logo
King Charles III greets French President Emmanuel Macron on state visit

King Charles III greets French President Emmanuel Macron on state visit

Miami Herald08-07-2025
July 8 (UPI) -- French President Emmanuel Macron was welcomed Tuesday in London by Britain's King Charles III for a three-day state visit in the first since 2008 by France's leader.
Macron and his wife, Brigitte, were greeted at RAF Northolt in west London by William and Catherine, the prince and princess of Wales, before meeting Charles and Queen Camilla in Windsor town centre after a horse-drawn carriage procession through the streets.
It marked the first state visit by a European Union leader since "Brexit" in 2020 and a renewal of diplomatic relations with Britain's former EU member states.
At Imperial College London, the French entourage will see examples of tech innovation, artificial intelligence, while the official state visit highlights advances in science.
"We expect to make good progress on a wide range of priorities, including migration, growth, defense and security, which will deliver on the interests of both the British and the French public," a spokesperson for British Prime Minister Keir Starmer told the BBC.
On Tuesday, British lawmakers and peers will hear Macron, 47, when he gives a speech to parliament.
Macron called the visit "an important moment" in the rich history between the two neighboring Western European nations.
The Macrons and the royal family will gather Tuesday night for a state banquet at Windsor Castle, where Britain's head of state is expected to give his own remarks about the "shared history and culture between our two peoples."
In prepared text, Charles, 76, will warn of present-day risks "emanating from multiple directions" and other issues that "know no borders" from which "no fortress can protect us."
He will state that France and Britain must stand united in the face of a "multitude of complex threats" and will issue warnings over defense threats, technology and ongoing threats of global climate change.
"For centuries our citizens have admired each other, amused each other, and imitated each other," the king's speech will read in part. "Our two nations share not only values, but also the tireless determination to act on them in the world," it adds.
Macron and the Labor Party leader Starmer, 62, will touch on a number of issues during Macron's visit, such as stopping small boats from crossing the English Channel, which Downing Street said Britain's relationship with France will be "key" to addressing that and other topics.
The British government has indicated a desire to reset diplomatic relations post-Brexit with its neighboring nations, still in the EU.
Meanwhile, Macron on Wednesday will visit a horse that he gave to the late Queen Elizabeth II on her 2022 Platinum Jubilee to mark her 70th and final year on the throne as the longest-reigning monarch in British history, just prior to her death later that year.
France's first couple are also set to visit the tomb of the late queen at Windsor during their stay.
Charles and Camilla visited France in 2023 for their own state visit where the king got a standing ovation after his speech to France's senate.
Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ukraine's Zelensky seeks cease-fire meeting next week
Ukraine's Zelensky seeks cease-fire meeting next week

UPI

time8 hours ago

  • UPI

Ukraine's Zelensky seeks cease-fire meeting next week

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Saturday called for a high-level meeting with Russian officials next week to discuss ending the war with Russia. File Photo by Turkish Presidential Press Office/EPA-EFE July 19 (UPI) -- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wants cease-fire negotiations with Russia next week and said he would be willing to meet directly and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Ukrainian officials have proposed cease-fire negotiations next week, and Russian officials confirmed their receipt of the proposal for a high-level talk, CNN reported on Saturday. "We need to do everything possible to achieve a cease-fire," Zelensky told Ukrainians Saturday during his daily address. "The Russian side must stop avoiding decisions regarding prisoner exchanges, the return of children and the cessation of killings," Zelensky said. "A meeting at the leadership level is essential to genuinely secure peace," he added. "Ukraine is ready for such a meeting." That meeting could be between Putin and Zelensky, the BBC reported. Ukraine's call for cease-fire negotiations comes after Russia attacked 10 Ukrainian cities and other locales during the overnight hours from Friday into Saturday. Russia launched more than 340 explosive drones and decoys and 35 ballistic missiles at targets in Ukraine, many of which the Ukrainian military said it intercepted. President Donald Trump on Sunday announced the United States will sell Patriot missile-defense systems to NATO, which will provide them to Ukraine. Trump also threatened to impose 100% tariffs on Russia if Putin does not end its war against Ukraine within 50 days. Russian and Ukrainian officials last met in Istanbul in early June, but that meeting ended quickly with no cease-fire agreement.

Gabbard: DOJ should investigate Obama administration for 2016 claims
Gabbard: DOJ should investigate Obama administration for 2016 claims

UPI

time9 hours ago

  • UPI

Gabbard: DOJ should investigate Obama administration for 2016 claims

National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard on Friday announced she forwarded documents to the Department of Justice to investigate the Obama administration for abuse of power due to 2016 claims of Russian interference in the U.S. election. Photo by Aaron Schwartz/UPI | License Photo July 19 (UPI) -- The Obama administration should be investigated for abuse of power to smear President Donald Trump in 2016, National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard said on Friday. Gabbard announced the release of files and a memo related to claims of Russia's alleged attempt to disrupt the 2016 elections to help Trump win the presidency over former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. "There was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of government," Gabbard said in a news release on Friday. "Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the president from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people," Gabbard said. She accused the Obama administration of an "egregious abuse of power and blatant rejection of our Constitution" that "threatens the very foundation and integrity of our democratic republic." President Barack Obama and his national security cabinet members "manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork" for falsifying claims that Russia acted to influence the election in Trump's favor and to impeach the president, according to the DNI release. Gabbard in 2019 was a member of the Democratic Party and a representative from Hawaii who said, "I could not in good conscience vote either yes or no," during the Dec. 18, 2019, House vote to impeach Trump, according to Politico. The DNI release says the U.S. intelligence community consistently concluded Russia likely was not trying to influence the 2016 election, and then-DNI Director James Clapper on Dec. 7, 2016, concluded "foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks" to alter the election results. Despite evidence to the contrary, Gabbard says Obama and others tasked Clapper with creating a new intelligence community assessment that claimed Russia acted to influence the election. Obama officials then leaked false statements claiming Russia tried to influence the election's outcome and produced a new assessment on Jan. 6, 2017, that contradicted prior assessments on the matter, according to the DNI. Gabbard said she is forwarding relevant materials to the Department of Justice for possible legal action. Some congressional Democrats have challenged Gabbard's announcement. "The unanimous, bipartisan conclusion was that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump," Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., told CNN on Friday. "This is just another example of the DNI trying to cook the books, rewrite history and erode trust in the intelligence agencies she's supposed to be leading," Warner added. Warner is vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Ranking Member Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., said "every legitimate investigation" into the matter affirmed the findings of the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment, CNN reported.

President Trump sues Wall Street Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch over reporting on Epstein ties
President Trump sues Wall Street Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch over reporting on Epstein ties

Chicago Tribune

time11 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

President Trump sues Wall Street Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch over reporting on Epstein ties

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump filed a $10 billion lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch Friday, a day after the newspaper published a story reporting on his ties to wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein. The move came shortly after the Justice Department asked a federal court on Friday to unseal grand jury transcripts in Epstein's sex trafficking case, as the administration seeks to contain the firestorm that erupted after it announced that it would not be releasing additional files from the case, despite previously pledging to do so. The controversy has created a major fissure between Trump and his loyal base, with some of his most vocal supporters slamming the White House for the way it has handled the case, and questioning why Trump would not want the documents made public. Trump had promised to sue the Wall Street Journal almost immediately after the paper put a new spotlight on his well-documented relationship with Epstein by publishing an article that described a sexually suggestive letter that the newspaper says bore Trump's name and was included in a 2003 album compiled for Epstein's 50th birthday. Trump denied writing the letter, calling the story 'false, malicious, and defamatory.' The suit, filed in filed in federal court in Miami, accuses the paper and its reporters of having 'knowingly and recklessly' published 'numerous false, defamatory, and disparaging statements,' which, it alleges, caused 'overwhelming financial and reputational harm' to the president. In a post on his Truth Social site, Trump cast the lawsuit as part of his efforts to punish news outlets, including ABC and CBS, which both reached multimillion-dollar settlement deals with the president after he took them to court. 'This lawsuit is filed not only on behalf of your favorite President, ME, but also in order to continue standing up for ALL Americans who will no longer tolerate the abusive wrongdoings of the Fake News Media,' he wrote. A spokesperson for Dow Jones, the Journal's publisher, responded Friday night, 'We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit.' The letter revealed by The Wall Street Journal was reportedly collected by disgraced British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell as part of a birthday album for Epstein years before the wealthy financier was first arrested in 2006 and subsequently had a falling-out with Trump. The letter bearing Trump's name includes text framed by the outline of what appears to be a hand-drawn naked woman and ends with, 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret,' according to the newspaper. Trump denied writing the letter and promised to sue. He said he spoke to both to the paper's owner, Rupert Murdoch, and its top editor, Emma Tucker, before the story was published and told them the letter was 'fake.' 'These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don't draw pictures,' the president insisted. The outlet described the contents of the letter but did not publish a photo showing it entirely or provide details on how it came to learn about it. In the lawsuit, Trump takes issue with that fact. The defendants, it attests, 'failed to attach the letter, failed to attach the alleged drawing, failed to show proof that President Trump authored or signed any such letter, and failed to explain how this purported letter was obtained.' 'The reason for those failures is because no authentic letter or drawing exists,' it goes on to charge, alleging that the 'Defendants concocted this story to malign President Trump's character and integrity and deceptively portray him in a false light.' Earlier Friday, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche filed motions in a separate federal court urging them to unseal the Epstein transcripts as well as those in the case against Maxwell, who was convicted of luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein. Epstein killed himself in 2019 shortly after his arrest while awaiting trial. The Justice Department's announcement that it would not be making public any more Epstein files enraged parts of Trump's base in part because members of his own administration had hyped the expected release and stoked conspiracies around the well-connected financier. The Justice Department said in the court filings that it will work with with prosecutors in New York to make appropriate redactions of victim-related information and other personally identifying information before transcripts are released. 'Transparency in this process will not be at the expense of our obligation under the law to protect victims,' Blanche wrote. But despite the new push to release the grand jury transcripts, the administration has not announced plans to reverse course and release other evidence in its possession. Attorney General Pam Bondi had hyped the release of more materials after the first Epstein files disclosure in February sparked outrage because it contained no new revelations. A judge would have to approve the release of the grand jury transcripts, and it's likely to be a lengthy process to decide what can become public and to make redactions to protect sensitive witness and victim information. The records would show testimony of witnesses and other evidence that was presented by prosecutions during the secret grand jury proceedings, when a panel decides whether there is enough evidence to bring an indictment, or a formal criminal charge.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store