Goodnotes 6 vs Apple Notes: Which Note-Taking App Reigns Supreme in 2025?
In this detailed comparison, Paperless X discuss the strengths and limitations of both apps, from Goodnotes 6's feature-rich design to Apple Notes' effortless integration within the Apple ecosystem. Whether you're a student, professional, or creative, this overview will guide you through key aspects like customization, pricing, collaboration tools, and multimedia capabilities. By the end, you'll not only understand how these apps differ but also gain clarity on which one aligns with your priorities. After all, the right note-taking app isn't just about features—it's about how well it supports your unique way of thinking. Goodnotes 6 vs Apple Notes Pricing and Accessibility
When considering cost, Apple Notes holds a clear advantage. It is completely free for all Apple device users and includes a web version, allowing cross-platform access. This makes it an appealing choice for individuals already invested in the Apple ecosystem, as it eliminates the need for additional expenses.
In contrast, Goodnotes 6 offers a limited free trial, allowing users to create up to three notebooks before requiring a subscription. The pricing structure varies by platform: $10 per year for Android and Windows users or a one-time $30 purchase for Apple devices. While Goodnotes 6 provides a robust set of features, its cost may be a deciding factor for budget-conscious users. If affordability is your primary concern, Apple Notes is the more economical option. User Interface and Customization
Apple Notes is designed with simplicity at its core. Its minimalist, single-screen interface ensures quick and distraction-free access to your notes. This straightforward design is ideal for users who prioritize ease of use and a clean workspace.
On the other hand, Goodnotes 6 offers a more customizable and feature-rich interface. It includes a dedicated homepage and workspace, customizable toolbars, and options to personalize your note-taking environment. These features make it a strong choice for users who value flexibility and a tailored experience. While Apple Notes excels in simplicity, Goodnotes 6 provides greater versatility for those seeking a more personalized approach. 2025 Comparison of Features and Usability : Goodnotes 6 vs Apple Notes
Watch this video on YouTube.
Unlock more potential in Apple Notes by reading previous articles we have written. Page Templates and Design
Goodnotes 6 leads the way in page design and customization. It offers an extensive selection of page templates, customizable notebook covers, and the ability to import or purchase additional designs. These features make it a standout choice for users who want to adapt their notes to specific projects, workflows, or aesthetic preferences.
In comparison, Apple Notes offers limited design flexibility. While functional, it lacks robust template options, which may not appeal to users who prioritize visual customization or need specialized layouts for their notes. For those who value creative control over their note-taking environment, Goodnotes 6 is the superior option. Writing and Drawing Tools
Both apps provide essential writing and drawing tools, including pens, highlighters, and pencils. However, Goodnotes 6 offers a more advanced toolkit. Features such as pressure sensitivity, adjustable motion smoothness, and dashed or dotted strokes make it particularly useful for detailed note-taking, sketching, or artistic projects.
Apple Notes, while simpler, includes unique tools like a crayon and opacity adjustments. These features cater to users seeking a straightforward and user-friendly experience for basic tasks. For advanced writing and drawing capabilities, Goodnotes 6 is the better choice, but Apple Notes remains a reliable option for casual users. Eraser and Zoom Tools
Goodnotes 6 provides a sophisticated eraser tool that allows users to auto-select or clear entire pages. Additionally, its zoom tool with auto-advance functionality makes it easier to work on intricate details, enhancing precision for tasks like annotating or drawing.
In contrast, Apple Notes offers a more basic eraser and lacks a dedicated zoom tool. While this simplicity may suffice for casual users, it could be limiting for those who require advanced precision in their work. If detailed editing is a priority, Goodnotes 6 offers a more comprehensive solution. Shapes and Text Tools
Goodnotes 6 excels in handling shapes and text customization. It supports irregular shapes, border styles, and extensive text box adjustments, including font selection, padding, and line spacing. These features make it an excellent choice for users who frequently incorporate diagrams, charts, or other structured elements into their notes.
Apple Notes, on the other hand, shines in managing body text. Features like collapsible sections, interactive lists, and handwriting integration enhance its usability for text-heavy workflows. Depending on whether you prioritize shape flexibility or text management, either app could meet your needs. Image and Media Handling
Goodnotes 6 offers superior image handling capabilities, allowing users to resize, crop, and enhance notes with stickers. It also supports timestamped audio links and editable transcriptions, making it a versatile tool for multimedia projects.
Apple Notes, while simpler in its image handling, provides real-time audio transcription. This feature is particularly valuable for users who rely on voice recordings for their notes. Depending on your media requirements, either app could be a strong contender, with Goodnotes 6 excelling in multimedia versatility and Apple Notes offering practical audio tools. Collaboration and Organization
For collaboration, Apple Notes takes the lead. It offers detailed permissions, centralized control over shared notes, and organizational tools such as tags, smart folders, and selective folder locking. These features make it a robust option for teamwork and group projects.
While Goodnotes 6 supports collaboration, it lacks the granular permissions found in Apple Notes. However, it compensates with features like comments and cloud backup options, including WebDAV support. If collaboration and organization are key priorities, Apple Notes is the stronger choice. Search and AI Tools
Both apps include handwriting search and live text input, but Goodnotes 6 incorporates advanced AI tools for tasks like summarization and organization. These features enhance its functionality for users who need intelligent assistance in managing their notes.
Apple Notes offers refined search options, such as case matching and attachment filtering, which improve its usability for locating specific content. Your choice will depend on whether you prioritize AI-driven features or advanced search capabilities. Export and Integration
Goodnotes 6 excels in exporting handwritten notes, offering tools like tape, stickers, and page editing for polished outputs. These features make it a strong choice for users who frequently share or present their notes.
Apple Notes, while less robust in export options, integrates seamlessly with the Apple ecosystem. This integration allows for effortless sharing across devices and apps, making it a convenient option for users deeply embedded in the Apple environment. Depending on your workflow, either app could meet your integration and export needs. Final Thoughts
Goodnotes 6 is an excellent choice for users who value advanced features, customization, and cross-platform support. Its robust tools make it particularly appealing for creative and professional workflows.
Apple Notes, on the other hand, offers a simpler, free alternative that excels in collaboration and seamless integration within the Apple ecosystem. Your decision ultimately depends on your specific needs and the features you prioritize in a note-taking app.
I hope this Goodnotes 6 vs Apple Notes comparison helps you decide which app is best for your workflow and productivity.
Media Credit: Paperless X Filed Under: Apple, Guides
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Washington has crushed Trump's Maga revolution
New presidential administrations often spur talk of revolution in Washington, and that goes double for Donald Trump. Supporters promise an end to the old politics; opponents warn of the end of America as we've known it. But the minute anything needs to be done through Congress, the forces of politics as usual reassert themselves. So it is with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill'. The gigantic tax and budget bill isn't just the centrepiece of Trump's legislative agenda. Given the narrow Republican majorities in both houses of Congress, the power of the Senate filibuster to block party-line bills outside of the tax and budget context, and the disinterest of all sides in forging bipartisan compromise, the bill is likely to be Trump's entire legislative agenda for 2025-26. There was a lot of talk about how the bill would do big, dramatic things and break with Republican policies of the past in favour of a new, populist agenda. Perhaps, Trump suggested, Republicans would raise taxes on the wealthy. There was fierce lobbying to undo some provisions of the 2017 Trump tax bill. But the forces of political gravity are not so easily defied. From the beginning, Republicans understood that this was a must-pass bill. Without it, not only would many of the 2017 tax cuts expire, but the GOP would likely miss the opportunity to satisfy priorities such as funding more immigration enforcement. In the end, the bill passed the House by just one vote, 215-214 (with two Republicans voting no and three others absent or abstaining), and did the same in the Senate, with vice-president JD Vance casting the 51-50 tiebreaker (with three Republicans voting no). The bill's passage followed a 'vote-a-thon' of record length in the Senate, as Senators voted down one amendment after another. When a must-pass bill needs every single yes vote to pass, that's a lot of people who have to be appeased or outright paid off. If the House baulks at the Senate's changes, the same dynamic is apt to repeat itself. So, the broad outlines of the bill look a lot more like traditional conservative policymaking with some Trump flavouring. Tax cuts for businesses and the wealthy are preserved, and coupled with working-class tax relief such as eliminating taxes on tips, overtime, and car loans. There's more money for warships and other weapons, and also for the tools of border enforcement (a wall, more agents, and more detention facilities). Poverty programmes such as Medicaid are subjected to work requirements, tightened eligibility rules, and restrictions on benefits for immigrants. The bill cuts back on subsidies for student-loan repayments and green energy. Republican moderates got their own concessions. The deduction for state and local taxes, which effectively subsidises high-tax blue states, was raised from $10,000 to $40,000 (at significant cost to the budget deficit) to secure a few votes from blue-state Republicans, mainly in the northeast. The child tax credit was expanded, which amounts to a payout to many lower-income taxpayers. Alaska was given more generous treatment in some benefits programmes once Senator Lisa Murkowski's vote became a must-have. Hospital and nursing-home lobbies made out like bandits. Fiscal hawks who wanted deeper spending cuts are instead presented with a bill that does nothing to alter the debt-ridden nation's grim fiscal trajectory. Other conservative ambitions were scaled back or ended on the cutting room floor. Abortion giant Planned Parenthood was defunded from the Medicaid programme – a long-time goal of pro-lifers – but the Senate cut the duration of that defunding to one year. The Senate version also cut out plans to ban Medicaid funding for gender transitions, sell public lands in the West, tax third-party funding of lawsuits, or prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence or giving state-funded healthcare to illegal immigrants. A Senate effort to reduce the federal subsidy for Obamacare health insurance plans was scrapped. The end result is a bill nobody likes – which is how lawmaking in Washington usually works. Among Republicans, only the handful of purist fiscal conservatives casting 'no' votes are truly at peace with their votes. Trump and Vance can doubtless sell the deal to Maga diehards as a necessity, and the donor class will be pleased. Democrats are back in their happy place, complaining that Republicans are cutting taxes on the rich and paying for it with welfare cuts for the poor – a hymn they've been singing since the 1930s. Voters instinctively dislike the bill because it's huge and messy, but that's precisely why they're unlikely to remember much about it a year and a half from now at midterm election time other than the Medicaid cuts, which Democrats aim to make the centrepiece of their campaigns. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The US has just exposed the green industry's dirty little secret
The cat is out of the bag. Electricity made from renewable sources is not as 'cheap' as its advocates sometimes claim. It evidently cannot survive without billions annually in tax credits. That's the message from the latest skirmish over America's renewable energy future, where the House and Senate have unveiled duelling visions for the rollback of energy tax credits – each with its own tempo and tone. The vitriolic reaction from the green lobby, and the predictions of disaster for renewables should any of these changes be passed into law, have exposed just how economically unsustainable even the fiercest backers of these energy sources clearly accept them to be. Supporters of renewable energy have assured us for years that the wind blows and the sun shines free of charge. But although these technologies have received hundreds of billions in subsidies globally over the past 20 years, proponents still demand more – for a few years, we're told, until renewables can stand on their own feet. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said: 'Eliminating these tax credits radically and irresponsibly rolls back all the progress we have made in recent years. It turns America's clean energy boom into a bust.' But the boom was always something of an illusion. It is often asserted that electricity in the United States made with wind and solar is less expensive than electricity made by natural gas and coal. But rather than declining, average American electricity prices have risen considerably over the past 20 years as wind and solar have entered the electricity mix. One dirty little secret is that, on a state-by-state basis, nine out of the top 10 states in electricity prices in the United States in 2024 required renewable energy as part of their electricity mix. The bottom 10 states generally did not require renewable energy. It can cost utility companies more to provide people with electricity using intermittent sources than continuous sources such as natural gas, coal, and nuclear power. The utility company is likely to need to put other energy sources in place, to provide back-up should demand not be met when the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't shine. For instance, when the wind stops, an alternative such as a natural gas power plant will likely need to be turned on to meet demand. Then it's turned off when the wind starts. With America's low natural gas prices, it is always likely to be cheaper to have one set of equipment and to operate one power plant continuously, rather than having it sit idle as the wind blows. Taxpayers are paying multiple times for renewables. In their electricity bills, they pay not only for wind and solar, but for the backups to the wind and solar. In their tax bills, they pay for the energy tax credits. They also give up faster economic growth when electricity prices rise. Another dirty secret is that renewable energy is often neither green nor clean. About 70 per cent of solar panels, wind turbines, batteries and their components are made in China, which remains reliant on coal-fired power plants to fuel its industries. Wind turbines kill birds, and, when offshore, can harm sea mammals. Solar power can take over agricultural land, which is likely to drive up the price of food. Green and clean are marketing hype used to push renewables onto unsuspecting consumers. While both chambers agree on tightening the purse strings by reducing tax credits, the House opts for a cliff-edge approach, while the Senate favours a more gradual wind-down. The House draws a hard line at Dec 31, 2025. From clean vehicles to home energy upgrades, nearly all credits vanish at the stroke of midnight. Even the clean hydrogen and nuclear incentives face sharp cut-offs, with added restrictions on foreign influence. Transferability of credits? Many are axed. The message is clear: the era of generous subsidies is fast ending. The Senate, by contrast, offers a more calibrated exit. Clean vehicle credits expire by Sep 30, 2025, but major production and investment credits are phased out over years, some as late as 2036. The Senate also tightens rules on foreign entities, but with more nuanced thresholds and timelines. Both bills close ranks on national security. Credits are denied to entities with ties to China, Russia, and other adversaries. The clean hydrogen credit in the House bill expires at the end of this year, but in the Senate bill by the end of 2027. Carbon capture faces identical construction cut-offs and foreign ownership bans. But only the House repeals credit transferability, an investor-friendly feature the Senate preserves. With the end of these tax credits, Americans may well discover that the true costs of renewable energy are higher than utility companies are willing to bear. Developers are already saying that they will halt projects without the tax credits. If the age of renewable energy tax credits is drawing to a close, Americans will be the beneficiaries. The question is how abruptly Washington will pull the plug – and whether other countries will follow.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Amazon Prime members can save $1/gallon of gas on Fourth of July weekend
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more The ability to save money on gas is one of many deals shoppers can snag ahead of the Amazon Prime Day sales event. Amazon Prime members, who are some of over 60 million drivers set to travel during the Fourth of July weekend, can save $1 per gallon of gas at participating locations from July 3 to July 6. Drivers can access the deal by linking their Prime membership to Earnify, the BP loyalty program. Once that is linked, they will receive the discount on one fuel purchase of up to 35 gallons of gas. Prime members can use this deal at one of more than 7,500 Amoco, BP and other participating locations nationwide, ahead of the Prime Day sales event from July 8 to July 11. Amazon Prime membership Customers can sign up for a free 30 day trial, giving them access to this discount without paying a cent. $14.99/month Shop Drivers can access the Earnify app's store locator for nearest locations, and redeem the offer by typing in a phone number or linked payment, or by selecting the gas station and pump being used in the app. In addition to this deal, Prime members can continue to receive a 10-cent-per-gallon discount every day at participating locations. Shoppers who aren't interested in gas saving can check out other early offerings, including a three-month free trial of Audible. Amazon Prime Day is available for all shoppers who don't mind spending $14.99 a month or $139 a year on a membership, but you can also sign up for a free 30 day trial which will give you access to all the deals. Young adults and government assisted shoppers could be eligible for discounts. Launched in 2015, Prime Day lasted for 24 hours that July in nine countries, including the US, the UK, and Canada. It became one of Amazon's most popular events, leading the company to add an October Prime Day in 2017. Today, the event is accessible in over 20 countries, and after racking in $14.2 billion in revenue last year, the company expects high earnings in what will be its first-ever four-day Prime Day from July 8 to July 11. Other benefits of a Prime membership include free same-day and next-day deliveries, Whole Foods discounts, and free Grubhub+ memberships. But it comes as thousands of shoppers have recently been turning away from Prime memberships despite the event hype. The service has been cutting some perks, including axing Amazon Today from various neighborhoods, eliminating its Try Before You Buy service, and raising the price of Amazon Music Unlimited subscriptions. While the company is expanding same-day and next day delivery to over 4,000 small cities, towns, and rural communities, some customers have begun exploring the idea of deactivating Prime in favor of Target 360 memberships. Amazon's annual Prime Day sales event will launch on July 8 and end on July 11 Prime Day comes after Amazon sent a grim warning of potential price hikes from tariffs. Experts have also predicted that the company could raise Prime memberships by $20 next year. JPMorgan analyst Douglas Anmuth forecast that Amazon customers may need to pay $159 instead of the usual $139 annually for a Prime membership starting next year. The prediction is based on Amazon's pattern of raising prices on significant features every four years. 'A $20 U.S. Prime price increase is seen driving about $3 billion in incremental annualized net sales,' Anmuth wrote in a note via TheStreet. The e-commerce giant will release its second quarter results on August 1.
