logo
Trump: wind farms are a ‘con job'

Trump: wind farms are a ‘con job'

Telegraph6 days ago
President Donald Trump branded wind power a 'con job' after playing golf in Scotland, describing how turbines ruined the view from the 18th hole of his Turnberry course.
The president said wind farms spoiled the landscape and sucked in expensive subsidies in comments likely to complicate a meeting with Sir Keir Starmer on Monday.
'The whole thing is a con job. It's very expensive,' he added as he announced a trade deal with the EU. The deal includes the EU buying billions of dollars of American energy, including natural gas.
Mr Trump spent Sunday morning playing golf with his son Eric and club members before sitting down for crucial European trade talks.
'Today I'm playing the best course, I think, in the world, Turnberry,' he said, in front of a giant picture window looking out on its fairways, dunes and the sea beyond.
'It's probably the best course in the world. And I look over the horizon and I see nine windmills at the end of the 18th. I said, 'Isn't that a shame?''
Mr Trump's Scotland visit is centred around his two golf clubs. On Friday, engulfed in the Epstein scandal at home, he issued an eleventh-hour invitation to Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, to come to his Ayrshire golf club to try to agree a trade deal before crippling tariffs come into force on August 1.
He announced a trade deal shortly after the meeting at Turnberry, and dismissed the idea the deal was a useful distraction from the Epstein accusations.
'We have reached a deal. It's a good deal for everybody,' he told reporters, confirming 15 per cent tariffs on all goods. Ms von der Leyen also hailed it as a 'good deal'.
Mr Trump's comments on wind energy, however, are likely to complicate Mr Trump's meeting on Monday with Sir Keir, who has staked Britain's future energy supply on wind.
In its manifesto last year, Labour promised to work with the private sector to double Britain's onshore wind power capacity by 2030.
That meant ending the de facto ban on new onshore wind farms in England and, by declaring them nationally significant infrastructure projects, stripping councils of their power to block giant onshore wind farm developments.
The policy, drawn up by Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, and condemned by critics as a 'power grab', cleared the way for a raft of new wind farms with turbines predicted to exceed 800ft in height.
In Scotland on Sunday, Mr Trump pushed back on any suggestion that his 'beautiful' morning of golf had put him in a good mood.
'I'm actually not in a great mood,' he said at the press conference with Ms von der Leyen, to laughter from his team.
Mr Trump may be on British soil, but he is meeting foreign leaders on home territory.
The vast ballroom at Turnberry was set out like the Oval Office, scene of so many televised showdowns.
The president took the seat on the right, just as he would at the White House, with his five advisers in seats beside him, arranged as if on the familiar couches, facing their counterparts no more than four feet away.
A small group of guests, including his sons Donald Jr and Eric, were seated to one side, with a close-up view of the spectacle.
But for all the important issues at stake, Mr Trump could not resist returning to golf and the presence of wind turbines.
He was visiting Turnberry for the first time since Kirk Hill wind farm began producing energy from eight turbines that rise more than 300 ft into the air.
'The whole thing is a con job,' he said. 'It's very expensive, and in all fairness, Germany tried it and wind doesn't work.'
He said it made no sense to subsidise energy projects such as wind farms.
'With energy, you make money, you don't lose money. But more important than that is it ruins the landscape,' he said. 'It kills the birds.'
He also said that 'windmills' were driving whales 'loco'.
Long-running battle over turbines
Mr Trump's hatred of turbines stems from a long-planning battle he had with Scottish authorities. He opposed plans for a major North Sea wind power development that he complained could be seen from his Aberdeenshire course but lost the case.
On Monday, Sir Keir is expected to push Mr Trump for his help in securing a ceasefire in Gaza.
The president promised more aid for Gaza but indicated that he had run out of patience with Hamas, accusing the terror group of toughening its line on returning the last remaining Israeli hostages.
'They don't want to give them back, and so Israel's going to have to make a decision,' he said.
His US negotiators left Qatar, which is mediating talks, on Thursday as talks collapsed.
In the press conference, Mr Trump also called Iran 'stupid' for continuing to enrich uranium in the wake of US air strikes on its nuclear facilities.
He said Iran had been 'beaten up very badly, for good reason'.
'I think Iran has been very nasty, with their words, with their mouth. I think they've been very nasty. They got the hell knocked out of them and I don't think they know it,' he added.
'You've just come out of something that's so bad and they talk about: we want to continue enrichment … How stupid can you be to say that?'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

73 Holyrood fat cats paid over £100,000 as satisfaction with public services falls
73 Holyrood fat cats paid over £100,000 as satisfaction with public services falls

Daily Mail​

time19 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

73 Holyrood fat cats paid over £100,000 as satisfaction with public services falls

The number of Scots civil servants earning more than £100,000 a year has soared under the SNP, the Scottish Mail on Sunday can reveal. Taxpayers are footing the bill for a growing army of civil servants - many of whom are predominanty allowed to work from home - as satisfaction with public services plummets. Overall, the Scottish Government now employs an unprecedented 73 mandarins who are officially ranked as Senior Civil Service (SCS) - mostly heads of various departments and directorates. In total, this upper tier of civil servants now costs the public purse an astonishing £8.6m a year in wages, with the vast majority earning in excess of £110,000 - three times the Scottish average annual salary. Earlier this year the SNP administration's finance secretary Shona Robison slashed millions from the budgets for the NHS, mental health and transport, claiming Scotland was facing 'enormous and growing' financial pressure. Despite this, the number of senior civil servants employed to run the country has grown sharply - as has the cost. At the same time, the civil service has come under fire for its refusal to abandon 'working from home' and for a 'sick-note' culture in which government staff take far more days off than workers in the private sector. Critics have attacked the 'out of control' cost to taxpayers and accused the SNP Government of getting its priorities all wrong. Scottish Conservative spokesman for finance and local government Craig Hoy said: 'The civil service, and the cost of it, have ballooned out of control under the SNP's watch, and by far the biggest expansion has been in those on the highest salaries. 'When Scots are paying the UK's highest taxes, but seeing worsening services, there 's no excuse for fat-cat pay packages of this sort.' Callum McGoldrick, researcher at the TaxPayers' Alliance said: 'At a time when public services are clearly under pressure, it's hard to justify the steady growth in high-paid civil servants at the top of the Scottish government. 'With budgets being squeezed across the board, Scottish taxpayers will be asking whether ministers have got their priorities right. 'The focus should be on improving services for the public, not inflating the salaries bill in Holyrood.' The Scottish Government recently published its annual list of Senior Civil Service staff, reflecting the situation at the end of March. Overall there are now 73 SCS on a wage bill of totalling £8.6m. The number is higher than the 66 staff on six-figure sums last year, which had added up to a total wage bill of £7.5m. In comparison, there were 52 SCS on £100,000 in 2023, 38 in 2021 and just 14 as recently as 2018. The current list includes director generals of government departments - plus heads of directorates including Cladding Remediation, Covid Inquiry Response, Organisational Continuity and Heat In Buildings. The highest paid is Caroline Lamb, director general of the health department and head of the Scottish NHS, whose salary is listed between £205,000 and £209,000 a year. Four other staff are listed as earning over £150,000, including former Permanent Secretary JP Marks who took home £190,000 as the country's most senior civil servant before leaving in April to take up a new job as chief executive of tax agency HMRC. He was replaced by Joe Griffin, who in his former role as the Scottish Government's director general of strategy & external affairs earned £140,000 a year. The official responsible for the country's finances is director general of the Scottish Exchequer Alyson Stafford who takes home £160,000. The list shows a further nine civil servants earning between £120,000 and £150,000 a year. Most are director generals of departments including Communities, Corporate, Economy, Education & Justice, and Net Zero. Overall 45 officials earn between £110,000 and £120,000 a year - including the government's directors of Corporate Transformation, Digital, and Propriety & Ethics. Meanwhile the public are increasingly unhappy with the public services the government provides. A survey published earlier this year by research firm Ipsos shows almost three in four Scots (74 per cent) think public services in their local area have got worse in the last five years. Of those, 62 per cent believe the Scottish Government is mainly responsible for the deterioration. Half of Scots (51 per cent) say they are dissatisfied with the quality of health services, while 28 per cent are dissatisfied with the quality of primary and secondary education, and half (51 per cent) are dissatisfied with the quality of policing. The civil service has also been criticised for clinging to the working from home policies initially imposed in the wake of Covid. Since the pandemic in 2020, working from home or hybrid working has been the default option for many staff. New rules introduced to try and boost productivity mean that, from October, staff will have to turn up at the office at least two days a week. The figure is lower than the equivalent policy for civil servants working for the UK government in Whitehall, which states that civil servants must spend at least 60 per cent of their time working in the office. However the edict has sparked complaints from some Scottish civil servants about the cost of having commute more regularly to government offices in Edinburgh and Glasgow. Some have raised concerns about the environmental impact of driving themselves to work - while others have warned the order to return to the office is 'an attack on their human rights'. Separately it emerged in June that Scotland's civil servants last year took an average of 8.7 days off sick - the worst recorded rate of absence in the government's history, and more than double the rate across the private sector. Although levels of pay for SCS staff are reserved to Westminster, the size and hierarchy of the civil service in Scotland is a matter for the Scottish Government. Responding to the criticism levelled at it, the government argued that its senior civil servants brought valuable expertise - while also vowing to deliver 'optimum value' for taxpayers. A spokesperson said: 'Senior civil servants manage performance and delivery, and ensure the Scottish Government achieves its goals. They bring significant expertise and progress the government's plans for delivering on its Programme for Government. ' It also said its public service reform strategy will 'ensure every pound spent delivers optimum value' and will 'reduce the annual combined corporate costs of the government and Scotland's public bodies by £1 billion over five years'.

Russia dismisses Trump's warning of sending nuclear subs closer to country as a ‘temper tantrum'
Russia dismisses Trump's warning of sending nuclear subs closer to country as a ‘temper tantrum'

The Sun

time19 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Russia dismisses Trump's warning of sending nuclear subs closer to country as a ‘temper tantrum'

RUSSIA has dismissed Donald Trump's warning he is sending nuclear submarines closer to Russia as a 'temper tantrum'. While the Kremlin has yet to respond, the US President has been mocked by local media. 2 Former major general Leonid Ivlev said it did not pose a new threat as the location of US naval forces is known and the range of submarines can be found online. Another retired lieutenant general called it 'meaningless blather'. And a Russian security expert told one paper: 'I'm sure Trump didn't really give any orders'. Trump had said he was ordering submarines to 'appropriate regions' after ex-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said they still had Soviet-era nuke capabilities. He said: 'Words are very important and can often lead to unintended consequences.' Trump has said that the US is "totally prepared" for a nuclear war following a slew of threats against America from a Kremlin comrade. He said: "If some words of the former Russian president [Medvedev] cause such a nervous reaction in the entire, formidable US president, then Russia is right in everything and will continue to go its own way. "Let him remember his favorite films about the "walking dead", as well as how dangerous a "dead hand" that does not exist in nature can be." Medvedev may have been referring to Moscow's"Dead Hand" nuclear weapons system, which is designed to launch a doomsday retaliation attack with full nuclear force - even if the Kremlin leadership is wiped out. He also warned that Russia "isn't Israel or even Iran." "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences. I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Trump says US is 'fully prepared' for war after moving subs towards Russia 2

74 years on - and Britain is still struggling to balance the books
74 years on - and Britain is still struggling to balance the books

Daily Mail​

time19 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

74 years on - and Britain is still struggling to balance the books

The past often looms larger than the present as one grows older. So I was grateful to receive a letter from a loyal reader who found a newspaper cutting revealing the contents of the 1951-52 Budget. At the time I was still in my Silver Cross pram blissfully unaware of the privations of the nation. But as a financial journalist who has reported on Budgets since the mid-1970s, the news was depressingly familiar. It dated to the final days of the post-War Government. The occupant of No 11 seeking to balance the nation's books was Hugh Gaitskell. Hailing from the moderate wing of Labour, he was the Rachel Reeves of his time. Tax and spend were the order of the day, but the welfare state was still in its infancy and handouts on today's scale were a dream. Dominating the Budget was defence of the realm. On the eve of the Korean War, Britain was spending 8.5 per cent of national output on the military. That was sharply down on the peak during the Second World War. It puts in perspective Keir Starmer's pledge to devote 2.5 per cent of gross domestic product to defence by 2027 and the undertaking at the recent Nato summit to eventually raise this to 5 per cent of GDP. In contrast the big consumers of Government resources in 2025-26 are welfare, the NHS and education. Spending on these was minuscule, compared with arms, in 1951-52. A key similarity with today is that the UK of 74 years ago was up to its neck in borrowing, debt and interest payments. Defeating Hitler was the only goal that mattered for Winston Churchill's Cabinet and in 1951 the ratio of debt-to-GDP stood at a huge 200 per cent. Britain has suffered three successive shocks to the public finances this century. The global financial crisis, Covid and soaring energy bills after Russia's invasion of Ukraine have sent the national debt soaring to 100 per cent of annual output. But remarkably that is half the level of 1951. The cost of servicing all that debt – including war loans from the US, savings certificates and Government bonds – was also far higher then. The annual interest bill was £215 billion in today's money – almost twice the £126 billion cost of servicing the national debt today. Those urging Reeves to loosen her fiscal straitjacket may find solace in the 1951 deal. Britain was deep in debt but survived. Taxation then was a simpler affair. Dominated, as it is today, by income tax, it was boosted by a surtax on the wealthy. National Insurance, now worth £199 billion a year to the exchequer, was near invisible. The biggest change to the tax system came after Britain joined the EU in 1973. It brought the Revenue the gift of VAT, which this year is set to raise £214 billion, making it the second biggest revenue-raiser after income tax. In 1951, when consumer spending power was modest, purchase tax raised a miserable £310 million or £3.8 billion today. One ever-present element of Budgets is alcohol duty. A few pennies off a pint is still seen by No 11 as a way of soothing the troubles of working people. As long as they can find a pub that's still open after the Chancellor's latest tax raid.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store