
Tales revealed during restoration of Anglesey listed building
The details are found in a report undertaken by Archaeology Wales Ltd, for Mark Dauncey, of the Amos Group Ltd, in na Anglesey County Council planning document.
The 'archaeology building recording level 3/4 ' document is a condition attached to Listed Building Consent required ahead of redevelopment and part of a recent planning application, for the variation of conditions.
The house is near the Norman motte and bailey castle Aberlleiniog Castell also known as Lleiniog Castle, near the shore.
The striking house has been part of the estates of Welsh Copper Mine owner the Right Honourable Lord Dinorben and the influential Anglesey Bulkeley family.
The East Facing Elevation Of The House (Image Ioacc Planning Documents)
The report describes how the property was built by Thomas Cheadle in 1630. He had been a constable of Beaumaris, and Sheriff of North Wales.
The 17th century structure, which incorporates a three-unit, two storey Plas or manor house, was possibly built over an earlier 16th century building.
The Cheadle family had been 'relative newcomers,' to Anglesey, the report explains.
Thomas's father, Richard had arrived on the island in the late 16th century, apparently after having 'driven a herd of pigs from the Bulkeley estates in Cheadle, Cheshire, to Beaumaris, where he stayed in service to the Bulkeleys'.
'The Bulkeley family themselves originated in Cheshire, but by the 16th century were one of the most influential families in northwest Wales, owning land across all of Anglesey' the report said.
'Sir Richard Bulkeley III, was a friend of Queen Elizabeth and the family seat was at Baron Hill, to the west of Beaumaris'.
Richard Cheadle, was also a Steward on the Baron Hill estate and later acted as a shipping agent for Sir Richard, in Beaumaris.
He was granted property in Anglesey by Sir Richard but was thought to have lived in Beaumaris.
Early 20th century photograph of The east front of Lleiniog (IoACC Planning Documents Image)
His son Thomas Cheadle, born around 1599, was well educated, having attended Beaumaris grammar school.
The report says: 'at the age of 12 or 13 he ran away to sea to become a pirate.
'When he returned four years later, he was employed by Bulkeley, who was probably influential in gaining him a royal pardon in 1624.
'It has been speculated that Bulkeley may have employed Thomas to utilise his piracy experience for his own smuggling activities…
'Whilst that may have been the case, Thomas was also involved in legitimate business for Bulkeley as an agent, and his signature is found as a witness on various documents in the 1610s and 1620s' the report notes.
In the early years of the Civil War, Thomas Cheadle, was now knighted, and accused of using the arsenal of Beaumaris castle to refortify Castell Lleiniog.
'While professing loyalty to the Royalist cause, according to William Williams, the report says, he was 'simultaneously offering Castell Lleiniog for the use of the Parliamentary forces'.
Inside Lleiniog during the restoration (Image IoCC planning documents)
In 1646, the report goes on, 'a group of Parliamentarians in Beaumaris under truce began to doubt their safety and removed to Castell Lleiniog, writing to Lord Bulkeley.
'The castle was besieged and taken by the Royalists and Cheadle
was imprisoned until Anglesey was taken by the Parliamentarians later in the same year.
'Cheadle's health began to fail, not aided by two subsequent imprisonments in
1648 and 1650, the latter for debt.
'He died in 1653. In his will, dated 21st August 1651, he left all his lands, tenements and hereditaments to his brother, Rowland Cheadle, and on his brother's death his nephew, also Rowland, and subsequent heirs.
Restoration at Lleiniog (Image Ioacc Planning Documents)
In the late 17th century, historical documents indicate that the house formed part of the Bulkeley's Baron Hill estate.
The details describe how Sir Richard Bulkeley III, died in 1621, and his son, Sir Richard Bulkeley IV, inherited the estate.
However the report reveals: 'Thomas began conducting an affair with Sir Richard IV's wife, Lady Anne. When Sir Richard met an untimely end in 1631, Thomas and Anne were charged with his murder by poisoning. They were found not guilty and later married, resulting in a
feud with the Bulkeley heirs and Lady Anne disowning her children'.
The report stated that 'the Bulkeley family biographer, William Williams of Beaumaris, writing c. 1674, describes how after the marriage Thomas 'lived very handsomely, bought neere £80 per annum lands in Penmon, Lleiniog, Llanvaes.
'[He] built good houses, as the Red house in Bewmares, the house adjoining the Church of Penmon, the house at Lleiniog, and the Castle at Lleiniog.''.
In the 18th century, Lleiniog appears to have remained part of the Baron Hill estate with a series of tenants listed in tax returns, throughout the 18th and 19th centuries.
One of the staircases at the Lleiniog property (Image IoACC planning documents)
The report says it was later bought by a Hugh Hughes (1706-1774), 'a small
squire' described as the the 'wily secretary' and agent to an eminent Anglesey landowner, Dr. Edward Wynne of Bodewryd, Chancellor of the Diocese of Hereford.
Hughes was said to have died in 1773-4 and his will, dated 1772, shows that the ownership of Lleiniog passed to his wife Mary.
After her death, ownership passed to their eldest son, the Reverend Edward Hughes, said to have married into the Anglesey copper mining industry and who bought Kinmel, Denbighshire in 1786, as the family seat.
His son William became 1st Baron Dinorben in 1831, who took on ownership in 1833, with a number of tenants at Lleiniog listed over the years.
The report points to documents dated June 14, 1867 detailing the lease of the farm by the Baronets Dinorben of Llysdulais to Henry Brasier Mitchell, for an estimated 94 acres known as Lleiniog.
It's suggested under the tenure of Mitchell's, a wealthy couple, that the house may have become known as 'Lleiniog Castle,' and extended.
Mitchell's cousin William Preston was living at Lleiniog by 1891, '… an agent to the Baron Hill estates,' the report said.
Preston lived at Lleiniog until at least 1904. By 1912, a Dr. Richard Williams MD is thought to have lived there.
In 1923, the report points to documents held in the Anglesey Archives record confirming the appointment of Lieutenant Colonel Clavel Esme Vivian M.C. of 'Lleiniog Castle,' Beaumaris, to Deputy Lieutenant, by Richard Henry Williams Bulkeley Baronet KCB the report states.
Photographs of the house from the late 20th and 21st centuries are located in the Anglesey Archives.
The house was altered and extended in the mid-19th century. It was listed in 1962, updated in 2002.
The listing describes 'a substantially sub-medieval house with significant surviving interior detail, and good external Georgian character retained from C18 remodelling' but the listing chiefly describes the house before remodelling between 2000-3.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
3 days ago
- BBC News
Court rules law passed after Grenfell is retrospective
A court has said that building owners and developers cannot recoup costs from leaseholders for fire safety remediation work. The Court of Appeal ruling on two separate cases earlier this month could have far-reaching implications for who bears the costs of building safety-related costs in the the wake of the Grenfell Tower tragedy, safety issues were discovered in buildings constructed years or decades court's ruling means that building owners can't charge leaseholders for fire safety defects that were discovered before 2022. 'A retrospective approach' The judges ruled that parts of the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA) can be applied retrospectively, favouring leaseholders and law came into force in June 2022 in response to the issues raised by the Grenfell Tower fire in 2017, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. The retrospective nature of the law was a key factor in its creation, and the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government Angela Rayner made written submissions to the court attesting to said: "A retrospective approach provides for effective routes to redress against those responsible for historical building safety defects that have only recently come to light, whatever level of the supply chain they operated at."The court decisions relate to disputes about Hippersley Point in Abbey Wood, south east London and five residential blocks in the East Village Estate in the Olympic Park in Stratford, east the Hippersley case, the tower block's owner Adriatic wanted to charge leaseholders the costs incurred during a tribunal process in which it asked to do away with certain regulations so it could charge residents more than £250 each to carry out remedial fire safety works. In the East Village case, judge looked at an application from the social housing provider and long leaseholder Triathlon which wanted to make the East Village developers pay for remedying fire safety defects via remediation contribution orders (RCO).The East Village RCOs were the first to be made under the BSA, with the developers appealing the First Tier Tribunal's original decision to allow the safety defects at Hippersley Point and in the East Village Estate were both discovered prior to when the BSA became both cases, the Court of Appeal ruled in favour of leaseholders over developers, deciding that parts of the BSA do have retrospective Nitej Davda, a partner at law firm Cripps, said it was "quite unusual" for such legislation to have retrospective effect. He said: "If you take a step back and you think about what happened with Grenfell, which is where all of this emanates from ultimately, and then you think about what is the intention behind the legislation and what is it intended to do."The BSA is intended to do two things fundamentally. "It is intended to give leaseholders protection and it is intended to make developers pay. "If it doesn't have retrospective effect then you are trying to make the act work with at least one hand tied behind your back."


Daily Mail
6 days ago
- Daily Mail
Residents living in clifftop homes fear being unable to sell up as council plots a ban on renovations
Residents living in clifftop homes fear they will never be able to sell up if new council plans ban them from doing even 'minor' building work on their houses. Locals on Cliff Road said new rules could mean they cannot carry out even basic renovations to their properties because of their location. The row of houses in Sidmouth in Devon is on top of famous cliffs - with several losing large chunks of gardens to the sea over the years due to coastal erosion. But residents are terrified they won't even be able to make 'minor amendments' or extensions soon as part of a local plan. Officials are considering a new coastal change management area (CCMA) for parts of Sidmouth. It is part of a twenty year East Devon scheme which would aim to limit development in areas at significant risk of coastal erosion. The CCMA could mean proposals for new residential development, including the conversion of existing buildings, would not be permitted. Residents fear it could limit their ability to develop their homes, build extensions, or even undertake 'minor' alterations. One resident said if the plan is 'far ranging' it will make 'houses deteriorate' and 'could impact people selling them'. They said: 'If those plans were to go ahead it will limit what I will do to the property subject to planning. 'The way that the local plan is drafted is that it would prohibit anything like extensions, work inside our homes, any knock down of properties and rebuild. 'If the plan is far ranging and people aren't even allowed to do minor amendments the properties could deteriorate in terms of their condition and it could impact people selling. 'We have got the South West Cost Path that is part of Cliff Road so we get hundreds and thousands of people walking the path every year.' They added: 'If the properties are not allowed to be sufficiently maintained or improved with work then this area can become quite downtrodden and what we don't want is that the lack of visitors to Sidmouth to then impact local businesses.' Paul Griew, leader of Cliff Road Action Group, lost an entire summerhouse in 2017 when it tumbled into the sea. He has lived on Cliff Road for 27 years and said his house is located 40 metres back from the erosion. He said there were 15 houses in the proposed CCMA which he said East Devon Council believe 'are at risk of being eroded in the next 100 years'. 'There was no indication of how they had arrived to just those 15 houses,' Mr Griew said. 'EDDC are now saying that these houses can't do any building works or alterations to the houses and you certainly can't knock down your house and put up a new one.' There are also concerns from locals that the policy does not account for the forthcoming £21million beach management scheme, which is expected to reduce erosion risk. Mr Griew also said the beach management plan, once completed in 2027, should mean the CCMA is no longer needed at that point. Peter Sinton, 82, lives 60 metres away from the cliff with his wife. He said the proposals to prevent any building work on local's homes is a 'bureaucratic manoeuvre' and is going to 'put a complete blight' on the value of the properties. He said: 'The argument is that people should be able to do anything within reason at their own risk. 'I don't see why a council should have the power to stop someone spending their money if they want to. 'We have completed the extension we needed when we bought our house three years ago, but if I was moving here now and if they had instituted this CCMA why should a council be able to say ''you mustn't spend money your money on it because the house may be in the see in 20 years time'' - in 20 years time I'll be very lucky if I am still here. 'I think it is a bureaucratic manoeuvre that doesn't serve any purpose because the data on which it was based as it whether or not this would erode is completely flawed.' Mr Sinton added: 'In allowing erosion here there is no benefit to birds, bats, badgers, or even fossils. 'The result will be years of derelict buildings spoiling the view from the promenade and occupying the council in endless legal battles with affected homeowners.' One local added: 'The concern is if we want to do some projects - like putting in a patio or doing an extension, will that be a problem? 'The sort of thing people normally just get on with and do to improve their homes - it might mean is a problem for us.' Ed Freeman, assistant director for planning strategy and development management at East Devon District Council, said he had made a note of the comments, and would see what he could do to address the concerns and make more information available. The strategic planning committee agreed that a report would be brought back to its next meeting in September with a review of the CCMA policy. Mr Griew suggested residents should be allowed to extend their existing homes at their own risk and subject to planning permission being granted.


Cambrian News
13-07-2025
- Cambrian News
Ffestiniog Railway's Penrhyn Station plaques for heritage award win after renovation
The project was necessary due to rotting in the external timber cladding. Due to the building's Grade II listing, Listed Building officers were invited to the site before work commenced to agree what would and would not be acceptable.