VPN – which pushes up the cost of living, as VPNs are not cheap. As for people with no ID and no money, they've basically been banned from accessing parts of the internet. This is just the start of an endless laundry list of problems with the OSA. Now, say if this law had been cobbled together in a few weeks with no research, then I would understand why it's such a complete mess. But that's not what's happened. The previous government started developing the OSA in 2017 – so our politicians have had eight years to perfect this legislation. Eight years to research, learn from experts, consult companies and the public, take questions in Parliament, scrutinise every detail and create a law that works. And this is what they came up with. A crock of nonsense. This all demonstrates a simple truth: We can't carry on like this, with the wrong people always in positions of power. It's bringing our country to its knees. Charlie Parrett, Stoke I have to take issue with Chris Shepherd (MetroTalk, Fri) stating Labour have reversed all their pre-election pledges. More Trending In 2010, the Tories inherited an NHS with its highest ever approval ratings of 70 per cent, when they left office in 2024 it had hit its lowest ever rating of 21 per cent with more than 7 7 7 million on waiting lists. The NHS are now delivering record amounts of treatment and waiting lists have fallen every month since Labour took power. On immigration, the Tories presided over a quadrupling of immigration. In Labour's first year, immigration was half what it was in the Tories' final year. GDP in Labour's first year was 0.9 per cent compared with the Tories' final year of 0.7 per cent. It takes more than one year to repair the colossal damage caused by Tory incompetence. They changed leader five times while the country went down the tubes. I'll judge Labour after four or five years in office, not 12 months. Robert Johnson, Harlow MORE: England defeat to India shows finishing touches are missing ahead of the Ashes MORE: The Metro daily cartoon by Guy Venables MORE: Our pick of the best bathroom paint shades for your next bank holiday DIY
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Sky News halted for 'breaking news' as Keir Starmer issued brutal blow
Keir Starmer's Labour government was issued a savage blow by Nigel Farage after he held a press conference this morning. Sky News was halted to show footage of the Reform UK leader speaking at the conference, where he slammed the government's new Online Safety Act once again. During the conference, Farage was in agreement that the initial intention of the Online Safety Act was "honourable" and "correct", but argued that 13-year-olds would find a way around the new legislation, the Express reports. Hitting out at Kyle, Farage stated: "I suspect that most 13-year-olds are more tech savvy than the Science Minister Peter Kyle because they simply go to VPNs. "When they can just access what's on the web, they can quite easily find themselves in the even deeper and darker recesses of the dark web." In another brutal dig at the Labour government, the politician added: "Do we want legislation that protects children? Yes. We're going to have to find a tech solution to it. The government is not there." The government's Online Safety Act will "require platforms to remove illegal content, including content which encourages people to self-harm or take their own lives". Farage's statement comes after Reform UK announced it would scrap the online safety legislation if the party won the next election. The politician's remarks led Peter Kyle, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology to allege he was "on the side of turning the clock back to when strange adults can get in touch via messaging apps with children.' Kyle said: "If people like Jimmy Saville were alive today, he would be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side, not the side of the children." During an emergency broadcast after the comments were made, Farage dubbed the attack "so absolutely disgusting that it's almost beyond belief". He said: "Just how low can the Labour government sink in its desperation? Yes of course they're in trouble, they're well behind us in the opinion polls, but frankly to say that I would do anything that would in any way aid and abet people like Jimmy Savile is frankly so below the belt..." Farage also demanded an apology from the Labour minister. He took to X to write: "Peter Kyle's comments on Sky News are disgusting. He should do the right thing and apologise. Farage's supporters took to social media to reply to his tweet as one wrote: "Sky News should apologise for its existence." A second echoed: "Says more about him than it does about you lol f he doesn't apologise." Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. A third wrote: "They have just lost more voters from the comments he just made. Absolutely vile." However, others fumed that Kyle had nothing to be sorry for. One hit back: "Peter Kyle is right. At least he holds surgeries in his constituency which is more than you do. Just stop the manufactured outrage."
